My Account Submit My Manuscript
Letpub, Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service

ENERGY

   For Publishers  New

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:
Professional Journal Cover Design
APA has partnered with LetPub to provide a full suite of author services

[ENERGY]Hello, you are Visitor Number 142678 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitleENERGY
Journal Title AbbreviationsENERGY
ISSN0360-5442
h-index158
CiteScore
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
6.202.0481.822
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Engineering
Subcategory: Civil and Structural Engineering
Q13 / 288
Category: Engineering
Subcategory: Building and Construction
Q15 / 168
Category: Environmental Science
Subcategory: Pollution
Q17 / 109
Category: Engineering
Subcategory: Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
Q115 / 323
Category: Engineering
Subcategory: Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
Q120 / 579
Category: Engineering
Subcategory: Electrical and Electronic Engineering
Q145 / 661

Self-Citation Ratio (2018-2019)22.50%
Official Websitehttp://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/483/description#description
Online Manuscript Submissionhttp://ees.elsevier.com/egy/
Open AccessNo
PublisherPERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD, THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD, ENGLAND, OX5 1GB
Subject AreaEngineering
Country/Area of PublicationENGLAND
Publication FrequencyMonthly
Year Publication Started0
Annual Article Volume2175
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index
Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0360-5442%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Authorized Data from Publisher:
Data from Authors: About 4.9 month(s)
Data from Elsevier: Average 14.2 Week(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: 88%
Online Article Publication TimeData from Elsevier: Average 6.3 Week(s)
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【ENERGY】CiteScore Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • CiteScore Trend


First    Previous    1    2    Next    Last  (To Page
/2)
  Reviews on ENERGY: Write a review
Author: yzyzhongyu@126.com


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-04-06 17:41:47
3 month first review. 2 reviewers.

(0) Thank | yzyzhongyu@126.com

Author: CCHP


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-02-12 14:33:01
Submit a month, or with editor, this processing speed...
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | CCHP

Author: PSE


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-01-24 16:19:40
Editor-in-Chief of RZ Wang, very efficient.Half a month or so will be able to get the return draft, thank you very much Professor Wang of Shanghai Jiaotong University.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | PSE

Author: Rain1


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-01-15 10:49:03
The speed is too slow. In time, I want to withdraw the manuscript. It has been half a month and still in the hands of the editor.Silent ah
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | Rain1

Author: 砌墙工


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-12-14 11:09:11
submitted 11. July. 2018Three reviewers, two minor revisions, one reject. major revision 23. sep. 2018Revised. 23. nov. 2018Accept. 12. dec. 2018
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 砌墙工

Author: 707145297@qq.com


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-07-11 17:08:59
The reviewer is very responsible and the review is coming to an end.Overhaul once, minor repairs, it is directly acceptd.Ha ha..Let's share it!725554986
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | 707145297@qq.com

Author: Frankie617


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-06-08 16:07:52
The second energy is gone.The first trial gave a major overhaul, questioning innovation, and some minor problems.He returned for about ten days and stayed in the editor for more than ten days before sending it to the second instance.The second trial is about one month, and the opinion is directly accepted after returning.Mainly still patience to modify it, seriously reply to the review comments, can do as much as possible as required.What can't be done is to euphemistically explain the reasons.
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | Frankie617

Author: 超超


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 11.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-06-02 10:51:43
Although the whole process is relatively stable, but the time is very long, with editor 7 days, the first trial used almost 6 months, 2Trial, 3 trials each month, directly accepted after two overhauls, there is a reviewer slightly more, seriously answer
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | 超超

Author: 834774137@qq.com


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-04-18 11:04:47
Submitted for 10 days, or with editor, what is the situation?Someone has news about 7 days. What fuel was submited before? The next day, the next day, I will not refuse it. If I have to submit it for review, this is 10 days. No news, it’s very anxious. The article is in a hurry.
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | 834774137@qq.com

Author: Frankie617


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-04-09 22:54:30
Published on December 11, 2017, under review on the 16th, major revision given on February 1, 2018, three reviewers, more opinions, but they are more positive.On March 8th, the overhaul returned. In the editor's hand, he waited until the 18th under review, and on the 23rd gave a minor revision. There was a small opinion on a reviewer.Return on the 28th, April 1 accept.Generally speaking, it is still relatively fast. It is mainly to see if the reviewers and editors are very busy.
Show Review in Original Language
(5) Thank | Frankie617

Author: laujqq@hotmail.com


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-03-22 14:07:45
contributed about 3 months, got the revised opinion, one gave the overhaul, the opinion was very pertinent, the other only pointed out the error in several symbols, and agreed to accept.Both judges have a positive attitude towards the content of the article.Personally feel that both reviews are from my recommendation.Seriously revised and submitted the reversed manuscript, now under review, there should be no big problem.Another point that I personally think is very important is that the journal editor and my professional direction are highly consistent. When I later checked the journal, I found out that many articles were quoted in my article. I feel that this is helpful for the submission.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | laujqq@hotmail.com

Author: Ray


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-12-21 12:23:20
submitted 2. Aug. 2017Three major revision 27. Sep. 2017Revised. 27. Nov. 2017Accept. 19. Dec. 2017
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | Ray

Author: xinianxi


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-12-01 09:33:11
revised draft after uploading, with editor 8 days, is it normal?
Show Review in Original Language
(4) Thank | xinianxi

Author: niuqinghe1990@163.com


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-11-18 20:37:00
The review speed is OK, the first trial is two months, the overhaul is given for two months, and the minor repair is one month.It has been difficult to modify the employment.
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | niuqinghe1990@163.com

Author: 超超


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 5.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-10-27 10:38:00
has been submitted for more than three months, ten days under review, the basic one month changed the date, but the status has been under review, how to break?
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | 超超

Author: Winner


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-10-17 17:38:54
Speed ​​is OK, directly acceptd after overhaul
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | Winner

Author: 498091303@qq.com


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-06-27 13:07:24
speed is OK, directly acceptd after overhaul.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 498091303@qq.com

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-08-19 11:59:45
shallow geothermal utilization related papers, one week later was rejected by the editor.Reasons: The paper is mainly related to heat transfer research and is not suitable for the journal.
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | Anonymous

Author: wgxpobin@sina.com


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 5.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2014-11-04 09:29:27
Submitted in mid-June, and now on November 4th, there is no return to the first-instance news. The middle boss sent emails several times in the past, and no substantive comments were returned.Third, I urgently need to graduate from the article. What happened to this chores?Is death is to live to give a point of advice, dragging so long in the end 啥 mean
Show Review in Original Language
(30) Thank | wgxpobin@sina.com

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-11-08 09:47:00
6 Submitted in mid-month, acceptd on November 7th, received first-instance results in mid-September, two reviewers, one more opinion, one less opinion, but they all affirmed the articleInnovative, Wang Ruzhu teacher handled and gave a major repair.The revisions given by the experts are relatively simple. It took a week to finish the revision, but it was dragged over for a month to upload the revised manuscript, which can give the review experts a good impression: after careful thinking and revision, respect the judges' labor results.After about 10 days, I received the review again. Teacher Wang found the third reviewer. He also affirmed the innovation of the article and gave some minor revisions to the minor repair.After the honest revision, the revised draft was uploaded on the same day, so that the editor can give an impression: after one
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-10-12 22:18:00
2 At the beginning of the month, the comments were returned in mid-July, and the editors returned for more than 10 days.The overhaul time was February, and it took more than a month to modify it.It was submitted for trial in early September.Recruited on October 11th, but let's take a little repair.3 reviewers.The opinions given by one person are very specific, overhaul, and I have revised it according to the opinions.Another reviewer has no specific comments, but just said that the new ideas are not enough.There is also a reviewer who gave the offer and no specific comments.The review speed is slow.For the urgent use of papers, be cautious.Although the previous review period is longer, the time should be considered moderate.The editor who gave me the paper is very good.European.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-09-04 09:26:00
8月21#Submission of October 6th to modify the opinion (this speed is very fast) October 30th to submit amendments, there are not many amendments, a total of three reviewers, the firstOne is very sure, three grammar mistakes were made, the second one did not change the opinion, the discussion was not deep, the third had three opinions, and the online conference papers that went to the meeting were found on the Internet, asking for explanation and the current one.Relationships and references.Editors and editors also have comments asking for references to energy 12 and 13 years of relevant literature.On November 24th, the second revision was given. The first reviewer said that there was no problem. The third reviewer said that there was still a small problem. The editor said that the latest documents should be cited and revised on November 28th.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-08-18 09:30:00
After 8 months, I finally received it today, and I am still very happy overall.Personally, this journal is too slow, and it is not suitable for people who are eager to get a paper for doctoral graduation.I am a biomass energy source. After I worked, I summed up part of my doctoral work, so I didn’t worry too much.Share the status:
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-06-08 10:17:00
just selectd, actually forgot to recommend the reviewer, currently under review, looking forward to good luck
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-05-25 02:51:00
Yesterday received major revision, but just oneComments Please consider reviewing and error analysis on the presented results as required by the publication. What does it mean to ask, do you want to add trials?Thank you.This journal also needs data error analysis?What method?
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

First    Previous    1    2    Next    Last  (To Page
/2)

Start your review of [ENERGY]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.

Intentional Space Tag


Contact us

Contact us  

Your name*

Your email*

Your message*

Please fill in all fields and provide a valid email.

Security Code*

© 2010-2020 United States: ACCDON LLC Tel: 1-781-202-9968 Email: info@accdon.com
Address: 400 5th Ave, Suite 530, Waltham, Massachusetts 02451, United States
LetPub Privacy Policy