X
My Account Submit My Manuscript
Letpub, Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service

RSC Advances

   For Publishers  New

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:
Journal Cover Design
APA has partnered with LetPub to provide a full suite of author services

[RSC Advances]Hello, you are Visitor Number 789155 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitleRSC Advances
Journal Title AbbreviationsRSC ADV
ISSN2046-2069
h-index113
CiteScore
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
6.500.7360.827
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Chemical Engineering
Subcategory: General Chemical Engineering
Q135 / 281
Category: Chemical Engineering
Subcategory: General Chemistry
Q158 / 398

Self-Citation Ratio (2019-2020)5.10%
Official Websitehttp://pubs.rsc.org/en/journals/journalissues/ra
Online Manuscript Submissionhttp://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/rscadv
Open AccessYes
PublisherRoyal Society of Chemistry, Thomas Graham House, Science Park, Milton Road, Cambridge CB4 0WF
Subject Areachemical sciences
Country/Area of PublicationEngland
Publication FrequencyContinuously updated
Year Publication Started2011
Annual Article Volume4583
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=2046-2069%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Authorized Data from Publisher:
Data from Authors: About 2.1 month(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors:
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【RSC Advances】CiteScore Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • CiteScore Trend


First    Previous    1    2    3    4    5    6    7    Next    Last  (To Page
/18)
  Reviews on RSC Advances: Write a review
Author: susuchim


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-11-01 09:56:33
2018.10.26Checking submission and files2018.10.27Initial assessment2018.10.29With editor2018.10.31In peer review
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | susuchim

Author: meloy


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-10-31 14:18:36
How long does the reviewer have to review the draft?Two months have not moved, the teacher urged me to write Chinese, and anxious
Show Review in Original Language
(13) Thank | meloy

Author: meloy


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-10-31 14:11:33
I selectd for two months, and I selectd for 8.30. There were several times from the editor to the reviewer, butIn the hands of reviewers, the time is very short, no more than one week. What does this mean?
Show Review in Original Language
(28) Thank | meloy

Author: 科学与研究


Subject Area: Environmental Sciences
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-10-08 12:41:00
This article has been published in many journals. One of the most popular ones is the Journal of Hazardous Materials. After more than three months of writing, there is no news, and then the manuscript is directly cupped. The reply isJournals do not receive articles dealing with water.NM was wasted for so long.Later, I went to the journal and it was quite smooth!9.5 day submission9.20 days received minor repair opinions, 2 reviewers, are very professional.Further explanations and explanations are given for issues that are of particular concern to the research community.Because the previous work is relatively complete, the data is available, no need to make up the experiment.Revised on September 2910.1 day receptionSome innovative articles are generally reviewed quickly, within two weeks.In addition, for the need for an article eager to graduate, the article requires detailed data, language clearance, this journal is a good choice.In the last release, prepare the money, about 4500RMB.
Show Review in Original Language
(18) Thank | 科学与研究

Author: 大仙鹤叔叔


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted directly


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-10-04 06:57:45
There are so many people who wash the land for this bad publication.Say two things you saw with your own eyes:1. A teacher from the next-door laboratory selectd for this publication. When I recommended the reviewer, I thought about not knowing any big cows. I just filled in the same door.Then the manuscript was sent to her brother for trial.2. My ex-girlfriend, who is engaged in polymer, submitted an article to a relatively high-energy polymer zone in the industry. It was not approved, refused to draft, and cried for a day.Then I said that you selectd for RSC ADVANCES, especially water.At the time, this publication was still in the second district.After a month, minor repairs were received.A publication that can send a manuscript to a person who is in the same unit as the first author, and dare to say that it is not water?Oh, everyone, look at it yourself.
Show Review in Original Language
(29) Thank | 大仙鹤叔叔

Author: DDDD


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted directly


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-09-21 15:41:59
Other professions dare not say that if people who engage in materials and chemistry feel that this journal is not watery, then you are really extremely limited
Show Review in Original Language
(27) Thank | DDDD

Author: FY


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-09-20 22:18:39
In 2016-2017, 20,000 articles were sent, only 18 articles were cited. Is this not a water journal?Noisy
Show Review in Original Language
(33) Thank | FY

Author: 行走的一只鹅


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-09-15 16:15:43
I think rsc adv is okay, the reviewers give advice very professional, and the improvement of the thesis is very good.Help, and the speed of review is very fast. In recent years, the amount of articles has continued to increase, but the self-introduction rate is not high, which may be a reason for the decline of the impact factor. It is said that this is the watermark's estimate is often issued JACS, nature.
Show Review in Original Language
(163) Thank | 行走的一只鹅

Author: rentaohu@126.com


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-09-11 14:29:01
6.23 submitted 8.30 overhaul 9.5 back is still in peer review. Not overhaul directly received? How can I submit it again!
Show Review in Original Language
(24) Thank | rentaohu@126.com

Author: qiqi


Subject Area: Environmental Sciences
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-08-30 12:53:58
The speed is very slow, there are two reviewers, one is accepted after modification, one is rejected, and the last edit is rejected. It is really a cup~
Show Review in Original Language
(6) Thank | qiqi

Author: 小明


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-08-28 07:48:42
6.27Submission,8.23 minor repair8.27 Submit revised draft8.27 receivingThe first SCi in life, I feel pretty good.
Show Review in Original Language
(6) Thank | 小明

Author: 夏天的学渣


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-08-24 11:44:36
has been contributing for more than 2 months, still in the peer review, can I try the manuscript now?
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | 夏天的学渣

Author: 巴西nag


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-08-20 14:37:33
, the rest of the data was written a small article, thinking that there is more SCI beauty, I am afraid that it is really a stain of life? Job resume can write thisArticle?A little regret
Show Review in Original Language
(8) Thank | 巴西nag

Author: huyubingmc@163.com


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-08-20 01:34:17
The first sci, received before the start of the study,Very happy.6.6 Submission7.31 overhaul8.16 repair8.18 receivingSpeed ​​is OK, not fast.I hope that the journal will be better and better.
Show Review in Original Language
(15) Thank | huyubingmc@163.com

Author: 勤劳的小蜜蜂


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-08-11 02:39:19
June 19 submissions July 11 reviewThe manuscript request for overhaul on the 27th to repair the August 7th notice to accept the high efficiency opinion is very professional and hopes better and better
Show Review in Original Language
(9) Thank | 勤劳的小蜜蜂

Author: wongyeokuen


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-08-07 13:30:31
Submitted on June 7th, still in peer review, tangled in the end or not.Please come over and tell
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | wongyeokuen

Author: 542318834@qq.com


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-08-06 10:17:28
I watched so many people sharing, I am very happy that I can share things for everyone.2018-6-10 Submit(23-Jun-2018) minor repair13th July 2018 ReceivingThe questions raised by the reviewers are very professional.This journal is not water, I hope it will get higher and higher!
Show Review in Original Language
(12) Thank | 542318834@qq.com

Author: xy


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-08-02 09:13:23
Submitted on May 9th, received review comments on June 8th, a major overhaul, a minor repair,The editor gave the minor repair, but the overhaul needed to be supplemented, and returned on June 21, but the euphemistic explanation did not intend to make up the experiment. The editor returned to the overhaul, which coincided with the graduation reply. It took a month to make up the experiment, and returned on July 27, 28receive.
Show Review in Original Language
(6) Thank | xy

Author: saca


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-07-18 08:03:15
5.24On the 7.6th, I received a minor revision, a minor repair, and a direct reception.7.16 was repaired, and some time was delayed in the middle.7.17 Receive
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | saca

Author: 小生


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-07-17 20:07:07
6.6-day submission6.28 days of receiving overhaul advice, no need to complete the experiment, 2 reviewers, one of them is very professional.There are many places for further explanation.Revised on 7.137.17 day receptionThe overall feeling is strict or not because of the reviewer's opinion, the speed is very fast, and it is hoped that the impact factor will remain stable or rising.
Show Review in Original Language
(11) Thank | 小生

Author: 707145297@qq.com


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-07-11 17:00:56
Submitted at the end of February, submitted for review in mid-March, and returned to editorial review in early June. At the end of June, he told Xiaoxiu to change it back to the editor for a week.In general, the speed of review is ok, and the time for the journal to reviewers is about one month.My first SCI, although I don't understand it, but I finally acceptd it. You need to analyze the experience and add 725,554,986 to learn from each other, discuss and share the submission experience and problems.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 707145297@qq.com

Author: 707145297@qq.com


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-07-11 16:44:37
Submitted at the end of February, submitted for review in mid-March, and reviewed in early June.Editor evaluation, informed minor repair at the end of June, changed back to the editor directly after a week.In general, the speed of review is ok, and the time for the journal to reviewers is about one month.My first SCI, although I don't understand it, but I finally acceptd it. You need to analyze the experience and add 725,554,986 to learn from each other, discuss and share the submission experience and problems.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 707145297@qq.com

Author: 左载


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-07-04 11:13:46
Upstairs, some people said that this is the four major water issues, in fact, the four major water issues do not include this.The four major watermarks refer to PLOS ONE, Scientific Reports, Medicine and Oncotarget, some of which have been delisted by SCI.The four major water journals are the ones that you dare to accept as long as you dare to select, and RSC Adv. is not that simple.It is said that this group of water may often send a series of nature, advanced materials such as
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | 左载

Author: 豪豪豪


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted directly


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-06-29 16:37:31
Why do so many people degrade him, okay, I hope to get rid of the notoriety of the water journal as soon as possible.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 豪豪豪

Author: dd


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-06-16 13:23:59
Although it is known as one of the four major water issues, I feel that it has something to do with the reviewers.A lot of watering articles are facts, but there are still some good articles.Still have to look at luck, there must be some innovation in the face of a strict editor.
Show Review in Original Language
(29) Thank | dd

First    Previous    1    2    3    4    5    6    7    Next    Last  (To Page
/18)

Start your review of [RSC Advances]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.


© 2010-2021  ACCDON LLC 400 5th Ave, Suite 530, Waltham, MA 02451, USA
PrivacyTerms of Service