My Account Submit My Manuscript
Letpub, Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service

RSC Advances

   For Publishers  New

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:
Journal Cover Design Service
APA has partnered with LetPub to provide a full suite of author services

[RSC Advances]Hello, you are Visitor Number 782721 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitleRSC Advances
Journal Title AbbreviationsRSC ADV
ISSN2046-2069
h-index113
CiteScore
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
6.500.7360.827
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Chemical Engineering
Subcategory: General Chemical Engineering
Q135 / 281
Category: Chemical Engineering
Subcategory: General Chemistry
Q158 / 398

Self-Citation Ratio (2019-2020)5.10%
Official Websitehttp://pubs.rsc.org/en/journals/journalissues/ra
Online Manuscript Submissionhttp://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/rscadv
Open AccessYes
PublisherRoyal Society of Chemistry, Thomas Graham House, Science Park, Milton Road, Cambridge CB4 0WF
Subject Areachemical sciences
Country/Area of PublicationEngland
Publication FrequencyContinuously updated
Year Publication Started2011
Annual Article Volume4583
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=2046-2069%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Authorized Data from Publisher:
Data from Authors: About 2.1 month(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors:
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【RSC Advances】CiteScore Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • CiteScore Trend


First    Previous    1    2    3    4    5    6    7    Next    Last  (To Page
/18)
  Reviews on RSC Advances: Write a review
Author: cczoneplace@163.com


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 5.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-09-17 14:35:30
Submitted on May 1, major revision May 24, Submitted on June 2, minor revision June 14, Submitted on June 22, major revision August 17, Submitted on August 28, and the paper is at peer review now. I thought it was easy to get accepted by this journal, so I submitted there. One reviewer requested major revision, while the other requested minor revision. All questions easy to address. After that resubmission, one review accepted while the other asked to do minor revision, but the advice was to add a new experiment. I thought that even the major revision did not request new experiment, and this was just minor revision so it wouldn’t be necessary. Now I knew I was wrong. As a result, the reviewer was very unhappy. The review period lasted 2 months, the review comments were very critical. I realized that my attitude was not appropriate previously so I quickly sent the paper out for language editing. After all, language is not my strength, so I understand why the reviewer has no patience reading it. The editor is very kind. After careful consideration, the editor gave me another chance of major revision. However, this review period is really long. Now I think it is all my fault so I want warn everyone not to take the reviewer comments lightly. I previsously heard that this journal accepts papers not so high in quality. If someone does have a paper published in a highest ranking journal, perhaps you can objectively evaluate this journal. I don’t think this journal allows  low quality papers at all.

(49) Thank | cczoneplace@163.com

Author: 123木头人


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-02-22 13:02:35
The recent mentality is very poor, the paper has no news, the graduation season, anxious papers, really anxious, I hope there is a good result!!!I wish you all a smooth submission.
Show Review in Original Language
(5) Thank | 123木头人

Author: 123木头人


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-02-22 12:59:44
First-time revision of the two-month repair; two weeks to fill the data, return; now one month after returning, still did not receive the repair results.I don't know why everyone said it is fast, I have more than three months before and after!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 123木头人

Author: Montaki


Subject Area: Agriculture Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-02-19 09:54:59
2018.12.152019.1.10 First-instance overhaul2019.1.31 Revised2019.2.09 Accepted2019.2.18 onlineThe review speed is very fast, and the questions raised by the reviewers are also very pertinent, which is conducive to improving the quality of the article. After receiving, the online is also very fast.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Montaki

Author: 风吹屁屁糖


Subject Area: Environmental Sciences
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-01-30 10:55:24
2018.12.8 selectd, the third day in peer review.But there is no first-instance news until now. This review cycle is really not short. The middle has changed many times between the editor and the in peer review.I hope there is good news.
Show Review in Original Language
(8) Thank | 风吹屁屁糖

Author: xiaoxiaohai


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-01-26 13:39:28
2019-1-18 contribution, with editor, how long do you send the review?
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | xiaoxiaohai

Author: 让你膨胀一会儿


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-01-15 18:51:10
Submitted for a month and a half, in the peer reviewAnd back and forth with the editor, why is this?Does anyone give an explanation?..Is it a change in the status of the review comments once?How many times have you changed your status after the trial?
Show Review in Original Language
(7) Thank | 让你膨胀一会儿

Author: 123木头人


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-01-12 10:22:02
RSC advances There is really no such thing as upstairs.My article, delivered on November 20, 2018, has passed nearly two months now, and the first-instance opinion has not returned yet.The graduation season, anxious papers, really anxious, I hope to have a good result.Friends who wish to deliver are cautious in their choice.
Show Review in Original Language
(14) Thank | 123木头人

Author: qian750425


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-01-05 16:27:45
contributed on November 22, 2018December 20, 2018 anti-review review comments, minor repairReturn to revised version on December 22, 2018Received on January 3, 2019The review comments are very pertinent and professional. At first glance, they know that they are experts.The middle caught up with Christmas and New Year's Day, so I received a few days of delay.Feel that this publication is ok!!
Show Review in Original Language
(10) Thank | qian750425

Author: 美丽的魅力


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-01-03 11:57:05
Soon, one week review is in the middle, a little minor repair, and they are very professional
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 美丽的魅力

Author: 简简单单


Subject Area: Environmental Sciences
Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-12-25 11:13:09
Actually, this journal is very difficult now. In June, it was submitted in. In July, it was overhauled. After 2 weeks of revision, it returned to overhaul. After being repaired, it was rejected for more than one week.Not reconciled, and then revised and submitted, more than 40 days to overhaul, 2 weeks after the repair and then overhaul, carefully changed back and returned, for fear of being rejected again, waiting for 10 days to return to receive, after more than half a year.
Show Review in Original Language
(12) Thank | 简简单单

Author: Bob


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-12-15 15:14:34
RSC ADVANCESThe circulation is huge, and the oolong should be understandable when the manuscript is sent to the acquaintance.Now, after OPEN ACCESS, the volume of submissions has dropped significantly, and there are many AEs working on it, trying to improve the quality of the articles published in the journal.Although RSC ADVANCES is not a high-ranking journal, it is working hard to get better and better.By the way: although it is now charged, it is not the kind of journal that is given by some irresponsible posters.At present, its rejection rate is 57%, and it is believed that it will reach 60% in the near future.
Show Review in Original Language
(133) Thank | Bob

Author: Bob


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-12-15 15:07:20
rejected by the three district polymer journals, selectd for the second district RSC AdvancesAfter receiving is also considered RSC Advances water and rotten.Do you know that there are many articles rejected by RSC ADVANCES that have been turned into better journals?Some authors were rejected and selectd for NANOSCALE, and my friend's article was rejected by RSC Advances. The article was transferred to ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY
Show Review in Original Language
(126) Thank | Bob

Author: Bob


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-12-15 15:04:01
Some people say that this journal is bad because it happened to the acquaintance.Do you know that this happened to Nature Materials?Do you want to say that this journal is also bad?
Show Review in Original Language
(154) Thank | Bob

Author: Bob


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-12-15 14:58:51
This review platform is really bad, my objective comments can't be uploaded!
Show Review in Original Language
(37) Thank | Bob

Author: Tomas


Subject Area: Environmental Sciences
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-12-13 21:36:08
This journal is now so pitted, placed in the editor for more than 20 days before being sent to the trial, and after the trial, it has been in the editor for 20 days, what editor is so busy?
Show Review in Original Language
(39) Thank | Tomas

Author: 让你膨胀一会儿


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-12-09 19:54:12
Is the review downstairs?
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 让你膨胀一会儿

Author: 石头零壹


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-12-05 10:45:09
Very fast, let the revision be made in January after submission, directly after the revision
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 石头零壹

Author: 小妖怪


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-11-14 17:34:21
contributed on October 23, and has been editing it for more than 20 days. Why is it not sent for review? Why are you receiving so fast?
Show Review in Original Language
(21) Thank | 小妖怪

Author: 安仔


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-11-03 11:11:43
Contributor: 9.20Overhaul opinion: 10.10Overhaul return: 10.20Receive 10.26Heavy metal wastewater treatment direction, quite good
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | 安仔

Author: susuchim


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-11-01 09:56:33
2018.10.26Checking submission and files2018.10.27Initial assessment2018.10.29With editor2018.10.31In peer review
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | susuchim

Author: meloy


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-10-31 14:18:36
How long does the reviewer have to review the draft?Two months have not moved, the teacher urged me to write Chinese, and anxious
Show Review in Original Language
(13) Thank | meloy

Author: meloy


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-10-31 14:11:33
I selectd for two months, and I selectd for 8.30. There were several times from the editor to the reviewer, butIn the hands of reviewers, the time is very short, no more than one week. What does this mean?
Show Review in Original Language
(28) Thank | meloy

Author: 科学与研究


Subject Area: Environmental Sciences
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-10-08 12:41:00
This article has been published in many journals. One of the most popular ones is the Journal of Hazardous Materials. After more than three months of writing, there is no news, and then the manuscript is directly cupped. The reply isJournals do not receive articles dealing with water.NM was wasted for so long.Later, I went to the journal and it was quite smooth!9.5 day submission9.20 days received minor repair opinions, 2 reviewers, are very professional.Further explanations and explanations are given for issues that are of particular concern to the research community.Because the previous work is relatively complete, the data is available, no need to make up the experiment.Revised on September 2910.1 day receptionSome innovative articles are generally reviewed quickly, within two weeks.In addition, for the need for an article eager to graduate, the article requires detailed data, language clearance, this journal is a good choice.In the last release, prepare the money, about 4500RMB.
Show Review in Original Language
(18) Thank | 科学与研究

Author: 大仙鹤叔叔


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted directly


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-10-04 06:57:45
There are so many people who wash the land for this bad publication.Say two things you saw with your own eyes:1. A teacher from the next-door laboratory selectd for this publication. When I recommended the reviewer, I thought about not knowing any big cows. I just filled in the same door.Then the manuscript was sent to her brother for trial.2. My ex-girlfriend, who is engaged in polymer, submitted an article to a relatively high-energy polymer zone in the industry. It was not approved, refused to draft, and cried for a day.Then I said that you selectd for RSC ADVANCES, especially water.At the time, this publication was still in the second district.After a month, minor repairs were received.A publication that can send a manuscript to a person who is in the same unit as the first author, and dare to say that it is not water?Oh, everyone, look at it yourself.
Show Review in Original Language
(29) Thank | 大仙鹤叔叔

First    Previous    1    2    3    4    5    6    7    Next    Last  (To Page
/18)

Start your review of [RSC Advances]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.

Intentional Space Tag



© 2010-2020  ACCDON LLC 400 5th Ave, Suite 530, Waltham, MA 02451, USA
PrivacyTerms of Service