My Account Submit My Manuscript
Letpub, Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service

WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY

   For Publishers  New

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:
LetPub Free Webinar
APA has partnered with LetPub to provide a full suite of author services

[WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY]Hello, you are Visitor Number 84998 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitleWATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Journal Title AbbreviationsWATER SCI TECHNOL
ISSN0273-1223
h-index124
CiteScore
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
1.550.4550.640
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Environmental Science
Subcategory: Environmental Engineering
Q256 / 117
Category: Environmental Science
Subcategory: Water Science and Technology
Q290 / 203

Self-Citation Ratio (2019-2020)6.50%
Official Websitehttp://www.editorialmanager.com/wst/
Online Manuscript Submissionhttp://www.editorialmanager.com/wst/
Open AccessNo
PublisherI W A PUBLISHING, ALLIANCE HOUSE, 12 CAXTON ST, LONDON, ENGLAND, SW1H0QS
Subject AreaEnvironmental Science
Country/Area of PublicationENGLAND
Publication FrequencySemimonthly
Year Publication Started1981
Annual Article Volume422
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0273-1223%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Authorized Data from Publisher:
Data from Authors: About 2.8 month(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: 71%
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY】CiteScore Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • CiteScore Trend


First    Previous    1    2    Next    Last  (To Page
/2)
  Reviews on WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY: Write a review
Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-06-12 09:21:00
Review speed is OKMore than one month, the second trial is almost a month, but it takes a long time from acceptance to publication.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-05-26 10:35:00
Speed ​​is OK, 50 days, rejection draft, two review comments
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-05-04 17:00:00
2 Submitted at the beginning of the month, received comments at the end of March, revised draft in early AprilOut, received in early May.It should be 8 weeks for the first trial and 4 weeks for the revised draft.It is not clear when it will be published.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-04-27 14:28:00
I wrote an article on electromagnetic water treatment, and after a week of urging, I was directly refusing the next day,
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-04-05 19:50:00
article receiving rangeVery wide, it is not difficult to submit.Processing speed is related to responsible editing.However, the review speed is relatively good, and there should be a reply within one month.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-02-20 09:14:00
The first 3 and a half months of direct reception, no modification.The second cup.The third and fourth re-submitment has been one and a half months, and I look forward to a good result!
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-12-27 17:20:00
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-12-05 15:06:00
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-11-27 10:40:00
has selectd two articles, one is submitted on August 5th, and now it is under review, anotherOne is the last select, or with editor, the overall feeling of editorial attitude is good, the mail reply is also very timely, prayer can be acceptd oh ~ graduation ah ~
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-11-17 17:44:00
is not a half-monthly?Why is the publication period long?
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-10-11 21:52:00
The publication text limit is too strict, less than 5000 words, and each chart is 350 words. Calculated, the number of words that can be written is very small.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-10-09 14:56:00
哎 WST and WST: The water supply is one, but the latter is not SCI, it is very troublesome.After submiting in an article, the editor believes that the content of the article is more in line with water science technology: water supply. The result is suggested to be transferred to accept the review of the water supply, and is negotiating. Of course, he does not agree to transfer to a journal that is not SCI.Then, the editor refused the article...
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-08-19 11:00:00
2000 was published by Sciencedirect before 2000, and now it is not...
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-04-09 09:45:00
is relatively easy, but the cycle is too long, and it is not recommended to submit a manuscript. Before submiting, I will count one year.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: 环境
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2010-12-15 21:12:00
Review timeLonger, usually after 3 months of revision comments uploaded, generally received a second review reply in January.In the decision-making stage of the editor-in-chief, the timeliness of the journal was slightly worse in one month, and the published time was a little longer. The article published in this article was accepted in May and published only in November.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2010-11-18 09:49:00
IF is not high, easy to use, there is a limit on the number of words, this comparison is big...
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science技术
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2010-08-27 12:10:00
is very easy, but the cycle is slightly longer
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2010-08-27 10:15:00
The review period is 3 months, then there will be review comments, and it will be accepted within one month.Respond to the second review.However, it took a long time from acceptance to publication, and there was no reply after copying right.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2010-08-03 19:16:00
is still relatively easy, I just selectd for an article, the review period is about three months, but the impact factor is not high, in recent years, it is about 1.0
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2010-07-20 21:24:00
IF is not high, but only a certain range of conference papers are included. The timeliness of the paper is very strong, there will be many new things, and it is very valuable.The papers in this journal are not available in the databases of many schools.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

First    Previous    1    2    Next    Last  (To Page
/2)

Start your review of [WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.

Intentional Space Tag



© 2010-2020  ACCDON LLC 400 5th Ave, Suite 530, Waltham, MA 02451, USA
PrivacyTerms of Service