My Account Submit My Manuscript
Letpub, Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service

THIN SOLID FILMS

   For Publishers  New

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:
Professional Journal Cover Design
APA has partnered with LetPub to provide a full suite of author services

[THIN SOLID FILMS]Hello, you are Visitor Number 61024 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitleTHIN SOLID FILMS
Journal Title AbbreviationsTHIN SOLID FILMS
ISSN0040-6090
h-index175
CiteScore
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
1.910.5310.815
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Physics and Astronomy
Subcategory: Surfaces and Interfaces
Q122 / 53
Category: Materials Science
Subcategory: Metals and Alloys
Q133 / 150
Category: Materials Science
Subcategory: Surfaces, Coatings and Films
Q140 / 116
Category: Materials Science
Subcategory: Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials
Q184 / 225
Category: Materials Science
Subcategory: Materials Chemistry
Q192 / 271

Self-Citation Ratio (2018-2019)6.60%
Official Websitehttp://www.journals.elsevier.com/thin-solid-films/
Online Manuscript Submissionhttp://ees.elsevier.com/tsf/
Open AccessNo
PublisherELSEVIER SCIENCE SA, PO BOX 564, LAUSANNE, SWITZERLAND, 1001
Subject AreaEngineering
Country/Area of PublicationNETHERLANDS
Publication FrequencySemimonthly
Year Publication Started1967
Annual Article Volume644
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index
Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0040-6090%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Authorized Data from Publisher:
Data from Authors: About 7.5 month(s)
Data from Elsevier: Average 15.1 Week(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: 87%
Data from Elsevier: 35%
Online Article Publication TimeData from Elsevier: Average 8.9 Week(s)
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【THIN SOLID FILMS】CiteScore Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • CiteScore Trend


First    Previous    1    2    Next    Last  (To Page
/2)
  Reviews on THIN SOLID FILMS: Write a review
Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-09-19 10:12:00
Super slow, my paper became under review one month after I submitted it. The review took 2 months. The decision was major revision. After I resubmitted the paper, it became under review after another half month. After another 20 days, the status became Required Reviews Completed. Half a month has passed, and the status is the same. It takes so long for the editor to make a decision! After waiting for a month, I got a decision for minor revision, mostly related to the format, language, and especially the figures. The journal has high requirements in these areas.

(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: 13687641416@126.com


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 7.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-07-05 13:46:30
The first select was directly rejected.After looking for foreign students to polish the color, directly minor repair, but the time of each state is very long.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 13687641416@126.com

Author: 20046073


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-06-27 22:10:44
Two weeks or Submitted to Journal
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 20046073

Author: KK


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-05-11 08:55:54
5.4Drafted to the journal, it has not yet reached the editor, it has been submitted to journal status.....Seeing that the reviewers are so slow, sure enough, praying to the editors soon
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | KK

Author: da


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 10.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-04-16 10:38:19
The article is too slow, the comments are not so accurate, it is recommended not to select for the journal.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | da

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-08-17 17:13:14
has two characteristics: first, the review of this journal is very strict; second, there are many constructive suggestions.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-10-11 15:16:00
the second TSF (the first one is remembered for the first trial for 4 months).Still two reviewers, the review is very strict, and the review comments will be given one month after the first trial, and will be replied according to the comments submitted by the reviewers (the data submitted is not fully added).The second trial period is very long for 4 months (probably because of the mid-interval summer vacation), because the submission system generally requires the reviewer to give a message within 4 months, send a reminder letter, notify the minor repair after one week, and accept it in the second half of the minor repair..It took about 6 months before and after.The journal is very good, but unfortunately IF fell last year, and it is estimated that it is related to the review cycle.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-09-26 10:16:00
This journal is really a long review period. It was selectd in November last year. The intermediate reviewer requested a change. The result was waited for another 3 months until I wrote a reminder.After the letter, it took another week for the editor to accept the notice. It took ten months to complete. If the worm friend who urgently needed the article did not recommend the journal, I really thanked the flowers.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-06-17 20:37:00
needs to graduate from the article, the journal selected by the boss, I have no choice.I have had a reply in almost two months.Made a lot of suggestions.I have to change it in the future, I hope I can finally include it.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-05-30 10:49:00
Old-fashioned professional journal, the name is not slow, more than three months to give advice, minor repairs need to be a small month.From submission to acceptance for almost half a year.However, I felt that it was very professional. The questions evaded in the article were all thrown out by the reviewers. After two minor repairs, I felt that the article grades had risen a lot and the content was much richer.So recommend this journal if you are not in a hurry.
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-05-19 22:28:00
01/29/2013Submission, 5.19 status or Under Review
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-05-16 21:51:00
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-05-14 14:32:00
Speed ​​is not fast.I submitted the manuscript on October 4 last year and accepted it on May 13 this year.It may be that luck is better, and the two review comments are softer, which is not a matter of revision.I can't figure out that this journal should not be in Zone 2.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-03-25 13:01:00
read everyone's comments, my two months are still reviewing, I have to calm down
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-02-21 10:15:00
reviewing too slowThe editor is still very responsible!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-10-19 11:10:00
thin solid film It turned into zone 3, and it fell too fast....
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-05-14 20:33:00
I made a dye-sensitized solar cell. I received an article last year. The journal is very good. The review speed is very fast. I have reviewed the results for more than one month. Overhaul, I spent a lot of energy to modify it.After submitteding it, there was news that it would continue to be overhauled. A total of 4-5 revisions were made, from submission to recruitment for about half a year.The editor is quite responsible, and the comments are very quick. The two reviewers have higher requirements on the format and picture clarity of the article.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-03-23 16:54:00
is really super invincible slow, last year selectd at the end of November, it is almost 4 months now, still under review, and the date has changed 3 times!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-03-22 11:35:00
is quite responsible for the journal, that is, the time is slow, but the quality is very high, if you want to improve your writing and logic ability, select it
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-12-16 11:31:00
speed comparisonSlow, it is cumbersome to modify according to the review comments, paying special attention to the format, and even the text of the vignettes entangled in the chart is too small.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-12-07 15:53:00
The review speed is really slow, but the review is still more serious. XPS is especially professional. It is a pity that it has changed from the second district to the third district in 11 years. The article rewards tragedy
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-11-30 17:52:00
experienced 8 months of suffering finally received, a lot of improvement, especially in the manuscript processing ability
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-11-28 08:53:00
Use the abbreviations "arb. units" to say arbitrary units and "au"For atomic units. In the end, is this how I want to adjust the unit, is it the unit on the map, or the unit of the full text?
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-11-14 15:19:00
contributed to this journal in the form of a letter a few years ago.The reviewer's comments can be received directly, but it is not suitable for publication by letter.The editor actually rejected the manuscript.It is really speechless.In addition, the domestic research team has submitted two articles, and the decision letter can be dragged on for three months.So I think the editor of TSF is very irresponsible.Subsequent articles are no longer considered for submission to this journal.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-11-02 19:48:00
thin solid film journal can be a group of subjects
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

First    Previous    1    2    Next    Last  (To Page
/2)

Start your review of [THIN SOLID FILMS]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.

Intentional Space Tag


Contact us

Contact us  

Your name*

Your email*

Your message*

Please fill in all fields and provide a valid email.

Security Code*

© 2010-2020 United States: ACCDON LLC Tel: 1-781-202-9968 Email: info@accdon.com
Address: 400 5th Ave, Suite 530, Waltham, Massachusetts 02451, United States
LetPub Privacy Policy