X
My Account Submit My Manuscript
Letpub, Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT

   For Publishers  New

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:
Journal Cover Design
APA has partnered with LetPub to provide a full suite of author services

[SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT]Hello, you are Visitor Number 299520 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitleSCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
Journal Title AbbreviationsSCI TOTAL ENVIRON
ISSN0048-9697
E-ISSN1879-1026
h-index205
CiteScore
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
10.501.7952.015
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Environmental Science
Subcategory: Environmental Engineering
Q16 / 146
Category: Environmental Science
Subcategory: Waste Management and Disposal
Q18 / 108
Category: Environmental Science
Subcategory: Pollution
Q110 / 132
Category: Environmental Science
Subcategory: Environmental Chemistry
Q113 / 122

Self-Citation Ratio (2019-2020)16.80%
Official Websitehttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00489697
Online Manuscript Submissionhttps://www.editorialmanager.com/STOTEN
Open AccessNo
PublisherELSEVIER SCIENCE BV, PO BOX 211, AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS, 1000 AE
Subject AreaEnvironmental Science
Country/Area of PublicationNETHERLANDS
Publication FrequencySemimonthly
Year Publication Started1972
Annual Article Volume6247
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index
Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0048-9697%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Authorized Data from Publisher:
Data from Authors: About 2.4 month(s)
Data from Elsevier: Average 6.1 Week(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: 75%
Data from Elsevier: 38%
Online Article Publication TimeData from Elsevier: Average 6.7 Week(s)
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT】CiteScore Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • CiteScore Trend


First    Previous    2    3    4    5    6    7    8    Next    Last  (To Page
/8)
  Reviews on SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT: Write a review
Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-11-12 23:34:00
Does the journal charge a $2,500 page fee?Please Supreme pointing
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-09-23 10:00:00
There have been 2 contacts with STOTEN last year.During the National Day, I dropped an article to STOTEN and chose an editor I knew him but he didn't know me.After 5 days, the paper entered the review state.There was a change in the status of the status after 2 months (should a reviewer return the review comments), but there was no change for the next month.On New Year's Day, I couldn't help myself. I sent an email to the editor to ask about the status.According to the experience of the insect friends, it was mainly asked whether the editor had encountered difficulties in reviewers' selection (the implication is that if there is no suitable one, I can choose my recommendation).Editor's reply: One reviewer has finished the review, and I a
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-09-06 09:05:00
contributed on December 6, 2012. It has been under review for several months, and a review was urged in the middle. The responsible editor said that because of the twoThe reviewer has only one reply, and he has to find another reviewer.On June 25th, 2013, I returned to the overhaul. On July 24th, I returned to August 1st to return to Xiaoxiu. On August 19th, I returned to August 23rd to return to Xiaoxiu. On August 24th, I received the reply on August 27th.The human issue has led to a slow review, and the efficiency is much faster after the draft. The responsible editor is very serious and responsible.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-08-15 15:28:00
8月5号 just submitted a manuscript, 10 days or With EditorThe state, do not know what the situation, hope to have good luck.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-08-12 20:28:00
feels good, submitted in mid-April, the review comments came back in early June, three reviewers, two minor repairs, and the editor gave the overhaul. The modification time was only given for 4 weeks.The review comments together with the reply of a total of 15 words on the 15th page, the reviewers' opinions are very professional, 6.20 return, review the draft again for a week, return to minor repairs, and upload the revised draft the next day to receive directly.Officially published in mid-July.high speed.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-07-15 10:26:00
Not very good, some questions raised, no way to modify
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-06-21 11:40:00
5.23 submission, 10 days after the review, the middle under review date has changed once, currentlyThere is no news for 1 month, wait patiently, and look forward to good results.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-06-05 17:17:00
4.6Submission, direct under review.After one month, 5.7 received the review comments.Two minor repairs, one refused.The editor gave a major repair.Repaired for nearly a month 6.2 and submitted it again.6.3 The manuscript was received, but the reason for the manuscript was very speechless. The manuscript reviewer of my revised manuscript did not read it at all. He sent it back directly to the same opinion as the first time, and then refused.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-05-24 07:49:00
The review speed is super fast, which is the fastest I have submitted.2013.02.21 contribution, 03.31 preliminary review opinion - overhaul, 04.15 submitted to the second trial, 05.09 second review opinion - overhaul, 05.15 submitted to the third trial, 05.22 third trial opinion - minor repair, 05.23 submitted to the fourth trial, the day accept.The overall feeling reviewer is very careful, and raises many questions. Of course, he is also very responsible. He helped to correct and correct a lot of grammar problems and learned a lot.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-05-15 12:34:00
Personally feels very fast, one journal, two districts, not bad, talking about word of mouth, many journals now have problems, key articles should have highlights, change the language before the select, doctoral periodThe fifth SCI, there is a point of confidence
Show Review in Original Language
(4) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-05-03 10:46:00
environmental policy research paper, is increased by the journal's competitiveness, the layout is limited to reject the draft, and the encounter with a insect friend upstairsLike, since we can't publish an article about our niche field, why is it called the total ring?
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-04-22 12:29:00
Published on December 18, 2012, received comments on March 17, 2013, Xiao Xiu (SCI article of the first minor repair) submitted revised version on March 21, 2013, March 25, 2013The day was accepted on April 19, 2013.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-03-31 20:12:00
Feel that editor Pavlos Kassomenos is very good. The manuscript we submitted is related to air pollution
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-03-26 17:33:00
20128Submitted monthly, no news in 2012.12, issued a reminder, and then wrote back to let me wait a moment, reviewing the manuscript, and at the end of 2013.01, the editor wrote back and said that the editors in China were reviewing the manuscript, and it was edited in 2013.03, editedI replied that I could not find the reviewer and rejected the manuscript directly.See editors and journals like this for the first time.It was wasted 7 months.In the future, try not to select for such a journal!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-03-22 22:46:00
I have never seen a journal of such high efficiency that it was rejected after one hour of submission, on the grounds that the layout is limited.It is estimated that this efficiency has not come before the ancients.
Show Review in Original Language
(6) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-03-21 18:10:00
Journals with faster speeds, it is very important to choose a matching editor, but also pay attention to strictly follow the submission guidelines.Submitted on August 20, 2012, the editor himself commented on the work report, lacking scientific assumptions.Submitted after one week.On October 10, the results of the first trial came out, an OK, a major repair.The editor also recommended an American to help change the grammar.Because the Americans delayed the progress, the revised draft was submitted on January 5, 13th.On January 25, the results of the second trial came out, minor repairs.Received on January 30th.Clean up on the 21st of February.See the journal on March 7.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-03-05 02:17:00
This journal seems to have a bad reputation in foreign countries, and it belongs to the type of influence factor. The foreign peers have low recognition of the article, I don’t know why
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-02-16 10:34:00
just received an article by STOTEN, even engaged in environmental chemistry, thought it was a good article, first selectd IF this year broke through 5 EI, was rejected by the editor, and then changed to Chemosphere, thought it was no problem,I didn't expect it to be rejected by the editor. I was shocked. I wanted to select for a lower journal. Later, I felt that I still have confidence in my manuscript. I switched to STOTEN. STOTEN's IF is actually higher than the chemosphere. This time.Unusually submitted on December 13th, I chose a research direction and my closest deputy editor to return on January 22, and four reviewers gave good evaluations. Each reviewer clearly stated that the content was good., can accept, so only
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-02-10 20:54:00
October 31st submitted the first review results on December 6, the overhaul on January 1, 2013, the second review results on January 18,Overhaul February 2nd revised draft reply, received on February 10
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-12-26 15:27:00
It’s hard to select now, but it’s pretty quick to refuse.The editor will say: "Publishing in STOTEN is increasingly competitive as there is now limited space in the journal. With this in view, we have to prioritise the papers we publish and some good quality articles sometimes cannot be accommodated.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-11-30 13:37:00
is directly rejected by research limited to a certain area, not sent for review.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-11-30 12:39:00
Influence factor is high, can be filled with publications, eager to send papers can select
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-09-12 11:14:00
Overhaul and direct acceptance, dust settled!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-07-22 09:01:00
has been submitted for 3 months, or under review status, do not know when there are results? Do not know if you canIn the middle of anxious waiting...........
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-06-28 11:58:00
submitted an article, the speed of review is super fast, minor repair, directly after the repair, from submission to recruitment23 days. Mainly to see if the editor is interested in the article, before submiting in an article, directly rejected after 1 month of review. . . .
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

First    Previous    2    3    4    5    6    7    8    Next    Last  (To Page
/8)

Start your review of [SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.


© 2010-2021  ACCDON LLC 400 5th Ave, Suite 530, Waltham, MA 02451, USA
PrivacyTerms of Service