X
My Account Submit My Manuscript
Letpub, Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT

   For Publishers  New

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:
Journal Cover Design
APA has partnered with LetPub to provide a full suite of author services

[SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT]Hello, you are Visitor Number 299516 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitleSCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
Journal Title AbbreviationsSCI TOTAL ENVIRON
ISSN0048-9697
E-ISSN1879-1026
h-index205
CiteScore
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
10.501.7952.015
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Environmental Science
Subcategory: Environmental Engineering
Q16 / 146
Category: Environmental Science
Subcategory: Waste Management and Disposal
Q18 / 108
Category: Environmental Science
Subcategory: Pollution
Q110 / 132
Category: Environmental Science
Subcategory: Environmental Chemistry
Q113 / 122

Self-Citation Ratio (2019-2020)16.80%
Official Websitehttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00489697
Online Manuscript Submissionhttps://www.editorialmanager.com/STOTEN
Open AccessNo
PublisherELSEVIER SCIENCE BV, PO BOX 211, AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS, 1000 AE
Subject AreaEnvironmental Science
Country/Area of PublicationNETHERLANDS
Publication FrequencySemimonthly
Year Publication Started1972
Annual Article Volume6247
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index
Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0048-9697%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Authorized Data from Publisher:
Data from Authors: About 2.4 month(s)
Data from Elsevier: Average 6.1 Week(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: 75%
Data from Elsevier: 38%
Online Article Publication TimeData from Elsevier: Average 6.7 Week(s)
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT】CiteScore Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • CiteScore Trend


First    Previous    2    3    4    5    6    7    8    Next    Last  (To Page
/8)
  Reviews on SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT: Write a review
Author: mylic


Subject Area: Medical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-06-08 11:47:48
What is the layout fee? 3000 dollars?
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | mylic

Author: 你们


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted directly


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-05-23 15:27:16
junk journal, I don’t know how it became Top. It’s very big, it’s better
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | 你们

Author: Linda


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-05-04 11:51:11
The manuscript processing speed is very fast, 25 days, all the comments of the four reviewers are returned and the results are given.Very worthwhile journals.
Show Review in Original Language
(9) Thank | Linda

Author: 835906635@qq.com


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 8.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-03-19 16:13:25
12.29Submission0102 external audit0121 reviewed, overhauled.Three reviewers, four words of opinion, only one month, very tight.Request to extend 2weeks, approved.0125 Editing the mail separately, returning to the fourth reviewer's opinion, is also drunk,,,, this workload!0305 overhaul completed, sent back.I feel that I have to treat the reviewers' opinions well. Some opinions are very helpful for improving the scientific nature of the articles!Review comments and replies, 8678 words, moved to the world.0308 dicision in process I saw that the editor was not sent, and the editor was also moved....0317 accepted0319 proof.
Show Review in Original Language
(29) Thank | 835906635@qq.com

Author: chemi


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-03-19 14:17:21
2 Submitted on the 15th of the month, and selected Professor Jay Gan, who is very good at evaluation, the manuscript number will come out that night, the third dayOn the March 15th, the status became under editor evaluation, and on the 17th, the review comments were overhauled, and the opinions of the two reviewers were more positive. Therefore, the editor gave the opportunity to modify and returned in one month.The total ring speed is very fast, I feel that Professor Jay Gan is very nice. It seems to be the teacher who went out of Zhejiang University.
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | chemi

Author: yajure


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-02-20 08:24:41
2015.12.23 submitted2015.12.31 under review2016.2.15 minor revision2016.3.13 Updated submission2016.3.13 accept
Show Review in Original Language
(13) Thank | yajure

Author: test090909


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-01-20 10:38:00
2016/12/26 Submission, the status changes to under review after a few days, and the 2017/1/18 status changes to Under Editor Evaluation the day before yesterday.I don't know if it is the rhythm of the manuscript?
Show Review in Original Language
(11) Thank | test090909

Author: WH


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-12-21 14:07:51
After receiving a small repair, the article received an email entitled “accept pending requirement”, which means that all the documents in the article are submitted again and the final revision period is given.The current state of the article is accept without revision.Is it okay to wait for acceptance, how long does it take?Looking forward to answering.Thank you!!
Show Review in Original Language
(9) Thank | WH

Author: Viv


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-10-21 18:14:57
Articles are submitted from the submission to the acceptance of two months, some time in the middle is delayed, otherwise it may be faster.Submission on September 1Return on September 25, return (two experts, all said to receive, not many questions)Reworked on October 20Received on October 21stSoon, the conscience journal reviewer’s problem is small, but it’s a bit of a hit.The editor is also Jay Gan, a good editor
Show Review in Original Language
(11) Thank | Viv

Author: 行云流水


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-08-14 06:12:31
Articles from submission to acceptance for one and a half months, the efficiency is relatively high.Submission on June 29Returned on July 13th, overhaul (four experts)Modified submission on July 31Returned on July 31, minor repairAmendment submission on August 13Accepted on August 13thThe editor is Jay Gan, who is more serious and responsible!
Show Review in Original Language
(4) Thank | 行云流水

Author: SH0326


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-07-22 10:14:44
Environmental drinking water safety direction article overall feeling soon 1 month notice overhaul 2 reviewers a rejection manuscript a major repair editor gave a major repair hair 40 questions replied 25 pages 1Months submitted for revision for two weeks and a little more shows that accepting the modified person is not a very authoritative Prof in this direction. However, it can be seen that very experienced reviewers are very careful and the overall problem is still very good.The journal has certain requirements for the new content of the research content. The reviewer has higher scientific requirements for the experimental design.The speed of the journal is faster. It is worth everyone to try!
Show Review in Original Language
(8) Thank | SH0326

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-07-15 17:35:07
Very fast journal, thanks to editor Jay Gan!2016/6/17 contribution2016/6/28 Minor repair2016/7/13 Minor revision2016/7/15 ReceiveThe middle minor repair also delayed a few days, otherwise it will be faster, really fast, thanks!
Show Review in Original Language
(9) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-06-02 19:23:44
This journal is quite efficient. It is under review on the second day of submission. It took 1 month for the first trial, 5 reviewers, 4 comments, 3 positive basics.No major problems, the editor gave a major revision, revised and submitted for review, received after 10 days of the second trial, and notified the draft three days after receiving.Submitted on April 8, 2016Received comments on May 7, 2016, overhaulSubmitted revised version on May 16, 2016Received on May 28, 2016.
Show Review in Original Language
(5) Thank | Anonymous

Author: i


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-04-09 11:41:00
Received 23 December 2015,Revised 13 March 2016,Accepted 13 March 2016,Available online 24 March 2016
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | i

Author: jy


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-03-24 21:50:37
The middle-upper journal of the environmental category, the amount of manuscript is relatively large, relatively easy, and the IF is also very high recently. It has already been 4, but it feels that the irrigation is serious.The reviewer’s words are fatal, and some reviewers are indeed very strict.Generally speaking, the English level of the paper is very high, and generally needs to be polished.
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | jy

Author: ZAJH


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2015-11-13 08:25:43
7 Submitted on the 1st of the month, notified the overhaul at the end of September, and returned after nearly one month of revision. The notice on November 12 directly accepted.The opinions of the two reviewers were very good and they were very helpful for the improvement of the article.It is the first article that was completed independently according to your own ideas.very happy.
Show Review in Original Language
(6) Thank | ZAJH

Author: ZAJH


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2015-11-13 08:25:38
7 Submitted on the 1st of the month, notified the overhaul at the end of September, and returned after nearly one month of revision. The notice on November 12 directly accepted.The opinions of the two reviewers were very good and they were very helpful for the improvement of the article.It is the first article that was completed independently according to your own ideas.very happy.
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | ZAJH

Author: ZAJH


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2015-11-13 08:25:13
7 Submitted on the 1st of the month, notified the overhaul at the end of September, and returned after nearly one month of revision. The notice on November 12 directly accepted.The opinions of the two reviewers were very good and they were very helpful for the improvement of the article.It is the first article that was completed independently according to your own ideas.very happy.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | ZAJH

Author: lalala


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2015-10-24 10:35:47
has been submitted for three months, and there is no news yet
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | lalala

Author: mj_zihao_23


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2015-05-05 09:33:40
STOTEN in recent years is very concerned about the direction of antibiotic resistance pollution, before tryingI selectd for EI but regretted that I was not sent to trial.Then change to STOTEN.Submitted on February 13th,The first review results around March 10, overhaulReply on April 8th,Received on April 26th.Overall, it was relatively fast, and the three reviewers did not seem to use my recommendation.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | mj_zihao_23

Author: 1256907077@qq.com


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2014-10-21 21:46:31
6February 24 contribution;Return to overhaul on August 12;Returned to the draft after the overhaul on August 24;Return to minor repairs on October 13;Returned to the minor revision on October 21, and received it on the same day;After the overhaul was returned, it was a little slower, but the overall feeling was not slow. The editor was very good. There was only one reviewer's opinion in the overhaul. The minor repairs seemed to be not one person with the reviewer of the overhaul, but the opinions were very pertinent, and the text was published.Just to thank everyone for your help, I hope to give you some reference!
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | 1256907077@qq.com

Author: 1256907077@qq.com


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2014-10-21 21:46:28
Feed on June 24th;Return to overhaul on August 12;Returned to the draft after the overhaul on August 24;Return to minor repairs on October 13;Returned to the minor revision on October 21, and received it on the same day;After the overhaul was returned, it was a little slower, but the overall feeling was not slow. The editor was very good. There was only one reviewer's opinion in the overhaul. The minor repairs seemed to be not one person with the reviewer of the overhaul, but the opinions were very pertinent, and the text was published.Just to thank everyone for your help, I hope to give you some reference!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 1256907077@qq.com

Author: 1256907077@qq.com


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2014-10-21 21:44:21
6February 24 submission;Return to overhaul on August 12;Returned to the draft after the overhaul on August 24;Return to minor repairs on October 13;Returned to the minor revision on October 21, and received it on the same day;After the overhaul was returned, it was a little slower, but the overall feeling was not slow. The editor was very good. There was only one reviewer's opinion in the overhaul. The minor repairs seemed to be not one person with the reviewer of the overhaul, but the opinions were very pertinent, and the text was published.Just to thank everyone for your help, I hope to give you some reference!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 1256907077@qq.com

Author: k


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-12-06 12:12:39
9 Submitted on March 3,September 9th, 11th under reviewNovember 3rd, the comments came back to the big changeSubmitted on December 2nd revised draftDecember 4th receiving
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | k

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Management
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-11-25 14:04:00
is very fast, and the general environmental management journals are required to be semi-annual to one-year. It seems that it is necessary to submit in comprehensive journals in the future.The speed is really fast, and it is easy to get recognition. The editor is very responsible. It will not directly reject the manuscript because of errors in the language. It will give the opportunity for revision. The level of reviewers is also very high. The questions raised are constructive and able toGet new enlightenment from the problem and have a deeper understanding of your own research...
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

First    Previous    2    3    4    5    6    7    8    Next    Last  (To Page
/8)

Start your review of [SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.


© 2010-2021  ACCDON LLC 400 5th Ave, Suite 530, Waltham, MA 02451, USA
PrivacyTerms of Service