X
My Account Submit My Manuscript
Letpub, Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT

   For Publishers  New

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:
Journal Cover Design
APA has partnered with LetPub to provide a full suite of author services

[SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT]Hello, you are Visitor Number 299521 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitleSCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
Journal Title AbbreviationsSCI TOTAL ENVIRON
ISSN0048-9697
E-ISSN1879-1026
h-index205
CiteScore
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
10.501.7952.015
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Environmental Science
Subcategory: Environmental Engineering
Q16 / 146
Category: Environmental Science
Subcategory: Waste Management and Disposal
Q18 / 108
Category: Environmental Science
Subcategory: Pollution
Q110 / 132
Category: Environmental Science
Subcategory: Environmental Chemistry
Q113 / 122

Self-Citation Ratio (2019-2020)16.80%
Official Websitehttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00489697
Online Manuscript Submissionhttps://www.editorialmanager.com/STOTEN
Open AccessNo
PublisherELSEVIER SCIENCE BV, PO BOX 211, AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS, 1000 AE
Subject AreaEnvironmental Science
Country/Area of PublicationNETHERLANDS
Publication FrequencySemimonthly
Year Publication Started1972
Annual Article Volume6247
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index
Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0048-9697%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Authorized Data from Publisher:
Data from Authors: About 2.4 month(s)
Data from Elsevier: Average 6.1 Week(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: 75%
Data from Elsevier: 38%
Online Article Publication TimeData from Elsevier: Average 6.7 Week(s)
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT】CiteScore Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • CiteScore Trend


First    Previous    1    2    3    4    5    6    7    Next    Last  (To Page
/8)
  Reviews on SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT: Write a review
Author: doch


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-03-09 16:36:28
Guess: 2017~2018 IF=4.4~4.5
Show Review in Original Language
(4) Thank | doch

Author: chem


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-03-02 11:13:39
Have a small partner to calculate the real-time impact factor of STOTEN
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | chem

Author: Rei


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-02-11 16:47:43
2017.12.11 submitted to journal2017.12.11 with editor2017.12.11 under review2018.1.2 major revision,2018.1.22 revision submitted to journal2018.1.22 with editor2018.1.22 under review2018.2.7 required reviews completed2018.2.7 acceptFrom submission to receiving the entire process within two months, the journal is very efficient, thanks to the editor-in-chief of Damià Barceló!
Show Review in Original Language
(8) Thank | Rei

Author: sss1061@126.com


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-01-29 08:40:36
2018.01.08 Submitted to journal2018.01.09 With editor2018.01.09 Under review2018.01.10 Under reviewUnfinished
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | sss1061@126.com

Author: jiangyf0308@163.com


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-01-10 13:11:12
9.23 with editor9.24 under review10.12 under review10.20 under review11.12 under review11.14 major revision, three reviewers, all expressed interest in the article (two thought to be revised, an interest), a total of 122 comments, large and small, four weeks to modify the time...12.02 revision submitted to journal12.02 with editor12.22 required reviews completed1.02 required reviews completed Estimated because the foreigner's holiday (double denier) delays the progress1.04 minor revision two proposals were published (but one of them has two minor questions, so the editor gave the changes again), one is expected to publish1.05 revised submitted to journal1.09 accept
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | jiangyf0308@163.com

Author: ronghao_chu@163.com


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-01-04 11:25:51
9.10With editor9.12 Language Retreat10.05 With editor10.10 Under review10.11 Under review11.14 Major Revision, three reviewers' opinions, two overhauls and one minor repair, a total of 75 comments, very pertinent, one month modification time12.13 Revision submitted to Journal12.13 With editor12.15 major revision12.18 Revision submitted to Journal12.18 With editor12.20 major revision12.22 Revision submitted to Journal12.22 With editor12.27 Completed acceptFor the first time, the journals have a high demand for language and innovation. They don’t care about the top journals in Zone 2, and they have paid a full 46 pages. Thanks to three anonymous reviewers and deputy editor Prof. Ashantha Goonetilleke for givingSuggestions and help!
Show Review in Original Language
(54) Thank | ronghao_chu@163.com

Author: markhuang


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-12-17 21:31:10
editor's requirementsVery tall, right from the environmental ecology class 2 top title
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | markhuang

Author: zhangshenyao_shena@163.com


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-12-12 02:00:26
Sleeping into the night, dreaming that the article was rejected, waking up and taking out the computer, it was rejected.Submitted on November 9th, the date of the under review is changed every 10 days.Three reviewers, two negative opinions,The final editor decided to reject the draft..Until December 12th today.Well, it’s very fast and there are some useful opinions.
Show Review in Original Language
(4) Thank | zhangshenyao_shena@163.com

Author: zhangshenyao_shena@163.com


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-12-12 01:59:04
Sleeping into the night, dreaming that the article was rejected, waking up and taking out the computer, it was rejected.Submitted on November 9th, the date of the under review is changed every 10 days.Three reviewers, two negative opinions,The final editor decided to reject the draft..Until December 12th today.Well, it’s very fast and there are some useful opinions.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | zhangshenyao_shena@163.com

Author: LS


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-11-15 14:41:04
9.07 Submitted9.07 with editor9.10 under review9.20 under review10.13 major revision11.04 submitted by11.13 accepted11.13 proofManuscript processing efficiency is still quite high, and the level of reviewers is not bad.
Show Review in Original Language
(4) Thank | LS

Author: 599035972@qq.com


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-10-19 15:20:19
8月30#SubmissionReturned on September 18, overhaul (3 reviewers were more positive, 2 comments were specific, 1 did not ask specific questions but pointed out that the language needed to be edited _(:зゝ∠)_ Editor-in-Chief also pointed out in the replyThe reviewer has to pay attention to the language, so the author must pay attention to it, so I bought the cheapest language service of Elsevier after the modification is completed →_→)October 14th revised submission (moving, plus 11 holiday breaks, only 4 days left from deadline, you don't want to learn me)Received on October 15thThe article was submitted from the submission to the reception for less than two months. The editor-in-chief Jay Gan and the reviewer were very responsible and the efficiency was very high.The day we submitted the repair was Saturday. I thought I would reply as early as the next Monday. I didn’t expect to receive a big reply from the editor on Sunday morning. I was moved to _(:зゝ∠)_!In short, recommend STOTEN to everyone, especially graduates who can't afford time.Whether you accept this journal or not, you will have results within one or two months, even if the rejected review comments are also valuable, which will help improve the quality of the article.
Show Review in Original Language
(7) Thank | 599035972@qq.com

Author: dingxuhan1990@gmail.com


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-10-19 00:14:13
. I selectd for the tailings dustproof topic.Submission on August 7 and overhaul on September 16.On October 12th resubmit, the 16th notice directly accept.My first article.The review manuscript is full of efficiency, and there are a lot of reviewers, plus a total of five people in the editor... Replying to the comments, thank you for the ten pages
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | dingxuhan1990@gmail.com

Author: simone


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 5.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-10-17 04:04:34
2016.5.11: submission;5.14: under review;7.7: get major revise;8.11: get minor revise;9.3: get minor revise;9.22: accept.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | simone

Author: 2251289834@qq.com


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-10-08 22:27:26
2017.07.152017.08.14 Overhaul, because it is a pilot test of engineering nature, there is no duplication.The three reviewers, the first two are very innovative, a small post-employment, and a post-repair. These two reviewers have more opinions, but they are very meaningful. It can be seen that this isExperts.Another reviewer directly said that there was no duplication, that the study was meaningless, and the editor gave the overhaul.2017.09.09 The overhaul returned, responding to the comments of the first two reviewers on 26 pages, explaining the opinions of the third reviewer, explaining the actual situation, and listing articles that were not duplicated in similar field trials.2017.09.10 Back, overhaul, the editor believes that there is no reply to the editor's comments in the first overhaul, saying that the article has a small grammar problem.The editorial opinions are all suggestions for serious inspections, one-by-one responses, and so on.Add a reply to the editor and find a foreigner.2017.09.19 Second repair return2017.10.05 Accepted, although there are twists and turns, the speed of reviewing the journal is indeed very fast, and it is in the editor's hands every time it returns to the basic day.
Show Review in Original Language
(9) Thank | 2251289834@qq.com

Author: US


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-10-05 02:39:46
Submitted in mid-April, only in September, the opinion is given to a Greek deputy editor.a bit!The reviewer is receiving, and a negative revision, but the revision suggestion is deep and difficult to understand. The old American boss is also watching the cloud, and after the revision, the reviewer is still dissatisfied, and the deputy editor fallow, not arbitrating.There is no valuable problem in the research, and there is no improvement in the research content. It can be seen that it is in vain for five months.Because the collection with this study is not very matchable, the reviewer is not professional.
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | US

Author: li_miany@163.com


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-10-03 08:58:55
7.18 Submitted to journal7.18 With Editor7.19 Under Review8.6 Under Review8.25 Under Review9.18 Major revise9.25 Minor revise10.2 Accept
Show Review in Original Language
(4) Thank | li_miany@163.com

Author: yuanxb15@lzu.edu.cn


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-09-30 01:18:37
This journal is really fast, submitted on July 13th, accepted on September 29th, the first SCI, keep up the good work!
Show Review in Original Language
(10) Thank | yuanxb15@lzu.edu.cn

Author: Fan


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-08-16 14:23:39
7月1 ContributionJuly 28th Overhaul (After uploading the review on August 12)August 14 Minor repair (After uploading comments on August 15)August 16 Receive
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | Fan

Author: 1362011508@qq.com


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-08-16 14:22:52
7月1 ContributionJuly 28th Overhaul (After uploading the review on August 12)August 14 Minor repair (After uploading comments on August 15)August 16 Receive
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 1362011508@qq.com

Author: 222


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-07-25 11:13:32
5.287.6 First opinion7.14 modify return7.24 Accept
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 222

Author: luicent


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-07-12 14:47:31
4.19 Submission5.13 Returned, 3 reviewers gave comments, overhaul, only one month of modification time,6.11 Change back, the middle of the field for a while, or else it will be faster6.14 Return, edit to three opinions, mainly because the length is too long, need to be reduced and concise, but still overhaul, one month of modification time6.29 Change back6.29 ReceivingMagazine editor Jay Gan is very responsible, very serious, especially efficient.The article pays more attention to revealing environmental issues, and it has high requirements on language. It has been revised twice, and the key moment influence factor is mentioned. It is very gratifying.
Show Review in Original Language
(4) Thank | luicent

Author: sjlnts


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-07-10 14:14:24
2.173.27 returned, 3 reviewers gave comments, overhaul4.20 Change back4.23 Returned, the editor gave the opinion, not much, but still overhauled5.16 Change back5.18 Return, edit to change several forms, minor repair6.12 Changed6.14 ReceivingThe journal editor Jay Gan is very serious and efficient. If it is not a drag on his own, it should be within 3 months of submission.
Show Review in Original Language
(7) Thank | sjlnts

Author: 雪飘人间


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-06-28 23:17:18
Objectively say two sentences, I don’t know what the mentality of the total circumstance is not the TOP. It is estimated that you should also do environmental science. Since you are so cattle, why not directly submit in EST, EIAnd EHP, cognac to submitted a total ring.Obviously, the overall environmental journal is weaker than EST and EP, but not weaker than any other journal.Because EP has too few articles per year, EP is not Top.I don't think you can occasionally send an article to the above to say that a journal can't. If you think you are a cow, this journal is sorry for you. You can't send it. If you can get water on it one day, then you canNot too late.The environment is inherently weak, and there are few journals in the first and second districts. You are still so stunned.
Show Review in Original Language
(24) Thank | 雪飘人间

Author: tatterfu@163.com


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-06-27 10:40:26
4月4, contributing;April 5, under review;May 10, overhaul;On June 4, return to the revision;June 26, received.Thanks for the hardworking editor, reviewers;Thanks to the friends who share the information in letpub, I wish you all the best!
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | tatterfu@163.com

Author: 老大


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted directly


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-06-20 21:27:43
Good, can't talk about top
Show Review in Original Language
(21) Thank | 老大

First    Previous    1    2    3    4    5    6    7    Next    Last  (To Page
/8)

Start your review of [SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.


© 2010-2021  ACCDON LLC 400 5th Ave, Suite 530, Waltham, MA 02451, USA
PrivacyTerms of Service