X
My Account Submit My Manuscript
Letpub, Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT

   For Publishers  New

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:
Journal Cover Design
APA has partnered with LetPub to provide a full suite of author services

[SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT]Hello, you are Visitor Number 299514 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitleSCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
Journal Title AbbreviationsSCI TOTAL ENVIRON
ISSN0048-9697
E-ISSN1879-1026
h-index205
CiteScore
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
10.501.7952.015
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Environmental Science
Subcategory: Environmental Engineering
Q16 / 146
Category: Environmental Science
Subcategory: Waste Management and Disposal
Q18 / 108
Category: Environmental Science
Subcategory: Pollution
Q110 / 132
Category: Environmental Science
Subcategory: Environmental Chemistry
Q113 / 122

Self-Citation Ratio (2019-2020)16.80%
Official Websitehttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00489697
Online Manuscript Submissionhttps://www.editorialmanager.com/STOTEN
Open AccessNo
PublisherELSEVIER SCIENCE BV, PO BOX 211, AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS, 1000 AE
Subject AreaEnvironmental Science
Country/Area of PublicationNETHERLANDS
Publication FrequencySemimonthly
Year Publication Started1972
Annual Article Volume6247
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index
Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0048-9697%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Authorized Data from Publisher:
Data from Authors: About 2.4 month(s)
Data from Elsevier: Average 6.1 Week(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: 75%
Data from Elsevier: 38%
Online Article Publication TimeData from Elsevier: Average 6.7 Week(s)
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT】CiteScore Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • CiteScore Trend


First    Previous    1    2    3    4    5    6    7    Next    Last  (To Page
/8)
  Reviews on SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT: Write a review
Author: NSC


Subject Area: Agriculture Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-12-10 20:08:12
I have always liked this journal9.15 Submission10.18 Notice overhaul11.16 Repair12.10 Receiving
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | NSC

Author: 两仪式的蕾丝


Subject Area: Environmental Sciences
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-12-02 09:20:26
From submission to receipt for 63 daysOverhaul once in the middleModify the language againhigh efficiencyBut how do you feel that you have not controlled the number of articles this year?I hope not to become a water issueThe distribution of countries published by STOTEN in the past three years:Mainland China: 1710USA: 1331Spain: 864Germany: 490Italy : 490
Show Review in Original Language
(26) Thank | 两仪式的蕾丝

Author: 春春


Subject Area: Environmental Sciences
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-11-09 23:48:55
0902 submit0903 under review1009 major revision1101 resubmit1101 under review1109 accept two complete cycles, the external review experts are very responsible, the questions are very professional, and the quality of the revised articles has improved a lot.The editor is Professor Hou Deyi of Tsinghua University, who is very nice and efficient.
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | 春春

Author: 草根


Subject Area: Agriculture Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-10-27 09:12:45
Invited by this journal as a reviewer, I sent a manuscript to review, and checked it was a good journal!
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | 草根

Author: 天才少女


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-10-25 20:04:36
I am eager to see this post, and I have been paying attention to STOTEN's small partners for a long time.September 28, submitted;September 28, with editor;October 2, under review;On October 5, 13, 19, 20, and 22, 2018, the status data changed on the above days.Currently, the status is still under review.According to the situation of STOTEN in the past, in general, the STOTEN first-instance cycle is about 20 days.I asked about the status data. What does this change mean?After the expert opinion of the external audit came back, the system status data changed?Or the editor gave it to other reviewers?Because it has been continuously changed 5-6 times before and after.I hope I can get the answer from the informed staff, thank you~!
Show Review in Original Language
(93) Thank | 天才少女

Author: 金翼飞鹏


Subject Area: Agriculture Science
Duration of Peer Review: 5.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-10-22 22:24:17
Rejected in March 2018First trial overhaul in May 2018Directly accepted after the second trial in June 2018The editor is very responsible, the reviewer's opinion is very important for the article, very good journals, of course, the quality requirements of the article are also very high, I hope that the impact factor will be 5 points next year~
Show Review in Original Language
(4) Thank | 金翼飞鹏

Author: ZooneyBB


Subject Area: Environmental Sciences
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-10-22 14:27:06
0820 submitted0821 under review0918 major revision1001 revise submitted to journal1001 under review1019 acceptedIn the complete two-month cycle, the first review only returns the opinions of one reviewer, and the second trial time is longer than usual. This makes me very worried, but by accepting the email, there should be a total of 5 reviewers.Yes, probably no other people have big opinions. I like this journal very much. I feel that I attach great importance to the innovation level of the article, especially whether the original intention and the interpretation of the results cross different fields~
Show Review in Original Language
(6) Thank | ZooneyBB

Author: 海角七号


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-10-22 12:22:37
9-14 Submitted9-15 under review10-12 major revisions The opinions were very good. All three reviewers stated that the papers were innovative and important. The shortcomings focused on too many language and grammar mistakes.Specially sent to touch up when modifying.10-18 revision submitted10-19 with editor (for 3 days)10-22 accepted The editor did not submit for review and received it directly.The editor is Jay Gan, the efficiency is very high!The overall feeling: therefore, the innovation of the article is very important, the data should be sufficient, and the discussion must be meticulous.In addition, journals have high language requirements, and it is recommended to polish them before submitting them.
Show Review in Original Language
(6) Thank | 海角七号

Author: ttenv


Subject Area: Environmental Sciences
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-10-20 18:15:32
Reviewing is very fast.After calculating the immediate impact factor, the probability of breaking the factor of 5 next year is not small.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | ttenv

Author: 季节不要变化


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-10-18 14:53:44
Is the management of this platform considered to clean up the message?The sour comments that some people have been rejected for leaving are not only not providing useful information, but also very spicy eyes.
Show Review in Original Language
(11) Thank | 季节不要变化

Author: review-player


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-10-14 19:22:57
Back downstairs:Not crazyDon't dare
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | review-player

Author: 江湖小生


Subject Area: Environmental Sciences
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-10-14 19:04:42
The downstairs is so mad.I feel that the total ring is basically a casual journal in your group?There aren't a few journals in the environmental field that you can see.Do not dare to give a real name, let us read about your masterpiece, do not know how many CNSP.
Show Review in Original Language
(13) Thank | 江湖小生

Author: review-player


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-10-12 19:24:07
I said a few big truths, it was all stepping on me......
Show Review in Original Language
(12) Thank | review-player

Author: review-player


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-10-10 21:27:34
From submission to receiving less than two months, the submission difficulty is low, the industry recognition is general, and the inner feeling is one level with plos one or scientific report.The editing process is extremely fast and worthy of praise.
Show Review in Original Language
(83) Thank | review-player

Author: review-player


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-10-06 23:17:37
Feeling that STE has tightened, the research team has refused two articles by two different editors. One of them is Jay Gan, who has received rave reviews. The reason for rejection is very consistent:Publishing in STOTEN is becoming increasingly competitive as there is limited space in the journal. With this in view, we have to prioritize papers that we publish and some good quality articles sometimes cannot be accommodated."
Show Review in Original Language
(8) Thank | review-player

Author: 春春


Subject Area: Environmental Sciences
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-10-04 11:50:55
Submitted on September 2, under review on September 3.Up to now, under review, the middle state has changed twice, it should be back to the comments of two reviewers.I don't know how many reviewers are in the end.It doesn't matter if you slow down, it is a month, don't refuse.
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | 春春

Author: lisa


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-09-28 22:51:34
Submitted on September 20th, the editor selected the jay gan that everyone has been acclaimed, and entered the edior on the 20th. It has been 8 days, this is not normal, it is anxious to die, will notWill you forget my article?
Show Review in Original Language
(5) Thank | lisa

Author: 小媛纸


Subject Area: Environmental Sciences
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-09-28 14:33:29
I would like to ask you which editor of this journal is more efficient, people are better, or some counterexamples can be.thank you very much!
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | 小媛纸

Author: Pengpeng


Subject Area: Environmental Sciences
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-09-27 14:47:20
7.25 Submission8.22 overhaul9.4 repair9.4 ReceivingThis speed is great!I hope that total will be better and better
Show Review in Original Language
(26) Thank | Pengpeng

Author: 铁生


Subject Area: Agriculture Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-09-03 08:17:18
Can only be said very very fast, submitted on July 5th, the results of the first trial on the 25th, 3 reviewers directly accepted, a minor repair, a major repair (calculated as a repair), editHe was given a major repair, and he was repaired on August 22nd. He was directly accepted on August 29th. He thought that the direction might not meet the requirements of the journal. The dead horse was a live horse doctor. The result was directly acceptd. The editor is Professor Chen Baoliang of Zhejiang University
Show Review in Original Language
(5) Thank | 铁生

Author: 514922818@qq.com


Subject Area: Environmental Sciences
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-08-16 17:19:36
6.26 submit6.27 under review7.17 under editor envaluation7.19 under editor evaluation7.20 major revise, 3 external trials, 21 opinions, more language problems, after the revision, I found two retouching agencies8.11 revise submitted to journal8.11 under review8.14 Required Reviews Completed8.16 acceptIn general, the journal is very fast, and the editor is also very responsible. The first-instance online is 21 days, and it is 21 days. The revised proposal is very detailed. It started to look very headache. Later, I calmed down and changed my mind. It feels very easy. I used 20After renovating around the day, I was afraid that it would not be a month. The editors felt that they had no intention to change, but the reviewers carefully looked at the revised place. Finally, the feedback said that the revision was very serious and very satisfactory.I hope that the total ring will be better and better~~~
Show Review in Original Language
(12) Thank | 514922818@qq.com

Author: 666666


Subject Area: Social Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-08-15 08:48:09
Very efficient, I will give you news the next day, my article is not innovative enough, it may be more suitable for regional journals,
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | 666666

Author: 522466737@qq.com


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-08-07 15:18:54
The first trial was rejected... It is an article that has recently published a similar topic. I don’t have enough research value. I recommend submitting it to regional journals.Maybe the study area is too small, 唉However, it is really fast, even if it is not given any advice, but the editor responded quickly.
Show Review in Original Language
(4) Thank | 522466737@qq.com

Author: drsa


Subject Area: Social Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-08-05 20:36:56
This journal is OK. This year's situation is two for the time being. One time is 60 days. After the overhaul, the second one will be fixed in 30 days.It is a good journal worth developing.Some people in the same group are submitteding, and they don’t stick to doi, they have to face.
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | drsa

Author: anx1990


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-07-10 17:55:58
The editor believes that the innovation is not high enough, giving two pages of opinions and suggesting to select for other journals.I don’t want to fill the water first, at least the editor’s comments will help the article to be modified.In addition, it is recommended that it is easy to post articles that you have published, and everyone will learn.Scientific research impetuous, psychologically distorted, not suitable for scientific research, such a mouse smashes a pot of soup.Research is done by publishing relevant research results in this field as soon as possible, regardless of the impact factor.Of course, the choice of journals should be based on the level of their own articles.My article is below the level of 3 points, seeing the post is not known to be high (very easy), tried to select, and wasted time.But it is also worth it.
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | anx1990

First    Previous    1    2    3    4    5    6    7    Next    Last  (To Page
/8)

Start your review of [SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.


© 2010-2021  ACCDON LLC 400 5th Ave, Suite 530, Waltham, MA 02451, USA
PrivacyTerms of Service