X
My Account Submit My Manuscript
Letpub, Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service

APPLIED CATALYSIS A-GENERAL

   For Publishers  New

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:
Journal Cover Design
APA has partnered with LetPub to provide a full suite of author services

[APPLIED CATALYSIS A-GENERAL]Hello, you are Visitor Number 91763 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitleAPPLIED CATALYSIS A-GENERAL
Journal Title AbbreviationsAPPL CATAL A-GEN
ISSN0926-860X
E-ISSN1873-3875
h-index192
CiteScore
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
9.001.2651.374
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Chemical Engineering
Subcategory: Process Chemistry and Technology
Q110 / 59
Category: Chemical Engineering
Subcategory: Catalysis
Q218 / 57

Self-Citation Ratio (2019-2020)4.80%
Official Websitehttp://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/500856/authorinstructions
Online Manuscript Submissionhttp://ees.elsevier.com/apcata/default.asp
Open AccessNo
PublisherELSEVIER SCIENCE BV, PO BOX 211, AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS, 1000 AE
Subject AreaChemistry
Country/Area of PublicationNETHERLANDS
Publication FrequencySemimonthly
Year Publication Started1991
Annual Article Volume375
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index
Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0926-860X%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Authorized Data from Publisher:
Data from Authors: About 2.0 month(s)
Data from Elsevier: Average 3.9 Week(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: Difficult
Data from Elsevier: 16%
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【APPLIED CATALYSIS A-GENERAL】CiteScore Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • CiteScore Trend


First    Previous    1    2    Next    Last  (To Page
/2)
  Reviews on APPLIED CATALYSIS A-GENERAL: Write a review
Author: jwdxb@163.com


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-04-12 10:00:08
This article has been accepted.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | jwdxb@163.com

Author: jwdxbjzh


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-03-31 22:25:06
Applied Catalysis A:General: Overhaul.Modified for one month to make up the loop experiment.I repaired it a few days ago and yesterday I was "Under Review".Look at luck!
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | jwdxbjzh

Author: jwdxb@163.com


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-02-27 20:29:02
A total of 13 days from the submission of the paper to the return opinion, gave a major repair, and gave two months to modify.The problem is not difficult to answer, supplement the catalyst cycle experiment.Expect good news!
Show Review in Original Language
(4) Thank | jwdxb@163.com

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-03-23 22:04:00
Editing Anrup's character is not bad, reviewing the draft for 4 months, no results yet, writing a letter asking, not returning, there is a problem with the editor's character, we do not choose this editor,
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-03-20 19:26:00
The review is very fast, and the editor's email will be received in 20 days. Both reviewers agree to receive, minor repair, and change the grammar.
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-03-12 03:39:00
I also selectd on December 18th, 12 years, but it is almost 3 months now, or under review, I don't know how it happened?
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-03-03 14:52:00
The first one is really not easy.First list the detailed process: 12.18 Submission 1.4 Received a reply, minor repair 2.1 Revised draft submitted 2.5 Edited reply to modify the language 2.28 Re-submitted and submitted 3.2 From submit to journal to with editor, then receive
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-06-26 15:13:00
last year on Appl catal A, the editor is South Korea's Sang Heup Moon.I personally feel that AC is still a very catalyzed journal, so I like it very much.In the beginning of May this year, I selectd for a basic catalyzed application of a new carbon material.The materials are synthesized according to the literature and have been characterized by many; while the catalytic part is fully available from process conditions, substrate expansion, and possible mechanisms.After submiting in the past, less than a week, there is no Under review, it is directly in Decision in process, it feels wrong.It turned out to be Sang Heup Moon, he gave reject, think that we should and peer work (name
Show Review in Original Language
(10) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-06-13 12:39:00
submitted a comment after one month, two reviewers, one overhaul, one minor repair, modifiedAfter the submitted, it has been close to 20 days, the state has not changed, or with the editor, not only ah, suddenly feels a little slow!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-04-13 10:30:00
recently just got an article,I am doing multi-phase catalysis, compared with this journal, submitting a manuscript for about two months to reply, overhaul, reply after minor repair. I feel that the reviewer pays more attention to the expression of active data, such as TOF, etc.The revised comments must be serious. The reviewer may not understand the meaning of your article. If you explain it carefully, the format is good. The following is the submission process and the publishing process. Received at Editorial Office: 28 Oct 2011 Article revised: 30Mar 2012Article accepted for publicati
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-03-22 18:54:00
I mainly conduct research on the catalytic direction. The submission experience is as follows: December 8th submission, January 15th request overhaul, March 1st submission modificationThe manuscript, minor repairs are required around March 20th, and received on March 22nd. The article focuses on the hot research directions that can be applied industrially. It is best to list the results of your own reaction with the current report results, which has certain advantages.It is possible to increase the weight of the publication. The major revision must carefully ponder the opinions of the reviewers, mainly on what the reviewer thinks, what answers he wants to get, and whether it is affirmative or negative.Conclusions inconsistent in the research results, remember not
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-03-12 15:51:00
3 months to receive the article~ The journal pays more attention to innovation~
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-12-10 23:36:00
Submission 15 days overhaul, repaired the next dayDirect reception, feeling very fast!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-11-30 22:51:00
27 days have review comments, four reviewers, two minor repairs, one refused, the other suggested to change. The editor is very good, gave a replyLet's modify it first, then rethink it. After 5 days of modification, it will be submitted again, and it will be accepted after three days. It requires certain innovation, and the reaction process can be innovative. Catalyst innovation can also be done, but it must be focused. The most important.The catalyst is not the focus of this application, but the catalyst is not the focus of this, but the characterization is complete, so it is put into the supplementary materials. Personal feeling, no matter the minor repair, it is possible to accept the change, the editor did not look at it.Generally rejected directly.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-08-21 17:03:00
Journal Homepage URL: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find ... ription#description
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-05-26 10:26:00
One, one monthThere are review comments, overhaul.However, the e-mail was not found in time. After five months of submission and submission, the system found that there was a review comment, and the modification time was two months. Later, it was explained to the editor, and the modification was received in the past three days.The article requires comparative systemicity, which is a good choice for catalyzing application.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-05-26 03:02:00
The wrong range of possible hits is very low
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-05-25 22:17:00
I have selectd for one of my brothers.Was rejected.Later, through the catalysis communication, in the middle.I feel that my brother's article innovation is not a lot, but the data is quite comprehensive and the picture is quite good.This journal is a bit of a requirement for innovation.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-04-22 18:53:00
The research direction is chemistry. I just got one of the catalyzed directions, submitted in 2011.1.18, 2011.2.11 reply to overhaul, 2011.4.1 repaired,2011.4.16 was received.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: 光子晶体
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2010-09-01 20:40:00
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: 催化表征
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2010-09-01 15:02:00
I recently had a high demand for innovation, the characterization of the catalyst must be comprehensive, and the reasons must be sufficient.The editor is very good and will help you to modify the English errors in the article in detail.The review is also very fast, about a month or so
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2010-08-12 13:44:00
personally like this journal, think that the catalytic profession is more influential, it is more difficult in recent years.Not only must there be good results, but also a more comprehensive representation.I feel that the reviewer is very good, and the opinions are very valuable. In the end, I will help you change the English in detail. It really benefits a lot.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: 催化剂设计
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2010-07-27 09:11:00
I used to be in the middle, it feels more difficult
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: 工业催化材料
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2010-07-16 08:52:00
The main side is important for industrial catalytic materials and processes, and the papers with application prospects are better.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

First    Previous    1    2    Next    Last  (To Page
/2)

Start your review of [APPLIED CATALYSIS A-GENERAL]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.


© 2010-2021  ACCDON LLC 400 5th Ave, Suite 530, Waltham, MA 02451, USA
PrivacyTerms of Service