APPLIED CATALYSIS A-GENERAL

This article has been accepted.

(0) Thank | jwdxb@163.com

Applied Catalysis A:General: Overhaul.Modified for one month to make up the loop experiment.I repaired it a few days ago and yesterday I was "Under Review".Look at luck!

(2) Thank | jwdxbjzh

A total of 13 days from the submission of the paper to the return opinion, gave a major repair, and gave two months to modify.The problem is not difficult to answer, supplement the catalyst cycle experiment.Expect good news!

(4) Thank | jwdxb@163.com

Editing Anrup's character is not bad, reviewing the draft for 4 months, no results yet, writing a letter asking, not returning, there is a problem with the editor's character, we do not choose this editor,

(2) Thank | Anonymous

The review is very fast, and the editor's email will be received in 20 days. Both reviewers agree to receive, minor repair, and change the grammar.

(2) Thank | Anonymous

I also selectd on December 18th, 12 years, but it is almost 3 months now, or under review, I don't know how it happened?

(1) Thank | Anonymous

The first one is really not easy.First list the detailed process: 12.18 Submission 1.4 Received a reply, minor repair 2.1 Revised draft submitted 2.5 Edited reply to modify the language 2.28 Re-submitted and submitted 3.2 From submit to journal to with editor, then receive

(1) Thank | Anonymous

last year on Appl catal A, the editor is South Korea's Sang Heup Moon.I personally feel that AC is still a very catalyzed journal, so I like it very much.In the beginning of May this year, I selectd for a basic catalyzed application of a new carbon material.The materials are synthesized according to the literature and have been characterized by many; while the catalytic part is fully available from process conditions, substrate expansion, and possible mechanisms.After submiting in the past, less than a week, there is no Under review, it is directly in Decision in process, it feels wrong.It turned out to be Sang Heup Moon, he gave reject, think that we should and peer work (name

(10) Thank | Anonymous

submitted a comment after one month, two reviewers, one overhaul, one minor repair, modifiedAfter the submitted, it has been close to 20 days, the state has not changed, or with the editor, not only ah, suddenly feels a little slow!

(0) Thank | Anonymous

recently just got an article,I am doing multi-phase catalysis, compared with this journal, submitting a manuscript for about two months to reply, overhaul, reply after minor repair. I feel that the reviewer pays more attention to the expression of active data, such as TOF, etc.The revised comments must be serious. The reviewer may not understand the meaning of your article. If you explain it carefully, the format is good. The following is the submission process and the publishing process. Received at Editorial Office: 28 Oct 2011 Article revised: 30Mar 2012Article accepted for publicati

(0) Thank | Anonymous

I mainly conduct research on the catalytic direction. The submission experience is as follows: December 8th submission, January 15th request overhaul, March 1st submission modificationThe manuscript, minor repairs are required around March 20th, and received on March 22nd. The article focuses on the hot research directions that can be applied industrially. It is best to list the results of your own reaction with the current report results, which has certain advantages.It is possible to increase the weight of the publication. The major revision must carefully ponder the opinions of the reviewers, mainly on what the reviewer thinks, what answers he wants to get, and whether it is affirmative or negative.Conclusions inconsistent in the research results, remember not

(2) Thank | Anonymous

3 months to receive the article~ The journal pays more attention to innovation~

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Submission 15 days overhaul, repaired the next dayDirect reception, feeling very fast!

(0) Thank | Anonymous

27 days have review comments, four reviewers, two minor repairs, one refused, the other suggested to change. The editor is very good, gave a replyLet's modify it first, then rethink it. After 5 days of modification, it will be submitted again, and it will be accepted after three days. It requires certain innovation, and the reaction process can be innovative. Catalyst innovation can also be done, but it must be focused. The most important.The catalyst is not the focus of this application, but the catalyst is not the focus of this, but the characterization is complete, so it is put into the supplementary materials. Personal feeling, no matter the minor repair, it is possible to accept the change, the editor did not look at it.Generally rejected directly.

(1) Thank | Anonymous

Journal Homepage URL: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find ... ription#description

(0) Thank | Anonymous

One, one monthThere are review comments, overhaul.However, the e-mail was not found in time. After five months of submission and submission, the system found that there was a review comment, and the modification time was two months. Later, it was explained to the editor, and the modification was received in the past three days.The article requires comparative systemicity, which is a good choice for catalyzing application.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

The wrong range of possible hits is very low

(0) Thank | Anonymous

I have selectd for one of my brothers.Was rejected.Later, through the catalysis communication, in the middle.I feel that my brother's article innovation is not a lot, but the data is quite comprehensive and the picture is quite good.This journal is a bit of a requirement for innovation.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

The research direction is chemistry. I just got one of the catalyzed directions, submitted in 2011.1.18, 2011.2.11 reply to overhaul, 2011.4.1 repaired,2011.4.16 was received.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

I recently had a high demand for innovation, the characterization of the catalyst must be comprehensive, and the reasons must be sufficient.The editor is very good and will help you to modify the English errors in the article in detail.The review is also very fast, about a month or so

(0) Thank | Anonymous

personally like this journal, think that the catalytic profession is more influential, it is more difficult in recent years.Not only must there be good results, but also a more comprehensive representation.I feel that the reviewer is very good, and the opinions are very valuable. In the end, I will help you change the English in detail. It really benefits a lot.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

I used to be in the middle, it feels more difficult

(0) Thank | Anonymous

The main side is important for industrial catalytic materials and processes, and the papers with application prospects are better.

(0) Thank | Anonymous