X
My Account Submit My Manuscript
Letpub, Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service

NEW JOURNAL OF CHEMISTRY

   For Publishers  New

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:
Journal Cover Design
APA has partnered with LetPub to provide a full suite of author services

[NEW JOURNAL OF CHEMISTRY]Hello, you are Visitor Number 147505 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitleNEW JOURNAL OF CHEMISTRY
Journal Title AbbreviationsNEW J CHEM
ISSN1144-0546
E-ISSN1369-9261
h-index112
CiteScore
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
5.300.6930.744
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Materials Science
Subcategory: Materials Chemistry
Q153 / 292
Category: Materials Science
Subcategory: Chemistry (all)
Q195 / 398
Category: Materials Science
Subcategory: Catalysis
Q229 / 57

Self-Citation Ratio (2019-2020)8.70%
Official Websitehttp://pubs.rsc.org/en/journals/journalissues/nj
Online Manuscript Submissionhttp://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/njc
Open AccessNo
PublisherROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY, THOMAS GRAHAM HOUSE, SCIENCE PARK, MILTON RD, CAMBRIDGE, ENGLAND, CAMBS, CB4 0WF
Subject AreaChemistry
Country/Area of PublicationENGLAND
Publication FrequencyMonthly
Year Publication Started1987
Annual Article Volume2093
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index
Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=1144-0546%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Authorized Data from Publisher:
Data from Authors: About 2.2 month(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: 50%
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【NEW JOURNAL OF CHEMISTRY】CiteScore Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • CiteScore Trend


First    Previous    1    2    3    4    Next    Last  (To Page
/4)
  Reviews on NEW JOURNAL OF CHEMISTRY: Write a review
Author: 东大冶金院


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-08-02 10:02:51
Summary: The quality of the manuscript has been greatly improved, and I feel that it is higher than the JCR Q1 journal I submitted before. The metal journal was tormented to explosion; there was no need to talk about the bitterness. The editor was responsible. There manuscript would not be rejected for external reasons (such as not nice reviewers) so long as the quality of manuscript was accepted by the editor. The editor controls the quality of manuscript more strictly; the description of this journal is “A journal for new directions in chemistry”. I have also been a reviewer, the journal has a demand on reviewer, it is “Routine or incremental work, however competently researched and reported, should not be recommended for publication in NJC as it does not meet our expectations with regard to novelty and impact.” The review speed was fast, it was about 2.5 to 3 months from submission to acceptance. Journal of the Royal Society of Chemistry is trustworthy, everyone should jump into submission.

(2) Thank | 东大冶金院

Author: 东大冶金院


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-08-02 10:00:43
I love the journal and hate it, what I hate is the torture of the reviewers, what I love is the responsibility of the editor and the control of the quality of the manuscripts. Now I post the process of submission to you for your reference. New Journal of Chemistry is a journal of Royal Society of Chemistry. The quality of manuscripts at the upper middle level in this field. The submission process is as follows: The status changed into primary review the day after submission. It was with editor in two days and in peer review in three days. (Assigning the manuscript was fast.). 20 days later, the comments came back. There were two reviewers, one minor revision (There were 8 comments. Generally, it’s easy to reply, this reviewer was nice). One reviewer suggested making major revision (There were 11 comments, it’s basically difficult to reply, supplementing various experiments and analyses was requested, this reviewer was tricky). The editor gave major revision. I revised carefully, especially the comments of the second tricky reviewer. I submitted it in one month. (Now the manuscript contained a lot of content, the word count of the text without supplementary materials was 7000, and the first draft was only about 5000.) The first reviewer was very satisfied with the revision and agreed to accept it. But the second tricky reviewer still disagreed and asked me to supplement the experiments. (There is an episode, the second reviewer had been dragging for two weeks before simply replying, and then asked me to supplement the experiments. At this time, I felt that the second reviewer deliberately targeted me, I guess it was the peer competition.) There was no other way but immersing myself in the experiments. I submitted the revision in 20 days. (At this time, the manuscript was over 8000 words, and I was exhausted.)

(4) Thank | 东大冶金院

Author: lemonda_yan@163.com


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-07-12 17:53:07
I submitted my article on solvent extraction. I had reviewers’ comments in a month, with minor revisions and a major revision. One of the reviewers gave 23 articles, mainly details, and raised a lot of questions about the English proficiency. It is estimated that this is also the reason why the editor gave the rejection. When I revised the article and resubmitted it, the process was very fast. The result was received in less than half an hour. I feel that NJC's initial assessment has a lot to do with its submission. The RSC submission process is still very user-friendly, and the editor is very responsible.

(10) Thank | lemonda_yan@163.com

Author: 果


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-01-15 16:53:23
Efficient, reviewer's opinion is pertinent, modify it, no problem.I hope that I can influence the energy and step by step.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 果

Author: 苦瓜VL


Subject Area: Environmental Sciences
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-01-11 09:25:32
10-18 Upload10-20 preliminary assessment10-26 editing10-31 review11-12 overhaul11-28 overhaul return1-7 minor repair references1-10 Receive
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 苦瓜VL

Author: ^^只是当时丶


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-09-07 17:40:27
2018.06.11 submit, checking submission2018.06.13 initial assessment2018.06.18 with editor2018.06.20 in peer review2018.07.16 major revision2018.07.31 resubmit, depending submission2018.08.01 resubmit, depending submission2048.08.03 acceptIn general, the editors are very good, and the opinions of the two reviewers are minor repairs; the first reviewer gave 12 comments, the review was very careful, and various grammar questions and legend questions were marked.Are all small problems.The second reviewer presented three comments on the representation.The editor gave the overhaul.After careful modification, uploading a file error due to network problems, directly uploaded, resulting in a wrong typesetting format.Later wrote to the editor to request a resubmission.The editor gave the opportunity to resubmit directly.Received two days after submitting again.After receiving the editor, I sent an email asking if there is any interest in the cover, which was ignored due to my own problems.Regret....
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | ^^只是当时丶

Author: xiaoqiang


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-09-05 19:55:41
May 4th SubmissionJune 13th Return to the first instance opinion OverhaulJune 19th, submit revised draftAugust 21, return to the second opinion, minor repairA revised draft was submitted on August 22 and was submitted for review again.August 29th Return opinion, still minor repairOn August 31, submit the revised draft and submit it for review again.September 4th ReceiveSeptember 5th After submitting the publishing agreement, online.The reviewer is particularly meticulous and very nice, and the revised place will be marked and suggested to be modified.The overall feeling is not fast, but fortunately the result is received.I did not expect this journal to be submitted for review every time.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | xiaoqiang

Author: 库赖


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-08-31 09:29:32
It’s been almost four months since I tried it. I don’t know anything. Does anyone know how to find an edit mailbox?
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 库赖

Author: 投稿接收


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-08-29 11:55:49
Submission was rejected for 11 days, saying that it is not suitable for publication in this journal, only submitted separately.Time is average, the submission requirements are still very much
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 投稿接收

Author: 111


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-08-26 23:19:02
Don't complain about the downstairs. I submitted the manuscript for two weeks, and it is still in the preliminary review stage!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 111

Author: 卡哇伊


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-08-23 08:27:19
Submitted for 1 week, or the initial assessment was drunk, sayingGood 20 days out of the results,,,
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | 卡哇伊

Author: skysailing


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-07-20 21:56:05
Submitted on May 13th;On June 8th, the reviewer comments were returned, two reviewers, one overhaul, one minor repair, and an overhaul by the editor;Upload the revised version on June 30;Received on July 8thThe first SCI, the editor is very Nice, thank you NJC, I hope NJC is getting better and better
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | skysailing

Author: easonzk


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-07-10 11:00:31
Submitted on April 7th, returned to review on May 7th:The editor found 5 reviewers, including 2 minor repairs, 1 overhaul, 1 re-submission, and 1 rejection.The editor was very kind and gave a major repair.Because I have a lot of comments, I will repair it back on June 1.On June 28th, I returned to the review comments of the overhaul. This editor only looked for three of the last five reviewers, and one reviewer (the original reviewer who re-submitted the re-submitted)I have two minor problems.On July 1st, the minor repairs went back, and the editors were sent again for review.........Received on July 6.(There is still a bit of an episode. After receiving, I have to sign a "Licence to Publish", but the author's order in the Licence automatically generated by this computer is inconsistent with the author's order in the manuscript and the manuscript. I also sent an email because of graduation.Is there any impact on the order in the Licence to Publish? The editor replies that the order of the final proof is correct.)
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | easonzk

Author: 呵呵


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-06-13 17:15:13
Submission for three months, the result is unknown
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 呵呵

Author: lixueq@zju.edu.cn


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-06-11 17:03:24
4.28 Submission, May 22 overhaul, June 5th return, June 7th use
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | lixueq@zju.edu.cn

Author: 小火炉


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-05-24 11:01:40
4月3Submission, April 25 minor repairMay 15 return to the opinion, May 23 received
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | 小火炉

Author: 2461428852@qq.com


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-05-23 16:30:04
This journal is best not to select, slow very
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 2461428852@qq.com

Author: 呵呵


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-05-20 11:00:53
I have already hehe, I have been in peer review for two months and have no results
Show Review in Original Language
(6) Thank | 呵呵

Author: qq


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-04-05 17:07:06
2017.11.24 submit2018.1.28 First trial3 reviewers (two minor repairs, one overhaul)Edit to overhaul2018, 2.8 repaired back2018.3.16 Second trial (overhaul reviewer)Repaired at 2018.3.19Not yet submitted for reviewLook at the comments are fast, I will haha, this life is not selectd this journal
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | qq

Author: LUCKY


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-03-29 18:00:06
Frequently check the journal information here, and everyone's review information, so thank you very much for this platform, but also to share it.2018.1.25 Submit2018.2.3 In peer review,2018.3.9 major revision (but only 5 questions, 4 are discussion questions, supplement 1 comparison data)2018.3.12 Resubmit(Check)2018.3.15 With editor2018.3.17 In peer review2018.3.21 With editor (should one of the reviewers return)2018.3.22 In peer review (the second reviewer has not yet reviewed)2018.3.29 AcceptedIn general, the review is for one month, but the review and review, as well as the review and review cycle of the return to the repair is relatively long, more than two months before and after the
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | LUCKY

Author: Lucky


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-03-16 10:35:23
11月9#SubmissionSubmitted on November 23rd ‘March 5 minor repairReturn on March 11Received on March 15thThe organic rookie, who made a partial application article, was rejected several times and desperately turned to the new chemistry for good luck.The first trial was okay, and after the trial, it was a long wait, thinking that I couldn’t select before graduation.The journal is still very good overall, and will not refuse to submit it without review.There is no format requirement for the initial submission, no RSC template is required, and it is ok to modify the layout.Thanks to those who shared their experience in submission.
Show Review in Original Language
(4) Thank | Lucky

Author: xyz


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-03-15 17:37:58
The editors and reviewers are very good, the 2.1th select, 2.28 return to the review comments, one reviewer to receive, the other to the overhaul, the editor to Xiaoxiu.After the revision, the editor returns to the second reviewer and returns to the comments one week later to receive.Very efficient journals, recommended for submitment.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | xyz

Author: 我也是


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-02-07 12:47:57
12,26Submission1, 3 with editor1,5 inpeer review1,25 overhaul2, 1 repaired back2, 5j receivingThe reviewer is very professional, but it is not related to the content, and the speed is relatively fast. It is recommended to submit more manuscripts.
Show Review in Original Language
(4) Thank | 我也是

Author: qq


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-01-31 15:02:10
has been submitted for more than 3 months, still do not know the result, no words dead
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | qq

Author: yita


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-01-26 13:09:08
This journal is almost speechless. The selected reviewer is too irresponsible.In the additional information, I said that I did not do it, and the review was not serious.Very speechless, and it seems that I didn't understand what I did, but I didn't have a good look. The review comments were also very funny. It was very angry.
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | yita

First    Previous    1    2    3    4    Next    Last  (To Page
/4)

Start your review of [NEW JOURNAL OF CHEMISTRY]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.


© 2010-2021  ACCDON LLC 400 5th Ave, Suite 530, Waltham, MA 02451, USA
PrivacyTerms of Service