X
My Account Submit My Manuscript
Letpub, Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service

GREEN CHEMISTRY

   For Publishers  New

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:
Journal Cover Design
APA has partnered with LetPub to provide a full suite of author services

[GREEN CHEMISTRY]Hello, you are Visitor Number 163505 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitleGREEN CHEMISTRY
Journal Title AbbreviationsGREEN CHEM
ISSN1463-9262
E-ISSN1463-9270
h-index186
CiteScore
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
15.202.2211.882
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Environmental Science
Subcategory: Pollution
Q13 / 132
Category: Environmental Science
Subcategory: Environmental Chemistry
Q15 / 122

Self-Citation Ratio (2019-2020)8.50%
Official Websitehttp://pubs.rsc.org/en/journals/journalissues/gc
Online Manuscript Submissionhttp://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/gc
Open AccessNo
PublisherROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY, THOMAS GRAHAM HOUSE, SCIENCE PARK, MILTON RD, CAMBRIDGE, ENGLAND, CAMBS, CB4 0WF
Subject AreaChemistry
Country/Area of PublicationENGLAND
Publication FrequencyBimonthly
Year Publication Started1999
Annual Article Volume651
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index
Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=1463-9262%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Authorized Data from Publisher:
Data from Authors: About 1.6 month(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: 91%
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【GREEN CHEMISTRY】CiteScore Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • CiteScore Trend


First    Previous    1    2    3    Next    Last  (To Page
/3)
  Reviews on GREEN CHEMISTRY: Write a review
Author: zjjzrs ang


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2020-05-14 15:37:52
This journal requires that the article should not only comply to the green topic, but also have a high degree of innovation. People around me and myself have been published 3 times and got rejected 2 times (the editor thought that there were similar works in other journals, and as it was not the first one, it was not recommended to publish it in this journal), but in the end, those two were published in Journal of Catalyst and ChemSusChem, respectively. Regarding time, it usually takes 1–3 days from submission to being sent for review, and the review cycle is generally between 1 and 1.5 months, and the fastest is 7 days or even shorter. Of course, this depends on the innovation of your article. In the case of high innovation, the reviewers will only need to praise you with a few words, and do not need to do everything possible to raise questions for you.

(100) Thank | zjjzrs ang

Author: Snowyqqq


Subject Area: Agriculture Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2020-04-27 22:40:00
2020.3.9 Submission; 2020.3.18 sent for review; 2020.4.10 Review comments were received in three weeks, 1 major revision, 1 rejection (No innovation), and it was accepted after minor revision; I speculated that the editor received two completely opposite opinions—minor revision and rejection, so a third reviewer was found, and the third reviewer approved the content and innovation, only some experimental details and a small part of the comparative data were required to be added; in the end the editor required major revision. 2020.4.23 revised submission two weeks later; 2020.4.27 direct acceptance. According to the acceptance letter from the editor, the revised manuscript should only be sent to the third reviewer, and the opinion of the rejected reviewer were not accepted. During the epidemic, the processing speed of editors and reviewers were still very fast. I feel that the journal values green and innovation, and the editor's opinion is very important (the signed reviewer is the associate editor, academician Buxing Han).

(4) Thank | Snowyqqq

Author: WSZDN


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2020-02-25 23:39:10
Well, it depends very much on innovation, originality, or the value in the "industry" of renewable energy; currently I have submitted two articles here, one was accepted and one rejected. In summary, the articles that are not innovative enough or not of high level will directly be rejected by the editor in a second; If I remember correctly, the IF of GC has been rising in the past 5 years, and the increase has been very large. Will it exceed 10 in two or three years? But it doesn't matter whether it break through suddenly. One of my articles has just got accepted so far... It does not have a big influence. I don’t encourage you to only care about the IF, and I hate the praising of certain journals among small circles. It is really not good to belittle other journals to praise one. I personally think that for work of the renewable energy field, if it is with high originality and high application value, GC is the first choice. Of course, if it is enough for Nature, Science, or JACS, then you may ignore what I said.

(24) Thank | WSZDN

Author: dingzheyuan@bjfu.edu.cn


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-02-11 13:26:34
The research direction is that biomass conversion graphene material (GQD), which is considered to be innovative enough, but we did not attempt to submit to JACS and Angew. This article really waited for a long time, three months before and after 2017.10.26 submission, immediately submitted for review, the time of the external review was surprisingly long, and several times the status changed. After waiting for two and a half months, I finally received a major revision on 2018.1.19. Three reviewers: one accepted, one directly rejected, and one gave major revisions. In fact, they are all minor. Revised, 2018.2.7 and officially accepted without any modification. In summary, if you submit in this journal for the first time, innovation is really important, the review cycle may be surprisingly long.

(0) Thank | dingzheyuan@bjfu.edu.cn

Author: 科研爱好者


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-12-20 12:38:45
Green Chem review is very professional, the review speed is faster, the journal levelVery high, do the catalytic direction.It is more difficult to select now.Submission status.The initial evaluation will be submitted to the trial two weeks later, and the review draft will be returned to the review draft for overhaul after two weeks.Four reviewers.There is a lot of data that needs to be revised and supplemented.The review is very professional.After replenishing a large amount of data, it will be repaired one month later. After one week, the minor repair will be received two days after the repair.
Show Review in Original Language
(6) Thank | 科研爱好者

Author: Renwu


Subject Area: Environmental Sciences
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-10-23 14:55:00
Submission, returning to re-attend after 2 weeks; 2 reviewers, a major repair, a minor repair; after a serious revision and returning after 1 month, another three weeks to return to the review comments, minor repairs, only the third reviewer re-submitted has two minor problems; revised one week after submission,The editor accepts directly.Therefore, the article that was rejected is still very playful!
Show Review in Original Language
(6) Thank | Renwu

Author: bwh113@163.com


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-06-03 10:05:14
Submission, returning to overhaul after 40 days of submitteding; three reviewers, one overhaul, one suggesting other journals, one minor repair; carefully revised after half a month and returning, and then half a month laterReturning to the review comments, the first reviewer still has some questions, and has little relevance to the article. The editor has given the second revision; after one week of revision, the editor accepts it directly.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | bwh113@163.com

Author: bwh113@163.com


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-06-03 10:03:13
contribution, return to overhaul after 40 days of submitteding; three reviewers, one overhaul, one suggesting other journals, one minor repair; after careful revision for half a monthAfter returning, I returned to the reviewer in half a month. The first reviewer still had some problems. The article was not related to the article. The editor gave the second revision. After one week of revision, the editor accepted it directly.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | bwh113@163.com

Author: dmuwxf@163.com


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-05-25 10:00:04
3月月4 submit, after about one week for review, on April 2, received comments overhaul, three reviewers have not a lot of questions, make up some experiments, May 5No. submit reversion, receiving on the 24th.The research direction is the application of platinum-cobalt bimetallic catalyst in selective hydrogenation. The experimental data is more, the GC is not enough, and the GC has not been tried.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | dmuwxf@163.com

Author: 沉


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-05-22 16:42:37
Biomass conversion, edit the second data, it only gives no innovation, no language
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 沉

Author: 沉


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-05-22 16:42:33
Biomass conversion, edit the second data, it only gives no innovation, no language
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 沉

Author: ending


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-05-04 22:21:50
review time is veryLong, but I can really see the rigor of the editor and the seriousness of the reviewer. I saw that the overhauled opinions were tangled, and many people were speechless, but they did cut the points and had to take it. For more than a month, they experimented and madeA few dozen pages of responses.The summary is to wait patiently, once thought it was rejected, but in the end it was accepted.
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | ending

Author: miclebibi


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-04-06 21:15:08
February 6 submission, initial assessment 10 days, received the review results on March 16, three reviewers basically noComments, raised a few minor issues, another request to add a variety of negative control, edit to overhaul, March 22 repair, received on April 6th, the day onlineWhat is the chitin functionalization method?Continued again
Show Review in Original Language
(4) Thank | miclebibi

Author: 一头牛


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-02-07 20:49:21
contribution for 2 weeks, still with editor
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 一头牛

Author: 一头牛


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-02-07 20:49:14
contribution for 2 weeks, still with editor
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 一头牛

Author: vlp任逍遥


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-01-16 12:17:09
2018.01.02 Submission, selected by the Cambridge office, 01.03 initial assessment, 01. 12 with editor.No change so far.I stopped and refused. I changed my select a few years ago........
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | vlp任逍遥

Author: simplezh@yeah.net


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-12-04 09:20:00
11.26Submitted, 28Initial assessment, 12.02 With Editor, no change, hope to be smooth!
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | simplezh@yeah.net

Author: 1096484709@qq.com


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-11-02 14:09:28
Two reviewers, one suggested to receive directly, and another reviewer had negative comments because the innovation was not enough.The editor directly rejected the draft and there was no arbitration.
Show Review in Original Language
(4) Thank | 1096484709@qq.com

Author: x123


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted directly


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-11-01 21:35:52
Although this submission has been submitted for trial for ten days, but the results are released three weeks after the trial, unexpected surprises, direct reception.I have submitted it many times before. This is the first time I received it. I am very happy and everyone is cheering.
Show Review in Original Language
(11) Thank | x123

Author: x123


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-10-08 17:07:28
My Initial assessment has been ten days, and I haven't used the editor yet. I remember it very quickly. Is the status upstairs updated now?
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | x123

Author: wugongde@163.com


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-10-06 10:36:17
I selectd for the article initial assessment status for 10 days, what is the situation!
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | wugongde@163.com

Author: 糊涂虫


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-09-21 17:03:16
Recently, is RSC journals very slow??What activities do they have?My group's initial assessment status has been 10 days and has not changed.Now every day I brush the webpage, people are going crazy. I thought that the good journals are relatively fast. I took the attitude of trying to try the water and played it. The result is stuck here.Knowing that my work is relatively poor, the big cow editors can't look at it, they should be rejected soon, and the result has always been the first trial.God, save me, I am wrong, can you not play!Haha, no news is good news, it is estimated that it is doing very well, the editors can't put it down, no way, has been the first trial.Haha, Ah Q, I wish you all the best!
Show Review in Original Language
(7) Thank | 糊涂虫

Author: 123


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-05-02 23:25:56
The two reviewers sent the results for two weeks, one clearly rejected the manuscript, the editor gave the rejection, and now the requirements for innovation are very high
Show Review in Original Language
(7) Thank | 123

Author: jiyouan@126.com


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-04-29 11:29:28
I don't know if I will be lucky. This journal is quite demanding.
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | jiyouan@126.com

Author: 123


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-04-29 01:12:10
submitted for review, hope good luckEveryone submitteds a journal for a long period of submission.
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | 123

First    Previous    1    2    3    Next    Last  (To Page
/3)

Start your review of [GREEN CHEMISTRY]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.


© 2010-2021  ACCDON LLC 400 5th Ave, Suite 530, Waltham, MA 02451, USA
PrivacyTerms of Service