KSII Transactions on Internet and Information Systems

I feel that the quality of this journal is not very high. I have seen a lot of errors in an article published in it. One of the low-level mistakes is that the title page author is two people. In the latter author's profile, there are three people's avatars. The journal only accepts Word submissions. There are two reviewers in total, and the first review takes about 3-5 months. The article is usually accepted after the second review. The advantage of this journal is that it publishes articles very quickly. It can take two months.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Just finished the reviewer of this journal, the article sent is very junk.It took 4 days to deduct, the article is logically confusing, there is no innovation, and the ambiguity of writing does not know what he is going to do.The experimental data is also quite small, decisively rejecting the manuscript.

(3) Thank | BugTan

This is not good now, very good papers are finally given...

(3) Thank | 232939@qq.com

wordVersion is no problem, there is a problem with converting to pdf, is it influential?

(0) Thank | angel514@foxmail.com

I would like to ask the classmates who know how long it will be able to give invoices. The articles I submitted in mid-June have not yet given invoices or electronic vouchers, and I have asked the editors not to reply.what?

(1) Thank | hello

I would like to ask the classmates who know how long it will be able to give invoices. The articles I submitted in mid-June have not yet given invoices or electronic vouchers, and I have asked the editors not to reply.what?

(1) Thank | hello

The whole journal is OK, the review speed is relatively fast, basically there will be results in three months, and the requirements for innovation are still relatively high. Currently, one has been acceptd, 2015Submitted on July 23, and responded to the first-instance opinion on October 18, three reviewers.It will be accepted after two revisions. It will be replied less than one month after the revision of the revision phase. It will be accepted on January 16, 2016 and will be published at the end of March.

(4) Thank | allanxjtu@163.com

I have been throwing out for 5 months, reminded me to wait patiently, but I feel really slow!I checked the journal's papers this month are all about me. I have already come out. I don't know why I am so slow.?Does a long review time mean that the chances of recording will be a little bigger??I don’t know anything about the first submission, I hope that there is a big god to give pointers!!!PS: I feel that I am not very good at writing. I don't know if the requirements of this journal are not high.?!!

(3) Thank | 934386827@qq.com

1 Floor is me, sorry.The previous paragraph did not seriously examine, this journal is sci, must search for ISSN number: 1976-7277.I just submitted it recently and spent 3 months reviewing it. It is now revised and I don't know the final result.

(1) Thank | xiaoyuxzz

http://science.thomsonreuters.com/cgi-bin/Jrnlst/jloptions.cgi?PC=DChecked TIIS, did not find any relevant information, has been kicked, and now in the review, if you are really kicked, you can only retract.Insect friends, check it out and confirm that it is right.

(5) Thank | xiaoyuxzz

just submitted an article before, the review speed is faster, less than 3 months have results.However, the level of reviewers is very general, or it may be that I am not lucky.My paper has three reviewers. The first reviewer mistaken the basic concept and said that my article is meaningless. The second and third reviewers only changed English, and some did not.Change it right.It is estimated that the students have changed, and the editor finally gave the reject.A complaint letter was written to the editor requesting that the reviewer did not respond.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

This journal is a journal that I think will be better after a long time of selection. My small paper is an article about the performance analysis of communication networks.Use the methods mentioned in 2-3 articles to apply to new scenarios.The first-instance reply was directly rejected, and the review comments were not innovative.Can be seen by the reviewers, the review is very serious, almost read all the references I mentioned and compared with my article, and got the review comments without innovation points.

(2) Thank | Anonymous

I am a reviewer for this journal, and I still distinguish between minor and major when submitting review comments.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

would like to select, thank you for the comments.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Submit a one-and-a-half month to the first-instance opinion, feedback to the second-instance opinion one month after the revision of the article, and the second half of the revision to give the employment email.Do not have a page fee, review fee.The whole process is relatively smooth, it may be luck!

(1) Thank | Anonymous

--------------------- let the modificationWhat does Accept with Changes mean?Is the hope in the big?Is it a major repair or a minor repair?

(0) Thank | Anonymous

The review speed is very slow. Last October, the review was completed. The review was completed in September this year. The direct accept was revised. After the accept, it was sent soon. Online version

(1) Thank | Anonymous

哎, submitted for more than 4 monthsNo news, no emails.return...

(0) Thank | Anonymous

The first trial is close to two months, and the second and third trials are close to one month.This journal, regardless of overhaul and minor repairs, is accept with changes and is modified for up to one month.The results of the first trial are equivalent to overhaul, and the requirements for the experiment are also put forward; the second trial is to make the revised map and English; the third trial has emerged as a reviewer, but the question is more informative and only gives 20 days to modify the time., after more than 20 days after returning, acceptd.I feel that the reviewers of the journal are very detailed and are relatively familiar people, so the questions are quite right.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

has been submiting for five months, or under review.I sent a second email and I waited patiently.Hey.....

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Journal Homepage URL: http://www.itiis.org/ksii/acoms/ ... =ksii1&jn_cd=E1

(0) Thank | Anonymous

I selectd twoFor more than a month, there was no audio. Before the submission, there was a problem with the conversion to a pdf document. Several letters were sent for consultation. There was no reply. During the period, I asked about the review of the article and I did not reply. I doubt whether it is a defective journal.No one has been on duty.I don't know if other people have encountered this situation.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

2007 Startup, a relatively new Korean journal.The review was extremely fast, and the comments were returned within one month of the initial review.The second trial is also very fast.It seems that there is no minor repair and overhaul, only Accept with revisions.If the direction is right, it is worth a shot.No page fee will be charged.Supplement: At present, due to the increase in manuscripts, it is changed to 12 issues each year, and the review time becomes longer.

(0) Thank | Anonymous