My Account Submit My Manuscript
Letpub, Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service

Progress in Electromagnetics Research-PIER

   For Publishers  New

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:
LetPub Free Webinar
APA has partnered with LetPub to provide a full suite of author services

[Progress in Electromagnetics Research-PIER]Hello, you are Visitor Number 46615 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitleProgress in Electromagnetics Research-PIER
Journal Title AbbreviationsPROG ELECTROMAGN RES
ISSN1559-8985
h-index80
CiteScore
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
4.200.4670.999
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Engineering
Subcategory: Electrical and Electronic Engineering
Q2179 / 670
Category: Engineering
Subcategory: Condensed Matter Physics
Q2118 / 403
Category: Engineering
Subcategory: Radiation
Q110 / 50

Self-Citation Ratio (2019-2020)1.80%
Official Websitehttp://www.jpier.org/PIER/
Online Manuscript Submissionhttp://www.jpier.org/PIER/on_line/index.php
Open AccessYes
PublisherE M W PUBLISHING, PO BOX 425517, KENDALL SQUARE, CAMBRIDGE, USA, MA, 02142
Subject AreaPhysics
Country/Area of PublicationUNITED STATES
Publication FrequencyIrregular
Year Publication Started0
Annual Article Volume19
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=1559-8985%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Authorized Data from Publisher:
Data from Authors: About 1.0 month(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: Easy
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【Progress in Electromagnetics Research-PIER】CiteScore Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • CiteScore Trend


First    Previous    1    2    Next    Last  (To Page
/2)
  Reviews on Progress in Electromagnetics Research-PIER: Write a review
Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-12-26 08:55:00
The IF is currently 5.29. I submitted two papers last year; one was accepted after minor repairs, and the other one seems to be problematic…

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: linana696


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-12-07 10:59:06
1 month to review comments, 1 month after returning the reply to the school draft and acceptance notice, from submission to publication in less than 2 months, before submiting in JSTARS, from submissionIt took more than 1 year to accept. This is very very fast in less than 2 months.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | linana696

Author: 科研


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-07-13 17:26:40
Submit the revised comments for one month, and submit the revised draft for half a month, receive it after half a month, and publish it one month later.In short, from submission to publication for 3 months, the speed is full.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | 科研

Author: 科研人


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-07-13 17:26:31
Submit the revised comments for 1 month, modify the revised draft for half a month, receive it after half a month, and publish it one month later.In short, from submission to publication for 3 months, the speed is full.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 科研人

Author: 科研人


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-07-13 17:24:59
1 month to return to the revised comments, half a month to modify the submission of revised drafts, received after half a month, one after the publication.In short, from submission to publication for 3 months, the speed is full.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 科研人

Author: spring


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-10-25 07:31:32
Is the main issue only SCI?
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | spring

Author: JM


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-05-28 02:13:27
The quality of the article has been improved over the years
Show Review in Original Language
(5) Thank | JM

Author: reviewer


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted directly


Write a review

Reviewed 2015-07-31 20:32:56
I am often invited to PIER reviewers, at least in my field direction.The quality of journal articles is generally not high.A lot worse than the IEEE journal.I am very curious about why the impact factor is so high.
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | reviewer

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-11-08 09:01:00
Have you ever selectd for PIER's insect friends?
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-08-23 22:54:00
The shortcoming of this journal is that it is serious, but it is much better now.The quality of journal articles is good, and the articles can be written very long and can describe their research results in detail.The article focuses on innovation, the reviewer's opinion is more pertinent, and the editor is very polite.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-08-21 10:07:00
PIER's article quality is still good, the review speed is fast, the review is serious, and the efficiency is high.Of course, the self-introduction leads to a high impact factor, and the actual impact factor is 2-3.My friend also selectd for PIER, overhauled once, and repaired it once. It lasted for 2 months and was still in the review. I hope it will be in the middle!So far PIER is still an SCI journal that can be retrieved, but is in a state of being warned, with no impact factor.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-07-02 21:52:00
is already kicked, or is it in the stage, why I can't find him on SCI (Science Citation Index, 2001-) and JCR-S (Journal Citation Reports - Science..The article, unless given the DOI or the entire text of the article, otherwise can not find the
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-07-02 10:07:00
market, everyone sells things are very expensive, suddenly come to sell vegetables cheap, and the ratio of vegetablesOthers are similar, but ask everyone to buy as much as possible. Others are eager to sell vegetables, saying that this is their place, so they joined forces to the Vegetable Market Association to participate in him, in the name of the angry and difficult to commit, suppress this saleThe food is cheap, saying that the family is not qualified, and does not give people a business license. A well-ordered vegetable market.
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-06-30 22:36:00
Self-referencing is very serious and has been seriously affected by the impact factor of JCR2012 kicking out
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-06-26 06:53:00
Some people say that journal water, I think it is not objective. The key depends on how you think about publishing a paper. If you send an article to send an article, then you stillDon't make a pier, the reason is very simple, like a wormSay, self-introduction is serious and the image is lowered. But if you can share more research results for your research and hope to show your research work on a better platform, then pier is a good choice. In his early years,I rarely select for Pier for the same reason. But in the past two years I have already submited in three articles, and they are all relatively good quality papers, although I am sure that even if the quality of these papers is lower, they can still be published, but II have my insistence. Although the review of the journal may not be particularly strict, it is still necessary to see the author
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Social Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-06-23 10:18:00
PROGRESS IN ELECTROMAGNETICS RESEARCH-PIER has been officially kicked out of SCI, too water, thoseGGMM, which once published an article in this journal with a high-impact factor, has stopped.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-05-25 10:47:00
Also, as some people have said, I have selectd two articles. The first one is reviewed in one month, and only two months from submission to publication..There is also a high demand for innovation.And the layout fee is only 2k5.The second article was rejected.It is worse than the first one.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-05-19 10:00:00
No new ideas, direct tragedy.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-04-17 11:31:00
just put out on Friday, don't have very strict requirements when submitting the manuscript, write quite slag, it is estimated that the main journal has no play~ps: came the review comments in early May, two positive and one negativeThen, answer the comments of the three reviewers one by one, upload the revised paper and the letter to the editor, check the review comments today, and find that the reviewer who gave the negative review comments has added anotherLarge section, but empty in "to do", the status is still revision.I don't know what to do, continue to change?Still waiting to see if you want to reject the draft or continue to modify it?
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-02-20 11:24:00
is now receiving the face fee, selectdThere are no results in three weeks.It is estimated that there are fewer viciouss.In fact, the article inside is OK, it is more self-referencing.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-11-02 12:58:00
self-cited very serious article more than 30 references, even self-cited 19 articles should be kicked out sci
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-04-24 15:49:00
reviewThe speed is really fast. I gave it to me in 6 days and I modified it. It took only 15 days from the date of the select to the publication.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-02-26 17:50:00
The quality is worse than the IEEE, and the internal lead is serious. The students who selectd around are also recommended to introduce other PIER articles, which leads to their low status in my mind but high influence factor.It is cheap, it seems that it is not a district, two districts, but the three districts, but only PIER and JEMWA are SCI, others are just EI index
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-02-18 13:51:00
review speed is fast, the publication speed is fast, noThe review fee is required, and the journal only charges when there is a super page. Unfortunately, it has not been sent to PIER or JMMA several times.Feeling journals should not be as watery as LS said.The quality requirements for the article should still be very high, especially if there is no big tree behind me.When you submit a manuscript, you should pay attention to the fact that the editor will only send an email to the communication author.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-12-08 12:12:00
The article I made is a combination of communication and radio waves. The result is good in a month. It may be that the subject is new.Directly acceptd the editorial department is very powerful. It is not very good now. It needs to be theoretically innovative. The problem is that everyone knows the internal problem, but the article quality can also be
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

First    Previous    1    2    Next    Last  (To Page
/2)

Start your review of [Progress in Electromagnetics Research-PIER]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.

Intentional Space Tag



© 2010-2020  ACCDON LLC 400 5th Ave, Suite 530, Waltham, MA 02451, USA
PrivacyTerms of Service