My Account Submit My Manuscript
Letpub, Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS

   For Publishers  New

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:
Professional Journal Cover Design
APA has partnered with LetPub to provide a full suite of author services

[JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS]Hello, you are Visitor Number 286162 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitleJOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Journal Title AbbreviationsJ HAZARD MATER
ISSN0304-3894
h-index235
CiteScore
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
7.911.9582.055
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Environmental Science
Subcategory: Environmental Engineering
Q11 / 117
Category: Environmental Science
Subcategory: Waste Management and Disposal
Q13 / 92
Category: Environmental Science
Subcategory: Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis
Q13 / 117
Category: Environmental Science
Subcategory: Pollution
Q14 / 109
Category: Environmental Science
Subcategory: Environmental Chemistry
Q16 / 100

Self-Citation Ratio (2018-2019)5.60%
Official Websitehttp://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-hazardous-materials/
Online Manuscript Submissionhttp://ees.elsevier.com/hazmat/default.asp
Open AccessNo
PublisherELSEVIER SCIENCE BV, PO BOX 211, AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS, 1000 AE
Subject AreaEngineering
Country/Area of PublicationNETHERLANDS
Publication FrequencySemimonthly
Year Publication Started1975
Annual Article Volume895
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index
Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0304-3894%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Authorized Data from Publisher:
Data from Authors: About 3.1 month(s)
Data from Elsevier: Average 8.1 Week(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: 73%
Data from Elsevier: 16%
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS】CiteScore Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • CiteScore Trend


First    Previous    1    2    3    4    5    6    7    Next    Last  (To Page
/9)
  Reviews on JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS: Write a review
Author: WangYy429@163.com


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-11-29 15:49:11
submitted a month, with editor, then resubmitted to the journal, upload again, go back 6 days and re-upload again, if you return, I will withdraw the draft, noVoted, junk journals, cattle are not good, the efficiency is too low!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | WangYy429@163.com

Author: 123124154


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-11-28 22:11:58
Garbage journal, selectd for the past 3 months to give a report, even a comment no
Show Review in Original Language
(6) Thank | 123124154

Author: Queen


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-11-28 17:28:25
Submission for 2 months, with editor3 weeks, second submitted to journal 5 weeks, I don't know what everyone is doing
Show Review in Original Language
(4) Thank | Queen

Author: wanyx


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-11-23 11:20:11
is too pitted, the technical review is one month. After the completion, it has been submitted to journal for one and a half months. Today, it is said that it is refused to engage. There is no reason to break the journal. It is better to change a journal of the same type.!
Show Review in Original Language
(9) Thank | wanyx

Author: 拍砖


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-11-22 23:14:27
This journal is really a service. It’s been 4 months. I’ve got a reviewer who didn’t even read my topic. I also said that I did not read the document carefully and served the editor and reviewer.people!The
Show Review in Original Language
(4) Thank | 拍砖

Author: au197


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 5.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-11-22 12:30:45
submitted the manuscript for half a year. The editor said that the reviewer was not found, so I would recommend several more trials.Drafter.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | au197

Author: 888


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-11-09 15:07:58
The submission was made on September 2nd. After two months, it was edited and rejected. It took so long to get the first trial. I served it and broke the journal...
Show Review in Original Language
(17) Thank | 888

Author: 456


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-11-09 11:19:04
6月25Submission, 725 format review and repair (edit line number), August 14with editorAugust 16 under review,September 6 under editor evalutionSeptember 17 under editor evalutionSeptember 18th OverhaulSubmitted on October 16October 17 format review let go to the line numberSubmitted on October 17October 20 with editorOctober 20 under reviewNovember 5Required Reviews CompletedNovember 9 acceptFor the format review is the line number problem, I am also speechless, for us to add the line number, according to my repeated revision experience: upload the file before the final submission on the generated pdf to see if the system has automatic edit line numberIf the system has compiled itself, don't add the line number. If the system has its own, don't edit the line number.
Show Review in Original Language
(41) Thank | 456

Author: o(∩_∩)o 哈哈


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-11-07 13:04:16
Aug 22 2017: Initial Date SubmittedAug 23 2017: with editorSep 20 2017: Submitted to journal(After pressing for one month, the technical review will be carried out. The number of reviews will exceed the point and return to the revision)Sep 22 2017: Submitted to journal againOct 30 2017: With editorOct 31 2017: rejectIt was a waste of two months before and after the rejection. It was a waste of time. I submitted comments on other articles in other journals during the same period. I submitted the revised draft. I only said that I refused here, and indeed, and other comments.It is unfortunate to say that if you feel that it is inappropriate to refuse early, you can change the journal earlier. You should not select for it and waste too much time.
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | o(∩_∩)o 哈哈

Author: o(∩_∩)o 哈哈


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-11-07 13:04:16
Aug 22 2017: Initial Date SubmittedAug 23 2017: with editorSep 20 2017: Submitted to journal(After pressing for one month, the technical review will be carried out. The number of reviews will exceed the point and return to the revision)Sep 22 2017: Submitted to journal againOct 30 2017: With editorOct 31 2017: rejectIt was a waste of two months before and after the rejection. It was a waste of time. I submitted comments on other articles in other journals during the same period. I submitted the revised draft. I only said that I refused here, and indeed, and other comments.It is unfortunate to say that if you feel that it is inappropriate to refuse early, you can change the journal earlier. You should not select for it and waste too much time.
Show Review in Original Language
(4) Thank | o(∩_∩)o 哈哈

Author: 猪非上台


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-11-05 08:59:18
What is the bad journal? It doesn't matter if it is released for two months. The reviewer directly rejects the draft one month. Only one reviewer also said that the innovation is insufficient.Purely waste time
Show Review in Original Language
(12) Thank | 猪非上台

Author: journal


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-10-13 13:27:01
Personally feel that the most important thing about this journal is the ability to edit.If you can submit a review, hope is great.In terms of innovation and language, it will be rejected by the editor first.If you just want to try your luck, the early technical review is really a waste of time.If the result is good, the long waiting time is also worthwhile. After all, it is a veteran journal, the quality is good.
Show Review in Original Language
(10) Thank | journal

Author: roger


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-10-13 09:13:01
I suggest you not to consider this journal, unless your article is very high, this review is really sorry for its impact factor, many recent articles from the first review toAfter the second submitted to journal is a long and endless state that has not changed, or is it rejected early?Pressing someone else's article is fun?Agree to the top left corner top
Show Review in Original Language
(131) Thank | roger

Author: hilihuo


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-10-12 09:21:43
selectd for half a month with editorSubmitted to journal after half a monthNot even moving.After two months, it is still submitted to journalThree months.I haven't sent it yet, I don't know what?So bloated?
Show Review in Original Language
(22) Thank | hilihuo

Author: zxj


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 5.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-10-11 14:50:56
4.24Submission6.10 under review6.16 under review9.12 under review (changes a few times)9.18 major review10.2 acceptThree reviewers, two of whom are sure to work and are innovative.A reviewer did not give any advice.Personally feel that in my field, this journal is better than C. E. J..Waiting during the period is really tormenting, everyone continues to cheer.
Show Review in Original Language
(5) Thank | zxj

Author: 1234567888


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-10-08 01:51:02
super slow!!!I suggest you not select for this, and now this journal is too inflated, hehe!After submitting the manuscript for three months, there was no review, the editor directly refused the manuscript, and the editor was very irresponsible. I refused to refuse it earlier.....Hey!I switched to EST and hope to have a good result!!!!
Show Review in Original Language
(11) Thank | 1234567888

Author: 402300211@qq.com


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-09-30 09:20:10
Show Review in Original Language
(4) Thank | 402300211@qq.com

Author: wangjingxiu0216@163.com


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-09-26 19:11:46
The second time submitted to journal for a month, it is really anxious, to refuse to refuse.
Show Review in Original Language
(5) Thank | wangjingxiu0216@163.com

Author: chen


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 5.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-09-26 10:11:42
My situation is similar to yours. I still have Submit to the journal. I haven’t changed it in a month. I’m in a hurry. This journal
Show Review in Original Language
(5) Thank | chen

Author: m


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-09-24 08:56:47
7.31Submission, after submitted to journal, with editor;No. 8.24 was submitted to journal again, and has not been updated since then.I don't understand what rhythm is this, whether it is rejected or not yet reviewed.Feeling good time.
Show Review in Original Language
(25) Thank | m

Author: 456


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-09-21 00:00:38
The result came out, giving the overhaul.Voted for 25 in June.In the middle of a month of format review, after July 25 select to 08.16 for review, 09.06 changed to under editor evaluation.0916 or under editor evaluation, but time has changed, and then 09.18 overhaul notice.There are a total of three reviewers, and the reviewers are very responsible. The questions raised are very professional and helpful for the revision of the thesis, and the language change is also very detailed.Why the under editor evaluation date will change, it should be changed when a reviewer returns. If the first comment is rejected, the editor may finish the review without waiting for other reviewers' opinions. I hope to help everyone.
Show Review in Original Language
(61) Thank | 456

Author: 思妞


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-09-12 21:33:31
3月5日稿with editorOn April 5, the editor was notified of the preliminary examination and prepared for the external trial.April 8 under reviewJuly 22 minor repairRevised on August 2Received on August 8The editor is very responsible and the reviewer's questions are very professional.
Show Review in Original Language
(8) Thank | 思妞

Author: 456


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-09-09 09:49:15
08.16Submitted, 09.06 status changed to under editor evalution, until the status of 09.09 has not changed, how often do you have this state, how long will it last?
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 456

Author: smilxin


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-09-08 17:52:13
4 Submitting at the beginning of the monthAt the beginning of May, the editor informed that it was necessary to remove the line number of the article and repair it one day later.Submitted in early JuneReturn to review comments in early July, overhaulRevised in early AugustReceived on August 16The total time is 4 and a half months to receive, the result is good, the reviewer is also more serious and responsible, but the editing efficiency is a bit low, resulting in a long review cycle, the most unacceptable is that after the submission, the editor is pressing for one month.Then look at the format or language, etc., whether it meets the requirements, people are very broken!
Show Review in Original Language
(6) Thank | smilxin

Author: 安仔


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-08-22 17:46:28
The second one submitted it againContributed to jun 10, 2017,Submitted to july 27, 2017Minor repair Aug 18, 2017Minor repair returns to Aug 21, 2017Completed - Accept Aug 22, 2017
Show Review in Original Language
(37) Thank | 安仔

First    Previous    1    2    3    4    5    6    7    Next    Last  (To Page
/9)

Start your review of [JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.

Intentional Space Tag


Contact us

Contact us  

Your name*

Your email*

Your message*

Please fill in all fields and provide a valid email.

Security Code*

© 2010-2020 United States: ACCDON LLC Tel: 1-781-202-9968 Email: info@accdon.com
Address: 400 5th Ave, Suite 530, Waltham, Massachusetts 02451, United States
LetPub Privacy Policy