My Account Submit My Manuscript
Letpub, Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS

   For Publishers  New

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:
Professional Journal Cover Design
APA has partnered with LetPub to provide a full suite of author services

[JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS]Hello, you are Visitor Number 286216 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitleJOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Journal Title AbbreviationsJ HAZARD MATER
ISSN0304-3894
h-index235
CiteScore
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
7.911.9582.055
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Environmental Science
Subcategory: Environmental Engineering
Q11 / 117
Category: Environmental Science
Subcategory: Waste Management and Disposal
Q13 / 92
Category: Environmental Science
Subcategory: Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis
Q13 / 117
Category: Environmental Science
Subcategory: Pollution
Q14 / 109
Category: Environmental Science
Subcategory: Environmental Chemistry
Q16 / 100

Self-Citation Ratio (2018-2019)5.60%
Official Websitehttp://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-hazardous-materials/
Online Manuscript Submissionhttp://ees.elsevier.com/hazmat/default.asp
Open AccessNo
PublisherELSEVIER SCIENCE BV, PO BOX 211, AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS, 1000 AE
Subject AreaEngineering
Country/Area of PublicationNETHERLANDS
Publication FrequencySemimonthly
Year Publication Started1975
Annual Article Volume895
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index
Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0304-3894%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Authorized Data from Publisher:
Data from Authors: About 3.1 month(s)
Data from Elsevier: Average 8.1 Week(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: 73%
Data from Elsevier: 16%
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS】CiteScore Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • CiteScore Trend


First    Previous    1    2    3    4    5    6    7    Next    Last  (To Page
/9)
  Reviews on JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS: Write a review
Author: 499506481@qq.com


Subject Area: Environmental Sciences
Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-08-25 09:31:25
The normal review period is approximately four months.One month through the initial trial arrangement number, the email reply review will take about four months, the journal is very slow, and the submission should be cautious!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 499506481@qq.com

Author: 1031968986@qq.com


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 5.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-08-10 15:55:06
Submitted in March, waiting for format review, wait for one month;April format review, one month;Submitted for review in May;Return to review comments in June, overhaulReturn to revision in JulyReceived in AugustIf it is not the time for format review (2 months), 1 month for first trial, more than 20 days for second trial
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | 1031968986@qq.com

Author: 123


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-08-07 16:04:16
submitted on June 19th;July 12under review;Under editor review on August 5;Under review on August 6;Bumping, feeling cool.
Show Review in Original Language
(5) Thank | 123

Author: zebrafish


Subject Area: Medical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 5.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-07-30 00:59:23
Directly acceptd after minor repairs, the frontier and cross-disciplinary subjects are also highly regarded by the journal.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | zebrafish

Author: 悲催


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-07-27 12:34:31
2018 0227 The select was rejected for more than 3 and a half months.Just a reviewer.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 悲催

Author: yudeyou92@gmail.com


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-07-25 11:53:01
7.09 select, it is still STJ, and it will take a long time to read the comments.How can JHM not speed up the speed? In this way, the development of journals is not good!
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | yudeyou92@gmail.com

Author: zlxnnx111@163.com


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 7.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-07-24 00:42:03
under review before waiting for more than 3 months, the first trial waited for more than 2 months, the two reviewers, the comments were very pertinent, the editor gave the major revision, two weeks laterBack, waiting for about 20 days to receive directly, lasted for more than 7 months, the overall speed is slow, but also the impact factor of the journal, as long as the opportunity to wait patiently will always have good results.
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | zlxnnx111@163.com

Author: 1449018138@qq.com


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-07-18 12:12:21
2018.1.3 During the submission period with editor→under review→under editor evaluation→Major revision (5.23, waiting for more than four months)→6.20 repair →7.12moderate revision→7.16with editor→7.18acceptAlthough the time is long, the result is good.Thanks to the editor Dr. Diana S Aga, who is very nice
Show Review in Original Language
(9) Thank | 1449018138@qq.com

Author: aaaa


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 5.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-07-17 21:21:00
Envy the old man (old girl) upstairs.After two months of submission, my format review ended, and I have been submitted to the Journal until now (one month). I don't know when I can edit it.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | aaaa

Author: TEMP. BUSINESS PLEASURE


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-07-16 23:10:37
March 12th submission June 15th review is still underreview for 4 months. I stayed in the editor for 3 months. Is this a diseased editor there for a month?It is acceptable to put it in the editor's hand for 3 months. Is the editor going to vacation?
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | TEMP. BUSINESS PLEASURE

Author: 杨建林


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-07-10 03:07:43
Submitted at the beginning of March, submitted for review in early June, now one month, no review comments are not said to be quick after the trial.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 杨建林

Author: 大力狗痞


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-07-06 14:20:30
Master's first English article, 2018.2.11 submitted paper, fourSubmitted at the beginning of the month.The first trial was completed after more than 20 days.Rehabilitated in mid-May, 2018.6.02 minor repair received.Overall, it is worth waiting for.The research direction is environmental catalytic direction, catalytic degradation of volatile organic pollutants.In summary, the journal has certain requirements for innovation, and the level of review opinions is relatively high, which has inspired many experiments in the future.The overall cycle is about four months, and the article is not recommended for submitment. When the innovation is novel, the work system is no problem.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 大力狗痞

Author: 上善若水


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-07-04 10:07:20
Submitted at the end of February, the first review at the end of May, overhaul, but basically do not make experiments,Mainly emphasize the importance of joining the environment.Returned on June 24th.On the 28th, the second trial came back, minor repairs.Returned to the draft on July 2 and accepted on the 3rd.Emphasize the innovative and environmental significance of the article.The editor is very responsible.The first trial was slower, but the journal stated that it was normal for 4 months.Soon after, editors and reviewers are dealing with them in a timely manner, which is super fast.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 上善若水

Author: 1042339146@qq.com


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-07-03 11:40:35
I only graduated after receiving it, but I have seen a lot of literature in this journal before. I like this journal. I don’t want to try it before I graduate.2018.1.5 contribution; 2018.7.1 reception.One month technical review, waited 111 days for review, one month for review time, overhaul, one month for review comments, 18 days after return, accept
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | 1042339146@qq.com

Author: KPC


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 8.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-06-30 14:37:31
Journals are relatively good, really innovative things are worth a select, or do not select, after all, the time before the trial is longer.After the trial is still very fast, the first trial is usually a month.Editor Andrew J. Daugulis is more responsible.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | KPC

Author: yitahutu


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 10.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-06-29 20:53:04
The journal is still good.But its snail speed is really the first in the world!Science and technology report publications, and requires strong innovation, but how to deal with manuscripts at such a slow speed, how can we undertake the task of quick reporting!
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | yitahutu

Author: EC2018


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-06-08 09:49:35
The journal is generally good, at least better than the chemosphere SOTEN EP.The editor is still friendly.2017-9-20 submitted and then left over;2017-12-18 I received an editorial letter saying, have great difficutly during find reviewers, let me recommend a few more.So I recommended several foreign cattle people in the field (recommended not to introduce people, personal submission is to recommend the cattle in the relevant fields, in order to get a more objective evaluation);2017-12-23 major revisions (unusually fast);2018-1-20 authorized submitted;2018-3-12 Accepted.The manuscript was submitted, I suggest you not to remind me, I have never urged the manuscript.Before submiting in this journal, you should know the approximate time of it. If you are in a hurry, you should submit faster, and you don't have to vomit.Personal feeling: The amount of data is large, the discussion is meticulous, and there is a lot of opportunities for innovation.Two journal articles have been reviewed recently, and the review time is 28 days (4 weeks).The requirements were clear and innovative, and when reviewing the manuscript, the editor said that the rejection rate was 74%, so that the reference could be judged.
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | EC2018

Author: 阿道夫的狗


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-06-07 19:27:35
There was one in 2013, submitted in early June, and accepted at the end of August.17~18 years, I have done 2 reviewers, both of which are given to the middle school. Two articles are compared to est, gca, em, aem, and they are really average!!The review period for the editor is 31 days, and the editor's point of interest is completely different from the reviewer.The amount of manuscript is too large or the reviewer is procrastinating, which reduces the efficiency of the journal and has a high impact factor.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | 阿道夫的狗

Author: keqiao


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-06-04 16:42:11
contributed two months to get the repair advice.After returning for one month, I will get a minor review in two weeks and return to receive it again.4 reviewers, 3 small.The last major overhaul, many opinions, the material method part is very demanding on the details, and even a bit nitpicking; in the conclusion part, the reviewer did not understand the legend and has been entangled in a picture.Overall, the final reviewer was a bit difficult.
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | keqiao

Author: hi123


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted directly


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-06-02 23:57:09
is considered to be a watering journal, be careful!
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | hi123

Author: 1449018138@qq.com


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 8.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-05-23 22:01:57
11.26 During the submission period, with editor→under review→under editor evaluation→3.12 Decision in process, this state is more than two months, and it is more urgent to find a job. Do you have a similar situation?Please give me a lot of advice?
Show Review in Original Language
(8) Thank | 1449018138@qq.com

Author: ginver


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 5.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-05-07 13:43:49
submitted a technical review after 1 month,Submit for another monthAfter 2 months, I returned to the opinion, a minor repair, a major repair, and the reviewer of the overhaul was more vague.Submit again after 2 weeks of modificationAccepted after 2 weeksOverall, the speed is slow, and it should be deliberately pressured, but the reviewer and editor are still more responsible
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | ginver

Author: YY


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-05-03 11:08:36
17, submitted on July 28, after rejecting the manuscript in three months or so, on December 26, the re-submitment was revised according to the review comments.Three reviewers have a bunch of opinions), April 2 overhaul (one received, two overhauls, one rejected), modified in January, repaired after three weeks, received after 11 days.10 months before and after
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | YY

Author: liu


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 5.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-05-02 16:57:37
lj not lj I don't know.But as far as I personally think, the review is indeed strict.But when I saw some comments from the front upstairs, I once again stated: First of all, the question of submission, can you ask me if you can submit the manuscript request for the journal homepage?The first point: The cover letter must specify the total number of words in the article, the total number of tables, and the total number of drawings.The second point: line number, do not mark the line number in the manuscript, because the journal will automatically add the line number when generating the pdf.This kind of technical review is basically no problem for one month, and everyone does not waste much time.Regarding time, I think the journal also said an average of 4 months. You should consider whether you want to select or not, depending on the time you can wait!There is also a high rejection rate.These things are not clear before you submit your own, so please don't select!!
Show Review in Original Language
(16) Thank | liu

Author: Shij


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-05-02 11:46:02
This Lj journal must be thought twice before submitting.My experience is for your reference:Submitted on February 1, 2018, one month later (in early March, the specific date was forgotten) Technical check results: Cover letter must state the manuscript word count, which includes text, figure captions, and table legends, but not references(Because I didn't receive the email notification, I only knew it by logging in on March 15). After the correction was made on March 15th, it was released on the same day. Until April 20th, I was still "submitted to journal". I sent an email reminder.The reply said that with the editor next week, April 30 was rejected, the reason is that it does not meet the scope of the journal (no email notification, login to view).Everyone sees it, the processing speed is super super slow...
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Shij

First    Previous    1    2    3    4    5    6    7    Next    Last  (To Page
/9)

Start your review of [JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.

Intentional Space Tag


Contact us

Contact us  

Your name*

Your email*

Your message*

Please fill in all fields and provide a valid email.

Security Code*

© 2010-2020 United States: ACCDON LLC Tel: 1-781-202-9968 Email: info@accdon.com
Address: 400 5th Ave, Suite 530, Waltham, Massachusetts 02451, United States
LetPub Privacy Policy