I have submitted two articles to this journal. After three days, in response to the first article, the editor suggested expanding discussion of the actual wastewater treatment effect. Since the work was not done in this area, I withdrew the submission and submitted it to other journals. The second article was about the detection of pollutant degradation intermediates. After two months, six reviews were provided. Five of the reviews were very appropriate. It was only suggested to modify the grammar and some minor issues, and I revised accordingly. The sixth review proposed that I add the degradation intermediates in the context of actual wastewater. I am refuting this opinion, and feel that my article will be accepted.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

water treatment direction, mail submission, select at 7 o'clock in the evening, after 3 hours, I received a reply from the editor, saying that the subject matter is not consistent.The efficiency is quite high, and there is no delay in resubmission.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

submitted a theoretical calculation article on the structure-activity relationship of pollutants. After the select, it returned to the opinion three months later. There were not many suggestions for academic comments, but a brief answer, but the requirement must beThe professional language organization used English to polish the color, and the result of the touch was quickly received. After about 6 months of publication, the page fee was not required, which is better than the domestic journal.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Journal Homepage URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/lesa20

(0) Thank | Anonymous