My Account Submit My Manuscript
Letpub, Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ANTENNAS AND PROPAGATION

   For Publishers  New

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:
LetPub Free Webinar
APA has partnered with LetPub to provide a full suite of author services

[IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ANTENNAS AND PROPAGATION]Hello, you are Visitor Number 43172 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitleIEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ANTENNAS AND PROPAGATION
Journal Title AbbreviationsIEEE T ANTENN PROPAG
ISSN0018-926X
E-ISSN1558-2221
h-index175
CiteScore
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
8.801.6972.152
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Engineering
Subcategory: Electrical and Electronic Engineering
Q164 / 670

Self-Citation Ratio (2019-2020)23.60%
Official Websitehttp://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/RecentIssue.jsp?punumber=8
Online Manuscript Submissionhttp://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tap-ieee
Open AccessNo
PublisherIEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC, 445 HOES LANE, PISCATAWAY, USA, NJ, 08855-4141
Subject AreaEngineering
Country/Area of PublicationUNITED STATES
Publication FrequencyMonthly
Year Publication Started0
Annual Article Volume840
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index
Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0018-926X%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Authorized Data from Publisher:
Data from Authors: About 4.0 month(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: Moderate
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ANTENNAS AND PROPAGATION】CiteScore Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • CiteScore Trend


First    Previous    1    Next    Last  (To Page
/1)
  Reviews on IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ANTENNAS AND PROPAGATION: Write a review
Author: 司空菲离


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-04-22 16:51:52
Antenna article, three reviewers, first review was three and a half months, all reviewers agree to accept.

(5) Thank | 司空菲离

Author: jszhao@shmtu.edu.cn


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-09-11 09:07:04
The review speed was nearly two months, submitted in early April 2017, and received notice of revision in mid-May. Overhaul, many opinions were very pertinent, and the review request was continuously improved.It took more than two months to revamp, make up the experiment, and do the calculation.In August, the revised draft was submitted, and in September, the revised notice was received, minor repair.It took half a month to revise the submission, and in October, I received a modification notice to polish the English.Submitted in mid-November and received in a few days.Online in December, officially released in January 2018.The review requirements are very high, which is very helpful for the improvement of the quality of the paper.
Show Review in Original Language
(4) Thank | jszhao@shmtu.edu.cn

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-07-30 20:11:03
Now it’s stricter than the previous review, and the requirement is getting higher.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: jwmathphy@163.com


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 12.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-06-05 16:49:37
, the first time I encountered such a review and rejected the manuscript, the request was still very high. I have a paper that has undergone 2 major repairs, 3 minor repairs, and finally accepted, which took 1 year.Half, the comments made by Xiao Xiu are that the English expression of this article is not good. Every time there is a so-called TRACK EDITOR, let me modify the English expression in the article.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | jwmathphy@163.com

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-12-06 12:31:16
Very good journal, now the review cycle is accelerated, focusing on theoretical analysis and innovation, simple simulation and debugging is not easy!
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-10-21 15:59:44
I feel that this journal is very authoritative when I first started doing the antenna. Now it’s definitely okay.There are too many waters to be filled, and there will be seven or eight articles in three years, because I am not an example in this field.Of course, I also administer myself, but I still have a conscience, at least not against academic ethics.
Show Review in Original Language
(55) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-10-21 15:58:29
I think this journal is very authoritative when I first started making antennas. Now it’s definitely okay.There are too many waters to be filled, and there will be seven or eight articles in three years, because I am not an example in this field.Of course, I also administer myself, but I still have a conscience, at least not against academic ethics.
Show Review in Original Language
(27) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-10-21 15:58:22
I think this journal is very authoritative when I first started doing the antenna. Now it’s definitely okay.There are too many waters to be filled, and there will be seven or eight articles in three years, because I am not an example in this field.Of course, I also administer myself, but I still have a conscience, at least not against academic ethics.
Show Review in Original Language
(7) Thank | Anonymous

Author: enzo


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-02-02 01:59:26
big change smallRe-recorded.One of the reviewers is quite responsible.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | enzo

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-11-30 22:06:10
3 At the end of the month, I received a revised opinion until June.Overhaul: A total of two reviewers, only one format question was raised in the first instance, and eight revision opinions were written in the second instance. Some of the amendments also included many independent opinions.Seriously revised one by one, submitted a revised draft after one and a half months, and wrote a full 13 pages of words.Until the mid-September received the revised comments, the reviewers had no comments, and the editors made the revision of the grammar.So I revised the grammar and submitted it, and I received it in October.In general, reviewers have a thorough analysis of the article and should be in one direction.The impact of this journal in the plasma is fairly good and is often applied.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-04-05 16:30:28
My situation is three reviewers, two of whom are very pertinent, and the comments are in place, and the recommendations are highly improved.However, the other reviewer was completely unreliable, and he did not give the review comments for four months. Finally, the editor urged him to reluctantly give a review comment.At the time of the second instance, I didn’t even give advice...However, as the most influential journal in the field of antenna and communication, I still try to select for the
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-09-23 18:53:00
12Submission in June, September overhaul, submitted in February, February, May, minor repair, July, and then submitted in September.Almost this cycle
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-08-05 14:19:00
The world's top journal in the field of antennas.The speed of review is completely based on luck.My first submitment was in April, April, and I was overhauled in September. I submitted a revised draft in December, a minor repair in February, and a accept in June.The second submitment was in September, September, and was overhauled in November. The revised draft was submitted in December and was accepted in January of 2013.Some reviewers are dragging, and there is no way. Sometimes the editor or editor can drag on for a long time. I don't know if they will go on vacation.Recently, I feel that there are some differences in the level of people. Some are very professional and very serious. Some of them are just two sentences, but the editors and editors will check them out.Because the journal is divided into long texts and short essays, some articles will be transferred if they are not very good.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-05-09 15:57:00
First trial + modification + second trial has spent more than a year.The first trial was 3-4 months, and the major revision was given.A reviewer gave a minor repair, a major repair or rejection.The second trial took more than five months.Finally, the article content was rejected because it did not conform to the scope of the journal.The content of the article is in communication theory. Although it is in contact with the antenna, it is indeed the mainstream of non-TAP.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-05-08 17:57:00
Do you know that the chances of this journal being accepted in the second instance are high??
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-05-02 11:17:00
The journal is a Top Journal, JCR2 District, 2012IF is 2.151. The journal is a top authoritative journal. Many classic literatures and famous scholars have contributed on it. The quality of the manuscript is very high!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-06-04 04:49:00
As mentioned above: the world's top journals in the field of antenna and radio wave propagation.The reviewers are very professional and ask a lot of questions. Of course, it is also possible for a professional reviewer to not fully understand the author's work (especially the details).Individual deputy editors who like to find references are reviewers, so you can pay attention to this submission.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-08-19 14:36:00
Journal Homepage URL: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/RecentIssue.jsp?punumber=8
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-08-09 11:01:00
selectd once and was rejected.However, the reviewer (one) is very serious, and I am convinced by the comments!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-07-10 23:44:00
The world's top journal in the field of antenna and radio wave propagation.The circle is not big, so the reviewers are very professional, and it is difficult to get through the draft.Generally, there are two reviewers, but there are many questions raised. It is not mandatory to have experimental verification. However, if there is no experiment, it will be more difficult to accept. It takes a lot of effort to rectify the results like the reviewer.Sex.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

First    Previous    1    Next    Last  (To Page
/1)

Start your review of [IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ANTENNAS AND PROPAGATION]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.

Intentional Space Tag



© 2010-2020  ACCDON LLC 400 5th Ave, Suite 530, Waltham, MA 02451, USA
PrivacyTerms of Service