IEEE COMMUNICATIONS LETTERS

Fast.

(5) Thank | lj.world09@gmail.com

Recently, I was fortunate to accept another one. The overall processing speed is faster. The editor is very professional and careful. As long as the innovation is clear and sufficient, it is very likely that it will be accepted. I wish you good luck..The following is the processing flow of my thesis:1) 18-09-05 submit; 2) 18-10-05 reject and re-submission allowed; 3) 18-10-26 resubmit; 4) 18-11-15 accepted.

(11) Thank | Allan

Recently acceptd an article, the processing progress is as follows:1) Submitted on May 13th, under review on May 16th, and rejected and resubmission allowed on June 11th;2) Submit the revised draft on August 17 directly under review, September 5th second opinion (minor revision required);3) Submit the revised draft on September 11 directly under review, accepted after two hours.In general, the editor is very responsible, and the invited reviewers (three) are very familiar with the research field, and the processing speed is very fast.By submitting and modifying, it is a great reward for students, and I hope that next time I can hit a higher level of journals.

(16) Thank | allanxjtu@163.com

the old-fashioned journals in the field of communication, the amount of submission is still very large, more than one month after the submissionThe number has been increased by 700, and it is still not easy to publish.

(3) Thank | 小明

Spam journals, just a shot.The editor is also very irresponsible and the reviewer is amateur.

(0) Thank | qwet

Overall feeling: reviewThe draft is faster and the reviewer is responsible.After a report on the signal processing was rejected by SPL, he decided to switch to CL. He selectd at the end of September 2017 and returned to the review at the end of November: Rejected - Resubmission allowed, a total of four reviewers, and AE also raised questions.It was announced in early January 2018 and was accepted at the end of January.

(0) Thank | Martin

Overall, the main requirements for the innovation of the paper are higher, and the workload is not emphasized.I have recently been fortunate to have an article, the specific process is as follows,(16 years) submitted on September 6th, under review on September 12th, reject and re-submission allowed on October 15th, re-submitment on December 23rd, (17th year) second trial result on January 18th (The minor revision was rehabilitated on February 7 and received on March 7.The overall speed is slower than the average, but it is still quite satisfactory. The reviewers are very professional and the editors are very careful.I hope everyone has to help.

(14) Thank | allanxjtu@163.com

Communication field is very good sci, the quality of the article is very high.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

contributed on June 16, 2013; resubmitted after receiving revised review comments on July 24, 2013; October 7, 2013 (renewed deadline)The opinions were carefully revised and re-submited; on November 9, 2013, the acceptance of

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Double blind submission for 1 month, the result is allowed to re-attend, after careful revision has been re-submited, looking forward to good news

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Submitted on June 1st, rejected on July 18th, no re-submission is allowed.

(1) Thank | Anonymous

successfully submitted on December 11, 2012; on January 22, 2013, there was a review result---Rejected and Resubmission allowed. In the middle of the Spring Festival and other things, it was dragged until March 25On the 26th of April, the review results of the re-submitment papers came back and asked for Minor Revision Required; on the evening of May 14th, the papers after the minor repairs were uploaded; on the morning of May 15th, they were accepted.Notification email.

(1) Thank | Anonymous

Reviewing is faster than I thought, submitted in mid-January, and the first-instance opinion in early March was rejected and resubmitted, the review comments were OK, the re-submitment after the revision, and then aThe month is accepted.Overall, the speed of review is still very fast.However, the review comments are still relatively targeted.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

has been used as a coauthor, and there is an article in the first round. The result of the reject and resubmit in the first round has been submitted and is under review; and there are many papers in this journal..Therefore, I would like to make a few personal comments and experiences on the following issues: 1. Quality: Overall quality is OK, small papers, but international evaluation is good, a bit inclined to love to receive newer ideas.2. Review time: Generally speaking, the first round is about one and a half months, but it depends on the reviewer. For example, my first article will give the result more than one month, and receive it after minor repairs.This waited for more than 2 months before giving the result.3. Evaluation of results: The first round of results can be roughly conceived.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

The review speed is very fast, only one month, usually three to four reviewers, the editor is very responsible,Also very good.Journals are highly demanding for innovation.For the papers that have been re-submited, the author should take the review comments seriously, because only one chance of re-submitment is given.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

The review speed is very fast, submitted on July 10, re-submitted after modification on the 27th, re-submited on August 17, and received directly on September 6.Doing GNSS signal processing is also closed.It feels that the innovative requirements of the method are relatively high, and the processing results of the algorithm should be fully analyzed. After the middle, the Latex typesetting must be used.It feels that as long as there are new ideas, it is not difficult.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

is still not good, and the writing requirements of the article are also relatively high, and the reviewers say that the writing is not good.The opinions returned from the reviewers can also be seen, and some reviewers do not seem to understand.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

11 Submitted on the 21st of the month, the results of the minor repairs given on January 5th, 40 days, very soon.In the middle of the Spring Festival, so the revised draft was submitted later, the revised draft was uploaded on February 5, and it was successfully received on March 16.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Since the IEEE trans. commun. no longer accepts the letter, the journal has changed its original limit of three pages into a limit of four pages!

(0) Thank | Anonymous

The review speed is very fast, and there are messages within three months.Rejected for the first time, but allowed to re-attend.After the revision of the reviewer's request, I selectd again and received it.Emphasize innovation.In the IEEE standard format, the double column cannot exceed three pages.Now it has been changed to double-column and four-page.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Journal Homepage URL: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/RecentIssue.jsp?punumber=4234

(0) Thank | Anonymous

is faster. I was drafted in mid-October in 10 years. I received an editorial reply about 2 months and refused.However, it is allowed to select again.CL's handling of manuscripts is generally only as follows: direct publication, post-modification (usually some small errors such as typos), rejection of the manuscript but allowing for minor changes on the basis of the manuscript, and then rejection is not allowed.Re-submitment (meaning that you can't change it again).

(0) Thank | Anonymous

The communication field is more authoritative.Cost-effectiveness is high, but not good.The speed is relatively fast, the editorial official said that the first trial was completed within 12-16 weeks.After two and a half months, I have to remind me to edit, or I will drag, huh, huh, look at the effect and ask, otherwise it will be troublesome.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

The recruitment rate is not high, personally feel about 15%.For example, I submitted an article in early November, the article number has reached more than 2,000, and it is about 30 articles per issue.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

This journal is the authoritative journal of communication, and IEEE TCOM, IEEE JSAC, and IEEE TNET are the top four journals in the field of communication, which are not good.The acceptance rate of IEEE COMMUNICATIONS LETTERS is the lowest among these journals, generally not exceeding 12%.But this does not mean that it is the most difficult, because IEEE COMMUNICATIONS LETTERS has a large amount of submissions, and it cannot be changed. Therefore, there are too many drafts.In other journals, because of the big change option, the employment rate is above 20%.Personally think that the most difficult thing is IEEE TNET.

(0) Thank | Anonymous