My Account Submit My Manuscript
Letpub, Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service

IEEE COMMUNICATIONS LETTERS

   For Publishers  New

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:
LetPub Free Webinar
APA has partnered with LetPub to provide a full suite of author services

[IEEE COMMUNICATIONS LETTERS]Hello, you are Visitor Number 68195 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitleIEEE COMMUNICATIONS LETTERS
Journal Title AbbreviationsIEEE COMMUN LETT
ISSN1089-7798
h-index127
CiteScore
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
7.601.2611.614
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Mathematics
Subcategory: Modeling and Simulation
Q111 / 274
Category: Mathematics
Subcategory: Computer Science Applications
Q169 / 636
Category: Mathematics
Subcategory: Electrical and Electronic Engineering
Q175 / 670

Self-Citation Ratio (2019-2020)5.50%
Official Websitehttp://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/RecentIssue.jsp?punumber=4234
Online Manuscript Submissionhttp://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/comml-ieee
Open AccessNo
PublisherIEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC, 445 HOES LANE, PISCATAWAY, USA, NJ, 08855-4141
Subject AreaEngineering
Country/Area of PublicationUNITED STATES
Publication FrequencyMonthly
Year Publication Started1997
Annual Article Volume570
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index
Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=1089-7798%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Authorized Data from Publisher:
Data from Authors: About 2.8 month(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: 75%
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【IEEE COMMUNICATIONS LETTERS】CiteScore Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • CiteScore Trend


First    Previous    1    2    Next    Last  (To Page
/2)
  Reviews on IEEE COMMUNICATIONS LETTERS: Write a review
Author: lj.world09@gmail.com


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-04-11 12:56:29
Fast.

(5) Thank | lj.world09@gmail.com

Author: Allan


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-11-19 10:08:52
Recently, I was fortunate to accept another one. The overall processing speed is faster. The editor is very professional and careful. As long as the innovation is clear and sufficient, it is very likely that it will be accepted. I wish you good luck..The following is the processing flow of my thesis:1) 18-09-05 submit; 2) 18-10-05 reject and re-submission allowed; 3) 18-10-26 resubmit; 4) 18-11-15 accepted.
Show Review in Original Language
(11) Thank | Allan

Author: allanxjtu@163.com


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-09-11 23:05:26
Recently acceptd an article, the processing progress is as follows:1) Submitted on May 13th, under review on May 16th, and rejected and resubmission allowed on June 11th;2) Submit the revised draft on August 17 directly under review, September 5th second opinion (minor revision required);3) Submit the revised draft on September 11 directly under review, accepted after two hours.In general, the editor is very responsible, and the invited reviewers (three) are very familiar with the research field, and the processing speed is very fast.By submitting and modifying, it is a great reward for students, and I hope that next time I can hit a higher level of journals.
Show Review in Original Language
(16) Thank | allanxjtu@163.com

Author: 小明


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-08-20 16:54:25
the old-fashioned journals in the field of communication, the amount of submission is still very large, more than one month after the submissionThe number has been increased by 700, and it is still not easy to publish.
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | 小明

Author: qwet


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted directly


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-07-07 12:47:05
Spam journals, just a shot.The editor is also very irresponsible and the reviewer is amateur.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | qwet

Author: Martin


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-03-27 14:50:21
Overall feeling: reviewThe draft is faster and the reviewer is responsible.After a report on the signal processing was rejected by SPL, he decided to switch to CL. He selectd at the end of September 2017 and returned to the review at the end of November: Rejected - Resubmission allowed, a total of four reviewers, and AE also raised questions.It was announced in early January 2018 and was accepted at the end of January.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Martin

Author: allanxjtu@163.com


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-03-08 23:36:19
Overall, the main requirements for the innovation of the paper are higher, and the workload is not emphasized.I have recently been fortunate to have an article, the specific process is as follows,(16 years) submitted on September 6th, under review on September 12th, reject and re-submission allowed on October 15th, re-submitment on December 23rd, (17th year) second trial result on January 18th (The minor revision was rehabilitated on February 7 and received on March 7.The overall speed is slower than the average, but it is still quite satisfactory. The reviewers are very professional and the editors are very careful.I hope everyone has to help.
Show Review in Original Language
(14) Thank | allanxjtu@163.com

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-09-29 10:31:28
Communication field is very good sci, the quality of the article is very high.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-11-08 19:17:00
contributed on June 16, 2013; resubmitted after receiving revised review comments on July 24, 2013; October 7, 2013 (renewed deadline)The opinions were carefully revised and re-submited; on November 9, 2013, the acceptance of
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-10-15 13:13:00
Double blind submission for 1 month, the result is allowed to re-attend, after careful revision has been re-submited, looking forward to good news
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-09-23 22:20:00
Submitted on June 1st, rejected on July 18th, no re-submission is allowed.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-05-24 15:19:00
successfully submitted on December 11, 2012; on January 22, 2013, there was a review result---Rejected and Resubmission allowed. In the middle of the Spring Festival and other things, it was dragged until March 25On the 26th of April, the review results of the re-submitment papers came back and asked for Minor Revision Required; on the evening of May 14th, the papers after the minor repairs were uploaded; on the morning of May 15th, they were accepted.Notification email.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-05-06 23:24:00
Reviewing is faster than I thought, submitted in mid-January, and the first-instance opinion in early March was rejected and resubmitted, the review comments were OK, the re-submitment after the revision, and then aThe month is accepted.Overall, the speed of review is still very fast.However, the review comments are still relatively targeted.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-01-26 21:29:00
has been used as a coauthor, and there is an article in the first round. The result of the reject and resubmit in the first round has been submitted and is under review; and there are many papers in this journal..Therefore, I would like to make a few personal comments and experiences on the following issues: 1. Quality: Overall quality is OK, small papers, but international evaluation is good, a bit inclined to love to receive newer ideas.2. Review time: Generally speaking, the first round is about one and a half months, but it depends on the reviewer. For example, my first article will give the result more than one month, and receive it after minor repairs.This waited for more than 2 months before giving the result.3. Evaluation of results: The first round of results can be roughly conceived.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-01-11 23:35:00
The review speed is very fast, only one month, usually three to four reviewers, the editor is very responsible,Also very good.Journals are highly demanding for innovation.For the papers that have been re-submited, the author should take the review comments seriously, because only one chance of re-submitment is given.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-09-06 18:19:00
The review speed is very fast, submitted on July 10, re-submitted after modification on the 27th, re-submited on August 17, and received directly on September 6.Doing GNSS signal processing is also closed.It feels that the innovative requirements of the method are relatively high, and the processing results of the algorithm should be fully analyzed. After the middle, the Latex typesetting must be used.It feels that as long as there are new ideas, it is not difficult.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-08-22 19:48:00
is still not good, and the writing requirements of the article are also relatively high, and the reviewers say that the writing is not good.The opinions returned from the reviewers can also be seen, and some reviewers do not seem to understand.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-03-18 14:23:00
11 Submitted on the 21st of the month, the results of the minor repairs given on January 5th, 40 days, very soon.In the middle of the Spring Festival, so the revised draft was submitted later, the revised draft was uploaded on February 5, and it was successfully received on March 16.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-10-24 19:26:00
Since the IEEE trans. commun. no longer accepts the letter, the journal has changed its original limit of three pages into a limit of four pages!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-10-10 20:46:00
The review speed is very fast, and there are messages within three months.Rejected for the first time, but allowed to re-attend.After the revision of the reviewer's request, I selectd again and received it.Emphasize innovation.In the IEEE standard format, the double column cannot exceed three pages.Now it has been changed to double-column and four-page.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-08-19 09:15:00
Journal Homepage URL: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/RecentIssue.jsp?punumber=4234
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-03-19 20:09:00
is faster. I was drafted in mid-October in 10 years. I received an editorial reply about 2 months and refused.However, it is allowed to select again.CL's handling of manuscripts is generally only as follows: direct publication, post-modification (usually some small errors such as typos), rejection of the manuscript but allowing for minor changes on the basis of the manuscript, and then rejection is not allowed.Re-submitment (meaning that you can't change it again).
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-03-14 21:17:00
The communication field is more authoritative.Cost-effectiveness is high, but not good.The speed is relatively fast, the editorial official said that the first trial was completed within 12-16 weeks.After two and a half months, I have to remind me to edit, or I will drag, huh, huh, look at the effect and ask, otherwise it will be troublesome.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2010-12-29 12:07:00
The recruitment rate is not high, personally feel about 15%.For example, I submitted an article in early November, the article number has reached more than 2,000, and it is about 30 articles per issue.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2010-07-22 14:02:00
This journal is the authoritative journal of communication, and IEEE TCOM, IEEE JSAC, and IEEE TNET are the top four journals in the field of communication, which are not good.The acceptance rate of IEEE COMMUNICATIONS LETTERS is the lowest among these journals, generally not exceeding 12%.But this does not mean that it is the most difficult, because IEEE COMMUNICATIONS LETTERS has a large amount of submissions, and it cannot be changed. Therefore, there are too many drafts.In other journals, because of the big change option, the employment rate is above 20%.Personally think that the most difficult thing is IEEE TNET.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

First    Previous    1    2    Next    Last  (To Page
/2)

Start your review of [IEEE COMMUNICATIONS LETTERS]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.

Intentional Space Tag



© 2010-2020  ACCDON LLC 400 5th Ave, Suite 530, Waltham, MA 02451, USA
PrivacyTerms of Service