X
My Account Submit My Manuscript
Letpub, Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY

   For Publishers  New

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:
Journal Cover Design
APA has partnered with LetPub to provide a full suite of author services

[ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY]Hello, you are Visitor Number 252738 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitleENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Journal Title AbbreviationsENVIRON SCI TECHNOL
ISSN0013-936X
E-ISSN1520-5851
h-index345
CiteScore
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
13.802.8512.056
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Environmental Science
Subcategory: Environmental Chemistry
Q16 / 122
Category: Environmental Science
Subcategory: Chemistry (all)
Q132 / 398

Self-Citation Ratio (2019-2020)11.60%
Official Websitehttp://pubs.acs.org/journal/esthag
Online Manuscript Submissionhttps://acs.manuscriptcentral.com/acs
Open AccessNo
PublisherAMER CHEMICAL SOC, 1155 16TH ST, NW, WASHINGTON, USA, DC, 20036
Subject AreaEnvironmental Science
Country/Area of PublicationUNITED STATES
Publication FrequencySemimonthly
Year Publication Started1967
Annual Article Volume1484
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index
Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0013-936X%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Authorized Data from Publisher:
Data from Authors: About 2.9 month(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: 80%
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY】CiteScore Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • CiteScore Trend


First    Previous    1    2    3    4    Next    Last  (To Page
/4)
  Reviews on ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY: Write a review
Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-05-15 17:24:00
spent more than 3 months reviewing the manuscript, only looking for 3 reviewers~ two rejected, one did not express, the editor refusedIt is.Both reviewers refused because a feature they thought was important, but did not comment on other results.The trial was very simple, only one or two questions were raised, and no comments were made on most of the research content.I am very disappointed with the EST review. I haven’t said it for so long, and there are only a few questions, and if there is a lack of representation, why should I reject it directly?I am considering argument, I hope I can make a turn.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-05-10 20:17:00
From submission to accept, the first modification, a total of 4 months.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-04-03 00:11:00
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-04-01 20:31:00
The article has been submitted for two and a half months, but there is no news!I wrote an e-mail consultation to the presiding judge, and the presiding secretary replied to confirm the review, and hoped to have feedback with all my heart, and did not say the same!Pray, there is good news!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-03-28 10:26:00
About ES&T, because I have not been engaged in research activities abroad, I have not communicated with foreign scholars on this journal. I have been submitting this journal to my own experience over the past 3 years.Talk about my own opinions for your colleagues' reference.As with many people in the country, I also considered ES&T as the top journal for the environment (currently the Chinese Academy of Sciences has been classified as Zone 1) when I first submitted to ES&T in 2010.In fact, my personal research direction is coal combustion and its pollutant control. The published papers are basically focused on the combustion process in the furnace. The content related to the environmental field is actually relatively small, so the first time I selectd for this journal is to try it.The mentality, because I myself feel that the burning papers may be
Show Review in Original Language
(10) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-03-17 01:55:00
I know the editor-in-chief of this publication. In fact, no one said that it is so unattainable.The Chinese papers are published on the top, and it is not very noticeable.The discipline is too complicated.There are already four Chinese editors, indicating that the publications do not maintain the leading edge of the discipline as before.There is only one Japanese editorial board member.Japan's environmental science is the world's top, indicating that Japanese scholars do not pay much attention to this publication.Today's publications are not very upscale.Chinese papers far exceed Japan's.It gives people the feeling that there has been a tendency to irrigate in recent years.Japanese, Taiwanese scholars do not quite agree with this journal.Mainly the discipline is too complicated.Japan's environmental science is world-class, with good research, generally chooses professional publications, not
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-03-07 15:12:00
EST as the top journal in the field of the environment, its influence and the quality of the article are deeply trusted by the people.As a journal of ACS, the mode of submission is basically the same: 1. Before submitting the manuscript, please read the instructions for submission, http://pubs.acs.org/page/esthag/submission/index.html, which is detailed in the article.Things to be aware of when submitting a manuscript.2. The number of words in the research manuscript is limited to about 7,000 words, but does not include the literature and the header page. The number of words per chart can be estimated by 300 words.3. Need to make a TOC/abstract art legend, which can clearly express the
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-03-07 10:05:00
of the paper. Who knows the EST submission format?Briefly explain, look at the submission guide did not see clearly
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-02-28 09:04:00
has been submitted for 40 days, there is no news, do not know what will happen, praying
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-01-24 14:06:00
The speed is very fast, and the editor will reply in one month.The three reviewers receive one and the two need to be revised and re-examined.The manuscript has been revised for more than 20 days, hoping to have good news.I am the new army of ES&T. I feel that the reviewers are more serious, can put forward a lot of constructive suggestions, and have higher requirements for the innovation of the work.Therefore, when you contribute, you must pay attention to the innovation of your work.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-01-10 18:58:00
The Chinese Academy of Sciences finally divided him into a district, but unfortunately it has not been in the past, continue to work hard!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-01-05 23:05:00
reviewed for one and a half months and was rejected.The three reviewers, the opinions were basically mixed, but did not raise the issue of lack of innovation, and there was no serious injury.Because the editor deleted the reviewer's evaluation of whether the article was modified or acceptd, I don't know what the specific opinion is, but I feel that it is a big change, otherwise there is no need to delete it.The last editor refused, mainly because of a similar article in the journal.It seems that the conclusion of the editor is the most important.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-12-15 00:56:00
The article has been dragged from the beginning to the end of the submitment for nearly a year, 28 minutes after the select received the minor revision decision, the four reviewer said that the article should be published.After 10 days, the conversion was completed, and after 3 days, accept, and after 4 days, the proof was received, and each process was very fast.
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-11-26 21:25:00
First submission, one month review, three reviewers - one overhaul, one minor repair, one direct rejection, editorial opinion: rejection of the boss for the second reviewThe person dissatisfied, wrote a complaint letter, and the editor agreed to re-attend.Re-submitment for more than a month, and now waiting...
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-11-23 16:49:00
The top journals in the environment category are highly recognized at home and abroad.This year, I was fortunate to have published two articles in the journal. Both articles were directly accepted after minor repairs. From the time of submission to the acceptance of less than 3 months, ACS journals were faster and the editors were responsible.The journal focuses on innovation, and both methods and research systems are highly demanding.Children's shoes that want to contribute to the journal in the jar must focus on innovation.Otherwise, the chances of being rejected are great!In addition, the writing of the article has to pay attention to, concise, clear, and focused!I wish you many ESTs for environmental children's shoes.
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-11-22 11:05:00
Since I was just received an article, I carefully studied the journal's preferences and came to the following conclusion: The number of articles in the first column of this month is as follows (November 6, 2012)(Volume 46, Issue 21, pp. 11485-12242)): Comment: 2Features: 1Policy Analysis: 2Characterization of Natural and Affected Environments: 9Environmental Processe
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-11-17 21:11:00
Part 2 just submitted out, burn incense.......Still the same, in the middle of the scattered gold coins.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-09-21 16:01:00
waiting results
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-09-21 15:10:00
has already been published in two articles, all of which are modified after the application, one is three reviewers, one is two, it feels not somagical.Another weak question, which journal is environmental chemistry?
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-09-20 01:01:00
After receiving the manuscript less than 2 months, the reviewers received comments. The two reviewers all believed that the article had certain depth and innovation, and all required minor repairs. The editor also gave Xiao Xiu’s opinion.Return after 10 days and receive it after one week.In fact, est is not necessarily 4 or 5 reviewers, and the opinions of reviewers may be more of a reference. More rights are in the editor's hands, because the journal looks like editors are big bulls in all directions.So, they basically know at a glance what level your article belongs to. Before sending it out for review, it should basically have a preliminary conclusion, just let the reviewer further confirm his judgment.Personal point of view, only for reference.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-09-09 18:28:00
Looking forward to ING...........
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-09-09 12:18:00
2Submission on the 28th, the next day for review, the speed is relatively fast, the first trial is about 45 days, the result is major revision, three reviewers, have to say that EST reviewers still have a level,The three people's focus is different, one minor repair, the other two put a lot of opinions but they feel that the research is quite meaningful. It took a month to make up the experiment and carefully sort out the papers. The reply letter wrote 16 pages, and responded to the review comments one by one.After one month’s submitment, I didn’t expect the second trial to be two months. I wrote a reminder letter. The editor was very nice. I immediately wrote a suggestion and published a proposal. One of them raised a lot of questions that were completely different from the first trial.The method is still overhaul, and it is a long revision. After writing, it is found that 80% of the content is different from the initial submission. After one month, I re-submited
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-07-06 20:36:00
for 2 months, the efficiency is quite good.Fast, the editor is very good.Not worthy of the boss est.There is no possibility of irrigation.Three reviewers.Three overhauls were directly rejected.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-06-28 15:12:00
EST has a high impact in the field of environmental chemistry, but the doctoral period focused on environmental analysis, and EST has little relationship, never selectd, but sent an EST as a target.Research on pollutant degradation after work has been concerned with the latest EST papers.A job is more comprehensive, from the identification of degradation products, to the study of degradation mechanism, to the actual sewage treatment plant test, the results are good, try to select.The review is about 2 months, and the modification time of 5 weeks is received one week after the modification.After receiving it, I felt that there was no imaginary difficulty.I suggest you try more.EST has a clearer requirement for the number of words, but if you have more content, you can consider putting it in SI.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-06-10 12:37:00
There is almost no chance of watering, and it is a good opportunity to work hard. It is the more authoritative of this profession
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

First    Previous    1    2    3    4    Next    Last  (To Page
/4)

Start your review of [ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.


© 2010-2021  ACCDON LLC 400 5th Ave, Suite 530, Waltham, MA 02451, USA
PrivacyTerms of Service