Overall, CEC was very quick in terms of the review process, which was great. Our manuscript was accepted in less than a month, and the editor was very professional. My one negative comment is that the reviewers were somewhat unreasonable in their edits and comments (which was recognized by the editor).

(21) Thank | jszb1324

Half-month review comments came back overhaul, minor repairs in half a month, and accepted after 4 days.The first paper, excited

(3) Thank | 流恋糖

The article was edited, and a report came out after the submission. The journal's recruitment rate is less than 40%.I submitted it in early November, the article ID number is 1900, and less than 1000 articles are accepted each year, and the data is reliable.I pray that the editor can submit my article for review.

(1) Thank | sunlight

Submitted on July 20th, review comments on August 15th, both reviewers are overhauled, supplemented with experimental data, repaired on September 5threturn.Received on September 26.High efficiency~

(2) Thank | 魏悄悄

Submitted to receive for almost a month, the efficiency is really high, I hope the journal is getting better and better, the impact factor is getting higher and higher

(3) Thank | Anonymous

2018.6.05 Submitted for review one week later, 6.27 overhaul, 7.05 minor repair, 7.13 reception, about 40 days, speed is still possible

(6) Thank | yjf

2018.6.05 submitted for review a week later, 6.27 overhaul, 7.05 minor repair, 7.13 reception, about 40 days, speed is still possible

(2) Thank | yjf

2018,3,01-submitted-submitted2018, 4, 03-major revision (three reviewers have a total of 11 opinions, one rejects the manuscript, a major repair, a minor repair. The editor makes the overhaul.)2017,4,30- a revision Has been submitted2018,5,15-accept.

(4) Thank | 1136946432@qq.com

Not yet letter

(3) Thank | 123456

08-Jan-2018 Submitted (send it from the editor after about 5 days);20-Jan-2018 Major Revision (there are 5 comments from two reviewers, and there are about 3 additional trials! It is helpful to improve the quality of your thesis.)03-Feb-2018 A revision has been submitted (it is expected to return to the hands of 2 reviewers, one agrees to accept, one has some minor problems);24-Feb-2018 Minor Revision (may be delayed due to the Spring Festival, but it is still very fast!)01-Mar-2018 A revision Has been submitted03-Mar-2018 Accept

(17) Thank | jyxiayan@whu.edu.cn

2017,11,02 one shot-submitted2017,11,27-Reject and Resubmitted2017,12,13-Resubmitted2018,1,22-Major revision2018,1,25-Revision submitted and accept.The total time is close to 3 months, and the individual feels that giving a re-review and re-submitment is a great opportunity to make serious changes.

(0) Thank | zzzaa

2017.06.24 selectd DALTON TRANSACTIONS, 2017.06.27 received an editorial rejection and strongly recommended to switch to CRYSTENGCOMM, because the article itself is to study nano-single crystals and crystal clusters, indeed as the editor said is more suitableCrystal Communications Magazine.2017.07.17 received the overhaul notice, the two reviewers respectively raised 6 questions, all of which were better to answer, added a decimal and returned to the editor after 07.20, and then were sent to one of the reviewers.2017.07.25 accept2017.08.06 proof2017.09.01 See publicationAfter switching to receiving less than a month, I still recommend that you select for the journal, which saves time and effort.Of course, do not rule out good luck published in a better journal

(12) Thank | 浅念对白

2017-2-26Draft, 4-9 days to come back to review comments, refused to re-submit, three reviewers, a more positive work, minor repair; a major repair; editor sent to arbitrationArbitration overhaul; after careful modification, 5-12 re-submitment, 6-13 days to receive.According to the editors and reviewers' comments, careful and careful revision will have good results.I wish you all the best, and the manuscripts that have been submitted have good results.

(1) Thank | dandan

has been selectd for 10 days, submitted on June 2nd, and became editor with June 3rd, then there is no more....I have been in the With editor state, I don’t know what the situation is. I selectd for Communication ah

(0) Thank | 天狼星

3.26Submission 5.03 Minor repair 5. 12th return 5.19 reception

(0) Thank | 1360870444@qq.com

2月25Submission, March 17 return, two minor repairs, March 29 modified return, April 13 accept online

(0) Thank | 1150885049@qq.com

2 submission on the 12th, March 31st to first-instance opinion, separated by 48 days, twoReviewers, all given minor repairs;After dragging on for so long, I thought that I was arbitrated. The final result is still good. It may be because of the reason for the New Year. Editor-selected Academician Zhang Hongjie~

(3) Thank | jyrensdu@sina.com

article. It is quite fast, nanomaterials.Direction, the first shot Crystengcomm, 2015.11.13 select, 2015.12.07 overhaul, 2016.0-1.07 return revised draft, 2016.01.13 directly accepted.Zhang edits quite quickly!

(0) Thank | jiangaj1616

The time for editors to reviewers is relatively short, general communication for 1 week, full text and review for 2 weeks.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

first selectd for the journal, a Full Paper was submitted to the journal from October 10th, and there is no first-instance news yet. After listening to the insects, the journal is now reviewing the paper very slowly.I want to know how long the review period for the journal editor is for the reviewer.On November 27th, the results of the first trial, the two reviewers, a lot of criticisms on the review comments, made many suggestions on the sentences in the paper, another evaluation actively recommended the publication, the editor found the editorial board arbitration, the arbitration took the bugThe papers were incomplete, and actually said that under such inaccurate theory, there are still so many "ridiculous" data reported, and the rejection of the manuscript, the words feel very disrespectful to the author, it is doubtful that the judges morality.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

has a small job, submitted Crystal Growth & Design rejected, changed to CrystEngComm, selectd on the 15th, there is no news yet, I hope to give a force, at least send a review.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

This posting speed is really good!Three review comments in two weeks!Minor repair, upload the night to accept!Complete all the programs in less than a month!Zhang editor is very efficient!The quality of this article is really good, I feel a good article reviewer, the editor's attitude is really good!I hope everyone has to help!!!

(0) Thank | Anonymous

30-Aug contribution; 30-Sep revision comments returned, two reviewers, one minor repair one refused to engage, the editor gave an arbitration, arbitration minor repair, and finally edited to Xiao Xiu; 16-Oct Edited the manuscript, was scared to death, submitted a revised draft on the 17th; 21-Oct editorial notice accepted!From submission to recruitment for almost 2 months, I had some delays in the middle, and the editors and reviewers were very friendly and made some constructive comments...

(0) Thank | Anonymous

The first submitment in Asian chemistry and pccp were not submitted for review, and the journal did not report great hopes. The submission was submitted on July 29, minor repair on September 19, and received on October 3!!!!!It’s quite smooth, it’s been a little longer.....Pray for the National Award!!!

(0) Thank | Anonymous

27-Aug-2013Submission.13-Sep-2013 Review comments returned.Two reviewers, one overhaul, one minor repair.20-Sep-2013 revised draft is sent back.It is accepted 10 days later (today 30-Sep-2013).From submission to recruitment for 1 month and 3 days. High efficiency.Reviewers and editors are very friendly.

(0) Thank | Anonymous