ChemSusChem

Direction of photocatalytic CO2 reduction. It was firstly submitted to Angew, and both reviewers required major revisions (rating: one 15%, and one 50%). It was rejected in the second review because the key data could not be completed. After nearly a year, I filled up the data requested by the reviewers and resubmitted it to Angew, and the editor rejected it directly. Then we attached the review comments from Angew and submitted it to ChemSusChem. It was sent for review the next day, and the review comments returned after ten days. Two reviewers (rating: one 5%, and one 15%) each asked five or six questions, requesting additional data. The revised manuscript was submitted 12 days later, and it was accepted and online after 3 days. It took 25 days from submission to acceptance, which was extremely efficient.

(15) Thank | Trump.Ray

I also specially registered an account here to make a comment just like others did in previous post! I did a part of the research work in the first half of the year and found it was very meaningful. I submitted the manuscript to several journals with IF up to 10 but it was rejected by all of them. I didn’t want to postpone the assessment, so I submitted it to this journal under the advice of a foreign advisor. Below was the basic process: 12.02 submit to journal; 12.03 under review; 12.10 revisions; 12.23 submit revised; 12.27 accepted; 12.29 online. The evaluation was good, the opinions were pertinent, and the review speed was super fast. I like this journal! If there is a chance inn future, I will continue to consider to submit this journal! Work hard together!

(5) Thank | 一只想变成猪的科研狗

The manuscript was processed very quickly. It took about 20 days from submission to the return of first review comments. One major revision and two minor revisions. The reviewer, who recommended major revision, made about 15 pertinent comments that helped to improve the level of the article indeed, and I also learned something. I would like to thank the responsible reviewer. The revised manuscript was returned a week later, the second review took about 5 days and the manuscript was accepted directly. After the notification to upload the PDF file, it was published online the next day. The previous goal was too high, and it was rejected by both ACS Nano and AFM. I couldn't wait to submit to this journal because I was about to graduate. Generally speaking, I am quite satisfied with this submission. With impact factor of 7.8 and high recognition, it is a Q1 journal steadily in chemistry field.

(0) Thank | 一块好砖

I have to say that this journal is really efficient. 2017.12.30, submitted; 2017.12.31, Return request for supplemental stability data. 2018.1.3, Returned the paper after supplementation. 2018.1.4, paper has been submitted for review. 2018.1.29, Received the review comments, two reviewers, one immediately accepted, one asked for a minor revision, the editor favored direct acceptance, but the reviewers' opinions prevailed and they asked me to add an experiment. 2018.2.7, Returned the modified manuscript. 2018.2.8, manuscript accepted online. In general, the review process is relatively smooth, but the journal emphasizes articles with new ideas and data. Often, an article may have to be modified many times to have the final good result. I hope that this journal will get better and better. IF over 8.

(3) Thank | tiger C

Submitted on November 19thSubmitted on November 23On January 7th, I sent an e-mail asking the editor to review the manuscript. After more than a month, I still have no news. Why is it so slow?On January 8th, the editor sent an email to let us modify it if there was only one reviewer, saying that other reviewers have not responded yet.Returned to the evening on January 23Directly received on January 24th

(2) Thank | 路之遥

Only five days, let me switch to a new journal under Weily...Now in the appeal, it is estimated that

(0) Thank | llfzcmsleep

Molecular sieve direction, the opinions of the three reviewers are relatively pertinent, after the minor repair, I hope the journal will be better and better

(0) Thank | vigilsunny

has been submitted for 70 days, still no news, the review speed is very slow!The status now becomes with editor.Looking forward to the good results!

(0) Thank | 489644184@163.com

have to say that the review of this journal is very efficient.Submitted for 20 days to return the news overhaul, 20 directly after the repair.The editor is very responsible.I wish you better and better!

(1) Thank | 帕部

Want to ask who is the chemsuschem submission template?Ask for a template, the gods who have selectd for help.How long will it take for the first trial?My mailbox cyxxsm@163.com

(0) Thank | cyxxsm@163.com

Speed ​​is very fast, I hope the impact factor can pass 8, I wish more and better.

(1) Thank | CO2

Reviewing speed is very fast, returning comments in two weeks, repairing 20 days to receive

(3) Thank | xiaoqiu

From September 2016, ChemSusChem began to increase the monthly volume, from 30 articles per month to 60 articles.The publication speed of the article has been greatly improved.

(4) Thank | jelin.ge201@gmail.com

ChemSusChem is a good journal with an estimated impact factor of 8.0.

(2) Thank | Anonymous

is still a very influential journal

(3) Thank | Anonymous

2013 IF = 7.475

(0) Thank | Anonymous

This year's new impact factor everyone feels able tohow much?

(0) Thank | Anonymous

recently submitted an article, pure organic things are not cold, and directly shot, it is estimated that if it is interdisciplinary will be better.

(1) Thank | Anonymous

submitted to Chemsuschem for a month, the status is always submitted, is it wrong when I submitted the manuscript?Which one knows what is going on?anxious!

(2) Thank | Anonymous

contributed more than forty days to review the comments, one refused to engage, two minor repairs.Finally, draw a month to review the manuscript submission and go over 30 days to receive!The editor will give a chance to modify!After the revised manuscript is submitted, it will be received one month later~

(0) Thank | Anonymous

that changhefei that can't see the status, you can go to https://www.manuscriptxpress.com/osm/ in this linkJsp/loginHP2.jsp.Two reviewers, one and a half months, one overhaul, one minor repair, overhaul is mainly introduction and manuscript error.In the result,

(0) Thank | Anonymous

has been submitted for half a month. Every time after submitting from the submit an article, it is a new submission order. I can't see the status of the manuscript. Where do you check the status of the manuscript?

(2) Thank | Anonymous

has been submitted for more than two months, the status is still submitted.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

just got an article, minor repair.Now the impact factor has been 6.8, a very good journal

(1) Thank | Anonymous