I have to say that this journal is really efficient. 2017.12.30, submitted; 2017.12.31, Return request for supplemental stability data. 2018.1.3, Returned the paper after supplementation. 2018.1.4, paper has been submitted for review. 2018.1.29, Received the review comments, two reviewers, one immediately accepted, one asked for a minor revision, the editor favored direct acceptance, but the reviewers' opinions prevailed and they asked me to add an experiment. 2018.2.7, Returned the modified manuscript. 2018.2.8, manuscript accepted online. In general, the review process is relatively smooth, but the journal emphasizes articles with new ideas and data. Often, an article may have to be modified many times to have the final good result. I hope that this journal will get better and better. IF over 8.

(3) Thank | tiger C

Submitted on November 19thSubmitted on November 23On January 7th, I sent an e-mail asking the editor to review the manuscript. After more than a month, I still have no news. Why is it so slow?On January 8th, the editor sent an email to let us modify it if there was only one reviewer, saying that other reviewers have not responded yet.Returned to the evening on January 23Directly received on January 24th

(2) Thank | 路之遥

Only five days, let me switch to a new journal under Weily...Now in the appeal, it is estimated that

(0) Thank | llfzcmsleep

Molecular sieve direction, the opinions of the three reviewers are relatively pertinent, after the minor repair, I hope the journal will be better and better

(0) Thank | vigilsunny

has been submitted for 70 days, still no news, the review speed is very slow!The status now becomes with editor.Looking forward to the good results!

(0) Thank | 489644184@163.com

have to say that the review of this journal is very efficient.Submitted for 20 days to return the news overhaul, 20 directly after the repair.The editor is very responsible.I wish you better and better!

(1) Thank | 帕部

Want to ask who is the chemsuschem submission template?Ask for a template, the gods who have selectd for help.How long will it take for the first trial?My mailbox cyxxsm@163.com

(0) Thank | cyxxsm@163.com

Speed ​​is very fast, I hope the impact factor can pass 8, I wish more and better.

(1) Thank | CO2

Reviewing speed is very fast, returning comments in two weeks, repairing 20 days to receive

(3) Thank | xiaoqiu

From September 2016, ChemSusChem began to increase the monthly volume, from 30 articles per month to 60 articles.The publication speed of the article has been greatly improved.

(4) Thank | jelin.ge201@gmail.com

ChemSusChem is a good journal with an estimated impact factor of 8.0.

(2) Thank | Anonymous

is still a very influential journal

(3) Thank | Anonymous

2013 IF = 7.475

(0) Thank | Anonymous

This year's new impact factor everyone feels able tohow much?

(0) Thank | Anonymous

recently submitted an article, pure organic things are not cold, and directly shot, it is estimated that if it is interdisciplinary will be better.

(1) Thank | Anonymous

submitted to Chemsuschem for a month, the status is always submitted, is it wrong when I submitted the manuscript?Which one knows what is going on?anxious!

(2) Thank | Anonymous

contributed more than forty days to review the comments, one refused to engage, two minor repairs.Finally, draw a month to review the manuscript submission and go over 30 days to receive!The editor will give a chance to modify!After the revised manuscript is submitted, it will be received one month later~

(0) Thank | Anonymous

that changhefei that can't see the status, you can go to https://www.manuscriptxpress.com/osm/ in this linkJsp/loginHP2.jsp.Two reviewers, one and a half months, one overhaul, one minor repair, overhaul is mainly introduction and manuscript error.In the result,

(0) Thank | Anonymous

has been submitted for half a month. Every time after submitting from the submit an article, it is a new submission order. I can't see the status of the manuscript. Where do you check the status of the manuscript?

(2) Thank | Anonymous

has been submitted for more than two months, the status is still submitted.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

just got an article, minor repair.Now the impact factor has been 6.8, a very good journal

(1) Thank | Anonymous

just an article about microbial battery anode research December 6, 2011On the 9th of January, I received the first-instance revision opinion. On January 17th, I returned to the second instance. On March 6th, I received the journal request for a higher level. There is only one modification opportunity. I need two reviewers before deciding whether to accept it.Definitely still going up

(1) Thank | Anonymous

2011 to submitted an article.For 40 days in the first instance, the two reviewers suggested amendments and made a lot of constructive comments.Two shots were acceptd 25 days later.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

may be more suitable for research topics and journals, plus the boss article is carefully changed, 12.26 submissions, and 2.4 is directly accepted.It’s very good to have such good news just after the end of the year.This is my second post, I didn't expect it to be so smooth.

(1) Thank | Anonymous