Researched my article and started to submit in Chem. Common. Two reviewers, one suggested minor revision, one said article was not suitable for acceptance yet. They suggested that I submit to JPCC.  On July 20, I changed to European Chemistry instead. On August 30, I replied to the comments. A major revision was mainly aimed at my English, a lot of grammatical mistakes.  The reviewers replied to my revised draft on September 9 and accepted it on September 25. Overall, the process was quite smooth. The chemical efficiency in Europe is obviously not as high as that of Chem. Common.

(1) Thank | Anonymous

The Chinese Academy of Sciences division is a wonderful, European chemistry is 2 districts.Materials Nano Many journals have a high impact factor, and many of these journals are in Zone 1.Look at the country, how many people are still sticking to basic chemistry, and they are working on nano materials.In the long run, China's scientific research is finished.

(50) Thank | dfgt

European Chemistry, as an old European journal, guarantees the quality of the article and is the top journal of the comprehensive journal of Chemistry.

(7) Thank | 小太阳2018

2018.8.22 Submitted2018.8.22 underreview2018.9.10 int revision2018.9.21 Submit Revision2018.9.24 under review2018.9.26 accept2018.9.30 accepted manuscript onlineThe editor-in-chief handled the manuscript very quickly, and the reviewer responded quickly, thinking that he did not return to the reviewer after the revision.The result returned two reviewers and was accepted shortly.Like the editors and reviewers for their efficiency!!!

(5) Thank | shenhd8848

2018.8.4 No contribution, no news yet, the teacher selectd, the specific state is unknown.

(0) Thank | 有机多孔材料

The review is quick, and the reviewer's opinion is very professional.There are not many journals on chemical synthesis, and European Chemistry is the top journal of the Journal of Chemical Integration.

(0) Thank | who

2018 03 20 Submitted2018 03 26 Under Review2018 05 11 In Revision2018 05 21 Manuscript revised2018 05 25 Manuscript Accepted2018 05 26 Accepted Manuscript OnlineThe questions raised by the reviewers are more in-depth and more professional, thanks to the editors and reviewers!After the article was accepted, the speed of Online exceeded my imagination

(1) Thank | kai_蓝风

I have been almost 2 months, or under review.................

(0) Thank | ghjg

3月8March 10 under reviewIt’s still under review for 50 days..The master's degree is postponed.... I still don't dareI want to cry without tears...

(1) Thank | 642885878@qq.com

2018.2.26 Submitted2018.2.28 Underreview2018.4.09 Int revision2018.4.16 Submitted2018.4.17 Under review2018.4.19 AcceptThe editor-in-chief handled the manuscript very quickly, and the reviewer responded quickly, thinking that he did not return to the reviewer after the revision.The result returned two reviewers and was accepted shortly.Like the editors and reviewers for their efficiency!!!

(2) Thank | Anonymous

09 Apr 2018: Submitted09 Apr 2018: with editor10 Apr 2018: Transfer (Introducing four optional sister publications: ChemistryOpen; ChemNanoMat; ChemPhotoChem; ChemPlusChem)
 ╮(╯▽╰)╭ Continue to work hard.

(1) Thank | o(∩_∩)o 哈哈

Reply to review commentsThree days, still waiting, I also count on him to award scholarships, and I will judge tomorrow, just to see if I can come back tonight.

(3) Thank | 好

has previously selectd GREEN CHEMISTRY, both reviewers have given overhaul, and the editor has found a reviewer. It is hard to say that the silane used is not environmentally friendly, okay, water system,Silane condensation forms silica microspheres, which is not in the category of green chemistry. It was rejected by the editor. After revision according to the reviewer's opinion, CHEMISTRY-A EUROPEAN JOURNAL, 12.24 submissions, 2.8 direct acceptance, because abroadOn vacation, I took the initiative to postpone the week, and received an invitation from the editor to make a cover paper.Currently in the drawing...

(7) Thank | engle

3Submitted on March 30, returned to the review comments after 17 days, both reviewers suggested to amend, no major overhaul or minor repair, return on the 22nd, May 13accept.Although I accepted it in my own expectation, I was very happy to open a new chapter for me.

(1) Thank | srxiedongjx@sina.com

The first time I selectd for European chemistry. After two weeks of submission, I received it and felt very lucky.A reviewer asked Xiao Xiu, and the other completely agreed.

(2) Thank | 小虾米

11 On the 3rd of the select, the 17th review came back to minor repairs. I delayed it for half a month, and on December 3, I submitted a revised draft, accepted on December 9th, except for my own delay.Time, submission to accept 20 days.give it a like!

(2) Thank | 妞

submitted an article, the first trial is almost one and a half months.Then, it was a minor repair. It was accepted about 20 days after the revision. There was a reviewer who did not agree with the reaction mechanism. The editor did not say anything and accepted it.I will wait for the time to hang out on the Internet.If you can still see the new idea!

(0) Thank | Anonymous

2013-08-03Submission, 2013-08-27 Editor's reply.Two reviewers, one directly accepted; one accepted after a small change.The editor accepts directly.This is my fastest paper so far.Refueling

(0) Thank | Anonymous

At the beginning of April, Chemical Communication tossed for two months and was finally rejected by arbitration. After changing to the full text, 6.14 selectd for European chemistry, 7.4 review comments came back, two minor repairs, the editor directly received.It is an unexpected surprise.I feel that the innovative requirements of the article are not very high, but the article must be comprehensive and logical.

(3) Thank | Anonymous

Previously selectd small was rejected by a reviewer, post-submitment Europeanization, 3.31 submission, editor let first answer small reviewer's opinion, May 24 first trial result, 2The reviewer, before the small reviewer recommended to accept directly, a modification, 6.24 returns the revised opinion, 6.27 notification received.The first trial may take a long time, and the second trial is basically decided by the editor.

(1) Thank | Anonymous

Received an article this year, currently on line, is a bit slow after receiving the program, it is estimated that it will take a long time to officially publish

(0) Thank | Anonymous

My is from angewIn chem., one reviewer gave reception, and one refused to be novel.After 3 days of submitteding this journal, the editor will receive it directly.However, the receipt letter was sent for more than a month. The online still couldn't find

(0) Thank | Anonymous

3 submission on the 14th, and returned to the minor repair on April 5th, and may receive it.On April 11th, he returned to the revision and re-submitted the status. On April 17th, he was accepted and sent to one of the reviewers who had a little more opinion.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Submitted after one and a half months of receiving, a reviewer, gave 3Point modification suggestions are relatively simple.Edit direct reception.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

European quality is still OK, the influence is good, and the impact factor is relatively stable.I selectd for one, and the three reviewers have always agreed to accept it. The editor received it directly. It can be found for about 2 weeks from the notification to the Internet. It may be that the editor is in the arrangement!

(0) Thank | Anonymous