CHEMICAL COMMUNICATIONS

Based on my submission to Chemical Communications, I think that the journal’s review process is rigorous. This is a short-format journal (short communication articles only), so it is important to be concise but also thorough when describing your experiments – don’t ignore certain steps to meet the word count. The editors and reviewers are very responsible and efficient. It has been suggested that CC plans to reduce the amount of articles published per year starting in 2018. In my opinion, the current IF does not express the scientific merit of this journal; it’s likely to break 7 next year. If your research is novel, submit to CC. The review period is short; never exceeded 38 days for my submissions!

(4) Thank | 某某某

10.31 Submission After one week, submit for review11.23 Review comments, three minor repairs, edits to overhaul12.13 Graduation reply, but also to fill the data, dragged on for a while, repaired backThe next step is to wait, foreign countries start Christmas and New Year holiday, this time is the most tormented, every night will be dreaming of awakening, every day in the state of brush and small woodworm to see everyone's contribution experience1.2 comments, the crystal reviewer raised some questions, minor repairs1.15 receiving and acceptingIt’s not easy to select for an article. For the entire 18 years, I’ve been writing articles, submitteding articles, being rejected, re-submiting, and receiving..Too tired, I am relieved that I have sent 5 SCIs a year, graduated, and I got a post, and I can take a break for the New Year.Fight again in the coming year, everyone cheers!

(13) Thank | 新页6608

2018.11.25 Submission2018.12.27 Return to minor repair2019.01.10 Modify submission2019.01.10 EmploymentThe article looks at innovation and is highly efficient.

(2) Thank | 帅大哥

Submitted a few days before Christmas It is still the initial assessment status.急急

(5) Thank | Marilyn

A minor repair A rejection suggestion re-submitment, arbitration rejection...The comments of a reviewer who declined the submission were a bit confusing..

(0) Thank | Marilyn

I don’t know why I didn’t send it for the first time.2018.10.9 First submission2018.11.1 Reject

(1) Thank | labdog

Journal is a ace journal,However, the initial review was still a bit slow.I am working with the three divisions of the research team on the clean use of biomass.Every time I selectd for a long time, I was rejected.Reviewers will search for relevant papers, and if there are already more relevant papers published, they will be rejected.The review was rejected for a few months, and there was no strong innovation. If you are anxious, it is not recommended to select.

(0) Thank | shanghai氢

My paper has been paying attention to everyone's sharing experience since I started contributing CC to receiving. Now the paper has received some of my experiences.Submission time: 8.9 Submission; 10.2 overhaul; 10.18 rehabilitated; 10.21 received;1. It can be seen that the first-instance cycle of the paper is very long, and it is almost 2 months. At that time, it was particularly embarrassing. I always brushed the submission system and saw the continuous review and the editor. I saw the opinions of many people.However, after receiving the first-instance opinion, it turned out to be a minor repair, a major overhaul.It can be seen that the length of the first instance is not necessarily arbitration. It may be that the editor is always looking for reviewers.2. It is very fast to reply to the comments after the overhaul, and this is CC praise. The communication between the editor and the editor is very nice, and invites to do back cover.3. Many people now say that CC irrigation, but I am the first time to select, is also the first time the research team selectd, if the article is not new, it is still difficult to review, the relationship is exceptional.Graduation is finally hopeful, ε=( ́ο`*)))唉!It’s hard to graduate from a Ph.D.!!

(23) Thank | PCs-CHY

Chemical Communications What is this going to do?Self-falling influence factor???Good articles still exist, but there are more and more hydrographs. In 16 and 17 years, the continuous reduction of the volume of manuscripts (wos data) has not blocked the decline of IF. In 18 years, a lot of hydrology has been produced, and the same material does the same.Application, receiving the same month???In 19 years, if IF fell below 6, it would completely scrap this ace journal.I really appreciate the innovation height before CC, I don't like to spray, I don't want to check the data and then spray me.

(14) Thank | 科研小白666

2018-08-08 Submission2018-08-22 overhaul2018-09-14 Modified select2019-09-20 AcceptThe innovative requirements for work are not very high, the writing should be rigorous, realistic, and highlight certain innovation!The explanation should be reasonable, especially for key data.Answer the questions raised by the reviewers and answer them carefully!The impact factor has been very stable for the past two years, and it has not been robbed by ACS journals.

(2) Thank | 科学与研究

selectd one year ago, the editing efficiency is quite high, and I accept it after the overhaul!!2018-08-08 Submission2018-08-22 overhaul2018-09-14 Modified select2019-09-20 AcceptThe innovative requirements for work are not very high, the writing should be rigorous, realistic, and highlight certain innovation!The explanation should be reasonable, especially for key data.Answer the questions raised by the reviewers and answer them carefully!The impact factor has been very stable for the past two years, and it has not been robbed by ACS journals.

(0) Thank | 科学与研究

2018.05.23 Submission2018.06.12 Refusal, edit to re-submitted after modification2018.06.27 Re-submitment after modification2018.07.09 overhaul major revision2018.07.16 Finished return2018.08.02 Article AcceptedThe overall efficiency is very fast, the editorial opinion is very good.

(1) Thank | gordoneggegg@gmail.com

Today's cc, pray for a smooth reception!

(19) Thank | 行者

A small article, issued by the boss after two years, the first time to select directly second refused and then appealed to the trial, and then refused to engage or re-submit, and then re-submited for 10 days to receive is also the first paper in life, currently the first doctorThe work has been written and hope to continue to go (direct blog), go spurs go~~~

(99) Thank | Anonymous

After one week of submission, the editor is still in the hands of the editor. After one week, he will submit the review, and 15 days will be reviewed. Two minor repairs,Uploaded after modification, received directly on the same day, this speed is no one, and the review speed is very fast!

(0) Thank | little

I have been with editor until June 25th.No. in peer review may be too large for the manuscript, but the editor is still trying to submit the

(1) Thank | 大头

All with editor9 days, does anyone know that the status of this journal will show under review?Mys is not already submitted for review?

(0) Thank | apple

2018.01.10Submission;2018.03.10 rejected the draft, a minor repair, the arbitration said that there were serious chemical problems rejected;2018.04.24 re-entry;2018.05.26 direct reception, invitation backcoverRejection after arbitration is still promising if it is revised according to the reviewer's opinion. The overall feeling is that CC still emphasizes innovation, especially in writing, it must be built around the innovation center. The probability of this is great.

(4) Thank | GGD

Very good, the review comments are positive and negative, directly accepted after the overhaul, it is recommended that everyone pay attention to the format

(0) Thank | scdx

Just sent an article, from submission to acceptance for a few days

(0) Thank | worm

is getting more and more water, no wonder the influence factor is getting lower and lower

(1) Thank | sciencewss

The first post of graduate students is also the most difficult way to contribute.From March 2017, the manuscript was submitted to the end of April 2018, and finally it was submitted out.I will probably share with you my contribution experience:On August 25, 2017, he selectd for JMCA and began an anxious wait for more than two months; the result was a rejection.However, the reviewer's opinion was very pertinent. After the revision of the reviewer's opinion, he then selectd for the ACS AMI and did not submit it for review.There is no way to make up the experiment and select for CC.Submitted on February 3, 2018, the reason for the possibility of a holiday in the middle, returned to the overhaul on March 6, 2018. I really need to thank Dr Jamie Purcell AMRSC.The speed of CC is fast, it will be repaired on March 25, 2018, and the result will be accepted on April 4.

(4) Thank | 搬砖人

03.083.12 Directly refused3.14 file a complaint, edit the complaint at night, and submit it directly for review.14 days have passed. No news yet, anxiously waiting....

(17) Thank | 977314966@qq.com

2017.1.19 Submission2017.2.21 minor repair2017.2.23 Back Accepted on the same day, online

(1) Thank | Sigo

Received comments 14 days after submission, a minor repair and a rejection.The comments were very deep and accurate, and the reviewers who refused to submit only gave a reason to point out the shortcomings of the article.However, this problem is really difficult to solve in the field.It took 6 days to integrate the comments and submit the revised draft, explain and discuss the problems that could not be solved, and re-emphasize the significance of the innovation of this article.Accepted two days later.The speed is very fast and the efficiency is very high. The reviewers are also very professional and knowledgeable.The key is efficiency!The research content is very innovative, can help and inspire peers, and needs to be published as soon as possible.Cc is doing very well in this regard, it is worth "home to urgent high quality communications from across the chemical sciences."

(1) Thank | Anonymous