My Account Submit My Manuscript
Letpub, Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service

CHEMICAL COMMUNICATIONS

   For Publishers  New

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:
Journal Cover Design Service
APA has partnered with LetPub to provide a full suite of author services

[CHEMICAL COMMUNICATIONS]Hello, you are Visitor Number 278815 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitleCHEMICAL COMMUNICATIONS
Journal Title AbbreviationsCHEM COMMUN
ISSN1359-7345
E-ISSN1364-548X
h-index297
CiteScore
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
9.801.9921.144
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Materials Science
Subcategory: Materials Chemistry
Q118 / 287
Category: Materials Science
Subcategory: Catalysis
Q110 / 57
Category: Materials Science
Subcategory: General Chemistry
Q135 / 398
Category: Materials Science
Subcategory: Metals and Alloys
Q16 / 152
Category: Materials Science
Subcategory: Surfaces, Coatings and Films
Q18 / 120
Category: Materials Science
Subcategory: Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials
Q123 / 234
Category: Materials Science
Subcategory: Ceramics and Composites
Q17 / 106

Self-Citation Ratio (2019-2020)6.30%
Official Websitehttp://pubs.rsc.org/en/journals/journalissues/cc
Online Manuscript Submissionhttp://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/chemcomm
Open AccessNo
PublisherROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY, THOMAS GRAHAM HOUSE, SCIENCE PARK, MILTON RD, CAMBRIDGE, ENGLAND, CAMBS, CB4 0WF
Subject AreaChemistry
Country/Area of PublicationENGLAND
Publication FrequencyWeekly
Year Publication Started1996
Annual Article Volume3194
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index
Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=1359-7345%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Authorized Data from Publisher:
Data from Authors: About 1.7 month(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: 82%
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【CHEMICAL COMMUNICATIONS】CiteScore Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • CiteScore Trend


First    Previous    1    2    3    4    5    Next    Last  (To Page
/5)
  Reviews on CHEMICAL COMMUNICATIONS: Write a review
Author: 某某某


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-04-05 08:24:37
Based on my submission to Chemical Communications, I think that the journal’s review process is rigorous. This is a short-format journal (short communication articles only), so it is important to be concise but also thorough when describing your experiments – don’t ignore certain steps to meet the word count. The editors and reviewers are very responsible and efficient. It has been suggested that CC plans to reduce the amount of articles published per year starting in 2018. In my opinion, the current IF does not express the scientific merit of this journal; it’s likely to break 7 next year. If your research is novel, submit to CC. The review period is short; never exceeded 38 days for my submissions!

(4) Thank | 某某某

Author: 新页6608


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-01-18 17:14:37
10.31 Submission After one week, submit for review11.23 Review comments, three minor repairs, edits to overhaul12.13 Graduation reply, but also to fill the data, dragged on for a while, repaired backThe next step is to wait, foreign countries start Christmas and New Year holiday, this time is the most tormented, every night will be dreaming of awakening, every day in the state of brush and small woodworm to see everyone's contribution experience1.2 comments, the crystal reviewer raised some questions, minor repairs1.15 receiving and acceptingIt’s not easy to select for an article. For the entire 18 years, I’ve been writing articles, submitteding articles, being rejected, re-submiting, and receiving..Too tired, I am relieved that I have sent 5 SCIs a year, graduated, and I got a post, and I can take a break for the New Year.Fight again in the coming year, everyone cheers!
Show Review in Original Language
(13) Thank | 新页6608

Author: 帅大哥


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-01-10 14:15:45
2018.11.25 Submission2018.12.27 Return to minor repair2019.01.10 Modify submission2019.01.10 EmploymentThe article looks at innovation and is highly efficient.
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | 帅大哥

Author: Marilyn


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-12-28 21:00:13
Submitted a few days before Christmas It is still the initial assessment status.急急
Show Review in Original Language
(5) Thank | Marilyn

Author: Marilyn


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-12-24 11:03:50
A minor repair A rejection suggestion re-submitment, arbitration rejection...The comments of a reviewer who declined the submission were a bit confusing..
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Marilyn

Author: labdog


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-12-18 16:41:59
I don’t know why I didn’t send it for the first time.2018.10.9 First submission2018.11.1 Reject
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | labdog

Author: shanghai氢


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-12-15 15:05:36
Journal is a ace journal,However, the initial review was still a bit slow.I am working with the three divisions of the research team on the clean use of biomass.Every time I selectd for a long time, I was rejected.Reviewers will search for relevant papers, and if there are already more relevant papers published, they will be rejected.The review was rejected for a few months, and there was no strong innovation. If you are anxious, it is not recommended to select.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | shanghai氢

Author: PCs-CHY


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-10-22 10:57:03
My paper has been paying attention to everyone's sharing experience since I started contributing CC to receiving. Now the paper has received some of my experiences.Submission time: 8.9 Submission; 10.2 overhaul; 10.18 rehabilitated; 10.21 received;1. It can be seen that the first-instance cycle of the paper is very long, and it is almost 2 months. At that time, it was particularly embarrassing. I always brushed the submission system and saw the continuous review and the editor. I saw the opinions of many people.However, after receiving the first-instance opinion, it turned out to be a minor repair, a major overhaul.It can be seen that the length of the first instance is not necessarily arbitration. It may be that the editor is always looking for reviewers.2. It is very fast to reply to the comments after the overhaul, and this is CC praise. The communication between the editor and the editor is very nice, and invites to do back cover.3. Many people now say that CC irrigation, but I am the first time to select, is also the first time the research team selectd, if the article is not new, it is still difficult to review, the relationship is exceptional.Graduation is finally hopeful, ε=( ́ο`*)))唉!It’s hard to graduate from a Ph.D.!!
Show Review in Original Language
(23) Thank | PCs-CHY

Author: 科研小白666


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-10-17 14:54:21
Chemical Communications What is this going to do?Self-falling influence factor???Good articles still exist, but there are more and more hydrographs. In 16 and 17 years, the continuous reduction of the volume of manuscripts (wos data) has not blocked the decline of IF. In 18 years, a lot of hydrology has been produced, and the same material does the same.Application, receiving the same month???In 19 years, if IF fell below 6, it would completely scrap this ace journal.I really appreciate the innovation height before CC, I don't like to spray, I don't want to check the data and then spray me.
Show Review in Original Language
(14) Thank | 科研小白666

Author: 科学与研究


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-09-22 09:03:43
2018-08-08 Submission2018-08-22 overhaul2018-09-14 Modified select2019-09-20 AcceptThe innovative requirements for work are not very high, the writing should be rigorous, realistic, and highlight certain innovation!The explanation should be reasonable, especially for key data.Answer the questions raised by the reviewers and answer them carefully!The impact factor has been very stable for the past two years, and it has not been robbed by ACS journals.
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | 科学与研究

Author: 科学与研究


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-09-22 09:02:10
selectd one year ago, the editing efficiency is quite high, and I accept it after the overhaul!!2018-08-08 Submission2018-08-22 overhaul2018-09-14 Modified select2019-09-20 AcceptThe innovative requirements for work are not very high, the writing should be rigorous, realistic, and highlight certain innovation!The explanation should be reasonable, especially for key data.Answer the questions raised by the reviewers and answer them carefully!The impact factor has been very stable for the past two years, and it has not been robbed by ACS journals.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 科学与研究

Author: gordoneggegg@gmail.com


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-08-03 01:12:25
2018.05.23 Submission2018.06.12 Refusal, edit to re-submitted after modification2018.06.27 Re-submitment after modification2018.07.09 overhaul major revision2018.07.16 Finished return2018.08.02 Article AcceptedThe overall efficiency is very fast, the editorial opinion is very good.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | gordoneggegg@gmail.com

Author: 行者


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-07-26 22:09:07
Today's cc, pray for a smooth reception!
Show Review in Original Language
(19) Thank | 行者

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-07-14 20:33:58
A small article, issued by the boss after two years, the first time to select directly second refused and then appealed to the trial, and then refused to engage or re-submit, and then re-submited for 10 days to receive is also the first paper in life, currently the first doctorThe work has been written and hope to continue to go (direct blog), go spurs go~~~
Show Review in Original Language
(99) Thank | Anonymous

Author: little


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-07-10 09:44:04
After one week of submission, the editor is still in the hands of the editor. After one week, he will submit the review, and 15 days will be reviewed. Two minor repairs,Uploaded after modification, received directly on the same day, this speed is no one, and the review speed is very fast!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | little

Author: 大头


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-06-29 13:22:28
I have been with editor until June 25th.No. in peer review may be too large for the manuscript, but the editor is still trying to submit the
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | 大头

Author: apple


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-06-29 10:38:38
All with editor9 days, does anyone know that the status of this journal will show under review?Mys is not already submitted for review?
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | apple

Author: GGD


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted directly


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-06-15 23:07:03
2018.01.10Submission;2018.03.10 rejected the draft, a minor repair, the arbitration said that there were serious chemical problems rejected;2018.04.24 re-entry;2018.05.26 direct reception, invitation backcoverRejection after arbitration is still promising if it is revised according to the reviewer's opinion. The overall feeling is that CC still emphasizes innovation, especially in writing, it must be built around the innovation center. The probability of this is great.
Show Review in Original Language
(4) Thank | GGD

Author: scdx


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-06-14 23:30:45
Very good, the review comments are positive and negative, directly accepted after the overhaul, it is recommended that everyone pay attention to the format
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | scdx

Author: worm


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted directly


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-04-27 21:49:33
Just sent an article, from submission to acceptance for a few days
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | worm

Author: sciencewss


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted directly


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-04-27 21:17:21
is getting more and more water, no wonder the influence factor is getting lower and lower
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | sciencewss

Author: 搬砖人


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-04-06 15:30:37
The first post of graduate students is also the most difficult way to contribute.From March 2017, the manuscript was submitted to the end of April 2018, and finally it was submitted out.I will probably share with you my contribution experience:On August 25, 2017, he selectd for JMCA and began an anxious wait for more than two months; the result was a rejection.However, the reviewer's opinion was very pertinent. After the revision of the reviewer's opinion, he then selectd for the ACS AMI and did not submit it for review.There is no way to make up the experiment and select for CC.Submitted on February 3, 2018, the reason for the possibility of a holiday in the middle, returned to the overhaul on March 6, 2018. I really need to thank Dr Jamie Purcell AMRSC.The speed of CC is fast, it will be repaired on March 25, 2018, and the result will be accepted on April 4.
Show Review in Original Language
(4) Thank | 搬砖人

Author: 977314966@qq.com


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-03-29 20:57:02
03.083.12 Directly refused3.14 file a complaint, edit the complaint at night, and submit it directly for review.14 days have passed. No news yet, anxiously waiting....
Show Review in Original Language
(17) Thank | 977314966@qq.com

Author: Sigo


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted directly


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-03-16 16:12:36
2017.1.19 Submission2017.2.21 minor repair2017.2.23 Back Accepted on the same day, online
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Sigo

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-03-03 09:49:31
Received comments 14 days after submission, a minor repair and a rejection.The comments were very deep and accurate, and the reviewers who refused to submit only gave a reason to point out the shortcomings of the article.However, this problem is really difficult to solve in the field.It took 6 days to integrate the comments and submit the revised draft, explain and discuss the problems that could not be solved, and re-emphasize the significance of the innovation of this article.Accepted two days later.The speed is very fast and the efficiency is very high. The reviewers are also very professional and knowledgeable.The key is efficiency!The research content is very innovative, can help and inspire peers, and needs to be published as soon as possible.Cc is doing very well in this regard, it is worth "home to urgent high quality communications from across the chemical sciences."
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

First    Previous    1    2    3    4    5    Next    Last  (To Page
/5)

Start your review of [CHEMICAL COMMUNICATIONS]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.

Intentional Space Tag



© 2010-2020  ACCDON LLC 400 5th Ave, Suite 530, Waltham, MA 02451, USA
PrivacyTerms of Service