My Account Submit My Manuscript
Letpub, Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service

Nanomaterials

   For Publishers  New

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:
Journal Cover Design Service
APA has partnered with LetPub to provide a full suite of author services

[Nanomaterials]Hello, you are Visitor Number 62328 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitleNanomaterials
Journal Title AbbreviationsNANOMATERIALS-BASEL
ISSN2079-4991
h-indexN.A.
CiteScore
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
4.100.8581.089
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Chemical Engineering
Subcategory: General Chemical Engineering
Q273 / 281
Category: Chemical Engineering
Subcategory: General Materials Science
Q2147 / 460

Self-Citation Ratio (2019-2020)11.70%
Official Websitehttp://www.mdpi.com/journal/nanomaterials
Online Manuscript Submissionhttp://susy.mdpi.com/
Open AccessYes
Publisher
Subject AreaNANOSCIENCE & NANOTECHNOLOGY
Country/Area of PublicationSWITZERLAND
Publication Frequency
Year Publication Started2011
Annual Article Volume1774
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=2079-4991%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Authorized Data from Publisher: 14.22 Day(s)
Data from Authors: 14.22 Day(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors:
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【Nanomaterials】CiteScore Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • CiteScore Trend


First    Previous    1    2    Next    Last  (To Page
/2)
  Reviews on Nanomaterials: Write a review
Author: lvkai@caep.cn


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-03-19 16:20:52
My work is on the acid hydrolysis behavior of hybrid materials. Initially submitted to Langmuir and JCIS, rejected without peer review. Then I submitted to more specialized journals, MMM and PDS, again rejected without peer review. RSC Advances sent it out for review, more than two month; 1 reviewer requested minor revision and 2 rejected. Then I decided to try an open access journal and submitted to Nanomaterials. Submitted on February 5, and received review comments February 19. One editor requested minor revision and the other suggested rejection. The editor gave the decision of rejection with the opportunity to re-submit. The reasons for rejection were just language expression and some part of the discussion not good enough. After spending 2 days to revise it, I re-submitted on the 21st, and received the comments for major revisions on March 8. It was sent to the same two reviewers. The one who rejected initially requested major revision this time, just modifying the language. Re-submitted on the same day, accepted the next day, and published online on the 14th.

(1) Thank | lvkai@caep.cn

Author: 小小飞侠


Subject Area: Physics
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted directly


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-01-08 12:44:11
The speed is very fast, the overhaul is generally given to five days, the time is more urgent, but the editor is quite good.It will be online in a month.
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | 小小飞侠

Author: ying


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-12-11 23:01:35
Submitted for review the next dayReceived review comments after two weeks, overhaul, request to return within 5 daysAmend the second day after submissionIt’s online in a few days.It can be said that it is very speedy. If you are eager to rush an article, you can definitely consider it. It means that the charge is a bit expensive.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | ying

Author: moon1004


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-11-22 13:46:09
nanomaterials It is really fast 10.30 Submission 11.13 First-instance overhaul, 3 reviewers, one overhaul 10 questions butIt is a non-detailed question written by the test method. One question is 5, one is directly acceptd, the editor gives 5 days to modify the time, the 16th is returned to the revised draft, the 19th is waiting for the editorial decision, and the 22nd is accepted.Less than a month, the speed is very fast, the research content feels average, I don't know if the journal is watery, but the speed is fast and the division of the second district still feels worthy of submitment.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | moon1004

Author: Nano-Xman


Subject Area: Environmental Sciences
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-10-09 11:35:52
MDPI's 2 districts, IF=3.504, the speed is really fast, 9.12 submission, because of the format and check the reasons 9.17 resubmission, 9.23 2Overhaul 1 rejection, edited to major revision, 9.30 resubmission, 10.2 minor revision, 10.3 Accepted, 10.9 online. Layout fee is 1500 Swiss francs, review is still relatively standard, the quality of the article will not be water, we refer to nanomaterials, hope IFAs soon as possible to break 4.
Show Review in Original Language
(4) Thank | Nano-Xman

Author: 北极狼


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-09-20 11:25:57
Journal speed, special thanks Editor:June Liang processing speed is very good, 9.7 submission, 9.11 return, 9.17 submitted revision, 9.17 minor repair, 9.19 return, 9.20 receptionThe reviewers were very serious and professional. The two reviewers, the first one raised four questions, the second one raised 12 questions, but both were better.I wish the journals better and better!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 北极狼

Author: microthief


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-08-29 21:49:24
Very fast, 8.6 submission, 8.19 return, 8.25 submitted revision, 8.26 minor repair, return on the same day, 8.28 receptionThe reviewers are very serious, and the three reviewers, the first one raised more than 20 questions...But the answer is good, still very nice
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | microthief

Author: 囧


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-06-20 17:49:12
Two weeks in the first trial, submitted after 10 days of overhaul, one week in the second instance, stayed in the editorial department for another week, and finally told the result reject.The second-instance expert opinion "Hence I would like to recommend this revised manuscript for publication in Nanomaterials in present form."Editable "The academic editor has decided that your paper is not suitable forNanomaterials." The reason is "Manuscript Out of Journal Scope". Why have you gone early, have you reviewed the out of journal scope for half a day?Wasting time, speechless!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 囧

Author: hihdi66


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-05-24 23:07:18
The article should be innovative, the review draft is very efficient, and the difficulty of the draft is generally higher.The opinions given by the reviewers are also very professional. Both reviewers are receiving, and the small repairs are returned on the same day.I hope that everyone can support the reference to nm, the impact factor is good to break 4!The
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | hihdi66

Author: 237390647@qq.com


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-05-21 11:05:31
is very fast.The review is quite strict and the depth of the content of the article is quite high.Although it belongs to Open, the quality can still be graded.The editor is very responsible, the two reviewers, the opinions are very positive, the editor requested 15 days to modify, I will repair it on the 10th day.Received directly the next day.Of course, the article can be innovative and has a certain small flaw.I would like to thank the editors in China for their praise.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 237390647@qq.com

Author: jhzr


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-04-27 15:23:29
is very efficient, and the comments are very pertinent, thanks to Professor Yueyue Zhang.That is, the overhaul gave 7 days, supplemented the experimental data, changed the language, and was busy. The fourth article of the doctor can be properly graduated.
Show Review in Original Language
(4) Thank | jhzr

Author: an


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-04-13 10:11:28
Thank you for your experience sharing, and I also won an article.The whole process took one month and the results were obtained in two weeks.The reviewer's opinion is relatively pertinent, and the journal's efficiency is particularly high.The first major overhaul was also submitted for the day, and the second minor repair was not accepted directly after three days of trial.
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | an

Author: nano-com


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-03-09 15:47:14
1 Submitted in mid-month, 20 days in the first trial, and three reviewers, each gave ten comments and asked to change it back within ten days.The reply letter wrote nearly 30 pages, and returned to the second trial. The original two reviewers made two new comments based on the reply letter.I really didn't expect this journal to be so nb.After the second repair, I wrote another five pages and received it one week later.The rigorous result of the review is that the impact factor has increased year by year, and the journal is more optimistic.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | nano-com

Author: 相信


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-03-06 02:28:59
first trial rejected, switched to journalOf materials science Directly acceptd
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 相信

Author: 相信


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-03-06 02:28:55
first-instance rejected, transferred to journal of materials science directly acceptd
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 相信

Author: dftkiiu


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-01-17 09:20:37
downstairs that buddy, before submittingIf you don't look at the website, do you want to open the journal?I also selectd for this IQ, and it was also served...Still black journal, 12 months review, is Nima a stupid?
Show Review in Original Language
(7) Thank | dftkiiu

Author: heima


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 12.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-01-16 18:07:49
Dizzy, such an important point comment actually did not mention, this journal is to charge, everyone pays attention to
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | heima

Author: wueyuyx


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-01-03 20:54:36
Journals are highly efficient and have strict review requirements.Generally, the results of the review are given within 2 weeks, and it is hoped that the journal impact factor will break 4!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | wueyuyx

Author: nikou


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-12-14 16:17:40
reviewing the speed is very fast, a good journal, the person in charge should vigorously promote the citation of the paper, in factIt's very easy to do it. The domestic Nano-micro Letter is based on a small number of articles, and the relationship is published. Once the article is up, it is definitely 3 or less. It is recommended that you select for NM, and many references
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | nikou

Author: 190188519@qq.com


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-05-15 16:02:45
I just made a mistake. I want to ask a article published in the journal nanomaterials. It has been in May, but in the web of science, I can only find the article in January 2017.,How is this going?Isn't it sci included?Can this journal know what to say?thank you very much!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 190188519@qq.com

Author: 190188519@qq.com


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-05-15 15:59:14
I want to ask a ha nanomaterials thisThe articles published in the journals have been in May, but in the web of science, only the articles in July 2017 can be found. What is going on?Is it not included in SCI?Can this journal know what to say?thank you very much!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 190188519@qq.com

Author: haaogagiejpeogg


Subject Area: Medical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-03-08 20:40:08
can only say that this journal is very fast, within 20 days of the first trial, the opinions of the two reviewers, opinions areVery pertinent, the editor gave the overhaul, gave 10 days, made up some experiments and submitted the revised draft. The second trial was slightly slower. It took two weeks to notify the reception, but it was published very quickly after receiving it. It was officially published two or three days later.It is.Although this journal is OA, but the review is more formal, it is definitely not given to the money, and the impact factor is calculated. This year is estimated to be around 3.6, which is still much higher than last year.
Show Review in Original Language
(8) Thank | haaogagiejpeogg

Author: 909702745@qq.com


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-12-06 15:06:36
The editor is very responsible, the requirements of the journal for the article are also quite high, and the reviewers are very professional, and hope is getting better and better.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 909702745@qq.com

Author: 恩典发


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-10-27 12:25:14
officially entered Zone 2, cattle!The manuscript is constantly coming!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 恩典发

Author: 二次电


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-06-15 15:23:09
IF flew, 2.69, entered the 2nd district at the end of the year.
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | 二次电

First    Previous    1    2    Next    Last  (To Page
/2)

Start your review of [Nanomaterials]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.

Intentional Space Tag



© 2010-2020  ACCDON LLC 400 5th Ave, Suite 530, Waltham, MA 02451, USA
PrivacyTerms of Service