Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service
中文 繁體中文 English 한국어 日本語 Português Español

NANO LETTERS

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:

[NANO LETTERS]Hello, you are Visitor Number 181565 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitleNANO LETTERS
Journal Title AbbreviationsNANO LETT
ISSN1530-6984
E-ISSN1530-6992
h-index430
CiteScore
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
12.716.2112.396
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Engineering
Subcategory: Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
Q15 / 579
Category: Chemical Engineering
Subcategory: Bioengineering
Q15 / 139
Category: Physics and Astronomy
Subcategory: Condensed Matter Physics
Q19 / 397
Category: Chemistry
Subcategory: General Chemistry
Q111 / 371
Category: Materials Science
Subcategory: General Materials Science
Q117 / 439

Self-Citation Ratio (2018-2019)4.50%
Official Websitehttp://pubs.acs.org/journal/nalefd
Online Manuscript Submissionhttps://acs.manuscriptcentral.com/acs
Open AccessNo
PublisherAMER CHEMICAL SOC, 1155 16TH ST, NW, WASHINGTON, USA, DC, 20036
Subject AreaEngineering
Country/Area of PublicationUNITED STATES
Publication FrequencyMonthly
Year Publication Started2001
Annual Article Volume1104
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index
Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=1530-6984%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Authorized Data from Publisher:
Data from Authors: About 1.3 month(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: 50%
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【NANO LETTERS】Impact Indicator Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • Impact Indicator Trend


First    Previous    1    2    3    Next    Last  (To Page
/3)
  Reviews on NANO LETTERS: Write a review
Author: 942699560@qq.com


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-05-17 02:16:46
This is one of the top publications on nanomaterials. There were two reviewers who offered a lot of insights and information. I revised based on their suggestions. In all, it took about 5 months for publication. The editor of DS, Kohane, is very good. I hope that I can continue to publish good publications in the future, and I hope that you can publish research papers in your favorite journals.

(9) Thank | 942699560@qq.com

Author: Marilyn


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-12-24 11:08:18
The submission was rejected, and the reviewers were not familiar with the direction of the editor..Rejected
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Marilyn

Author: XfZhong


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-10-08 15:16:44
No. 5 just submitted, do not know the result how
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | XfZhong

Author: xianzhi


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-09-05 10:42:37
The first submission, the manuscript was assigned to Charles M. Lieber, the editor was very good, gaveAfter the opportunity to submit a trial, after a major overhaul, a minor revision, and finally acceptd, I feel very much the editor can give the opportunity, very happy in this top journal, in general, the efficiency of Nano Letters is not bad, the innovation requirements are high,I hope that the journal impact factor will continue to rise!
Show Review in Original Language
(6) Thank | xianzhi

Author: Luan Guo


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-06-22 16:51:15
Real-time updateSubmitted on June 02, the Park editor was assigned on the same day.June 20th No news
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Luan Guo

Author: 757466723@qq.com


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-05-13 21:56:24
Submitted just one month back news, three reviewers, basically minor repairs, no big problems, editing room park, really good, modified for about four or five days,Return to receive within a week, very smooth
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 757466723@qq.com

Author: GGBoulder


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-02-27 03:51:08
The thermal property measurement of the two-dimensional material was submitted to Nano Lett, and both were rejected by the editor.Choosing edits for Yi Cui and Phillip Kim was assigned to Angel Rubio by Alivisatos.After the second submission, it was rejected.I feel that it is not really difficult to send Nano Lett in this circle. In the circle, I don’t know how to ask for water. I will select for him less in the future. The influence factor of 2017 has not dropped recently...
Show Review in Original Language
(4) Thank | GGBoulder

Author: 261048396@qq.com


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-08-19 15:13:54
The second part of NL is just one year apart. It is also Park for editors. Park people are really good and highly recommended.
Show Review in Original Language
(10) Thank | 261048396@qq.com

Author: nano


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted directly


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-01-21 15:13:32
Very good journal, editor is also very responsible!
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | nano

Author: 261048396@qq.com


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2015-09-04 10:31:42
Park This editor is really good, submitted to his hand because he happened to take a vacation, delayedIn two weeks, he specially sent a letter to apologize, saying that the manuscript had been submitted for trial. Two weeks later, the results of the first trial, one minor repair, one direct publication, Park let the revision, we added a little data, and sent it back two days later.
Show Review in Original Language
(5) Thank | 261048396@qq.com

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-11-10 23:41:00
A manuscript has been sent to nature materials, nature communications, because there is no experiment to support the editor to send it off, sent to NL, did not expect to accept directly one month, Hongkun Park this editor is good
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-11-05 22:55:00
Edit is Younan Xia, speedSoon, people are also very good.Received review comments in 2 weeks.The change is basically accepted within one week after the change.After accepting, from hanging to the Internet, the proof, ASAP, the speed is quite fast, basically all done in one day.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-10-31 14:21:00
We are doing nano-biological materials, we selectd for NL, and we were transferred to Alivisatos three days later. It’s almost 10 days now. I don’t know if I can submit it for review. Will there be a notice for review???
Show Review in Original Language
(5) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-10-25 22:32:00
My select is 8.11, a week later (8.19) notice is assigned to Lieber, and opinion No. 9.24 comes back, Xiao Xiu, Lieber himself also reviewed, plus a reviewer.After minor repairs, accepted for 2 weeks.After Proof, ASAP was posted online on the Internet every other day.good luck.
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-10-04 19:23:00
submitted an article about nanooletter, after the trial, the editor will inform the author?
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-09-23 09:37:00
811 submission, one week later assigned to the editor of liber, until nowNearly 40 days, there is no news, liber this seems to be a bit slow at times.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-09-11 17:25:00
ACS The article has a high impact factor, nano letters are obviously the leading journal of nanometers, assigned toEditor of liber, revised back in three weeks, accepted three weeks after the revision.Whether or not interest is critical, of course, you can refer to several editorial articles.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-08-05 21:29:00
Very lucky, only one reviewer (the other is lieber editor himself), made some small suggestions, and accepted the small work.I heard that Alivisatos is biased against Chinese people?
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-06-27 07:54:00
3Submission No. 31, assigned to the editor of liber, notified on April 10th.A notice of acceptance was received on June 24.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-06-18 22:19:00
recently selectd for a Nano Lett, the first time to select for NL, the selected Lieber, and later assigned to Prof Joachim P. Spatz. Submitted on May 22nd, received comments on June 15th, a reviewer, minor repair.The revised draft was returned on June 16.Just received the mail reception (No. 18), asked to change the red font in the revised draft to black, put the refs on one page, and Supporting Information to re-mark in the page format such as S1.Very efficient, thanks to Prof Joachim P. Spatz. Our group rarely sends NL, so this time it is really lucky.It is not like the relationship between many insect friends in the forum. Our boss is not
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-05-30 08:56:00
successfully sent to Alivisatos. After 12 days, it was successfully rejected.The speed is still very fast, the result is very bad, 哎
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-04-14 05:40:00
Because the coverage is lower than JACS and Adv Mater, the influence is relatively small, because the suspicion of nano "irrigation" is often criticized.The influence factor that once relied on pride has lagged behind Adv Mater. Should decision-makers reflect on it?Nano Letters is a high-level journal in micro-nano materials and technology.The same level of journals, including Small in Germany and ACS Nano under ACS, are basically in a three-legged state.The grades of the three journals ACS Nano, Nano letter and Small can be roughly equal.The three have different emphasis, Nano Letter focuses on physical devices, Small biomedical field
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-04-07 18:59:00
high-end journals, the level will not be too bad.Even if there is, the exception is.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-03-27 19:24:00
falls into the hands of Alivisatos!!!3 days, now there is no news, God bless!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-03-19 10:44:00
Chinese people met Nicole Alivisatos and they died directly....
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

First    Previous    1    2    3    Next    Last  (To Page
/3)

Start your review of [NANO LETTERS]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.

Contact us

Contact us  

Your name*

Your email*

Your message*

Please fill in all fields and provide a valid email.

Security Code*