Journal Profile | |||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Journal Title | ACTA AGRICULTURAE SCANDINAVICA SECTION B-SOIL AND PLANT SCIENCE | ||||||||||||||||||||
Journal Title Abbreviations | ACTA AGR SCAND B-S P | ||||||||||||||||||||
ISSN | 0906-4710 | ||||||||||||||||||||
E-ISSN | 1651-1913 | ||||||||||||||||||||
h-index | 31 | ||||||||||||||||||||
CiteScore |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
Self-Citation Ratio (2019-2020) | 7.30% | ||||||||||||||||||||
Official Website | http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/sagb | ||||||||||||||||||||
Online Manuscript Submission | http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/sagb | ||||||||||||||||||||
Open Access | No | ||||||||||||||||||||
Publisher | TAYLOR & FRANCIS AS, KARL JOHANS GATE 5, OSLO, NORWAY, NO-0154 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Subject Area | Agriculture and Forestry | ||||||||||||||||||||
Country/Area of Publication | NORWAY | ||||||||||||||||||||
Publication Frequency | Bimonthly | ||||||||||||||||||||
Year Publication Started | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Annual Article Volume | 80 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Indexing (SCI or SCIE) | Science Citation Index Science Citation Index Expanded | ||||||||||||||||||||
Link to PubMed Central (PMC) | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0906-4710%5BISSN%5D | ||||||||||||||||||||
Average Duration of Peer Review * | Authorized Data from Publisher: Data from Authors: About 2.2 month(s) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Competitiveness * | Data from Authors: 66% | ||||||||||||||||||||
Useful Links |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed. |
|
|
|
First Previous 1 Next Last (To Page | |
Reviews on ACTA AGRICULTURAE SCANDINAVICA SECTION B-SOIL AND PLANT SCIENCE: | Write a review |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Geoscience Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2012-03-04 22:46:00 The reviewer was very careful, and the editor was extremely serious. The manuscript went through three revision rounds before and after, and I got a lot of comments. After I revised a lot, the manuscript was finally accepted. My experience is a total of 4 months from submission to acceptance. The key is the reviewer. If the manuscript is assigned a reviewer who does not find issues, the process is very smooth and fast. The journal’s impact factor is very low. I think it is not a question of the quality of the article, but that the content is too narrow. ![]() ![]() |
Author: thirtyone Subject Area: Agriculture Science Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2019-01-12 20:43:12 Why didn't I find the submission format for this journal????Still not selectd ![]() ![]() |
Author: swfu Subject Area: Life Science Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2017-04-13 10:15:02 215 submission, March 9th, overhaul.But there was no opinion. After returning on April 12, I accepted it that evening, and it felt very fast. ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Life Science Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s) Result: Rejected Write a review |
Reviewed 2016-07-06 15:13:20 after two minor repairs, rejected by 25% pass rate.It is unclear whether the amount of submission is large, and for what reason, the article was rejected, and it was wasted for three months.Change select~~ ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Life Science Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2013-02-26 15:01:00 Soon, December 20No. select, the editor reviewed 2 times, returned to overhaul on January 20, and accepted on February 10.The editor found a reviewer, and the other was her own review, mainly looking at the experimental design and method of the article. There was no question about the result, but there was a requirement for the comprehensiveness of the discussion.The reviewer said that the article was innovative and valuable, but the structure of the article was lacking and the depth was not enough. Some content that needed to be added was mentioned.The editor requested to change to a newsletter and accept it.The overall feeling journal is not high, the work is not detailed enough, and the action is very fast. It seems that the positioning is to introduce new manuscripts, not to ask for academic level. ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2012-07-24 17:27:00 I heard that it is faster, I have already selectd for one and a half months, and I haven’t heard back yet. ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Life Science Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2012-05-24 18:29:00 is faster, rejects the draft with a 25% pass rate, and the overall statement.tragedy.I can only select for even worse journals. ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Geoscience Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2012-02-25 08:49:00 journal is still relatively fast and easy. It is worth noting that this journal does not contain the title, no review.Fee, the layout fee is too expensive, 80 dollars a page!Suitable for students who want to graduate! ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2011-08-20 16:47:00 Journal Homepage URL: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/sagb ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2011-02-21 21:18:00 just selectd, refused, said there is 25% of the manuscript pass rate ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: 土壤学 Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2010-10-06 20:14:00 This journal is very suitable for graduation, accepting very fast, once selectd for one, and given less than half a month to give advice, then accept, less than 2 in totalMonth, but the journal has been used for almost 2 years and has to pay. ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2010-07-31 21:42:00 Review time is generally moderate in one and a half months. The editors generally give overhauls. After the revision, they can generally receive...However, the time interval for printing is relatively long, almost 1.5 years to 2 years. ![]() ![]() |
First Previous 1 Next Last (To Page |