X
My Account Submit My Manuscript
Letpub, Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service

Food & Function

   For Publishers  New

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:
Journal Cover Design
APA has partnered with LetPub to provide a full suite of author services

[Food & Function]Hello, you are Visitor Number 61514 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitleFood & Function
Journal Title AbbreviationsFOOD FUNCT
ISSN2042-6496
h-index53
CiteScore
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
6.401.1451.275
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Subcategory: Food Science
Q139 / 310

Self-Citation Ratio (2019-2020)10.10%
Official Websitehttp://pubs.rsc.org/en/journals/journalissues/fo
Online Manuscript Submissionhttps://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/food
Open AccessNo
Publisher
Subject AreaBIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Country/Area of PublicationENGLAND
Publication Frequency
Year Publication Started2010
Annual Article Volume713
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=2042-6496%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Authorized Data from Publisher:
Data from Authors: Average 1 Month(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors:
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【Food & Function】CiteScore Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • CiteScore Trend


First    Previous    1    Next    Last  (To Page
/1)
  Reviews on Food & Function: Write a review
Author: Tianlynn


Subject Area: Agriculture Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2020-05-14 06:39:18
The research is on the health effects of food and its influence on the digestion of fats. I’m considering whether to submit it to this journal or Food and Function. It feels that IF of Journal of Functional Foods has been declining.

(1) Thank | Tianlynn

Author: 若此朝阳


Subject Area: Agriculture Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2020-03-23 22:08:14
19.12.4, checking submission and files; 19.12.6, with editor; 19.12.23, in peer review; 19.2.9, major revision; 19.2.20, revision submitted; 19.3.10, accept. The review speed was average. There were 2 reviewers. The questions were all basically related to the organization of the article. One reviewer requested to supplement one datum. There was no kit with high specificity, and it happened to catch up with the COVID-19. After explaining the reason, the revision was submitted. Thanks to the reviewers who didn't make trouble for me.

(4) Thank | 若此朝阳

Author: 冰冷的落叶1


Subject Area: Medicine
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-12-26 14:52:52
My research direction was the prevention and treatment of cardiovascular diseases by nutritional active ingredients. The research was based on animal experiments. The amount of data was quite large. At that time, in order to catch graduation in December, I submitted it to this journal for guarantee. If it weren't for graduation in a hurry, looking back, a manuscript with so much data can be submitted to a journal with IF over 5. The in vitro experiment part and the experimental data of the population was published in MNFR. This animal experiment part was published separately. The manuscript was submitted on July 26, 2019. Unexpectedly, it was still with Editor at the end of August. It was sent for an external review in the middle. Perhaps some reviewers didn’t have time to review it, so it was sent back to Editor again. I was so anxious to death. The boss asked me to wait slowly and not to urge the Editor. Later, at the beginning of September, it was finally sent for review. The review comments returned during the National Day. A total of 2 Reviewers. The first reviewer asked two small questions. The second reviewer asked the question of dosage. In short, they were all minor problems. They didn't let me supplement the experiments. I revised and returned it on October 8. It was accepted on October 15. So, it took almost 3 months from submission to acceptance. The main reason was that the review process was too slow, and the subsequent acceptance was very fast.

(0) Thank | 冰冷的落叶1

Author: 小面鱼


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-11-07 10:03:45
I feel the review process is fast. Some people say that the review time is long, may be because their papers are on different topics than mine. The initial review is took one month, and the decision was major revision, no deadline. However, I felt I shouldn’t wait too long to resubmit, so I set a timeframe of 45 days for myself. However, something happened and I felt I wouldn’t be able to finish on time so I wrote to the editor. The editor quickly responded. Eventually I used months to revise the paper. The editor was very nice, replied soon, and accepted the paper about one month after my re-submission. Very efficient, I think.

(1) Thank | 小面鱼

Author: 我是31235


Subject Area: Agriculture Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-08-16 15:48:13
Fancy the reputation of RSC, submitted it for 4 days and have not submitted it for review. Expect good results.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 我是31235

Author: 23145736@qq.com


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 10.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-08-15 21:53:37
Junk Journal!!!In October last year, the first trial took more than six months to overhaul. The problem was not a lot. It was also seriously revised. After the repair, I continued to wait. After 4 months, I was rejected. I did not explain why.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 23145736@qq.com

Author: han


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-07-17 16:15:31
The submission speed is slower than JAFC.The article is not too strong.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | han

Author: han


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-07-17 16:15:10
Submitting the review speed is slower than JAFC.The article is not too innovative.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | han

Author: 来了


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-06-13 22:38:04
Check the weight before submiting?
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | 来了

Author: sunyifan529@163.com


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-05-29 10:21:21
submitted in February, acceptd in May, the interim trial time is relatively long, the editor is super nice, and it is so patience to encounter such procrastination as me.I am very grateful. The external review opinion is very pertinent. It is directly accepted after the revision of the opinion. It is the animal experiment that requires ethical certification. This part is only reissued after the notification is received, but it is best to write it when submitting the manuscript.
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | sunyifan529@163.com

Author: 爱科研的小萝卜


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-05-21 23:52:17
3月31SubmissionApril 6th external auditReturn opinion on May 9th, minor repairRevised on May 16Accepted on May 21Overall, it is still very fast, and the opinions are very fair.
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | 爱科研的小萝卜

Author: 彦北


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-11-13 15:46:43
Seeing the reputation of RSC, the submission was really not disappointing.Innovative requirements, strong experimental design, editorial and reviewers are very professional, and very small questions are pointed out.The review status changes quickly. Each time the revision is made, the editor will send it to the reviewer for re-examination. It is a journal that is flourishing and expects a new breakthrough in the impact factor.
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | 彦北

Author: 花逝


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-05-16 08:39:42
Submitted on January 21, overhauled on March 5, rehabilitated on March 20, accepted on April 18.The reviewers are friendly and the questions they ask are not difficult to answer.Overall it is better.Hope it could help everyone!!!
Show Review in Original Language
(4) Thank | 花逝

Author: 花逝


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-01-14 14:07:59
I would like to ask if this journal is a district of the Academy of Sciences.
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | 花逝

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-09-09 10:40:00
7月3日,Submission 8.19 Received feedback for repair; 9.5 days for submission; 9.8 days for about 2 months before and after acceptance!
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-05-08 21:56:00
was invited as a reviewer and there is no deadline for reviewing!19天审会
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-08-23 11:30:00
The quality of the article is not bad, but the impactThe factor is not high, only the first estimate is to compare with ACS's jafc. If you select for this journal, don't worry about IF. After all, RSC's reputation is there
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | Anonymous

First    Previous    1    Next    Last  (To Page
/1)

Start your review of [Food & Function]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.


© 2010-2021  ACCDON LLC 400 5th Ave, Suite 530, Waltham, MA 02451, USA
PrivacyTerms of Service