X
My Account Submit My Manuscript
Letpub, Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service

Advanced Energy Materials

   For Publishers  New

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:
Journal Cover Design
APA has partnered with LetPub to provide a full suite of author services

[Advanced Energy Materials]Hello, you are Visitor Number 115308 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitleAdvanced Energy Materials
Journal Title AbbreviationsADV ENERGY MATER
ISSN1614-6832
E-ISSN1614-6840
h-index156
CiteScore
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
35.409.5133.018
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Materials Science
Subcategory: General Materials Science
Q16 / 460
Category: Materials Science
Subcategory: Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
Q13 / 179

Self-Citation Ratio (2019-2020)4.10%
Official Websitehttp://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1614-6840
Online Manuscript Submissionhttps://www.editorialmanager.com/ADVENERGYMAT
Open AccessNo
Publisher
Subject AreaCHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL
Country/Area of PublicationGERMANY
Publication Frequency
Year Publication Started2011
Annual Article Volume581
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=1614-6832%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Authorized Data from Publisher:
Data from Authors: About 1.0 month(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: About 25%
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【Advanced Energy Materials】CiteScore Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • CiteScore Trend


First    Previous    1    Next    Last  (To Page
/1)
  Reviews on Advanced Energy Materials: Write a review
Author: Elmagnifico


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-11-29 14:28:08
8.12, submission; 9.9, the result of first review returned. There were 3 reviewers. The first reviewer appreciated our work and though it was a great breakthrough. The second and third reviewers rejected it without understanding it and the editor rejected it. I disagreed with it and appealed. The comment of the appeal returned on September 10, and the editor completely agree with my opinion. Only 10 days was given for major revision, and the editor advised transferring. It was resubmitted after revision on September 30. The response letter was written more than 5,700 words, and many experiments were supplemented. The problems that the second and third reviewers cannot understand was popularized for a long time. The result of the second review returned on October 28, and it was sent to the second and third reviewers who gave rejection. As a result, the reviewers understood the content I popularized, but did not understand the experiment part I supplemented, so they rejected it again. The editor apologized and had to reject it after receiving rejection comments repeatedly. Overall, the editor of this journal was good. It's just that the reviewers were really speechless, who rejected the manuscript without understanding it. The review was very perfunctory. The questions asked were not technical and did not help improve the quality of the article. The reviewer even asked the questions without seeing clearly what we did. Especially the No. 3 reviewer, who said that our work was based on other people’s hypnosis without reading carefully in the first review. In the second review, he rejected the manuscript on the grounds of not having heard of it before. He was not consistent with himself. I want to say that if you have heard of it, is this still called innovation? Moreover, when these two reviewers made qualitative comments, they boasted that this journal had high standards and enjoyed a high reputation. They did simping stuff. It's a pity that we are a small research group, and the boss is unknown. If the corresponding author is an expert, maybe this reviewer will send us an email to show favor.

(29) Thank | Elmagnifico

Author: Shuning


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-06-21 01:27:01
In the research direction of photocatalytic water splitting. It took only one month from submission to acceptance. 2019.03.08 Submission; 2019.04.01 comments returned; one directly accepted it and recommended to VIP, and one required a minor revision with an experiment added. The editor gave me 7 days to revise. 2019.04.07 Revised submission; 2019.04.11 Accepted; 2019.04.15 cover invitation received; 2019.04.17 proof received; 2019.04.24 Online; 2019.05.08 Cover selected; 2019.06.12 Cover officially published. The editor was Dr. Carolina Novo da Silva from Germany. The manuscript processing speed was very fast. I wish the journal more and more successful.

(31) Thank | Shuning

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-11-06 16:57:00
I have submitted one paper, accepted after 2 months with minor revision in between. I feel manuscript processing is slow, because it wasn’t published until after half a year. It is the sister journal of Adv. Mater., so has high standards for novelty. Energy materials are definitely the hottest area today. Although it is only in November, I think this journal’s first IF will definitely be above 10. The number of publications is still controlled in the second year, but I wouldn’t be surprised if it surpasses the main issue in the near future.

(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Eric Lee


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-12-25 10:34:27
2018.08.02 Submission2018.09.11 Overhaul Two reviewers The opinions are not sharp2018.09.16 Submit revised draft2018.10.01 Direct reception2018.10.12 Proof submitted on the same day2018.10.18 OnlineProvide detailed dates for your reference.The overall time is two months, and the efficiency is quite high.What is done is the battery direction, the material preparation method is relatively new, the performance is comparable, and finally the calculation and simulation are done.
Show Review in Original Language
(71) Thank | Eric Lee

Author: CrazyTangbao


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-12-14 10:19:36
2018.8.6 Submission2018.8.23 Received overhaul review comments2018.9.6 Submit revised draft2018.9.17 Received minor review comments2018.9.27 Submit revised draft2018.9.28 ReceiveOverall, the editors are highly efficient, and the article requires a high degree of innovation, requiring eye-catching characterization and in-depth discussion.
Show Review in Original Language
(9) Thank | CrazyTangbao

Author: 科研绘图


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted directly


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-08-06 17:50:55
Scientific research drawing structure drawing diagram flow chart SCI journal three-dimensional abstract drawing TOC cover drawingPlease add QQ3188675558
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 科研绘图

Author: 793549762@qq.com


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-04-08 14:57:36
2018The manuscript was submitted on January 12th. After more than two months, the manuscript was submitted once. The editor replied in the hands of the reviewer. He immediately urged me to contact us and edit the reply one week later.Some sorry words, then said that I received a negative report, refused to draft, asked if we continue to wait for the review, or retract, immediately 3 months, my heart is very depressed, I feel like being pitted, now I am going to retract??
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | 793549762@qq.com

Author: linxiyawen@163.com


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-11-17 08:50:07
is very fast.The tragedy is that after a week of submission, I received a rejection letter...Very sad..
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | linxiyawen@163.com

Author: 31430986@qq.com


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-11-16 09:29:44
review is super fast, the editorial department is very efficient.October 13th contributionNovember 2 Return to the review comments, one big and one small, the editor gave a 10-day overhaulNovember 8th Return to the revised commentsNovember 15 Receive
Show Review in Original Language
(8) Thank | 31430986@qq.com

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-10-11 14:24:31
2017.9.13 Submission2017.10.4 Received review comments and gave 11 days to modify2017.10.8 Submit revised draft2017.10.12 Received
Show Review in Original Language
(14) Thank | Anonymous

Author: tiantian


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted directly


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-06-17 10:25:12
This year's IF is over 16, the difficulty is getting bigger and bigger, three reviewers, two directly receiving, one minor repair, the editor gave the overhaul, the time is not faster than oneReceived in the month.It feels really not easy.
Show Review in Original Language
(4) Thank | tiantian

Author: David


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-05-03 23:47:48
The review speed is super fast, 7 days for the past, 7 days after the modification, from submission to receiving less than 20 days.Three reviewers, one VIP, one modified directly received, and one overhauled.Feel the focus on innovative and performance-enabled functional materials.
Show Review in Original Language
(14) Thank | David

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-08-24 19:45:38
Editing processing efficiency is very high, the article level is also very good.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-09-26 01:16:00
July 28, 2013 Contributions September 25, 2013 Officially received ~
Show Review in Original Language
(4) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-07-12 10:21:00
I am very fortunate to have published an article on AEM with the following experience
Show Review in Original Language
(5) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-06-20 18:16:00
AdvEnergy Mater. The first impact factor of 10.04, unlimited prospects!
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-05-09 17:45:00
Another cow's fork journal, let's leave a name here, and work hard to see it later!
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-05-09 17:04:00
is very demanding, selectd twice, and submitted for review, but only one..Two reviewers, the opinions are all minor repairs!
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-03-09 16:11:00
has published an article on Adv. Energy Mater. The request is still relatively high.This year's first impact factor is about to come out, IF is more than 10 basically no problem, it is indeed another boutique of the Adv. Mater. family.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-07-26 08:31:00
This journal was launched in 2011 and is the same series of journals as Adv. Mater. and Adv. Funct. Mater.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

First    Previous    1    Next    Last  (To Page
/1)

Start your review of [Advanced Energy Materials]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.


© 2010-2021  ACCDON LLC 400 5th Ave, Suite 530, Waltham, MA 02451, USA
PrivacyTerms of Service