X
My Account Submit My Manuscript
Letpub, Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service

SPECTROSCOPY LETTERS

   For Publishers  New

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:
Journal Cover Design
APA has partnered with LetPub to provide a full suite of author services

[SPECTROSCOPY LETTERS]Hello, you are Visitor Number 26603 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitleSPECTROSCOPY LETTERS
Journal Title AbbreviationsSPECTROSC LETT
ISSN0038-7010
E-ISSN1532-2289
h-index34
CiteScore
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
1.900.2300.474
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Physics and Astronomy
Subcategory: Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
Q3133 / 192
Category: Physics and Astronomy
Subcategory: Analytical Chemistry
Q389 / 122
Category: Physics and Astronomy
Subcategory: Spectroscopy
Q461 / 74

Self-Citation Ratio (2019-2020)8.90%
Official Websitehttp://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/titles/00387010.asp
Online Manuscript Submissionhttp://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/lstl
Open AccessNo
PublisherTAYLOR & FRANCIS INC, 325 CHESTNUT ST, SUITE 800, PHILADELPHIA, USA, PA, 19106
Subject AreaPhysics
Country/Area of PublicationUNITED STATES
Publication FrequencyBimonthly
Year Publication Started1968
Annual Article Volume63
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index
Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0038-7010%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Authorized Data from Publisher:
Data from Authors: About 1.0 month(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: Easy
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【SPECTROSCOPY LETTERS】CiteScore Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • CiteScore Trend


First    Previous    1    Next    Last  (To Page
/1)
  Reviews on SPECTROSCOPY LETTERS: Write a review
Author: nike_tao


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2020-05-26 09:46:56
I don't know what the format requirements of this journal are. It was rejected 10 days after submission, without telling the specific problems. Then they sent us an attachment and required us to revise according to it. The attachment is not the same as the version on the official website. The main difference is the format of references and abstract. It is very strange; one is 300 words and the other is 100 words. The reference format is also inconsistent. I’m so angry... How should we revise the format? Anxious… Is there anyone who knows can tell me?

(4) Thank | nike_tao

Author: cauzl


Subject Area: Agriculture Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-07-01 23:26:07
The journal is very strict with the formatting of the manuscript. It was submitted successfully after three revisions of formatting during the period. After one month, the editorial office’s mail was received. A total of three reviewers: the first one asked to supplement the experiment and made good suggestions, which greatly improved the quality of the manuscript; the second one raised a few insignificant questions; and the third directly agreed to accept it. The editor gave decision of rejection and resubmission after supplementing the experiment. It then was resubmitted after 55 days, and after 3 and 3 days, it directly showed acceptance. In short, the review speed of the editors and reviewers are really fast.

(3) Thank | cauzl

Author: 147259@163.com


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 5.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-03-31 14:54:14
Very long wait. Every time the paper was submitted, it was returned for various reasons. It took me 40 days to submit the paper, followed by a long review, more than three months. Eventually sent an e-mail to ask about the situation. On the third day, I received a rejection. For a four-zone journal with only a few influence factors, if time is tight, this journal is not recommended.

(0) Thank | 147259@163.com

Author: MARS


Subject Area: Physics
Duration of Peer Review: 5.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-08-15 09:50:59
It is not recommended to select for this journal, the impact factor is low, and the editing efficiency is low!Half of the time is spent on format review. A little bit of the problem is returned. It doesn't point out where there is a problem. It only sends you a lengthy format request, and a link to provide a format modification service.Change the format and select for it, wait a week or two, and be returned again because of the format problem.Not returning two or three times is not normal!After the accept, it will sink into the sea.I thought that the letter would be faster, and now I regret to select for this journal!
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | MARS

Author: langyh228@126.com


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-09-23 10:41:31
During the period, due to the format problem, the submission was successful twice, and the status of the next two weeks was changed to under review, and now threeMonth, it has been this state.In the middle, a manuscript was urged, and the editor said that one of the reviewers was already urging.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | langyh228@126.com

Author: 小


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted directly


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-01-25 21:14:33
IJRSReturned and changed.The review speed is fast.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | 小

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-08-13 08:16:00
The journals, editors and reviewers with very good spectral directions are very responsible and efficient.The review comments are also very professional, and it is very important to improve your research.From submission to official reception for just one month!Like a
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-07-26 08:59:00
old-fashioned journal, the journal editors are very efficient and the reviewers are also very professional.After more than 20 days, he returned to the review draft for overhaul. After returning for two weeks, he returned to the second day and retired.呵呵
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-06-17 18:12:00
The journal is very efficient. The first trial is less than one month, and it will be overhauled. It will take a month to modify this article and repair it for a week.I accepted it the next day.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-02-22 23:10:00
Two weeks after the submission, I will reply. The two reviewers are minor repairs. I changed it to the day and acceptd it. It is really fast, and the editor is very responsible.Magazine in the direction of the spectrum.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-08-10 21:23:00
came back for the first time in 2 weeks. There were two reviewers. After a big change, they returned to the reviewer and then gave it to the reviewer.Two weeks.Minor repairs for a few days, submitted back, accepted on the same day.The speed is still quite fast.Is the journal is very general, anyway, sci, can graduate, Chenghe
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

First    Previous    1    Next    Last  (To Page
/1)

Start your review of [SPECTROSCOPY LETTERS]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.


© 2010-2021  ACCDON LLC 400 5th Ave, Suite 530, Waltham, MA 02451, USA
PrivacyTerms of Service