My Account Submit My Manuscript
Letpub, Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service

Small

   For Publishers  New

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:
Professional Journal Cover Design
APA has partnered with LetPub to provide a full suite of author services

[Small]Hello, you are Visitor Number 216475 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitleSmall
Journal Title AbbreviationsSMALL
ISSN1613-6810
E-ISSN1613-6829
h-index195
CiteScore
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
9.903.5491.593
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Engineering
Subcategory: Engineering (miscellaneous)
Q11 / 51
Category: Materials Science
Subcategory: Biomaterials
Q13 / 83
Category: Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Subcategory: Biotechnology
Q16 / 257
Category: Chemistry
Subcategory: General Chemistry
Q117 / 371
Category: Materials Science
Subcategory: General Materials Science
Q121 / 439

Self-Citation Ratio (2018-2019)4.10%
Official Websitehttp://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1613-6829
Online Manuscript Submissionhttps://www.editorialmanager.com/small-journal/default.aspx
Open AccessNo
PublisherWILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH, PO BOX 10 11 61, WEINHEIM, GERMANY, D-69451
Subject AreaEngineering
Country/Area of PublicationGERMANY
Publication FrequencyMonthly
Year Publication Started2005
Annual Article Volume1036
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index
Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=1613-6810%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Authorized Data from Publisher:
Data from Authors: About 2.4 month(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: 50%
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【Small】CiteScore Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • CiteScore Trend


First    Previous    1    2    3    Next    Last  (To Page
/3)
  Reviews on Small: Write a review
Author: 1054259517@qq.com


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-03-19 13:41:01
The direction is the energy storage battery, the submission AM is rejected, the editor recommends to switch to small, the review is 9 days, a VIP minor repair, a major repair, the editor gives 11 days of overhaul time, and repairs after one week., receive it directly in four days!The efficiency is getting higher and higher, the old journal, the influence is okay, I hope not to fall down!
Show Review in Original Language
(7) Thank | 1054259517@qq.com

Author: hou1559054@163.com


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted directly


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-02-23 17:20:23
Tent out 20 days to receive comments, two reviewers, one overhaul and one minor repair, all of which are more innovative.Edit to overhaul.After the amendment, go home for the New Year and notify the reception before returning to school.The editing efficiency is very high.
Show Review in Original Language
(15) Thank | hou1559054@163.com

Author: maodong@nwpu.edu.cn


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2015-12-10 10:37:29
Recently, Small was very fast, and submitted comments for review for 20 days. After one week of reply, the next day was accepted.I like the high efficiency of the editor, I hope that the influence of Small is getting bigger and bigger.
Show Review in Original Language
(5) Thank | maodong@nwpu.edu.cn

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-10-28 11:24:00
The first reviewer and the second reviewer, one refused a minor repair, and the editor gave a revised re-attend.After supplementing the theoretical calculation results, the article was rewritten. After the select was over, the reviewer who refused to think that the article was promoted was obvious and agreed to minor repairs.After re-editing, I selectd for the second day of direct editing.The editor is very nice, and at any time can not give up the article, seriously modify, according to reason, the miracle will always appear
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-09-23 11:25:00
giant slow incomparable
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Medical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-06-13 14:40:00
smallLibi sister journal AM and AFM slightly lower, the quality of the above article is still good, last year submitted an article, was refused to engage in a month, the editor is very friendly, think that after careful revision can re-attend, modified for half a year, light reponseAfter writing more than 30 pages, it was received more than two months after the re-submitment. Both reviewers believed that the quality of the revised article was significantly improved, and no modification was made. However, the online publication was slow and patiently waiting.Not only this year's If will be?
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-05-05 18:37:00
Will the small one is a little more communication or a full paper, please have experienced bugs to help answer, thank you!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-05-03 13:25:00
4.23Submission, 5.2 rejected, suggest transfer to physica status solidi (b). Think about it, the gap is a bit big, ready to fight another journal
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-04-17 10:42:00
After two months of revision and re-submitment, and then two months of minor repairs, it is really tormenting people
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-04-14 03:14:00
Now, I feel that the grades of ACS Nano, Nano letter and Small can basically be graded.No.The three have different focuses, and Nano Letter focuses on physical devices, and there are many small biomedical fields.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-02-28 20:47:00
我的一The newsletter, just one month, the review comments came down, the first two are minor repairs, and the third is directly received.It took three days to answer the question and received it three days after the select.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-01-22 23:57:00
is charged as a color map for Advanced materials, for a fee of 595 EUR for one color figure or 495 EUR per figure for two or more color figures (including VAT).In general, it is slow, or it has been slow, and I have never seen it slower than him. Please be prepared for long-term operations.However, compared to Americans, the Germans are still friendly to us.This is the same feeling every time I go out to a meeting. They seem to be more sensible. Of course, don't forget that there are Chinese big cattle editors.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-01-12 20:34:00
I selectd for two and a half months, and I still have no news, can I urge the editor?In addition, the editor of the journal is friendly to the polymer micro-nano materials in the morning, please recommend.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-12-09 02:29:00
One of my articles was a tragedy in the journal of biomaterials. Later, I simply put together two articles on biomaterials + cell mechanics and submitted them to SMALL.In the first instance, after almost two months, the editor wrote a reply: two reviewers gave Xiao Xiu, and one reviewer refused.The editor suggested re-submitment after modification.At that time, I thought, no matter whether it was in the middle or not, I still carefully supplemented the experiment according to the review opinions and supplemented the discussion.Unfortunately, the experimental results were not made, so I had to use other methods to prove it.Modified for one month and re-submited.In fact, I personally thought that there was no play.After one month, it was accepted.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-12-01 18:33:00
The review was slow, the first trial was close to three months, and after the minor repair, it was actually reviewed for 50 days. There is no ACS fast.However, the journal is pretty good, the boss likes it.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-11-26 16:09:00
23 The end of the first trial, overhaul, more than three weeks to improve the select, a week after the end of the second trial, directly received.
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-11-12 19:12:00
For a total of three months, Communication will give a review opinion after one and a half months, and the second half of the repair will be longer after the overhaul, and it will be received three days after the repair.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-11-09 20:11:00
The first two months of the trial, the time is too long, the reasons for the reviewer's rejection are numerous, the editor said that the full text is more, in short, there are thousands of reasons for receiving, there are many reasons for rejecting the draft, remember, cautious submission, can not afford to hurt, the Chinese article is so difficult.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-07-17 10:55:00
is a watering journal for people in the circle, and it is not easy for people outside the circle to enter.
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-07-13 05:39:00
I think it's still good. The quality of the journal articles is still very good.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-02-17 17:45:00
The article is OK, that is, the review is too slow.I selectd for an article last year. It took more than two months to get results. The two reviewers had to overhaul, the editor refused, and suggested re-submitment after the revision.I thought that there was a play, and I tried to fill in the data. Some very troublesome experiments were hard to make. I returned after four months, one received directly, the other refused, and said that it was not well written.The result editor refused.It is estimated that the editor does not want to.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-12-06 09:38:00
recently sent an article, a good journal, is a very slow review.The revised draft was accepted only in the past three months.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Medical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-11-29 09:46:00
Do not review the draft fee and the layout fee, but the color map is subject to the sponsorship fee. After each submission of 495 euros, the comments are sent in the past three months, mainly because the picture is not clear enough.And the test conditions should be added, officially accepted after ten days, SCI area, impact factor 7.33
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-11-15 16:54:00
made of polymer materials, submitted for 15 days, was edited as an inorganic non-metallic materialDirectly rejected, not submitted for review.I feel that the review process is too slow, and the manuscripts that have not been submitted for review have been spent for half a month, which is too late.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-08-15 19:23:00
Personally think that it is absolutely new.Can not be arrogant, selectd for 3 days to edit the direct manuscript.However, there are many related and similar articles on Small, and it may be that there is no big cow endorsement.More depressed + sad.Later, the temper was simply throwing the manuscript onto the Nano Letters. In the old A, it was miraculously persisted for a week and almost sent for trial.Oh, I know this, I will do a good job.This matter tells us that we still have to do the specific point of the work, consider the point, and select for ACS is more cost-effective.However, Small is undoubtedly a good journal.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

First    Previous    1    2    3    Next    Last  (To Page
/3)

Start your review of [Small]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.

Intentional Space Tag


Contact us

Contact us  

Your name*

Your email*

Your message*

Please fill in all fields and provide a valid email.

Security Code*

© 2010-2020 United States: ACCDON LLC Tel: 1-781-202-9968 Email: info@accdon.com
Address: 400 5th Ave, Suite 530, Waltham, Massachusetts 02451, United States
LetPub Privacy Policy