X
My Account Submit My Manuscript
Letpub, Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service

SCIENCE

   For Publishers  New

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:
Journal Cover Design
APA has partnered with LetPub to provide a full suite of author services

[SCIENCE]Hello, you are Visitor Number 117402 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitleSCIENCE
Journal Title AbbreviationsSCIENCE
ISSN0036-8075
E-ISSN1095-9203
h-index1058
CiteScore
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
45.3013.1107.521
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Multidisciplinary
Subcategory: Multidisciplinary
Q12 / 111

Self-Citation Ratio (2019-2020)1.20%
Official Websitehttp://www.sciencemag.org/
Online Manuscript Submissionhttp://www.submit2science.org/ws/menu.asp
Open AccessNo
PublisherAMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE, 1200 NEW YORK AVE, NW, WASHINGTON, USA, DC, 20005
Subject AreaMultidisciplinary Journals
Country/Area of PublicationUNITED STATES
Publication FrequencyWeekly
Year Publication Started1880
Annual Article Volume774
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index
Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0036-8075%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Authorized Data from Publisher:
Data from Authors: About 3.3 month(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: About 5%
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【SCIENCE】CiteScore Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • CiteScore Trend


First    Previous    1    Next    Last  (To Page
/1)
  Reviews on SCIENCE: Write a review
Author: cnsfavor


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-11-07 14:03:59
I waited for a month with the mentality of "no news is good news", but it was still bad ending. It was considered uncompetitive, and advised to submit to the paid sub-journal Science Advances. 5/26, submitted; 5/27–28, under evaluation; 5/29–31, rejected-transfer offered.

(8) Thank | cnsfavor

Author: 杜小兔


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-06-11 22:44:49
I submitted a report, and it was rejected almost two weeks ago. Unfortunately, it didn’t pass the editorial board. The overall view is that while your paper will be of great interest to the field it is not one of the most competitive in terms of general interest. If you have confidence to submit this leading journal, please remember that it is a leading journal, and you have to maximize general interest. So that your paper will have a better chance to get approved lying on the solid foundation of your article. Of course, you could encounter a competitor who is in the same field and his paper is more excellent than yours. Roll a dice. There is nothing you could do. If you want to submit it to Science, you must be excellent and lucky.

(11) Thank | 杜小兔

Author: 一刀倾城


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-02-25 08:53:36
It has been the most systematic work that makes us proud in recent years. I submitted it to the journal as a report, and received a notice 10 days later, saying "Because your manuscript was not given a high priority rating during the initial screening process, we have decided not to proceed to in-depth review." It was then transferred to Nature, but also got rejected after 15 days.......

(10) Thank | 一刀倾城

Author: donghuig@gmail.com


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2015-12-15 15:30:42
Submitted a study on the catalytic activity point of oxygen reduction in nitrogen-doped carbon materials. 7.23 submission; 7.31-8.2 (more than one week) for review;;9.17 (6 weeks) editor received comments and evaluation. 10.23 review comments came back, 2 of them asked a few difficult questions, suggested addition of some missing data, and recommended resubmission. Resubmitted 11.20, 11.23 again under review;12.08 edit under evaluation,12.08 accepted.

(83) Thank | donghuig@gmail.com

Author: 一刀倾城


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-02-25 08:53:36
The most fascinating and most systematic work in recent years, the report form was selected, and the “Because your manuscript was not given a high priority rating during the initial screening process, we have decided notTo proceed to in-depth review.", then switched to Nature, and was smashed after 15 days....
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 一刀倾城

Author: wolf5666


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-02-21 11:57:22
Submit a week of tragedy
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | wolf5666

Author: 纯天然


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-11-09 14:10:16
research on phase change energy storage materials.8.22 submission;8.29 (one week) was rejected.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | 纯天然

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-11-01 11:33:00
is on the submitted, I am not the author.After one and a half months of the select, the editor said that he was sent to the trial.After another one and a half months, I received two positive comments, one neutral, one biased, and one very negative. The editor refused to submit the manuscript and stated that he would not accept the same manuscript and then re-submit.Science has a committee, and submissions must first be reviewed by the committee and then sent out.However, the lineup of the five reviewers is a bit exaggerated.
Show Review in Original Language
(4) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-12-22 11:58:00
After the select, I will send it to the external audit about one week, and I will receive the opinion in the fourth week.Amendments, re-submitments, and external trials, received more than three weeks.Amend again, then externally, and receive comments two weeks.Finally say OK.The reviewers have always been the first two.The editor is responsible and strict.The quality of the article, new ideas, etc. are high, and the review is extremely strict.After accepting, you should embargo, pay attention to confidentiality, and the article cannot be preached.It is also a great test for psychology and psychology.Normal heart..
Show Review in Original Language
(14) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-07-16 21:18:00
http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_498d060f01011bwf.html
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-09-04 09:20:00
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-09-03 08:57:00
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-08-18 21:48:00
Journal Homepage: http://www.sciencemag.org/
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-08-14 16:20:00
Does anyone have a Science paper template?The boss asked me to find, thank you
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-05-22 19:59:00
just put the paper out, I look forward to being tragedy as soon as possible.I also changed to other journals.Why was there quite confidence at the beginning, but now I have no courage to mention it, I just hope to be rejected as soon as possible.Even the boss did not dare to tell this.
Show Review in Original Language
(12) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2010-10-31 11:16:00
1.Impact factor: 29.162
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2010-09-02 04:47:00
selectd once, in one.The official website said that 75% of the manuscripts were directly rejected, not submitted for review, and generally received rejected news in ten days.After three weeks of voting, I received a message for review.Another month and a half, get a review.All are big cows, and the opinions are in place.According to the suggestion, it took three weeks to complete, including supplementary data and modified statements.The revised manuscript was sent out one month later and the message was accepted.It was published another month.
Show Review in Original Language
(22) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2010-07-21 11:02:00
Science is one of the best published original research papers and peer-reviewed journals that review and analyze current research and science policy.Founded in 1880 by Edison for $10,000, the journal became the official publication of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 1894.There are 51 issues in the whole year, which is a weekly journal with a global circulation of more than 1.5 million copies.Most scientific journals charge readers for reviewing, commenting, and publishing.However, the publication of the journal Science is free.The journal's funding source has three parts: AAAS membership fee, India
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

First    Previous    1    Next    Last  (To Page
/1)

Start your review of [SCIENCE]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.


© 2010-2021  ACCDON LLC 400 5th Ave, Suite 530, Waltham, MA 02451, USA
PrivacyTerms of Service