X
My Account Submit My Manuscript
Letpub, Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service

PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

   For Publishers  New

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:
Journal Cover Design
APA has partnered with LetPub to provide a full suite of author services

[PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA]Hello, you are Visitor Number 105156 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitlePROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Journal Title AbbreviationsP NATL ACAD SCI USA
ISSN0027-8424
E-ISSN1091-6490
h-index699
CiteScore
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
15.705.1652.689
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Multidisciplinary
Subcategory: Multidisciplinary
Q14 / 111

Self-Citation Ratio (2019-2020)2.70%
Official Websitehttp://www.pnas.org/
Online Manuscript Submissionhttp://www.pnascentral.org/cgi-bin/main.plex
Open AccessNo
PublisherNATL ACAD SCIENCES, 2101 CONSTITUTION AVE NW, WASHINGTON, USA, DC, 20418
Subject AreaMultidisciplinary Journals
Country/Area of PublicationUNITED STATES
Publication FrequencyWeekly
Year Publication Started1915
Annual Article Volume3347
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index
Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0027-8424%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Authorized Data from Publisher:
Data from Authors: About 2.8 month(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: About 22.5%
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA】CiteScore Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • CiteScore Trend


First    Previous    1    Next    Last  (To Page
/1)
  Reviews on PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA: Write a review
Author: 一刀倾城


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-07-16 11:38:58
I haven't published here yet, but I just reviewed a manuscript for PNAS a few days ago. After accepting the review, the editorial office sent a request that "PNAS strives to publish papers of exceptional quality and importance. Please consider the novelty and general interest of this article when preparing your review", and it required the reviewer to return comments back within ten days. When submitting review comments, the system requires the following evaluation of the paper: Suitable Quality? Sufficient General Interest? Conclusions Justified? Clearly Written? Procedures Described? Supplemental Material Warranted? Willingness to Re-review? etc. PNAS has been affected by the impact of OA publications, but its status is equally high, and the impact factor is nothing. I hope that I will have the opportunity to publish one article here in the future.

(21) Thank | 一刀倾城

Author: sss


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-03-30 11:35:21
The PNAS Review is very interesting; my two submissions were a bit long. The reason is that the editor has conducted a preliminary review of the article and proposed detailed revision comments and suggestions. After submitting the revised data according to the comments, the editor found two reviewers, responded for about 1 month, and gave yes or no re: the innovation, universality, data volume, writing, etc., and put forward specific opinions. The supplementary data was modified and submitted. It took a total of 8 months. The overall feeling: Editor is very, very nice, and put forward very good suggestions, greatly improved the article, and we benefited a lot.

(10) Thank | sss

Author: qqyang


Subject Area: Environmental Sciences
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-12-12 11:10:41
Second District Journal
Show Review in Original Language
(11) Thank | qqyang

Author: hello


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-07-29 16:16:42
A journal that is purely experimental, one page can be published, no meaning.
Show Review in Original Language
(53) Thank | hello

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-01-01 04:50:14
non-biological, non-academician recommended direct submitment is still very difficult.The reviewers are first-rate scholars and the opinions are constructive.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: hwzhang2014@yahoo.com


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-03-02 14:16:59
has just been acceptd, the review is particularly serious, the first trial makes up the experiment, the second trial only speaks the language problem, then submitted it and receive it directly.
Show Review in Original Language
(6) Thank | hwzhang2014@yahoo.com

Author: panda


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-08-30 08:48:19
For computer science articles, Scientific ReportsStill difficult.We need to reposition the contribution of the paper so that editors from other fields can understand it.The article was submitted out in April 2016, and the first trial was minor in July and completed in two weeks.The second trial was accepted at the end of August.
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | panda

Author: 502283190@qq.com


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2015-02-06 16:15:10
gives the major revision after two months of trial;The reviewers' opinions were quite harsh and changed for 3 months;The second trial was just over Christmas, about 40 days to inform the accept.There are a lot of interactions between various authors and editors.The first time I selectd for paper, it was not clear whether it was a feature of PNAS.
Show Review in Original Language
(6) Thank | 502283190@qq.com

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2014-04-23 16:46:28
direct deliveryThe 28-day result of the first trial came out to be revisedAccepted in the second trial for 10 daysAfter 18 days online
Show Review in Original Language
(5) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-06-07 09:36:00
Reviewer #1:
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-05-02 10:44:00
2013-04-26Turned out 2013-05-01 receivedThe feedback of the editor was directly rejected. The efficiency of the journal was high. The other one went to
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-11-11 14:51:00
For Nature, Science, PNAS and other journals, the impact factors are all clouds.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-09-17 16:59:00
The PNAS impact factor is 9.681
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-06-22 22:35:00
Very nice journal, it is too biased, perhaps because it really came to the "century of life sciences"~~~ But after a direct select a lot ~
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-06-18 23:00:00
I received an article on March 23, the direction is Evolution, the submission method is Direct Submission.The first trial will take about two and a half months to know the result. The second trial will be received for one and a half months, and the third trial will receive the acceptance letter within 25 days.It is said that if PNAS decides not to submit for review, the draft is very fast, and the results will be known in about two weeks.The number of PNAS in the field of evolution is about 4-10 per month. This data is judged by the number of articles in the Evolution field of each issue of PNAS. Generally, there are only 1-2 articles in each period, and four per month.More time.The general interest points of the Direct Submission papers published on PNAS are quite wide.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-08-02 20:24:00
is the result of the research of the cattle, and I have not been able to select for this publication recently.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-06-10 20:32:00
Just one article, one month and a half for the first trial, and one month and a few days for the second trial.I am doing high-throughput sequencing and it is estimated to be relatively good.Still not easy.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science学
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2010-08-01 11:26:00
I have just one article, the review is very fast, two reviewers, selectd on May 5, 2010, and received the review on May 17.From July 2010, all manuscripts are directed submit, and the impact factor will definitely increase.This journal has a good influence. I selectd for the journal, and the science review was rejected.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2010-07-21 23:39:00
Now PNAS also has some very watery articles, called the academician's trash can, because the academician can recommend five articles per year to select on. In addition to the United States, other countries selectd for this journal to be accepted.The probability is very low. Recently, quality control may be carried out, and the system recommended by the academicians will change.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science学
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2010-07-17 08:27:00
Some water articles before, the academicians recommended by the American Academy of Sciences, in addition to the direct submitment articlesThey are very difficult and require innovation.Moreover, all direct submitment after July this year, it is estimated that the impact factor will be long.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

First    Previous    1    Next    Last  (To Page
/1)

Start your review of [PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.


© 2010-2021  ACCDON LLC 400 5th Ave, Suite 530, Waltham, MA 02451, USA
PrivacyTerms of Service