Natural Hazards

The editing process of this journal is faster, and it will start under two days after submission. From submission to retirement for one and a half months, it has changed for more than one month, and it has been reviewed for another month.月

(0) Thank | 517122191@qq.com

currently seems to be processing speed of the editorial department, three days is the Reviewer Assigned state, and look forward to good results!Just submitted, the review speed above is not informative.

(12) Thank | 走在西大

really feels that this journal editor is particularly good, especially responsible, this journalThe impact factor will rise straight up.Because it was just submitted, the review cycle is not clear, and the above 6-month review cycle does not have a reference.

(13) Thank | 398021789@qq.com

reviewed the manuscript for 7 months, and the direct minor revise received it.

(4) Thank | hahah

Compare water

(13) Thank | Anonymous

I want to ask you, does this journal allow articles to have an appendix?The review comments said that it is required to attach an attachment to indicate some of the contents of the article. If the attachment is included in the article, it is still only on the Internet, not counting the page fee?

(2) Thank | 毛球一号

A very fast journal, the article has been received, the following time I submitted the manuscript and the status of the article shared with the friends: 6.25 contribution; 8.9 comments returned - overhaul; 9.29 repair;10.20 comments returned to minor repair; 10.22 repaired; 10.23Accept.

(10) Thank | Anonymous

Submitted on June 30, 2013, minor repair on September 4, revised revision after September 16 revision, and directly acceptd on September 19.My first SCI, I feel that the review is fast, the editor is very serious, and the professional paper is very good.

(6) Thank | Anonymous

The review speed is very fast, the publication is more formal, the editor is also very familiar, and overall it is a good journal.

(7) Thank | Anonymous

3The month of the select, minor repair at the end of April, received and online in May, just in time to graduate.The review speed is very good, and the reviewers' opinions are also very professional. I feel that the editors are more responsible for the reviewers who are looking for them.Have the opportunity to select again!

(5) Thank | Anonymous

The editor is very responsible, send an email to ask about the progress of the review, and will reply soon, unlike the domestic editorial department who simply ignores the author's inquiry.Received soon after the revision, has been published.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

no #7 said exaggeration, it is only a few cases.This journal is very fast, basically going to the external trial within ten days, and the review is finished within two months.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

February 11th, during the period, it is required to recommend another reviewer. On March 20th, the editor-in-chief will make a revision according to the reviewer's comments. On March 27th, the revised draft will be sent back, and on March 29th, the review will be received.On April 15th, the electronic version is still very fast, and the editor is very responsible and dedicated.

(1) Thank | Anonymous

Journal Homepage URL: http://www.springer.com/earth+sc ... ology/journal/11069

(0) Thank | Anonymous

is OK, send a messageThe volume is relatively large, the publication is more formal, the professionalism is stronger.

(1) Thank | Anonymous

This journal does not know how it happened. I selectd for the draft for 6 months before submitting it for trial. Two months after the trial, there is no news., too slow

(5) Thank | Anonymous