Journal Profile | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Journal Title | Natural Hazards | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Journal Title Abbreviations | NAT HAZARDS | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
ISSN | 0921-030X | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
E-ISSN | 1573-0840 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
h-index | 87 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
CiteScore |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Self-Citation Ratio (2019-2020) | 5.00% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Official Website | https://www.springer.com/journal/11069 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Online Manuscript Submission | https://www.editorialmanager.com/nhaz/default.aspx | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Open Access | Yes (Hybrid OA journal) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Publisher | SPRINGER, 233 SPRING ST, NEW YORK , USA, NY, 10013 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject Area | Environmental Science | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Country/Area of Publication | UNITED STATES | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Publication Frequency | Monthly | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Year Publication Started | 1988 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Annual Article Volume | 301 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Indexing (SCI or SCIE) | Science Citation Index Expanded | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Link to PubMed Central (PMC) | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0921-030X%5BISSN%5D | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Average Duration of Peer Review * | Authorized Data from Publisher: Data from Authors: About 4.5 month(s) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Competitiveness * | Data from Authors: Easy | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Useful Links |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed. |
|
|
|
First Previous 1 2 Next Last (To Page | |
Reviews on Natural Hazards: | Write a review |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Social Science Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2013-01-16 10:05:00 I submitted my article in March and it was accepted in October. The review process was very fast. My article is a review of community-level disaster management. This is my first article and I am very happy. It is a foreign language journal. ![]() ![]() |
Author: 13579 Subject Area: Engineering and Materials Duration of Peer Review: 12.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2019-03-14 09:55:13 It has been 1 year from the submission until now. The current stage is reviewer assigned. The review process is quite slow. Hope for the good feedback soon. I really need this publication. ![]() ![]() |
Author: 13579 Subject Area: Engineering and Materials Duration of Peer Review: 12.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2019-03-14 09:55:06 It has been 1 year from the submission until now. The current stage is reviewer assigned. The review process is quite slow. Hope for the good feedback soon. I really need this publication. ![]() ![]() |
Author: 九点子 Subject Area: Geoscience Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2019-02-26 09:31:23 2018.12.5 new submission,2018.12.6 After the editor assigned three months, the status of the manuscript has not been updated, and 2019.2.25 issued a reminder letter to the handing editor and the editorial office respectively.Assigned for reviewers.The manuscript is pressed in the editorial department for too long, I hope that the speed can be faster. ![]() ![]() |
Author: 随风2 Subject Area: Engineering Duration of Peer Review: 5.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2019-02-22 09:31:04 Submitted for more than 5 months, stillEditor assigned, no message ![]() ![]() |
Author: 媛媛 Subject Area: Engineering Duration of Peer Review: 5.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2019-02-05 15:41:13 selectd for 5 months, the reminder letter was also sent four or five times, no news ![]() ![]() |
Author: 季节不要变化 Subject Area: Geoscience Duration of Peer Review: 12.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2019-01-08 21:06:02 Is this journal poisoned, the previous processing of the manuscript is said to be very efficient,Now how to become like this ![]() ![]() |
Author: 云的east Subject Area: Environmental Sciences Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2018-10-21 15:41:24 has been contributing for a month, and is still assigned by editor. The journal suddenly became slow... ![]() ![]() |
Author: yangjing1989 Subject Area: Geoscience Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2018-10-08 21:17:35 has been submitteding for more than 3 months, or is assigned by editor.It has been urged many times to reply to the same official statement. ![]() ![]() |
Author: 论文赶紧中 Subject Area: Engineering Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2018-09-17 16:05:24 This journal is really slow. It has been a fight with the domestic EI. The operator has been assigned for two months. There is no movement at all. In the end, it is a statement.Really anxious!! ![]() ![]() |
Author: 天才伊豆 Subject Area: Geoscience Duration of Peer Review: 7.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2018-08-01 14:53:01 After waiting for 7 months, I forgot to select for this article, let Xiao Xiu, directly acceptd one week after the change. ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Management Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2018-06-23 11:12:59 5.15 Submission6.08 minor repairI feel that the editing process is very fast, that is, the monthly publication is less, and the retrieval is slower. ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Engineering and Materials Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2018-05-15 11:03:52 This journal has made me a bit miserable. I selectd for two months or Editor Assigned, and I don’t reply to the editor’s email. I missed the time and never selectd ![]() ![]() |
Author: 78894591@qq.com Subject Area: Engineering and Materials Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2018-05-15 11:02:30 This journal has made me miserable. I selectd for two months or Editor Assigned. I don’t reply to the editor’s email, delay time, neverRe-submitted ![]() ![]() |
Author: douj888 Subject Area: Geoscience Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2018-02-03 14:02:34 in two articles in 2015, very good journals, and reflected faster.I really like this journal ![]() ![]() |
Author: wangchxizo@163.com Subject Area: Engineering and Materials Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2018-02-01 17:16:28 17 contributed on October 6th, December minor repair, January 31st, 18th.The content is generally statistical analysis of mine disasters, data categories.I feel that this journal is not very difficult, but it is not allowed to add the author when it is minor. Because the research team needs it, I originally wanted to add an author, but the editor refused, and the added author was included! ![]() ![]() |
Author: 刚哥 Subject Area: Geoscience Duration of Peer Review: 10.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2018-01-04 13:23:52 This journal can be added when the minor repairs ![]() ![]() |
Author: 1013565476@qq.com Subject Area: Geoscience Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2017-11-14 13:31:05 has been overhauled twice in March. It’s uncomfortable to fall from the three districts to the four districts, but it’s not good for me. I hope that there are good results ![]() ![]() |
Author: 这个杂志比较坑!! Subject Area: Geoscience Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s) Result: Accepted directly Write a review |
Reviewed 2017-11-08 20:52:36 哎, I also want to think more and more, I will graduate soon next June, and then suddenly tell you that the journal you have submitted has changed from three districts to four districts.a bolt from the blue!!!!The release time of the Chinese Academy of Sciences division is too boring, and people can't accept it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ![]() ![]() |
Author: zhaoyuan2262006@163.com Subject Area: Geoscience Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2017-11-08 16:18:11 is indeed a pit. In mid-October, it is still three zones.It has now become a four district.There is still a third district from graduation.Can only cry and laugh! ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Geoscience Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s) Result: Accepted directly Write a review |
Reviewed 2017-11-08 12:18:59 , the journal of the pothole, when it was submitted, it was still a three districts. In 2017, it was relegated to four districts.Bubble!!!!!! ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Engineering and Materials Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2017-11-07 10:42:49 Edit processing speed is very fast, like ![]() ![]() |
Author: tiantian Subject Area: Engineering and Materials Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2017-11-07 10:41:40 Edit processing speed is very fast, like ![]() ![]() |
Author: 15937110883@163.com Subject Area: Management Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2017-05-17 09:18:32 have to say.The journal editor is processing fast and without delay.Three months to the results of the first trial, direct minor repair, small repair play submitted, less than a week directly acceptd, and then directly online one week.I will select for this journal in the future. ![]() ![]() |
Author: Diva Subject Area: Geoscience Duration of Peer Review: 7.0 month(s) Result: Rejected Write a review |
Reviewed 2017-04-12 03:07:55 is not a very reliable journal, there is a specific review circle, and it is more exclusive to people outside the circle.Research methods, if there are more innovative ideas, or cross-professional cooperation results are not recommended this journal.After submitting the manuscript for 7 months, the results of the first trial were given, and one of the reviewers directly refused to publish. However, after reading his opinions carefully, I found that I did not understand my research at all, and gave a random comment. I just wanted to ask the editor directly for review.After that, the boss feels that he is wasting time to switch to other journals. After submiting in such journals, he must be cautious and cautious. ![]() ![]() |
First Previous 1 2 Next Last (To Page |