My Account Submit My Manuscript
Letpub, Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service

Nanoscale

   For Publishers  New

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:
Professional Journal Cover Design
APA has partnered with LetPub to provide a full suite of author services

[Nanoscale]Hello, you are Visitor Number 303245 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitleNanoscale
Journal Title AbbreviationsNANOSCALE
ISSN2040-3364
h-index176
CiteScore
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
7.172.3961.338
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Materials Science
Subcategory: General Materials Science
Q137 / 439

Self-Citation Ratio (2018-2019)6.00%
Official Websitehttp://pubs.rsc.org/en/journals/journalissues/nr
Online Manuscript Submissionhttp://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/nr
Open AccessNo
PublisherROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY, THOMAS GRAHAM HOUSE, SCIENCE PARK, MILTON RD, CAMBRIDGE, ENGLAND, CAMBS, CB4 0WF
Subject AreaCHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Country/Area of PublicationENGLAND
Publication FrequencyMonthly
Year Publication Started2009
Annual Article Volume2439
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index
Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=2040-3364%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Authorized Data from Publisher:
Data from Authors: About 1.4 month(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: 81%
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【Nanoscale】CiteScore Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • CiteScore Trend


First    Previous    1    2    3    4    5    6    Next    Last  (To Page
/6)
  Reviews on Nanoscale: Write a review
Author: lucky


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-03-16 10:13:25
1.18 Submitted to Journal will soon enter the Initial Assessment1.24 With Editor1.25 In peer review2.23 Major Revision3.11 Revision submitted to Journal3.12 With Editor will soon enter In peer review3.15 Accept
Show Review in Original Language
(6) Thank | lucky

Author: wzyhustsh@163.com


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-03-06 13:24:19
nanoscale as of 2018.3.6Factor 7.12, it should be no mistake...
Show Review in Original Language
(9) Thank | wzyhustsh@163.com

Author: 大法官


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-03-02 13:34:12
ending 2018.3.2, the immediate impact factor of 6.78, looks like 7 hopeless 矣
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | 大法官

Author: 中华民族的伟大复兴


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-01-23 22:26:27
Chinese journal as editor-in-chief, China’s rising journal, original articles on the active ingredients of traditional Chinese medicine, must be submitted to the journals of the Chinese people, so that foreigners can cite them, thus realizing the Chinese nation.The great renaissance is not far off.From then on, I will make a slogan (smart), a good article, an original article, a preference for Chinese journals, and a foreign journal.
Show Review in Original Language
(37) Thank | 中华民族的伟大复兴

Author: yhh1992612@sina.com


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-01-01 16:34:14
10月27#Submission, November 30th, come back to minor repair opinions, return on November 15thGoing, receiving on November 17, the efficiency is still very high.
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | yhh1992612@sina.com

Author: sdzbtf


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-10-25 09:18:25
2017.9.14 Submission2017.10.2 Overhaul2017.10.17 Return to the comments2017.10.23 ReceiveVery efficient, reviewers are also very professional
Show Review in Original Language
(5) Thank | sdzbtf

Author: jkl200301


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-10-25 08:24:41
2017. 7. 21 submitted manuscript2017. 8. 1 licence to publish completed submitted2017. 08. 28 major revision2017. 09. 13 submitted revised version (Supplementary experiment)2017. 09 . 16 with editor2017. 09. 20 in peer review2017. 10. 18 accept manuscript for publication after revisions (There is a reviewer suggesting to move the supplementary data to the original text; improve the clarity of the schematic)2017. 10. 21 submitted revised version R22017. 10. 23 with editor2017. 10. 24 acceptThe paper focuses on innovation!
Show Review in Original Language
(4) Thank | jkl200301

Author: 箜00随訫


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-09-15 08:26:14
2017-6-14 Submitted2017-6-15 Licence to Top submitted by submitted2017-6-18 With editor2017-7-11 In peer review2017-7-25 Major Revision2017-8-13 Submiti revised version2017-8-14 With editor2017-8-18 In peer review2017-9-11 AcceptThree reviewers, opinions are still relatively good, I wish Nanoscale is getting better and better
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | 箜00随訫

Author: YY


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-09-14 20:57:22
How is this journal so slow, 8.26 submissions, now 9.14, still with editor, is the editor all on holiday?
Show Review in Original Language
(6) Thank | YY

Author: Gua


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-09-12 17:12:58
article was recently acceptd by nanoscale.Share my submission experience.2017.6.13 Submission2017.7.24 Overhaul2017.8.22 Return to comments2017.9.10 Receiving3 reviewers, the evaluation is very pertinent, the opinions are very professionalI wish nanoscale is getting better and better.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Gua

Author: EricLL


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-07-01 17:05:53
2017/05/07 Casting2017/05/23 After receiving the reply, the two reviewers gave some insignificant minor revision comments and gave a higher evaluation. The editor gave the minor repairs.2017/06/05 Intentionally dragged back for a week2017/06/07 Receiving2017/06/28 proofI wish nanoscale is getting better and better.
Show Review in Original Language
(10) Thank | EricLL

Author: 赶紧毕业吧


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-06-16 10:21:54
The article was just acceptd by Nanoscale this morning.Share my long submission experience.2017.1.14 Submission2017.2.21 Edit rejection to re-success opportunities2017.3.19 Resubmitted after revision2017.4.20 Overhaul2017.5.8 Return to the revised comments2017.5.31 minor repair, received in principle, there are 2 small problems to modify the format2017.6.1 Return to the revised comments (I thought it would be received directly by the editor soon, and the results were submitted directly to the review.)2017.6.15 Receive
Show Review in Original Language
(7) Thank | 赶紧毕业吧

Author: gwdeng@ustc.edu.cn


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-04-07 21:50:55
Last year, I recently received an article.At present, the journal's requirements for innovation are quite high, and the personal feeling will be higher and higher, optimistic about the journal.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | gwdeng@ustc.edu.cn

Author: 1111


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-03-29 22:58:53
just got one, before the chemistry of materials for review, three reviewers, two overhauls (questions are better answers), one refused to draft, did not understand the article at all, speechlessThe deputy editor-in-chief, changed to Nanoscale, received review comments for three weeks, a minor repair, a major overhaul, basically a very good answer, 10 days to repair, and 10 days notice to receive, this journal for innovationHigh requirements
Show Review in Original Language
(4) Thank | 1111

Author: 小y


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-02-23 18:36:56
One week refused Editing is too embarrassing Or it is recommended to try ACS's better than RSC
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 小y

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-12-27 21:44:26
This journal impact factor is definitely rising very fast.The latest papers are very high.It seems that the journal positioning is relatively high-end.
Show Review in Original Language
(4) Thank | Anonymous

Author: 幻想


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-11-09 11:36:45
2016.10.22Submission2016.11.8 was rejected, and the period has been in the "with editor" state.It is estimated that the article level is too small, euphemistically said that it is not suitable for publication in nanoscale, and then the editor gave me a recommendation to switch to RSC Advance.
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | 幻想

Author: hawkeye


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-03-21 20:57:59
is used in photovoltaic devices for carbon nanomaterials.2015.10.13 first submission (try mentality), 2015.11.03, the results were rejected (two reviewers, one gave a good opinion but refused; the other gave some basic questions, suggested minor repairs);After returning, the teacher suggested that the reviewer should be carefully revised and re-submited in Nanoscale;2015.12.12 re-submitment, 2015.12.29 results overhaul; seriously revised, supplementary data;2016.01.25 submitted after the overhaul, 2016.02.24 results minor repair (the period is estimated to be somewhat slower than before), carefully revised (simply answer two questions);2016.03.02 submitted after minor repair, 2016.03.19 result Accept.In general, the editors (German editors) and reviewers are very responsible, and the speed of review is fast at every stage, especially thanks to the teachers who do so.Continue to cheer.
Show Review in Original Language
(35) Thank | hawkeye

Author: MM


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-01-25 12:49:03
The first paper, directly selectd nanoscale, overhauled after three weeks, repaired in two weeks, received directly after ten days, and the speed was very fast.One of the reviewers is very serious and rigorous, and praises one.The editing efficiency is also high, it is a German.In short, it is a good journal, a pleasant submission.
Show Review in Original Language
(13) Thank | MM

Author: wulang


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2015-08-06 11:43:22
3Submission on the 20th, May 16th to get the review comments, three reviewers, one directly refused, one minor repair, another overhaul, but three reviewers recommendedSupplement the experiment!The editor suggested re-attending!However, it was left unreasonable at that time. After two months or so, in desperation, the data was replenished. On July 18th, I selectd again. On July 28th, I received the review comments again. Two reviewers suggestedreceive!Changed for three days, then sent it, received on August 4!The overall feeling of speed is OK!I selectd for Nanoscale three times. It is not easy to receive this one!
Show Review in Original Language
(10) Thank | wulang

Author: Deity_4


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2015-07-24 11:26:59
3 at the end of the month, after 3 weeks, the review comments are returned, both reviewers are overhauled, editedFor overhaul, the modification will return after about 1 month, and it will be received after 9 days. After 2 weeks, the proof checking is generally high.NANOSCALE has increased its influence in recent years, and the difficulty of submission has gradually increased, and it still has great potential.I wish you all the best in research~
Show Review in Original Language
(6) Thank | Deity_4

Author: lucky


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2014-12-31 20:15:04
7.26Turn out, 8.27 received the review comments, respectively, overhaul and overhaul, the editor gave the overhaul.One week after the return, both reviewers agreed to receive it.Everything is going well!Grateful!The editing efficiency is very high. Prof. Jiangfang Wang.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | lucky

Author: kecheng_cao @live.com


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted directly


Write a review

Reviewed 2014-09-18 01:46:33
The first article of the master's thesis, the article submitted NC to transfer to SR did not transfer and then selectd JACS AM angew ACS NANO and so on.Post-submitment Nanoscale 2014.8.4 submission 2014.9.10 direct reception 2014.9.12 online.The editor of the selected Nano Institute is Jie Liu, and both reviewers have no opinion.
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | kecheng_cao @live.com

Author: IrisR


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2014-08-07 13:24:28
. After one month of submiting, I asked the article about it, saying that I still waited for a reviewer’s opinion and waited another month.Q, said that I would wait for the reviewer's opinion and received the decision letter in a few days.A major repair, a rejection.The editor gave the rejection.The editor and the two reviewers are Chinese.The review's comments are very unprofessional compared to the PR series of journals.I will not select for this journal in the future.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | IrisR

Author: 阿达


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2014-06-11 21:25:27
4 At the end of the month, the review comments came back in mid-to-late May, the problem is not big, a major overhaul,A minor repair, but the editor refused, very annoyed, feeling very embarrassed!Let's change the RSC advance to see a new journal. I don't know much, it's very big.Hey!
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | 阿达

First    Previous    1    2    3    4    5    6    Next    Last  (To Page
/6)

Start your review of [Nanoscale]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.

Intentional Space Tag


Contact us

Contact us  

Your name*

Your email*

Your message*

Please fill in all fields and provide a valid email.

Security Code*

© 2010-2020 United States: ACCDON LLC Tel: 1-781-202-9968 Email: info@accdon.com
Address: 400 5th Ave, Suite 530, Waltham, Massachusetts 02451, United States
LetPub Privacy Policy