ANALYTICAL LETTERS

The editor is super nice! The experts' review opinions are also very pertinent. It is a good journal worth recommending!

(12) Thank | 杨＆何

Submitted on December 30th, 2018, and got no replies from the reviewers till February 8th. It then was sent for another review. We resubmitted it on March 12th after rejection. And it was accepted on March 28th, the day we got replies from the journal. It’s very fast.

(1) Thank | 冰糖葫芦

Our manuscript was finally accepted (yes!), although the process was full of unexpected twists and turns. If you have patience, you can publish in this journal. We got six reviews, which seems like a lot, especially because each reviewer gave about sixty or seventy comments. After one month of revisions, we heard that our paper was rejected…. Apparently, the estimated “rejection rate” for this journal was underestimated for the previous year (or at least that’s what the editor told us). In the end, the editor let us resubmit and we received positive reviews from the new reviewers. Accepted!

(3) Thank | 00

See the journal's latest article, probably can find out the time of each review process, from receive to accept mostly in 1-1.5 months, accept to online mostly in 88-100day, fast also has about 55 days.The first time I submitted SCI, the meager experience hopes to help everyone.

(2) Thank | 萌萌萌萌媛儿

This journal is very efficient, 6.23 submissions, 7.24 returns to the initial review, after the minor repair 8.1 returned on the same day, and now waiting for proof.A little upstairs is also mentioned, returning to the review comments, the status is Reject

(1) Thank | zxyyyuan@163.com

It's easier.That is, the journal has a small means: every time you make a major retreat, whether it is a major repair or a minor repair, the date of receipt and the date of receipt seen on the online article are very close, even the same day.I was fooled at the time, and it took 4 months from the first submission to the reception, and it took another 4 months to see the journal.

(0) Thank | 猎魂

would like to ask everyone this journal online is very slow

(0) Thank | 羊羊

The first trial is one month, the return is overhauled, the second day is acceptd, the editor is very responsible

(0) Thank | czcz

is very efficient and has been submitted for two days.

(4) Thank | tjqqq

ANALYTICAL LETTERS has been acceptd, but the unit has to cover and catalogue, the journal is 50 books, 590 knives, which big god has a physical book, needVolume: 49, Issue:10 cover and catalog photos, QQ: 396015756

(1) Thank | 封寒矢

ANALYTICAL LETTERS has been acceptd, but the unit has to cover and catalogue. The journal has 50 books, 590 knives. Which big god has a physical book, need Volume: 49, Issue:10 cover and catalog photos

(2) Thank | 封寒矢

5.5 submit6.6 Edit let reject

(1) Thank | weiwei

3 The first submission on the 5th of the month, on April 5th, the notice was rejected and the re-submission was re-submitted. On April 8th, the manuscript was resubmitted, and on May 4th, the acceptance notice was received.The review was very quick, the editor was very nice

(0) Thank | niming

The first select of No.10 and No.23 in 2014, the revised opinion of No.11.25 came back, six reviewers gave about sixty or seventy comments, and one month was repaired, and another one was submitted on the 12.25.Going up, just in time for Christmas holiday, returning to No. 1.15 in 2015, the reviewers have no opinions, and the editor has a little format advice. Our boss said that it is estimated that the rejection rate in 2014 is not enough, so let us reCast, so even if it is 2015, it will be submitted immediately after the repair, and now wait for news.

(1) Thank | 318889425@qq.com

2014, the first select of 10, 23, the revision of the 11.25, 6The reviewer gave about sixty or seventy comments. After one month of repair, 12.25 was submitted again, just in time for the Christmas holiday. In 2015, the number 1.15 was returned. The reviewers had no comments, and the editor had a little format.On the opinion, our boss said that it is estimated that the rejection rate in 2014 is not enough, so let us re-submit, so even if it is 2015, it will be submitted immediately after the repair, and now wait for news.

(1) Thank | 318889425@qq.com

What do you need to do after editing an email?

(1) Thank | xtuzkx@126.com

Submitted on January 15th, returned on February 7th: threeReferee, two minor repairs, one direct accept, the editor gave a minor repair, and asked to sign copyright.Due to the Spring Festival, the revised time dragged on for a little longer. It was revised on February 28th and uploaded on March 2nd. The next day, the letter was received. After that, there is no news until now. I don’t know when I can see it.Journal.It is said that the publication needs to wait for a long time...This is the first SCI that I completed completely on my own after graduation. I have graduated for two years and finally accepted it. Congratulations to myself and cheer.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

This article is the first SCI written by the master's degree. It was written very seriously. The first APA was rejected. Later, the analysis science results were not directly rejected. Maybe theyMore similar articles are not needed. The third time is the analysis letters of the select. The reviewer's opinion is similar to the above insect friends. The two reviwer opinions are different. The opinions agreed to be accepted are very detailed and do not agree with the acceptance.Negative (I feel that he did not look carefully, but also take my article compared with ACA's article, Nima can compare? People's IF 4 or more), the final editorial opinion is minor repair, and at the same time let fill in the copyright, submit the recruitment time toInsect reference, 2012.12.16 contribution, 2

(0) Thank | Anonymous

11, on the 9th, submitted an article, received on December 12th, the two reviwer's opinions are completely different, agree to accept the commentsVery detailed, disagree with the acceptance is a total negation, feeling with my paper is hateful, the final editorial opinion is minor repair, and at the same time let fill in the copyright, accepted on December 15.I wrote this article more seriously, and people who have better English are modified once.I had hoped to select for a better journal, and I was rejected twice. I was really impatient.Fortunately, the editor of this journal has a very good attitude and accepts it quickly.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

9 Submitted on the 5th of the month, returning to the minor repair at the end of September, blaming your own English is not good, the modification is still not suitable, and a minor repair was carried out. After the first minor repair, the reviewer should be sent again.The second minor repair was accepted on the same day.Notice on November 26, two and a half months before and after.If you are better at English, it is estimated to be more than a month.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

According to the content to decide the employment situation is fast, then two months will definitely accept that the publication is slower

(0) Thank | Anonymous

8 Submitted at the end of the month, returning to minor repair in mid-September, although twoThe reviewers' opinions were diametrically opposed, but they were rehabilitated in early October and were very fast.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

just submitted an article, the routine analysis of LC-MS/MS, nothing new, rejected after 5 days.Rejected content: I have reviewed your manuscript above which submitted to Analytical Letters.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

8, submitted on the 1st of August, returned to minor repair on August 26, and acceptd on September 4.quite fast!The first paper of Xiaoshuo was accepted, happy, thank you for your help!

(0) Thank | Anonymous

7 On the 2nd select, return to the review comments on August 1st, select on August 14th, select on August 15th, and on September 10th.The comments are very scared to see the evening. The first SCI, thank you for your help.

(0) Thank | Anonymous