My Account Submit My Manuscript
Letpub, Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service

ACS Nano

   For Publishers  New

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:
Professional Journal Cover Design
APA has partnered with LetPub to provide a full suite of author services

[ACS Nano]Hello, you are Visitor Number 281239 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitleACS Nano
Journal Title AbbreviationsACS NANO
ISSN1936-0851
E-ISSN1936-086X
h-index310
CiteScore
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
14.296.2142.447
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Engineering
Subcategory: General Engineering
Q11 / 275
Category: Physics and Astronomy
Subcategory: General Physics and Astronomy
Q14 / 215
Category: Materials Science
Subcategory: General Materials Science
Q114 / 439

Self-Citation Ratio (2018-2019)4.40%
Official Websitehttp://pubs.acs.org/journal/ancac3
Online Manuscript Submissionhttps://acs.manuscriptcentral.com/acs
Open AccessNo
PublisherAMER CHEMICAL SOC, 1155 16TH ST, NW, WASHINGTON, USA, DC, 20036
Subject AreaEngineering
Country/Area of PublicationUNITED STATES
Publication FrequencyMonthly
Year Publication Started2007
Annual Article Volume1290
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index
Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=1936-0851%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Authorized Data from Publisher:
Data from Authors: About 1.7 month(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: 88%
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【ACS Nano】CiteScore Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • CiteScore Trend


First    Previous    1    2    3    Next    Last  (To Page
/3)
  Reviews on ACS Nano: Write a review
Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-11-09 18:22:00
ACS Nano is getting higher and higher.Compared with Nano Letters, ACS Nano focuses on innovative processes in the nano field, while Nano Letters pays more attention to the development and performance of functional devices.Therefore, the audience of ACS Nano should be said to be more extensive, and believe that the future impact factor has the potential to further enhance.The ACS Nano review is very fast and the submission process is relatively simple. It is important to note that you should not forget to submit the Copyright Agreement when uploading the first draft.Allow reviewers and reviewers to be 2, and evaluate the significant and general interests of the paper. The best evaluation is to reach T
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-09-05 18:47:00
ACS Nano and Nano letter AM AFM coverage in this field.The scope is similar, like the novel hotspots, the innovation of the article is very important, we must let the editor feel that it can lead to a wide-angle vision will be initially recognized.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-08-29 13:19:00
Journal is very good, I hope moreFollow this journal.Its growth is similar to that of Nano Lett. Then, JACS, Nano Lett. ACS Nano will become the main journal of ACS.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-08-19 07:20:00
Journal Homepage URL: http://pubs.acs.org/journal/ancac3
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-08-17 15:56:00
One of our laboratory AM rejected, transferred to one monthIn the
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-08-16 20:15:00
first-instance was rejected for half a year, revised for half a year, and then submitted, I did not expect to receive the
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-07-24 17:24:00
journal's influence factor in three days.Has been rising very fast, it is said that there is speculation suspected but also the hype of the big, now is the top journal of the strength of the
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-06-29 23:23:00
article is worse than nanoletter.Under JACS, AM, and AFM, it is ranked above JMC and CM.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-06-29 10:15:00
After all, the ACS article, scientific novelty, system integrity requirements are relatively high, in April a minor repair, then the editor asked me to review a related manuscript, in JuneInvestors, editors said that in order to improve their IF, I only want to receive the most innovative articles, suggesting that I change the submitment, 10 years IF came out, I believe that it will be more difficult to select in the future.
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-06-29 08:48:00
The latest impact factor 9.8
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-06-29 07:54:00
This year 9.8, the current receipt request must have a very positive evaluation at the first trial, and the three reviewers agree to the minor repair and the like, otherwise it will be difficult to edit the customs (15%) The most recently rejected article, the editor’s reply to us is that the number of accepted manuscripts exceeds the number of articles that can be published. Only a very positive evaluation can be accepted. It is recommended that we change the select (later in the biomterials) so the individualIt is extremely difficult to send, especially in the field, there are new trees, but the group that does not have too much fame accumulates that it can obtain certain review opinions from this journal, and then make changes to other publications
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-05-22 14:34:00
I have not selectd for ACS nano, but I have reviewed the manuscript of this journal and the quality is average.I have read many of the above articles and I feel that it is no better than PRB.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-05-22 00:08:00
engage in solar cells, I want to select for a hard to hear, the experiment has a brother who selectd two times, both rejected
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-05-09 09:41:00
I am doing organic photovoltaics.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-04-21 23:12:00
Feel that most of the articles in this journal have been submitted for about 3 months, and there are also faster and half a year.Recently, I had a good luck. I had a minor repair for 40 days in the first trial. I received it after 35 days of re-submitment. It was a little accident for so long. Fortunately, the final editor received it directly, and the second day of the reception was proof.Two days later ONELINE, the efficiency is amazing
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-04-20 04:27:00
For the full paper journal, the speed is very fast, one and a half months back to the review comments, the second-instance editor directly accepts, from receiving the proof to the online only a totalIt took 10 days.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-03-19 19:03:00
Journal mainly reads the quality of the article
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-03-06 19:23:00
Our lab selectd one, tragedy, but soon, the opinion came out in a week or so
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-03-05 21:00:00
features are not clear enough, the article grade is still a certain gap than nano letters.The quality of the article is uneven and there has been some improvement in recent years.The overall situation is optimistic.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: NANOTECHNOLOGY
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-01-23 16:53:00
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2010-10-27 15:08:00
Don’t look at the impact factor, the quality of the article is much worse than nanoletter, let alone Jacs,
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2010-09-23 08:29:00
Sometimes it takes more than three reviewers.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: 纳米材料
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2010-09-21 14:37:00
Journal articles are of high quality and are relatively popular.I hope to select for an article I don't know if I can
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: 纳米材料
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2010-08-25 23:18:00
is a journal worth reading. It is a sister journal of NANO LETTERS. The former sends a newsletter, the latter sends a full text. Both are similar. Estimated next yearThe impact factor will exceed 8.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2010-08-12 13:00:00
Magazine only looks at new results, new materials and new applications, and does not tend to explore articles on mechanisms and deep chemistry.So some articles feel that science is not too strong.There may be too many articles submitted, and many people may think that the level of articles is not enough for nanooletters to go here, and the impact factor is rising too fast.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

First    Previous    1    2    3    Next    Last  (To Page
/3)

Start your review of [ACS Nano]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.

Intentional Space Tag


Contact us

Contact us  

Your name*

Your email*

Your message*

Please fill in all fields and provide a valid email.

Security Code*

© 2010-2020 United States: ACCDON LLC Tel: 1-781-202-9968 Email: info@accdon.com
Address: 400 5th Ave, Suite 530, Waltham, Massachusetts 02451, United States
LetPub Privacy Policy