Journal of Materials Science

2020.01.24 submitted; 2020.01.25 under consideration; 2020.03.22 major revision was required; there were two reviewers; 2020.04.22 revision submitted; 2020.04.23 under consideration; 2020.05.03 minor revision was required; another reviewer was found; 2020.05.06 under consideration; 2020.05.07 under consideration; 2020.05.08 accepted. Under consideration changed 9 times during the review period. It is estimated that they were looking for reviewers. It changed 4 times during minor revisions. The article was about a small phenomenon I found before, which was just interesting, but I didn't dare to expect it to be accepted. Thus, I am very grateful for the journal's approval. Editor Naiqin Zhao is very nice.

(10) Thank | 老学生了

8.23, submitted; 8.27, under consideration; 9.10 under consideration; 9.11, major revisions needed; 10.21, revision submitted; 10.22, revision submitted; 10.23, revision submitted; 10.24, under consideration; 10.26, under consideration; 10.30, under consideration; 11.6, under consideration; 11.7, minor revisions needed; 11.7, revision submitted; 11.8, under consideration; 11.11, under consideration; 11.15 accept.

(9) Thank | 允熙熙

2019.8.1 submitted, 2019.8.4 under consideration, 2019.8.4–8.20 status changed several times, under consideration, 2019.8.20 major revisions (three reviewers, each reviewer asked three to four questions) 2019.9.9 submitted, 2019.9.9–9.23 status changed several times again, under consideration. 2019.9.23 I received an accepted email. The submission experience of this article was rather bumpy. I submitted it to the CARBON. The editor required a major revision. One of the reviewers commented so intensely that it made me feel uncomfortable. This may be the case. Perhaps the modification was not detailed enough that it was finally rejected. It took more than three months. After all, it is my first article and I was in a hurry to acceptance. I directly submitted to Journal of Materials Science. I hope that the impact factor of JMS will continue to increase. After all, it is a classic journal. I hope that more good articles could be included, and articles could be of excellent quality. Come on!

(10) Thank | 企鹅号

Let me talk about this legendary experience. 7.1 submit. 7.2 under consideration. 7.14 under consideration. 7.19 under consideration. 7.26 under consideration. 8.2 under consideration. 8.3 major. There are three reviewers with three minor revisions. However, the editor required major revisions. 8.7 revision submit. 8.8 under consideration. 8.29 under consideration. 9.4 under consideration. I received the acceptance email at noon. It was weird that the email was never received from the beginning to the end. The teacher never received it, either. All were sent to the fourth author. Three minor revisions bothered me for a month.

(2) Thank | fyhgkj

I was on the 279th floor, reply to the 281st floor that it has been accepted now! Let’s talk about the detailed status (including the status of each change): 5.28, submitted; 5.30, under consideration; 7.15, under consideration; 7.22, under consideration; 8.6, major revisions; 8.19, revisions submitted (It was delayed for a week without revision); 8.21, under consideration; 8.23, the status of my senior apprentice’s article was “Accepted”. 6.4, submitted; 6.8, under consideration; 7.18, under consideration; 7.22, minor revision; 7.26, revisions submission; 8.1, under consideration; 8.22, under consideration. The status of my senior apprentice’s article changed; it has not been accepted.

(7) Thank | 享受简单

I am very honored to have had two articles published in this journal.  The first article was accepted three months after submission with one round of review and revision. The second article was accepted a month after I submitted major revisions.

(73) Thank | hefchina@126.com

This journal is unexpectedly fast, the editor is very milkySubmitted by 2018.12.282019.1.21 overhaul2019.2.15 receivingThe first SCI in life, all completed independently, happy to burst!I hope the journal is getting better and better!

(1) Thank | 曼越元小小

2018.12.02 submitted2018.12.04 under considerationAfter two days, the state becomes under consideration, and then the date and state remain unchanged.2018.12.29 under consideration Date changed, the status remains unchanged2019.01.24 wrote a reminder letter to the editor, the editorial reply is in the hands of the reviewer, and I will reply to me immediately after receiving the review comments.I didn't want to select for this. The instructor said that this is fast, I can give a reply in a month, and then I am waiting for the news every day for two months. In the regret and suffering, I can't help myself. I feel that I am already depressed.If you want to graduate this summer, if you don’t receive a letter of acceptance in May, you will be overdue. You can’t be better in the year. I don’t know when it’s a head

(25) Thank | 麦阿may

Below is my submission status:2018.11.12 submitted2018.11.13 under consideration2019.1.2 major revision2019.1.10 submitted by revision2019.1.17 acceptedThe editing efficiency is quite high. The next day, the status of the submission becomes under consideration. The next date is updated no later than six or seven times. It is estimated that the reviewer will be submitted. The manuscript received comments submitted about two months, and the two reviewers mentionedThere are not many problems, no need to make up the experiment, the editor gave the overhaul for about 40 days, and after a week of revision, j will hurry back; I hope that the reception can be a good year before, and finally, I will receive it after one week!!!The entire submission process was smooth, this is the first article of the research career, all of which were completed independently. Although it is a quick graduation, it is also an affirmation for three years.The only unfortunate thing is that when you select, it is the second district, and the reception has become the third district.However, as a comprehensive old-fashioned journal of materials, JMS is also increasing its influence factor year by year. It is a good journal. It is more optimistic. Finally, I wish the journal will be better and better.

(8) Thank | 亿路有你

More than 1,300 articles were published in one year.Typical water journal!

(36) Thank | doude

Share my submission status:Submitted 2018.11.82018.11.8 under consideration2018.12.17 major revision2019.1.6 proposal submitted2019.1.8 under consideration2019.1.11 minor revision2019.1.15 revision submitted2019.1.15 under consideration2019.1.16 acceptedThe journal is very efficient. After submitting the manuscript for about one month, I received the review comments, but there are not many questions. I added two small experiments and returned after three weeks of overhaul. After a few days, the minor repair opinions are mainly to supplement the ORCID.Information, this is a bit of a hassle, every author must add and open, to complete this item before it can be received, and then return to the next day to receive it!!The entire submission process is quite smooth, this is the first and final article of my research career, hard work everyone!!The journal is very good. It is a comprehensive journal of materials. The impact factor is also increasing year by year. It is more suitable for Xiaoshuo, who has confidence in his research direction and rushed to graduate. Finally, I wish the journal will be better and better!!

(1) Thank | 冬冬冬酱

last year. When I arrived in the second district, I was still in the second district when I received it in July.Waiting for graduation

(2) Thank | 钢镚

I am a 2018-11-20 submission. It’s almost a month and a half. It’s been under considerision. According to everyone’s comments, I am facing a rejected submission immediately. %>_

(4) Thank | chemQing

瞎 rhythm.JMS veteran journals are highly recognized in our school.Just because it is a comprehensive journal, the impact factor does not go up.But in the past two years, it has changed.I counted it, instant if=2, just after half a year, next year at the end of June, there is a chance to go to 4.

(23) Thank | echo1994wf

Upstairs don't take the rhythm, jms is a veteran journal, including jennings hm and other big cows have sent articles on it. From the experience of submission, the editor is still very strict and responsible.If jms is reduced to 4 zones, then the flow of materials should not be kicked out of sci??

(12) Thank | ddsaber

This journal is the fourth district next time.In the field of materials, it is a very general journal.

(65) Thank | lj

Dropped into Zone 3? Previously TOP

(5) Thank | 搬砖

10.18 Submission11.18 minor repair11.28 Back12.6 Receiving

(1) Thank | WZ

contributed on August 20th,Overhaul on September 18,Return to the revision on October 26th.Minor repair on November 22nd,Return to the revision on November 25th.Received on November 30th.

(1) Thank | muzhan

JMS10-30 submission11-23 minor repair11-30 return12-1 minor repair12-1 back12-6 Receive

(1) Thank | 苦瓜VL

Submitted on July 10th, then the status has been under consideration but the date will change, the number of changes in the whole cycle is no less than 15 times, may be looking for reviewers, September 22Modify the comments, minor repairs (return 20 days).At that time, it was in the Mid-Autumn Festival, so it was not revised in time. The National Day took 5 days and was carefully revised according to the opinions of the reviewers.On the 6th, the revised draft was returned, and the status of the 7th continued to be under consideration, and the 8th was received.

(8) Thank | 悠悠

has been rejected for nearly three months. See the submission status below.7.20 submitted7.24 under consideration7.28 under consideration8.04 under consideration8.21 under consideration9.02 under consideration9.24 under consideration10.4 rejectionThe review comments are very general. It is estimated that the reviewers and the editors’ internal opinions can not be found. Before the 4,000 oceans recommended the link language in this journal, it took me nearly three months to reject the manuscript and gave it.The reason for not irritating and rejecting the article

(5) Thank | gugu

The editor of the journal is super nice, two reviewers, one overhaul, one without comments, and the editor has a little opinion.Submitted on June 16,Returned to major repair on July 25th.Reworked on August 30,Received on September 26.I hope everyone has to help!Also thank the journal editors and reviewers!!

(3) Thank | cuicui

Corresponding author discrepancy found in the manuscriptAsk the contributor to be the correspondent, sent back to author.Change to other journals

(0) Thank | wenyongma

Agree with the opinions of the former comrades, submitted on July 20th, the result is unknown, the status has changed several times

(4) Thank | gugu