Journal Profile | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Journal Title | Environmental Research Letters | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Journal Title Abbreviations | ENVIRON RES LETT | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
ISSN | 1748-9326 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
h-index | 97 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
CiteScore |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Self-Citation Ratio (2019-2020) | 7.10% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Official Website | http://iopscience.iop.org/journal/1748-9326 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Online Manuscript Submission | https://mc04.manuscriptcentral.com/erl-iop | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Open Access | Yes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Publisher | IOP PUBLISHING LTD, DIRAC HOUSE, TEMPLE BACK, BRISTOL, ENGLAND, BS1 6BE | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject Area | Environmental Science | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Country/Area of Publication | ENGLAND | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Publication Frequency | Quarterly | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Year Publication Started | 2006 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Annual Article Volume | 542 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Indexing (SCI or SCIE) | Science Citation Index Expanded | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Link to PubMed Central (PMC) | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=1748-9326%5BISSN%5D | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Average Duration of Peer Review * | Authorized Data from Publisher: Data from Authors: About 3.0 month(s) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Competitiveness * | Data from Authors: Moderate | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Useful Links |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed. |
|
First Previous 1 Next Last (To Page | |
Reviews on Environmental Research Letters: | Write a review |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2011-11-16 23:04:00 Good journal in environment science. ![]() ![]() |
Author: Kris Subject Area: Geoscience Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2018-11-20 14:01:50 Constructive review comments ![]() ![]() |
Author: Jack Subject Area: Geoscience Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2018-01-05 15:29:22 8.19 submitted8.24 awaiting referee reports9.20 awaiting decision9.25 minor revision10.6 awaiting referee reports10.15 accepted ![]() ![]() |
Author: .. Subject Area: Engineering and Materials Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s) Result: Rejected Write a review |
Reviewed 2017-12-25 16:32:49 Reviewing speed is fast 2 months directly rejected ![]() ![]() |
Author: lalaland Subject Area: Geoscience Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2017-11-18 17:13:11 3.15 submitted6.20 Overhaul8.10 Rework8.28 acceptedThe speed is very fast, the review comments are very professional, I feel that I am a small peer, and I replied 12 pages.Recently, the rate of rejection of journals is very high, thanksgiving! ![]() ![]() |
Author: hhhhh. Subject Area: Geoscience Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2017-01-08 16:56:58 How have you not commented recently?Ask for manuscript status information ah ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Life Science Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2016-09-12 09:55:46 Citations:Answer three questions when submitting a manuscript and upload it with the article.1. What are the new results or developments reported in your article?2. In what way are these new results or developments timely?3. Why are these new results or developments significant? ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Life Science Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2013-11-21 13:05:00 is the content of heavy metal pollution repair. Do you know that it does not meet the research direction of this journal?Try it ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2013-05-14 00:07:00 Magazine has made a supplement this year, invited me to contribute, and the result was rejected.In fact, there is a reviewer's opinion is good, but the editor directly refused.It is estimated that there are more people contributing. ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2013-01-31 04:21:00 1. Review is fast, after all, is letterExperience: In the first trial in January, the reviewer must reply within 10 days. 2. The review is really fine, and even the punctuation will be revised. 3. The reviewer looks at the whole, the quality is very good, and the article is greatly helpful. 4. SubmissionThe system is a bit simplistic, but it can't cover people's speed. 5. It is getting stricter and the article is getting higher. ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2013-01-12 10:40:00 Environmental Research Letters belongs to the second district? ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2012-12-13 15:22:00 Journal Homepage URL: http://iopscience.iop.org/1748-9326 ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2011-04-29 23:04:00 The review speed is very fast, and the two reviewers have great help in reviewing the manuscript; it is necessary to pay a publishing fee of about $1,700. ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Biodiversity Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2010-08-18 22:09:00 ![]() ![]() |
First Previous 1 Next Last (To Page |