ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION

Reviewers are very meticulous, and the opinions given are pertinent; the journals have requirements for novelty and workload, and the editors have patience. During the overhaul, they apply for delay, and the editors respond quickly.After two overhauls (each appraisal in about 1 month), a minor repair, received.2016-8-16 submit2016-8-22 under review2016-9-28 major revision The overall opinion of the two reviewers is quite positive and needs additional data.2016-10-16 submit2016-11-14 major revision Data format adjustment, additional literature discussion; because of other things, no time to draft, apply delay for two weeks2017-01-01 submit2017-02-06 minor revision Additional literature discussion, detail modification2017-02-13 submit2017-02-22 accept minor repair has not been approved, directly receive

(14) Thank | 写不出用户名了

Personal feelings: (1) requires a large amount of data, innovative; (2) the review time dragged a bit long, may be difficult for reviewers to find; (3) requirements for EnglishGao; (4) has been selectd many times before, and has been rejected many times, everyone must have patience.

(6) Thank | HNYL

is written in terms of air pollution. It has 2 months in the first instance and is relatively long. It is hard to change the three review comments.However, after a month of revision, it was directly acceptd, and it took more than three months to receive, but the journal was very slow.

(4) Thank | Joyce

has submitted a total of 3 times, the first two editorial reviews failed, and can only be changed to other journals.The third submission was a EST rejection paper, which was revised in detail based on the reviewer's comments.It is very efficient. It was submitted on March 25, and it was received in one and a half months. After half a month, it was revised back and received the next day.Individuals' evaluation of this paper is not as high as the amount of gold that was rejected by the editors before being submitted to the EP, but the papers are new enough and the data supports opinions.

(6) Thank | 631366314@qq.com

has selectd for 3 articles, and two articles were rejected.Those who were rejected were not sent directly by the editorial department, one week before and after.Insufficient innovation and routine local inspection are difficult.

(0) Thank | better

has selectd for 3 articles, and two articles have been rejected.Those who were rejected were not sent directly by the editorial department, one week before and after.Insufficient innovation and routine local inspection are difficult.

(0) Thank | better

After the select, the editor-in-chief is in the editor. After one day, the editor has assigned a deputy editor, and the status is decision in process.Is this normal? Is this waiting for the trial or the deputy editor is making the decision?!

(0) Thank | hwang_118@163.com

has certain requirements for innovation, and the Local interesting routine monitoring article is not very good.You need to submit a summary of the article to the editor first. This process may take a little longer.

(1) Thank | Anonymous

6 Submitted in mid-month, minor in mid-August, and acceptd in early September.The summary pre-audit time is longer, and it is urged twice to notify that it can be submitted.The editor is more responsible and the review period is shorter.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

was approved, and the official submission was made on October 5th. After waiting for two months, the status changed once, thinking that the review was over, but it changed again.In under review.So I waited for another two months, and finally received a rejection letter on February 9, the second year of the second year.A total of five reviewers were found. The previous two opinions were very different, so it took another two months to find someone else, and finally refused because of lack of innovation.Editors and reviewers are very responsible, giving good advice, but the time is a little longer.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Need to pre-inject the summary, it is best to send it directly to the editor. The editor will select the appropriate assistant according to the direction of your article. My summary is reviewed for one month...The editor explained that it was a meeting. Listening to others said that the general summary should be reviewed for 1-2 weeks. After the abstract is over, go to the website to select for the full text. Although there is a limit of 5,000 words, it is not very strict.After one and a half months of trial, the two reviewers, the first trial results were overhauled and changed for nearly two months; the second trial was less than one month, and the result was a minor change, then changed for three weeks, returned, accepted one week later, and the overall feeling was edited.The attitude is still good, that is, the reply is not timely, and the editor is relatively cold.The impact factor has a 3.7 this year, the environment is not bad, although it can not compare EST, WR but than ETC, Chemosphere this

(1) Thank | Anonymous

sent a few emails, the summary of the pastIgnore, the editor is too jerk.There was no way to change the Chemosphere and accept it after 6 months.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Submission summary The reply was given in the past week or so, but is it officially submitted for 10 days or is it normal with the editor?

(0) Thank | Anonymous

just selectd for Science of the Total Environment, the editor said that the layout is limited, it is recommended to change the select, I want to select for EP, before I sent a copy in the Environmental Science and Pollution Reasch, I want to change the high pointTry it.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Journal Homepage URL: http://www.journals.elsevier.com ... lution/#description

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Reviewing speed is very fast, at the end of FebruaryIn the first half of April, he returned to review the comments. The overhaul gave him two months. In the middle, he wrote a thesis defense and went back to the end of May. He returned to the second review in less than one month. There were several grammar problems.In general, EP is still relatively fast. The first article from submission to acceptance is almost 3 months.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

This journal has been reviewed very quickly. It has been news for one and a half months and it has been given for two months.Modify the time, change it back in one month, and accept it after one week.Very good journal.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Environmental comprehensive journal, with an impact factor of 3.4 or so, and its influence is also very good.More powerful than hazardous waste.The language requirements depend on the reviewer.Innovative and application articles are fine.In addition to EST and WR, maybe it is EP, maybe there are one or two before the EP, not sure.I am talking about the comprehensive environment class.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

has submitted two abstracts, which are rejected for the following reasons: If the research area is limited to a certain place, it is of a research nature.Very strange, I have seen that the journal recently published a similar article, and then it will not work.And I can't feel it with just one abstract, sweat one.Recently, however, I tried a feat that directly submitted the article without submitting the abstract in advance, and the editor was returned to the trial, and it was successfully acceptd, 嘎嘎

(1) Thank | Anonymous

IF=3.86

(0) Thank | Anonymous

This journal is still good in the environment, reviewing the manuscriptThe cycle is generally 2-4 months, the language requirements are not very strict, before the select, you need to give the editor pre-audit before you can select

(0) Thank | Anonymous

The article is the chemosphere that started to select, and was directly rejected, saying that the direction is not suitable.The EP was changed, and the review speed was very fast. The revised opinion was given in one month, and it was repaired in half a month and received the next day.I feel that the language and format requirements are not very strict, and the submission period is short.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Personal experience (1) This journal requires a summary review before it can be submitted through the system.(2) The cover letter must indicate which editorial review summary.(3) Must write highlight, highlight 3-5 sentences (that is, the key point of the article), each sentence does not exceed 85 characters.(4) The title of the diagram and table must be the same as the article, using a single document.

(1) Thank | Anonymous

Journal Homepage URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/02697491

(0) Thank | Anonymous

The environmental field has a high impact.

(1) Thank | Anonymous