Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service
中文 繁體中文 English 한국어 日本語 Português Español

ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:

[ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION]Hello, you are Visitor Number 135026 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitleENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION
Journal Title AbbreviationsENVIRON POLLUT
ISSN0269-7491
E-ISSN1873-6424
h-index194
CiteScore
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
5.981.6731.578
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
Subcategory: Toxicology
Q16 / 114
Category: Environmental Science
Subcategory: Pollution
Q18 / 109
Category: Environmental Science
Subcategory: Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis
Q110 / 117

Self-Citation Ratio (2018-2019)11.70%
Official Websitehttp://www.journals.elsevier.com/environmental-pollution/#description
Online Manuscript Submissionhttp://ees.elsevier.com/envpol/
Open AccessNo
PublisherELSEVIER SCI LTD, THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD, ENGLAND, OXON, OX5 1GB
Subject Area环境科学
Country/Area of PublicationENGLAND
Publication FrequencyMonthly
Year Publication Started1987
Annual Article Volume1480
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index
Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0269-7491%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Authorized Data from Publisher:
Data from Authors: About 2.8 month(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: Difficult
Online Article Publication TimeData from Elsevier: Average 7.8 Week(s)
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION】Impact Indicator Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • Impact Indicator Trend


First    Previous    1    2    3    Next    Last  (To Page
/3)
  Reviews on ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION: Write a review
Author: Tony


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 5.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-05-28 09:54:16
Very good editor, very efficient. Requires substantial data and good discussion.

(13) Thank | Tony

Author: 爱学习的巧克力


Subject Area: Environmental Sciences
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-12-25 17:19:53
Visually 2018IF is 5.3-5.4
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | 爱学习的巧克力

Author: 216354152656


Subject Area: Agriculture Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-12-19 22:58:17
This year will go up, and now the editing process is very fastThe first trial is about one month, and the first trial is revised one month after the revision of the second trial.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 216354152656

Author: 216354152656


Subject Area: Agriculture Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-12-19 22:56:09
Real-time impact factor has been 5.24
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | 216354152656

Author: 嘻嘻哈哈


Subject Area: Agriculture Science
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-12-12 14:49:46
After 4 months, I finally received it.It is not a district, the Chinese Academy of Sciences is also drunk.
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | 嘻嘻哈哈

Author: 爱学习的巧克力


Subject Area: Environmental Sciences
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-11-03 10:55:44
Thank you very much EP, the efficiency is very high!I wish we all good luck~2018.6.20. submit2018.6.21. with editor2018.6.24. reviewer invited2018.7.3. under review2018.9.12. minor revise Limited time is 29 days.The reviewer has a total of four questions on the content, and the editor has raised the details of several figures.2018.10.8. submit2018.10.8. with editor2018.10.10. accepted2018.10.12. available online
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | 爱学习的巧克力

Author: Pengpeng


Subject Area: Environmental Sciences
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-09-27 14:43:24
contribution, 6d in the editor's hand.This review is a bit worried.
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | Pengpeng

Author: 908589712@qq.com


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-09-10 12:13:45
Once I used to have an EP, I have always been concerned about EP.Overall, the EP journal has a good recognition.Many friends in the comment section mentioned the problem of the decline of IF in 2017. This is mainly due to the expansion of the EP in the past two years. However, after the pain period of the expansion, the EP will usher in the IF rising period.As of September 9, 2018, the implementation impact factor of EP is 3.71, TOTAL is 3.72, and EST is 4.58. On September 6, 2017, the real-time factor EP is 2.50, Total is 2.83, EST is 3.96, and final EP is 4.36.Total is 4.61 and EST is 6.65.According to this rhythm, EST will definitely break 7 when IF comes out in 2018, EP is expected to be around 5.8, but hopefully breaks 6; Total is expected to be between 5.5-5.7, we will wait and see.
Show Review in Original Language
(26) Thank | 908589712@qq.com

Author: huangb199203@gmail.com


Subject Area: Agriculture Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-09-08 11:14:26
Submitted on August 6th, 2018, directly with editor after three days, no modification formatAugust 16 under reviewBecome ready for decision on August 20thAugust 26 is also ready for decision, but the date has changed.August 28 is also ready for decision, but the date has changed.September 7th First review comments, revised, submitted revised draft within 21 daysThis speed is really fast.Looking forward to accepting!
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | huangb199203@gmail.com

Author: eric_liu


Subject Area: Medical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-07-23 10:47:58
After submitting the manuscript for 3 months, the major revision is proposed in five categories (including language issues).It was accepted after one month of revision.I feel that the editor is very detailed, and the comments are very pertinent. After the revision, I feel that the quality of the article does improve.It is best to consider the innovation, do not select for some purely repeated research, and try to pay attention to the details, don't make mistakes, otherwise you will be caught, and you need to solve it sooner or later.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | eric_liu

Author: 我是一棵草


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-07-11 11:36:14
There are four reviewers in the first trial. After two major overhauls, there are two minor repairs. The opinions are super-multiple. I feel that the reviewers and editors are more responsible and attitude.very serious.I hope that EP can become a district, I think they are not very different
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 我是一棵草

Author: ycmsichuan2009@163.com


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-06-11 10:58:12
The article has been published online on the EP recently. From the submission in December last year, it has been going through a full 6 months, followed by a major overhaul and minor repair.The first trial lasted for more than two months, the second trial lasted for half a month, the speed was quite acceptable, the editor was very responsible, and the three reviewers in the first trial raised a lot of key questions, and the quality of the article was greatly improved. Two reviewers in the second instance,Carefully go to the punctuation and the wording of the word.Overall, I experienced a lot of knowledge through this submission.The publication requirements of EP articles are still relatively strict. The above quality is also okay. It requires a lot of data and certain innovation, but it has not yet been in the previous district. Unfortunately, the impact factor will be lowered this year, and I don’t know why.Finally, thanks to the editor, reviewer.
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | ycmsichuan2009@163.com

Author: Tony


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 5.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-05-28 09:54:10
1. 12.11 Submissions Modify the language back and forth, adjust the content format, etc., and submitted it again on January 5th;2. 1.15 under review;3. 3.15 major revisions Three reviewers A minor overhaul A major overhaul (or a rejection of the manuscript, it is unclear) Two months to modify;4. Complement the experiment, add discussion, engage in one and a half months, 4.29 revision submitted, and soon under review;5. 5.16 minor revision, reviewers agree that the paper is very well modified, two minor issues;6. 5.23 revised submitted after three hours;7. 5.25 proof. The editor (Marina Cristina Fossi) is very good and efficient.In general, the amount of data is large, the discussion is sufficient, a little new, and the opportunity is quite large;I have sent EST, chemosphere, JHM, SOTEN, etc. during the reading of Bo, I have not sent EP, and now I have finally worked.Efforts will be rewarded, and everyone will share it.
Show Review in Original Language
(6) Thank | Tony

Author: 22


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-05-08 21:41:07
This paper mainly studies the specific mechanism of boron to alleviate aluminum toxicity in plants.Contribution No. 2018.3.5, editor No. 3.8 said that the repetition rate was re-submitted once, and the major revision was received on No. 4.6 (6 reviewers were found, one refused to approve, and five agreed.) 4.11 Reworked back.No. 5.7 direct accept
Show Review in Original Language
(4) Thank | 22

Author: duhui


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-03-01 16:23:11
EP is not a large amount, so it is not TOP.But the word of mouth is good, the industry is more respected.In the past two years, there have been two articles, and the speed is very fast. The number of submissions for ES
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | duhui

Author: haha


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-12-14 16:23:51
2017.9.16 submit2017.12.14 Still under reviewI don't know if the editor is going on vacation. This journal is one of the slowest journals in my submission.
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | haha

Author: duwpku@gmail.com


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-12-06 14:50:50
45 days from submission to reception, efficiency is very fast.However, the opinion of the first instance was overhauled and received directly after careful revision.Very good journal.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | duwpku@gmail.com

Author: liuwdut


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-11-24 14:46:06
Reviewed for 6 weeks and received comments from 4 reviewers, very professional and detailed.From scientific issues to language issues.The chief editor is also extremely responsible for helping the touch-up to modify the language.From review to publication, the entire process is extremely efficient.PROOF was received within 24 hours of receipt, and the issue number and page number were discharged in a few days.Reflecting the professionalism, rigor and efficiency of top journals, it is very good!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | liuwdut

Author: 风行者


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-11-23 21:47:42
From the time of submission to acceptance for two months, the deputy editor is very responsible and the processing speed is very fast.Directly acceptd after a major overhaul, thanks
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 风行者

Author: 191957125@qq.com


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-10-13 08:58:54
Editor is very responsible, the review experts are very patient, big and small problems are helpful to point out, easy to modify.Published quickly.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | 191957125@qq.com

Author: 191957125@qq.com


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-10-13 08:58:25
The editor is very responsible, the reviewing experts are very patient, and the problems of big and small are pointed out and the modification is easy.Published quickly.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 191957125@qq.com

Author: zaw


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-07-31 17:09:15
Why isn't it top??
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | zaw

Author: 溺水的飞鱼


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-07-07 11:21:05
The submission period is longer, not only the reviewer is not easy to find, but also the review is slow, the submission is under review for more than 2 months, without any news and changes, and the previous journal evaluation is checked.The review speed of journals is slow, with an average of 3 months. It is recommended that people who are in a hurry should be cautious~
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | 溺水的飞鱼

Author: 路过


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-04-10 10:38:30
submitted out, because the format, the effective number does not match, changed three times, after being thrown out, was rejected, because the content does not match.
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | 路过

Author: 一叶一枯荣


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-03-05 15:27:14
Real-time impact factor: 5.086.
Show Review in Original Language
(5) Thank | 一叶一枯荣

First    Previous    1    2    3    Next    Last  (To Page
/3)

Start your review of [ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.

Contact us

Contact us  

Your name*

Your email*

Your message*

Please fill in all fields and provide a valid email.

Security Code*