Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service
中文 繁體中文 English 한국어 日本語 Português Español

Environmental Earth Sciences

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:

[Environmental Earth Sciences]Hello, you are Visitor Number 101467 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitleEnvironmental Earth Sciences
Journal Title AbbreviationsENVIRON EARTH SCI
ISSN1866-6280
h-index98
CiteScore
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
2.120.6250.951
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Earth and Planetary Sciences
Subcategory: Earth-Surface Processes
Q236 / 136
Category: Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Subcategory: Soil Science
Q236 / 116
Category: Environmental Science
Subcategory: Global and Planetary Change
Q236 / 75
Category: Environmental Science
Subcategory: Pollution
Q244 / 109
Category: Earth and Planetary Sciences
Subcategory: Geology
Q255 / 218
Category: Environmental Science
Subcategory: Water Science and Technology
Q255 / 203
Category: Environmental Science
Subcategory: Environmental Chemistry
Q255 / 100

Self-Citation Ratio (2018-2019)10.70%
Official Websitehttp://www.springer.com/earth+sciences+and+geography/geology/journal/12665
Online Manuscript Submissionhttp://www.editorialmanager.com/enge/
Open AccessNo
PublisherSPRINGER, 233 SPRING ST, NEW YORK, USA, NY, 10013
Subject Area环境科学
Country/Area of PublicationGERMANY
Publication FrequencyBimonthly
Year Publication Started0
Annual Article Volume774
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index
Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=1866-6280%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Authorized Data from Publisher:
Data from Authors: About 14.5 month(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: About 75%
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【Environmental Earth Sciences】Impact Indicator Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • Impact Indicator Trend


First    Previous    1    2    Next    Last  (To Page
/2)
  Reviews on Environmental Earth Sciences: Write a review
Author: ybbnui.2008@163.com


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-06-01 16:36:23
2 months. 2 reviewers. One question was sharper and difficult to answer, and the other was simpler. High language requirements.

(18) Thank | ybbnui.2008@163.com

Author: 532boss


Subject Area: Environmental Sciences
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-01-18 11:23:54
2018.9.13Submission, and has been under consideration until the time of 2019.1.13 received the review comments
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 532boss

Author: 野熊耶


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 11.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-08-16 19:08:37
Share my experience in submission.Because the information about the Environmental Earth Sciences journals in China was not much before the submission, I also tried to work hard for nearly a year. I received the received mail early this morning, so I want to share my submission experience in detail, I hope I canProvide some reference and help to everyone who wants to contribute in the future.The general direction of my article is Land Use and Land Cover Change (LUCC). There is a little innovation in the method. The language is initially selected as the domestic translation touch, and the revised manuscript is also looking for the advanced editing service recommended by the journal.There are a total of nearly 9,300 references to the headings.The approximate schedule is the submission on September 28th, the overhaul on February 20th, the revised draft on March 29th, the minor repair on June 17, the revised draft on June 28th, and the receiving email on August 16.The specific situation is written here, I hope to help everyone.Https://weibo.com/ttarticle/p/show?id=2309404273702828145477
Show Review in Original Language
(7) Thank | 野熊耶

Author: lzq2314@yeah.net


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 9.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-05-26 09:17:50
Because the preliminary review experienced the reviewer's refusal, the period of the journal itself was relatively long.Initial review 6 monthsSecond trial within 1 weekFinal review and notification of final results within 1 weekIt is recommended that students who are eager to graduate carefully choose the journal. However, if the journal has been submitted, the initial review period is more than 3 months. It is recommended to send an email to the editor to inquire about the specific situation. The editor is very nice and the reply is very fast.Editor-in-chief at jlamoreaux@pela.com.Finally, I wish you all the articles submitted by the students to be published successfully!
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | lzq2314@yeah.net

Author: lzq2314@yeah.net


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-01-04 16:59:02
The journal was submitted to the journal in mid-month. After about 2 weeks, the status changed to Under Consideration. During the period, the status has been Under Treatment. The last state changed to the end of November. No specific review has been given.As a result, did you have a similar situation, can you send a mail reminder?I hope that teachers or students with similar experience can contact me, thank you very much!!!
Show Review in Original Language
(4) Thank | lzq2314@yeah.net

Author: Green


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-11-29 09:14:18
Modify one-time employment, edit very well, old-fashioned journals, SCI search, now the publication volume is reduced, the quality is getting higher and higher.
Show Review in Original Language
(4) Thank | Green

Author: geo


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-06-15 20:02:18
2016Impact factor 1.569
Show Review in Original Language
(8) Thank | geo

Author: soil science


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted directly


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-12-30 02:00:03
This journal is close to 50%, so this year Thomas Reuters does not calculate its impact factor, but the article is normally searched.This journal is not a SCI veteran journal will be kicked out, at most there is no impact factor, but the quality of the journal is no problem.
Show Review in Original Language
(11) Thank | soil science

Author: soil science


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted directly


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-12-30 01:59:14
This journal is close to 50%, so this year Thomas Reuters does not calculate its impact factor, but the article is normally searched.This journal is not the old journal of SCI will be kicked out, at most there is no impact factor, but the quality of the journal is a problem.
Show Review in Original Language
(4) Thank | soil science

Author: xtliufeng@foxmail.com


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-11-13 16:01:47
just selectd for an article, haven't replied yet, may I ask everyone, is there still a search certificate for this journal?Still considered SCI?
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | xtliufeng@foxmail.com

Author: SCI-HUB


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 5.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted directly


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-09-13 09:39:28
is very large in volume, the journal is flooded seriously, the articles are mixed, and many junk articles are in it, the impact factor is 0. The latest Chinese Academy of Sciences SCI partition table has no such journal.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | SCI-HUB

Author: wangsheng366@qq.com


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-08-31 19:21:02
Submission is easy, and the external audit is particularly slow; the first trial is revised back to 2 months after the notice is accepted.Unfortunately, EES was suppressed by JCR and there was no impact factor.
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | wangsheng366@qq.com

Author: 小小书


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-07-13 00:23:52
Thomson Reuters official website query This journal is not included in JCR2015. The journal name is not listed in 2015. The impact factor is neither 0 nor not available.However, there are user feedbacks to communicate with the journal editors. Due to the high self-introduction rate, the impact factor in 2016 was set to 0, but it was still included in the SCI.The specific situation needs to be confirmed.However, the Science Network blog posted that this journal is a list that has been suppressed:Http://blog.sciencenet.cn/home.php?mod=space
Show Review in Original Language
(12) Thank | 小小书

Author: waterschool@163.com


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 10.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted directly


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-06-19 22:44:32
The journal has a bad reputation. The above articles are uneven and there are too many irrigations.This is good, finally suppressed by SCI, wasting an article, mad at me ~~~
Show Review in Original Language
(6) Thank | waterschool@163.com

Author: mayflower


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 11.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-05-26 21:37:13
Submitted at the end of June 2015, changed several times in the middle, has been under considerationReceived minor revisions at the end of December 2015, adding some research contentRevised at the end of January 2016At the end of March 2016, I received minor revisions again, mainly words and sentences.Received mail at the end of May 2016There are not many comments from reviewers, but they are very pertinent.
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | mayflower

Author: zick079@163.com


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-05-25 10:08:38
15年12月12Submission of intermediate reminder 2 to 3 times 16 years February 16th review review opinion overhaul March 10th around March 25th request minor repair April 13 official receptionAs everyone said that the editor of this journal (at least I met that) is not too strict and not too rigorous to review the comments, so I am relatively lucky. I am here again.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | zick079@163.com

Author: Hank


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-03-09 15:34:15
1, reviewing speed is general, 4 months to complete the initial review, 1 month after the overhaul;2, the review requirements are low, the opinions are not very strict;
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | Hank

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 12.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2015-10-26 15:25:50
The journal review is slow, sometimes you need to send an email to urge the editor to process the conversion!The journal is a comprehensive journal with a wide range of professional coverage and a large number of publications!Submission 2 times, all are revised and acceptd, the online version is published very quickly, and the paper version needs to be lined up for about half a year!High language requirements!The level of reviewing experts is uneven, but most experts can give very detailed and highly targeted revisions. Be sure to answer them one by one.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 9.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2015-06-17 17:12:24
September 21, 2014 Submission, after a few days of under consideration, after three or four months changed the date, but still under consideration, this time should be looking for reviewers.February 28, 2015 Review comments returned, overhaul, mainly language issues.April 22, 2015Accepted on June 8, 2015opinion:1. The review period is long, and it is mainly used by reviewers for a long time. It is not recommended to select for this journal.2, the difficulty is not high, the review comments are not strict, but the language requirements are high
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: ViVi


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2015-05-15 20:55:10
August 25, 2014, SubmittedOn December 28, 2014, Major revision. Until this time, it was Under consideration, and the date was changed twice.Edit Olaf Kolditz.Three reviewers, the first reviewer 20 questions, but most of them are relatively simple; the second reviewer has several questions, but it is more difficult to answer; the third reviewer suggested 5 documents plus.The editor-in-chief made Feb 26, and was rehabilitated before 2015.January 13, 2015, 1st submitted submittedJanuary 14, 2015, Accept.After the rehab, I received it on the second day. The editor-in-chief finally came up with a sentence: Comments for the Author: excellent paper revision. Therefore, it is very important to make serious revisions. If the editor thinks that the change is good, he will receive it directly.This greatly reduces the review time after the rehabilitated.February 21, 2015, OnlineA total of 8 pages, no layout fee.2013-2014 latest IF=1.57.Overall, the editor is very good.
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | ViVi

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-11-06 11:54:00
Submitted in early May 2013, submitted the first review opinion in early August, overhauled.The four reviewers added more than 70 comments, and I wrote 20 pages in response to the letter.At the beginning of September, the first review of the second review in early October was revised.Inform that you need to modify the English.I feel that this journal is still very demanding on the language. When I first submitted the manuscript, I have already found a professional company to modify the English.There is no way to find another springer's partner Edanz to modify the English again.On October 25th, the second revision was carried out on November 5th. I accepted the feeling of reviewing the whole day and I was looking at the luck. I would give me a quick comment within 3 months.I just picked it up half a year.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-07-06 09:43:00
In early December 2012, new submission at the end of April 2013, major revision, review comments mainly in the language and graph expression problems in early June 2013, 1st revision submitted in early July 2013, accept communication author, the overall feeling of submission difficulty is still acceptable, the review speed has been greatly improved compared to the past
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-06-17 18:29:00
submitted on May 6, 2013, changed to Under Consideration in the next few days; June 13The number has been updated, but it is still Under Consideration. I don't know how long it will take after the follow-up. It is very abnormal that I wanted to write a letter and ask, but I found that there is no place to write a letter. There is only one View Submission option in Action Links.So I don't know who to write to.There are so many editors on the journal's homepage, and I don't know that in the editor's hands, I don't want to write letters one by one.Wait, wait, wait May 5 Submitted to Journal
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-06-09 21:08:00
Submitted on May 17, 2012, received on June 1, 2013!After a major overhaul, two minor repairs!I encountered a perverted reviewer and changed the editor in the middle. The original editor did not work. The journal needs to be frequently drafted. I have tried three or four times and the attitude is very good. After the draft, the effect is remarkable!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-05-11 16:59:00
Submitted in September last year, and then returned to the review comments after March, because the work is busy, so the return is very slow (the day before the deadline), and then waited for about 3Month, after receiving the minor, the last is in April, so it is still very fast.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

First    Previous    1    2    Next    Last  (To Page
/2)

Start your review of [Environmental Earth Sciences]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.

Contact us

Contact us  

Your name*

Your email*

Your message*

Please fill in all fields and provide a valid email.

Security Code*