X
My Account Submit My Manuscript
Letpub, Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service

ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS

   For Publishers  New

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:
Journal Cover Design
APA has partnered with LetPub to provide a full suite of author services

[ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS]Hello, you are Visitor Number 70834 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitleECOLOGICAL INDICATORS
Journal Title AbbreviationsECOL INDIC
ISSN1470-160X
h-index97
CiteScore
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
7.501.3151.644
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Subcategory: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Q135 / 647
Category: Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Subcategory: Ecology
Q128 / 400
Category: Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Subcategory: Decision Sciences (all)
Q14 / 37

Self-Citation Ratio (2019-2020)10.00%
Official Websitehttp://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-indicators/#description
Online Manuscript Submissionhttps://www.editorialmanager.com/ECOLIND
Open AccessNo
PublisherELSEVIER SCIENCE BV, PO BOX 211, AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS, 1000 AE
Subject AreaEnvironmental Science
Country/Area of PublicationNETHERLANDS
Publication FrequencyQuarterly
Year Publication Started2001
Annual Article Volume911
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=1470-160X%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Authorized Data from Publisher:
Data from Authors: About 3.0 month(s)
Data from Elsevier: Average 12.5 Week(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: Easy
Online Article Publication TimeData from Elsevier: Average 5.4 Week(s)
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS】CiteScore Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • CiteScore Trend


First    Previous    1    2    Next    Last  (To Page
/2)
  Reviews on ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS: Write a review
Author: 雨落凡尘


Subject Area: Environmental Sciences
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2020-12-01 14:23:35
The first SCI paper in my life, which is about the ecosystem service. It was submitted to the Science of the Total Environment on January 18, 2020 and was rejected in less than an hour. The editor suggested to transfer to the journal of chemical materials!!! On January 19, 2020, it was transferred to Ecosystem Services, and the editor-in-chief said that it lacked in innovation. So I transferred it to Ecological Indicators. On February 12, 2020, submitted to journal. On February 16, 2020, under review. I didn’t expect that it could be accepted, so I didn’t pay attention to how long it had been “with editor”. It was unexpectedly sent for review. On April 13, 2020, revise. Major revision (two reviewers with more than ten review comments in total); On May 19, 2020, revision submitted to journal. On June 30, 2020, revise. One reviewer accepted it, and another reviewer had a misunderstanding of the article, so he asked questions, but there was no need to revise. On August 3, 2020, revision submitted to journal. On September 10, 2020 revise. One reviewer accepted it, and the other reviewer was dissatisfied with the reply, so he continued to ask questions, and there was still no need to revise. On October 13, 2020, revision submitted to journal. On November 30, 2020, accept.

(24) Thank | 雨落凡尘

Author: Zing0903


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-11-25 20:43:09
2019.07.25, submission; 2019.07.26, under review; 2019.07.29, under review; 2019.08.26, under editor evaluation; 2019.08.29, revised: Comments of two external experts, one major revision and one minor revision, 15 questions in total. Two months for revision was given by the editor. Because the problems were not big, which were easy to revise, so I was not in a hurry but did other things during the period. I start revising on October 10; 2019.10.26, revision submitted to journal; 2019.10.27, with editor; 2019.10.31, under review; 2019.11.20, required reviews completed; 2019.11.21, accept without revision. The external reviewers were very responsible and serious. The speed of external review was also very fast, and the external review result was given in a month. The impact factor increased to 4.49 in 2019, and I hope it will increase again in next year. I will submit to this journal in the future. I hope you goes well in scientific research. Come on!

(7) Thank | Zing0903

Author: 桶


Subject Area: Environmental Sciences
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-11-15 10:04:55
It took too long. The processing speed of the editor was fast, but the date of under review changed several times. The impact factor of this journal has risen so fast recently. First submission, Jan 15 2019; With editor, Jan 28 2019–Feb 12 2019. The date of under review changed 5 times, Mar 10 2019; Under editor evaluation, Mar 14 2019; Under review, May 5 2019. Revision, Jun 23 2019; Revision submitted to journal, Jul 30 2019; Revised, Sep 26 2019; Revision submitted to journal; Accepted, October 28 2019.

(2) Thank | 桶

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-04-09 13:15:14
3 months to first revision. Not very insightful reviewer comments.

(7) Thank | Anonymous

Author: 梅花


Subject Area: Environmental Sciences
Duration of Peer Review: 12.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-02-18 19:45:07
The journal is very responsible, from overhaul to reception, during the period of 5 reviewers, the meaning is very pertinent, the journal editors deal with the manuscript very fast, in short, a pleasant experience.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | 梅花

Author: happy 1234567


Subject Area: Environmental Sciences
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-12-21 04:50:57
Is there a need for a layout fee?How to bill?
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | happy 1234567

Author: 房房


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 5.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-12-09 16:47:34
Submitted in October 2017, revised at the end of December 2018, rehabilitated at the end of January, received at the beginning of March, online after a few days of the month.
Show Review in Original Language
(4) Thank | 房房

Author: Eason1021


Subject Area: Environmental Sciences
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-10-16 17:11:09
The review speed is fast. It takes 93 days from submission to receiving through the system. The comments of the two reviewers are minor repairs, and then they are directly acceptd after modification.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Eason1021

Author: sss


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 12.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-07-04 20:28:07
Already 14 months.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | sss

Author: smile


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 11.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-01-12 15:33:02
The draft submitted in February 2017, has been reviewed three times, almost 11 months, really too slow
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | smile

Author: qishu


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 11.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-12-01 15:12:15
very good journal, experts are serious and responsible, so the review speed is slower.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | qishu

Author: aa


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 5.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-11-21 21:33:38
is very slow, from submission to final reception for a whole year, modified twice during the period, after reviewer four
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | aa

Author: statical


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-07-15 23:54:42
is very fast, the editing is very efficient, and the reviewer is very efficient.The opinions are also ok.Submitted for more than a month to request revision, less than one month after the repair, accept, from submission to reception for nearly three months, quite happy.
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | statical

Author: 11


Subject Area: Management
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-03-22 20:30:24
almost three months, modified after the commemoration, as my first SCI, is also the first SCI of the graduate tutor, for the school incapable, the face of the teacher is strongdespise.
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | 11

Author: hushumemory


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-03-10 19:32:44
4 months review period, the journal found three reviewers, only one mention8 questions; modified after 2 months of receiving, half a year!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | hushumemory

Author: cqwz


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-03-09 10:46:53
Submitted on January 4th, only modified on March 8thComments, asked to fix the return in May.Two months.Two reviewers.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | cqwz

Author: downtoearth@mail.nwpu.edu.cn


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-11-09 07:43:19
My manuscript processing speed is OK, I will review it shortly after submission, and I will ask for it after three months.The appointment will be announced about one month after the revised draft is submitted.From submission to recruitment for six months, I am very satisfied with the speed.Reviewers will not easily reject the manuscript, and the amendments will be pertinent.I will select again next time.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | downtoearth@mail.nwpu.edu.cn

Author: 行走者


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-08-16 09:09:35
is too junk out of the journal. It has been under review for three months, and refused to find a reviewer after three months.I also lied to me that the reviewer refused to engage in a review without comment. Later, I asked if I didn’t find a reviewer and never selectd again. The super slow is not responsible.
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | 行走者

Author: Mickey_Yan


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 5.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-01-22 22:53:40
The traditional journal with good reputation, the review is a bit slow, the second timeAfter the revision, it will be accepted for 5 months.
Show Review in Original Language
(14) Thank | Mickey_Yan

Author: tanfancy


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2015-09-04 20:01:40
speed is OK, after receiving a few days online.However, the review time is longer
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | tanfancy

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-10-28 11:09:00
has been contributing for nearly two months, pray for yourself!
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-09-24 13:40:00
The content of the article is mainly in the aspect of water resources evaluation indicators. It takes about 7 months from submission to receiving, the speed of reviewing is general, and the processing speed of manuscripts is OK
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-09-13 15:21:00
review time and reviewer processing speed, the overall response can also be traditional journals, very good
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-07-05 10:14:00
45 Give the first opinion opinion, send it back after change, accept it after 50 days, do the water quality evaluation article
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-02-06 16:15:00
The review speed is generally 4 months.Reviewers vary widely.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

First    Previous    1    2    Next    Last  (To Page
/2)

Start your review of [ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.


© 2010-2021  ACCDON LLC 400 5th Ave, Suite 530, Waltham, MA 02451, USA
PrivacyTerms of Service