COLLOIDS AND SURFACES B-BIOINTERFACES

2019.12.21 submitted to journal; 2019.12.24 send back to the author (saying that there were too many pictures, so I put some of them into the supplementary materials); 2019.12. 24 submitted to journal; 2019.12.27 under review; 2020.1.21 minor revision; 2020.1.31 response to revise (because the Chinese New Year and the epidemic, it has been delayed for a few days, otherwise it can be earlier); 2020.2.3 accept. This journal is relatively easy to get published. I hope the 2020 impact factor will not drop too much.

(6) Thank | 咸鱼封歌

I submitted it on December 5, 2018; it was accepted on March 20, 2019. (The submission period was 3.5 months) Direction: bio-functional polymer materials. I received the review comments on February 3, 2019, the comments of the first reviewer did not come back, and the comments that came back were written by Reviewer 2 and Reviewer 3. One gave 10 comments. (A few minor questions were relatively sharp.) The other gave four comments which were easy to revise. Since the review comments were received on the day before the new year, the deadline for resubmission gave by the editor was March 20. (Thanks to editor Xinyuan Zhu of Jiaotong University.) I submitted it after revision on March 2, 2019, and it was accepted on March 20, 3019. (The first submission of bottom-of-the-barrel undergraduate student was successfully accepted.)

(21) Thank | poker

2012-3-24, Initial delivery to journal. 2012-4-19, The opinion is returned, saying that the format is not correct and the paper did not pass the technical review, need to correct and resubmit according to the requirements. Comments: 1. The language fails; 2. The chart exceeds requirements; 3. The order of the tables is not correct according to the template; 4. The paper is not carefully proofread.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

on September 13th.Revised on October 9th, minor repair, two reviewers, 10 questions, relatively pertinent;Return on November 4th and continue under review;On the 20th of December, the second revision, a reviewer agreed to receive the previous review, and found another reviewer, and raised 10 small questions;It was retired on December 28th, and it was lucky to receive it on the first day of work on January 2nd. Thank you for reviewing the workman's holiday overtime.It lasted for nearly 4 months, which is relatively long. It is mainly that each time you go back to the reviewer, you will return it to the reviewer. The pharmacist reviewer did not see it and he has to go back to another reviewer for retrial.

(1) Thank | 一只药学科研汪

Submission, the research direction is relatively new, the recommended reviewers are not reviewed, waited for more than 2 months, until the end of April, let the reviewers again, and at the end of June, they returned to the review comments, are someThe problem of clarify is not too difficult.After the question was answered, it was submitted in mid-July and accepted only in August.It feels really slow.This article was selectd on CC and was rejected by the second.Change select C

(1) Thank | 490720612@qq.com

selectd on March 25th, returned to review manuscript on June 6th, returned on June 19th, directly accepted on August 14th, lasted nearly 5 months, this is what I encounteredThe longest submission time.The five reviewers, a total of 21 comments, are praised and not difficult to answer.The thesis has certain innovations, and it is written very seriously. The format is generally accepted according to the requirements of the journal.

(0) Thank | 676388738@qq.com

2018.5.17 Submission, review for one month, two reviewers' comments, not much change,After returning, it was received directly after about one and a half months. During the period, the reviewer was changed. The reviewer indicated that the first-instance opinion was better modified, and several small grammatical errors were mentioned, indicating that it could be received directly.In the middle of the second trial, one reminder was made, and the editor was very NICE, indicating that the reviewer would be reminded to speed up the review process.The second SCI of the individual.

(16) Thank | llf0807@126.com

Submitted on November 2nd last year, about the end of January at the end of January, I received comments on the review, two comments, saying that my writing level is too bad... there is a reviewer back and forthHe was replied three times and received on February 19.In general, it is OK, there is no situation that people can't receive too much...

(0) Thank | 12345

I have a master's degree, and I submitted my first academic paper.One select for two and a half months to return to the opinion (because the summer is involved in the middle of the summer, it will take a long time), overhaul, but the problem is not difficult to answer, do not need to do the experiment; review the manuscript again after revisit, return to the opinion in 20 days, minor repair;After waiting for 20 days (with Christmas and New Year holidays in the middle), then acceptd.The editors work very efficiently, the reviewers are very responsible, and the opinions are very pertinent.Now I think that this journal actually has higher requirements for details, and the amount of data is average, but the article needs to be innovative, and the difficulty of submission is not too big.

(2) Thank | Jasperchen

The fourth time this journal was submitted, the old journal, the word of mouth is very good, and the difficulty of submission is not high.Write carefully, the picture is clear, and it has certain innovation.One and a half months of the first trial (the first trial time is mainly to look at the speed of the reviewer), the opinion given is a minor repair, a major repair, but the amount of data modified is not high, repaired after one month, reviewed for one month, received.In terms of format, the graph can be placed in the article or uploaded separately.The article format is relatively flexible.

(3) Thank | 欢乐的树博士

2017.12.8. 17:00IF=3.369

(0) Thank | hkjl

The journal is very efficient. Professor Zhu Xinyuan of the country handled the manuscript very timely, received the modification notice more than 2 months, and the revised manuscript received the reply on the 10th day., received again after minor repairs.It lasted for 4 months and 5 days and was still very fast.

(1) Thank | smilxin@126.com

is too slow, and is still submit to journal, really want to retract

(2) Thank | nick

Cast out for more than a month, or with the editor state.

(0) Thank | yyk

submitted almost two samples for review, one month later, was rejected, a reviewer, did not put forward any constructive opinions, I feel very irresponsible!

(1) Thank | 爱你一万年

5 months is not bad.

(15) Thank | 1096716722@qq.com

4 On the 25th of the select, there is no news at the moment. Today, the impact factor has dropped. The last time we selectd for one, and the trial for three months ended up with a very far-fetched reason.Refused....I will not select for this journal in the future

(4) Thank | 1525565367@qq.com

The journal speed is still quite fast. It has been selectd about 4 times. Only this time, the domestic Chen Hong editor is very friendly!About 45 days to the news, minor repair, and then repaired back in 3-5 days.Thank you editor!

(0) Thank | wangbailiang2006@aliyun.com

7 Submitted in the month, it took four and a half months to come back to review the comments, only one reviewer's review comments!Receive one week after submitting the revised draft!

(2) Thank | bhj

The fastest experience of my submission is this journal, which has been submitted for less than a week, has not been reviewed, and received directly.

(7) Thank | lbf178888

4月28Submission; June 10, minor repair; August 8, return; August 20, English question, August 23 return, August 28, accept.The overall feeling journal has higher requirements for English, and there is a certain degree of innovation.The processing of the data is relatively strict

(0) Thank | Anonymous

from the submission to the final acceptance for 5 months, wait for the crazy!

(0) Thank | Anonymous

The journal impact factor is steadily rising

(0) Thank | Anonymous

2013.06.06 Submit the first draft; 2013.06.12 Technical review, telling up to 5 keywords, modify the submitted on the same day;2013.06.12 Submitted for the same day; 2013.07.19 Required Reviews Completed;2013.07.31 Review results: revise, one month; 2013.08.01 Submit revised draft; 2013.08.07 accept.

(1) Thank | Anonymous

October 31On the 4th, under review, November 14th, 15th, found 2 reviewers reviewing the draft, probably gave 3 weeks of review time, December 3rd, comments returned to minor repair due to 12.24, made up a small experiment, and repaired on December 21st.They have a holiday on Christmas, and the holiday ends on January 10th.

(0) Thank | Anonymous