CHEMOSPHERE

2019.12.24 Submitted to Journal; 2019.12.26 Editor Assigned; 2020.1.15 With Editor; 2020.1.22 Reviewer(s) Invited; 2020.1.31 Reviewer(s) Invited; 2020.2.7 Reviewer(s) Invited; 2020.2.13 Under Review; 2020.3.1 Decision in Process; 2020.3.1 Major Revision; 2020.3.18 With Editor; 2020.3.19 Under Review; 2020.3.31 Decision in Process; 2020.4.1 Minor Revision; 2020.4.2 Submitted to Journal; 2020.4.3 Editor Assigned; 2020.4.8 Accept. Mr. Jun Huang is professional and efficient, and the reviewers are highly skilled and responsible. I benefited a lot!

(17) Thank | 烤鸭毕业

This was first article included by the environmental journal, which was also my fifth article during my Ph.D. I worked together with my junior apprentice to complete it. I would like to share the submission experience: 26 Aug 2019 Submitted to Journal; 30 Aug 2019 Editor Assigned; 09 Sep 2019 Under Review; 06 Oct 2019 Decision in Process; 07 Oct 2019 Major revision; 06 Nov 2019 Revision Submitted to Journal; 06 Nov 2019 Editor Assigned; 10 Nov 2019 Under Review; 06 Dec 2019 Decision in Process; 07 Dec 2019 Moderate Revision; 17 Dec 2019 Revision Submitted to Journal; 17 Dec 2019 Editor Assigned; 24 Dec 2019 Under Review; 05 Jan 2020 Accepted.

(18) Thank | 小damn

The manuscript submitted to CEJ was rejected and transferred to Chemosphere. The direction was advanced oxidation treatment of industrial wastewater. Now share the submission history for your reference, 2019.11.06 Submitted; 2019.11.08 editor assigned; 2019.11.10 Invited reviewer; 2019.11. 24 Under review; 2019.12.11 with editor; 2019.12.11 Under editor evaluation; 2019.12.13 Moderate revision; 2019.12.26 Revision submitted to journal; 2019.12.27 editor assigned; 2019.12.28 Accept. The internet is abuzz with rumors that Chemosphere is relatively slow, but it may be related to the reviewer and direction and the editing process was still quite fast. One reviewer recommended moderate revisions, but he asked 9 questions, and I needed add a lot of experiments. Another reviewer recommended minor revisions, but he asked 6 questions and I also need add 2 experiments. The questions raised by the reviewers were very good, which can help improve the quality of the article. This year Chemosphere's IF broke 5. Hope the better!

(15) Thank | 晴天=。=

2017 11 01, submitted to journal; 2017 11 01, editor assigned; 2017 11 07, decision. (The word count exceeded the maximum of 6,500 words). 2017 11 13, document repaired and sent back. Two times under review and with editor. 2018 01 12, decision in process. 2018 01 17, minor revision, given 20 days to modify. 2018 02 04, revision submitted to journal. 2018 02 13, paper accepted. 2018 02 14, proof. 2018 02 14, online. There are also proofs of copyright, etc., which were sent together on February 14.

(7) Thank | 水木清华

Submitted on November 27, 2017, received a modification notice Moderate revise on January 3, due to other reasons, repaired in the next week, repaired on January 30, 2018, February 4th Notice Accepted

(1) Thank | YiyiYayaAi

2018.10.28 Submitted2018.10.30 reviewer(s) invited2018.11.09 under review2018.11.11 under review2018.11.12 under review2018.11.12 reviewer(s) invited2018.11.16 under review2018.11.27 with editor2018.11.28 with editor2018.12.02 with editor2018.12.03 with editor2018.12.04 major revison2019.01.13 submitted2019.01.15 accepted79 days to receive, 40 days to overhaul.

(4) Thank | Mr.c

editor assigned This state has been kept for 20 days. This ink is fast enough to catch the dangerous material

(5) Thank | sim sim

Actually, the speed is OK.Received 29 September 2018, Revised 28 November 2018, Accepted 9 December 2018, Available online 10 December 2018.

(2) Thank | Pengpeng

0901 subbmittedTo journal0902 editor assigned0908 reviewers invited0910 under review0924 under review0926 under review1003 under review1014 reviewers invited1024 under review1028 under review1029 under review1107 with editor1110 decision in process1111 rejectThe two reviewers replied that the first reviewer said that the data was a lot, there should be more in-depth discussion, and then some simple questions were raised; the second reviewer said that the manuscript was written by well writen, but it should beTo amend it, it is okay to ask some questions.Then I refused.what.what.what.

(5) Thank | wanwan

Is it an overview?

(0) Thank | SL君J

has been submiting for more than 16 days, still editor assigned efficiency is very low

(3) Thank | Pengpeng

2018.6.192018.6.20 editor assigned2018.7.2 Under review2018.7.9 Under review2018.8.10 decision in progress2018.8.14 major revisionThe editor's letter gave 40 days of modification time, but the system only gave 20 days, and the lab had some delays. So, by August 31, I wrote a letter to the editor from the system, and the application was given ten days.The next day, the editor extended the time and gave it 13 more days to return before the deadline.The three reviewers have more than 20 comments.2018.9.18 Revision submittion2018.9.19 editor assigned2018.9.25 acceptThe review reply also wrote 3,000 words, and the editor did not submit it again for review.Thank you very much for sharing, I hope everyone can contribute.

(4) Thank | 五公里女生

First trial for 2 months, just returned to repair, Buddha bless!

(11) Thank | 1510136753@qq.com

2018.6.10 submissions, received the editor's e-mail on June 12th, was very interested in the article, said that the number of words and drawings exceeded, required to modify according to the submission requirements, and euphemistic recommendations cited Chemosphere articles.On the same day, after the modification, the 6.13with editor, 6.14 under review, 6.28 received the modification notice, two minor repairs, and the revised draft was submitted on July 4, and received on July 6.The editorial efficiency and review speed are still very fast all day long, the workload is substantial, there are certain new ideas, and then several articles of the journal are cited. The winning rate is still quite high.Optimistic about the development trend of this journal.

(2) Thank | 风尘笑

has been submitted for more than 10 days and still Editor Assigned Very low efficiency

(0) Thank | whutwqw

May 28th Submission;July 9 Reply to acceptance with minor revision.Revised on July 13;August 8th, finally acceptd.Still a good submission experience.Reviewers and editors are more nice.

(1) Thank | xilihuahal

Really slow and slow, submitted on October 20, 2017, it took a long time to find the first trial. The editor said that it is difficult for the reviewer to find it. The result is only one trial for the first repair.The commentary of the manuscript, the minor repair suggestion is directly accepted, and after the repair, it shows that the reviewer is invited. It took a long time, and the second reviewer returned the opinion, saying that it was for the first time, and gave it a total of three trials before and after.The manuscript, the fourth time, when the reviewer was invited to review the manuscript, I couldn’t wait any longer. I sent an e-mail directly to ask the editor how long it took. The result was received on the third day. It’s too grueling. I don’t know if the editorial department is doing it..

(0) Thank | 472776374@qq.com

Submitted on June 7th, 2018 chemosphere, returned to the opinion after 29 days, repaired after one week, received directly in less than two days, the fastest since submission.Moreover, the editorial attitude of the journal is particularly good, it is worth recommending, and the impact factor continues to rise.Very optimistic.

(3) Thank | 13722697496@163.com

Submitted to chemosphere on June 7th, 2018, returned to the opinion for repair after 29 days, returned for repair after one week, received directly in less than two days, the fastest since submission., fast.Moreover, the editorial attitude of the journal is particularly good, it is worth recommending, and the impact factor continues to rise.Very optimistic.

(2) Thank | 13722697496@163.com

Submitted on July 4th, July 5th editor assigned, now 12 days or this state, how is it?

(4) Thank | Anonymous

March 29th contributionApril 2 under reviewMajor revised on May 4thReturn on May 17May 21 under reviewJune 14 minor revisedReturn on June 20June 21 acceptedJune 22 onlinePublished on June 26, published

(1) Thank | 1499634526@qq.com

2018.4.30 Submitted2018.5.25 decision: major revision2018.6.6 Submitted2018.6.27 Accepted

(1) Thank | yungliu

May 07 SubmittedMay 12 reviewers invitedJune 5 reviewers invitedThis is at the end of June, the state has not changed.Is it only the under review that means that the article is in the hands of the reviewer for the review process?

(2) Thank | xjhmzsy0816@163.com

The review speed is very fast, I don’t know if it’s because it’s quite right4.26 submitted out6.1 return to minor repairAlthough it has not been determined to receiveBut I can't wait to share the

(1) Thank | cartonjjs

Very good journalThe editing process is very timely.One month for the first trial, two reviewers, two minor repairs, two weeks later, and received after half a month.

(0) Thank | huluwa293