Overall, the submission and publication process for Carbon is straightforward. The current editor has been there for a long time and is quite professional. Our manuscript went through two rounds of peer review; the first round took 51 days and the second round lasted only 23 days. I’d recommend this journal for graduate students and professionals.

(10) Thank | yanyixingfu

2018.12.24 submit to journal2018.12.25 with editor Editor: Nikhil Koratkar2019.1.1 under review2019.1.22 major revision2019.2.1 revision submit to journal2019.2.3 with editor2019.2.6 under review2019.2.16 acceptCarbon's second article, this time the first ASC AMI was directly rejected, because the article used a new polymer carbon-rich material in the electrode material, so I quickly switched to Carbon.

(2) Thank | Rain1

Top journals should be journals of all sizes.The impact factor has a gradual increase trend. The current immediate impact factor is 15073/2107=7.154. When the impact factor is announced in the middle and late June, it should be between 7.5 and 8.0.

(70) Thank | 骨

From submission to acceptance for a total of 2 and a half months, including a one-month revision in my hand, so the efficiency of carbon is still very high.The two reviewers, the first one basically had no opinions, the second one raised three big questions, the needles saw the blood, and the editor gave the overhaul.Seriously revised one month, made up an experiment, wrote a seven-page reply to the reviewer, and after half a month, the reviewer returned his opinion, very satisfied, suggested to change a few typos, and the editor gave it to Xiao Xiu and said no longerSubmitted for review, sent back on the same day, received one week later.2018.10.04, submit to journal2018.10.05 with editor2018.10.09 under review2018.10.30 major revision2018.11.27 revision submit to journal2018.11.28 with editor2018.11.29 under review2018.12.10 required reviews completed2018.12.17 minor revision2018.12.17 revision submit to journal2018.12.18 with editor2018.12.23 accept

(2) Thank | bryan

is mainly for the reviewer.2018.08.02, Submit to journal2018.08.03 under review2018.08.09 under review2018.08.22 under review2018.08.28 under review2018.09.03 under review2018.10.04 major revision2018.10.24 Submitted2018.10.28 under review2018.11.18 Required Reviews Completed2018.11.19 One reception, one overhaul, the editor gave Major review2018.11.26 Revision submit to journal2018.11.29 under review2018.12.18 Accept

(25) Thank | 会飞的

2018.8.12 Submission2018.8.14 with editor2018.09.06 Review comments back, overhaul2018.10.18 repaired back2018.11.28 minor repair2018.11.30 Revised2018.12.2 AcceptAlthough the process is very difficult, I am honored to be accepted, and I am very grateful to the editor for his full support.

(7) Thank | Tank-chen

2018.9.252018.9.26 with Editor Editor2018.9.26 with Editor Deputy Editor-in-Chief Juan M. D. Tascon2018.9.28 Submitted for review2018.10.14 Review comments back, minor repair2018.10.29 Revised2018.10.30 with Editor2018.10.31 Direct acceptFrom submission to acceptance for a little more than a month, the efficiency is still very high.Carbon is the top journal in the field of carbon materials. Although the impact factor is not high enough, the influence and any degree are very high.I hope that Carbon will be better and better, and the impact factor should rise steadily.

(7) Thank | Zhen

2018.2.18Submission2018.2.21 for review2018.2.24 Review comments back, overhaul2018.3.19 Reply to the review comments2018.3.22 receivingFrom submission to reception, a little more than a month, I am very satisfied with the speed of this journal.

(23) Thank | 570096395@qq.com

2017.11.16 submitted2017.12.28 returned the revised comments, one reviewer minor repair 3 questions, the other reviewer more seriously raised 45 questions of large and small, overhaul, edit to overhaul, 6 weeks.2018.1.18 has carefully revised 30 pages and added three data.2018.2.20 returned the comments and raised 19 questions. It is really very detailed.2018.3.11 return2018.4.8 The three-instance opinion came back. It may be that another reviewer was found. There was only one question. The editor also wrote a sentence that looked very excited. "It seems we are close to publication"2018.4.12 return2018.4.22 Received.It’s quite tossing before and after, but the result is good.From the first instance, the editor still wants my article very much, otherwise many problems have long been rejected.really thankful.

(6) Thank | qianzxl@163.com

2月15日稿After 3 days under reviewOverhaul on March 15thApril 5 major overhaulOn May 4th, I received

(8) Thank | BIT-Mu

Absolutely good journals.Although the impact factor is not very high, the requirements are higher than many high-IF journals.The most important thing is that this journal also collects a lot of traditional carbon materials, so the overall reference is general.This journal is highly recognized in the carbon industry.

(12) Thank | Carbon

Submitted on July 19th, with editor3 weeks, reminded once, submitted for review, 5 weeks review draft, submitted on October 1st revised, accepted on October 23

(2) Thank | 2466788050@sina.com

22/08/17 Submission23/08/17 with editor31/08/17 with editor Deputy Editor-in-Chief; It seems that like other people said, this editor will take a closer look08/09/17 Submitted for reviewI am looking forward to a good result

(5) Thank | aa

Top journals in the carbon field.It is very difficult for someone who does not engage in nanometers to send an article.Submissions have basically one month of results, and journals require reviewers to return comments for 3 weeks.

(6) Thank | Carbon

2017.4.7Submission2017.5.6 received overhaul comments, revised 6 weeks back2017.6.21 received the overhaul opinion, the question reply is not complete, so it should still reply directly to the reviewer's opinion, can not be perfunctory, and return after 2 weeks of modification.2017.7.12 accept

(2) Thank | woxingwozong@stu.xjtu.edu.cn

Submitted before and after the May 1st, received a reply on June 2nd, minor repair, the question is considered to be expected.It took 2 weeks to figure out how to modify and reply.Return directly after June 28th.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Carbon is a very good journal in the field of carbon materialsThis is especially true for traditional carbon materials.Former Professor Peter often encouraged researchers to adhere to the work of traditional carbon materials.Professor Robert Hurt continues this valuable value.Carbon's IF can continue to grow, not only because of the research boom of new carbon materials such as grapheneIt is also derived from the strict requirements of the manuscript.My article major revision once, minor revision once.Resopnse adds up to nearly 30 pages.Although the process is painful, it does benefit a lot in the process of revision.

(11) Thank | Anonymous

Real-time impact factor: 6.3

(1) Thank | 789

one week after the select, and I received the comments in 1.5 months and 1 overhaul.Give 6 weeks to modify.After 5 weeks, the modification was completed and the submitment was made.Received after 1 month.

(3) Thank | raianckey@vip.qq.com

The second Carbon, 8.24 submission, 8.25 editor, 9.03 deputy editor Gareth Neighbour, 9.25 comments, a major repair, overhaul opinion is an Indian, very disgusting recommend yourselfA lot of articles, I have struggled to write a letter complaint (later contrary to the recommended literature), and wrote a 20-page response letter, 10.17 select revision, 10.22 reception.I feel that the speed is OK. When I reviewed Carbon for myself, I was asked to submit comments within three weeks.Therefore, if the two reviewers agree, it should not be too slow.

(3) Thank | Anonymous

first trial for three months, give the overhaul, give three weeks to modify, directly after the revision, the entire cycle of four months, delay the big things

(0) Thank | 1373377972@qq.com

Submission 1 week later for reviewSubmitted for 1 monthOverhaulModify 5 weeks to select againAccepted after 2 weeksI selectd twice, the first one received, I feel that there is no new idea.

(1) Thank | fwx009@foxmail.com

The second one was acceptd. The previous one was issued in 2013, or it is necessary to study things to be too hard.This time, it was a lot smoother than before, and my level may have improved a little.I hope that the journal's IF will continue to increase.If the community can go to Zone 1, it would be fine.

(1) Thank | qiulin111@sina.com

group has already made four articles. It feels that it is relatively easy to use carbon materials. The first one is submitted for two months, and now it is edited. The speed seems to be slower. SecondThe article and the classmate's contribution to the reception together for more than three months.There is an article currently being submitted, hoping to be in it.

(6) Thank | 一切ok

From submission to receiving, for a total of 3 months.I started to give a major repair, returned after the modification, and received it directly in about 10 days.

(0) Thank | guochaozhong1987@163.com