My Account Submit My Manuscript
Letpub, Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service

National Science Review

   For Publishers  New

Browse Journals by Title

Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:
Journal Cover Design
APA has partnered with LetPub to provide a full suite of author services

[National Science Review]Hello, you are Visitor Number 27793 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitleNational Science Review
Journal Title AbbreviationsNATL SCI REV
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Multidisciplinary
Subcategory: Multidisciplinary
Q16 / 111

Self-Citation Ratio (2019-2020)2.50%
Official Websitehttp://nsr.oxfordjournals.org/
Online Manuscript Submissionhttps://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/nsr_ms
Open AccessNo
Country/Area of PublicationPEOPLES R CHINA
Publication Frequency
Year Publication Started0
Annual Article Volume82
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=2095-5138%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Authorized Data from Publisher:
Data from Authors:
Competitiveness *Data from Authors:
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【National Science Review】CiteScore Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • CiteScore Trend

First    Previous    1    Next    Last  (To Page
  Reviews on National Science Review: Write a review
Author: unni

Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown

Write a review

Reviewed 2020-05-05 17:11:11
Among NSR, Sci. Bull. and Research, I personally feel most optimistic about NSR. It is too one-sided to evaluate journals through the impact factor. The impact factors of some journals that receive papers of popular directions such as energy and batteries are relatively easy to rise rapidly. For example, Sci. Bull. At present, most of the articles received are articles on batteries and popular materials. For comprehensive journals, I personally feel that even if the impact factor of this journal is very high, it may not be widely recognized. The work described in the article is solid or not should be judged by the peer readers. Some journals have low impact factors was due to the direction is not popular, but the work done by them is quite systematic and technical.

(70) Thank | unni

Author: 阳光眷顾

Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision

Write a review

Reviewed 2019-09-02 15:17:25
Four professional reviewers help perfect the article. It had been submitted twice in the group. It was not sent out for review the first time, and it was sent out for review this time, which was fortunate. This article was submitted to the Nature Chemistry and Chemistry before and not all the three reviewers agreed to let it be revised. All the four reviewers of National Science Review recommended revisions this time. Seriously revised it for a month. Finally accepted.

(9) Thank | 阳光眷顾

Author: looop

Subject Area: Physics
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected

Write a review

Reviewed 2019-03-27 16:44:28
There must be a relationship to submit to this journal. It's no use submitting to it if you don’t have a relationship. It won’t be accepted even if the review comments are good. Domestic journals pay more attention to invisible things than foreign ones. A lesson from the past, please pay attention to it if you intend to submit to this journal. It makes people believe that there still be a long way for domestic journals.

(432) Thank | looop

Author: 一刀倾城

Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision

Write a review

Reviewed 2018-12-12 10:41:28
A leading journal among journals published in China. Based on my several years of research in the field and a series of papers I published, I wrote up some personal opinions and thoughts about this field and submitted to the Perspective section of NSR. After submission, it was sent to peer review very quickly. The review took two months. All three reviewers gave favorable evaluations. The editor requested minor revision. The paper was accepted two months after I submitted the revision.

(10) Thank | 一刀倾城

First    Previous    1    Next    Last  (To Page

Start your review of [National Science Review]:

Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.

© 2010-2021  ACCDON LLC 400 5th Ave, Suite 530, Waltham, MA 02451, USA
PrivacyTerms of Service