X
My Account Submit My Manuscript
Letpub, Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service

ACTA ASTRONAUTICA

   For Publishers  New

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:
Journal Cover Design
APA has partnered with LetPub to provide a full suite of author services

[ACTA ASTRONAUTICA]Hello, you are Visitor Number 47024 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitleACTA ASTRONAUTICA
Journal Title AbbreviationsACTA ASTRONAUT
ISSN0094-5765
h-index68
CiteScore
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
5.401.1341.700
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Engineering
Subcategory: Aerospace Engineering
Q114 / 129

Self-Citation Ratio (2019-2020)26.60%
Official Websiteees.elsevier.com/aa/
Online Manuscript Submissionhttps://www.editorialmanager.com/AASTRONAUTICA
Open AccessNo
PublisherPERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD, THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD, ENGLAND, OX5 1GB
Subject AreaEngineering
Country/Area of PublicationUNITED STATES
Publication FrequencySemimonthly
Year Publication Started1974
Annual Article Volume597
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0094-5765%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Authorized Data from Publisher:
Data from Authors: About 9.0 month(s)
Data from Elsevier: Average 14.7 Week(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: 50%
Data from Elsevier: 67%
Online Article Publication TimeData from Elsevier: Average 5.7 Week(s)
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【ACTA ASTRONAUTICA】CiteScore Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • CiteScore Trend


First    Previous    1    Next    Last  (To Page
/1)
  Reviews on ACTA ASTRONAUTICA: Write a review
Author: 填坑人


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2020-12-21 11:37:41
It was accepted after the major revision, and it took about 50 days from submission to acceptance. The details are as follows: 2020-10-28_Manuscript Submitted to Journal; 2020-10-30_With Editor; 2020-11-02_under review; 2020-11-06_under review; 2020-11-16_under review; 2020-11-30_Required Reviews Completed; 2020-12-01_Decision in Process; 2020-12-01_Major Revision; 2020-12-08_Revision Submitted to Journal; 2020-12-09_With Editor; 2020-12-09_Under Review; 2020-12-17_Required Reviews Completed; 2020-12-17_Decision in Process; 2020-12-17_Accept; 2020-12-17_Completed-Accept.

(3) Thank | 填坑人

Author: 狼主


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-06-27 11:58:06
My research direction is navigation. It was revised after 2 months of submission, and accepted after revision. Later, the journal emailed me that it could be searched online. But it has not been found online. Is there any way to be certain of it? Or it could be the method I checked was wrong. I searched on the journal's official website and on the web of science. Does anyone know how to contact the journal for inquiries? Thanks a lot.

(1) Thank | 狼主

Author: zarathustr


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 12.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-03-02 20:16:05
I personally think that Acta Astronautica is a very comprehensive journal with many articles on the overall design of satellites. Reading more can improve the accomplishment of engineers.

(5) Thank | zarathustr

Author: DJKing


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 12.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-07-08 12:09:49
Submitted on June 28th, 2017, reviewer invited nearly 160 days. At that time, I felt that the situation was wrong. I deliberately sent an email to ask, and the next day became under review.Later, I learned that it was because I could not find a suitable reviewer, and I finally edited it myself and went through the review.Recruitment mail was received on July 8, 2018.The paper's direction mainly involves spacecraft autonomous navigation, but AA seems to be very weak here...Psychological preparation for a long-term battle before classmates in the same direction
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | DJKing

Author: tjf@hdu.edu.cn


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 5.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-07-02 10:47:37
The journal is very formal, the requirements are not low, the editor will first reviewThere is no possibility, it may be sent to the trial, my submission is very fast, but the minor trial of the first trial did not notify me by email!!!After a long period of time, I suddenly saw it, and I almost passed the time. If the research direction is aerospace science, it is easier...It is difficult to test the photos of the equipment in the project, especially the system after the necessary system is implemented.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | tjf@hdu.edu.cn

Author: RobSa


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-06-30 00:31:55
Chinese people have a little bit of it. According to the latest JCR report released in 2018, mainland China has the world's number one in the journal, reaching 416, and the second in the US, 222.In the top 5 organizations, China has three.A Chinese university with the most irrigation has issued 106 papers, which are more than the whole country of Germany, France, Britain, Japan and Canada.However, China does not have a university in the space science discipline that is one percent before the ESI world, let alone one thousandth of the world.The article of the method class is good, and the article of the scientific principle class is difficult to write.Everyone is opportunistic to do some tinkering methods, and natural irrigation is much more.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | RobSa

Author: Le06


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-05-10 22:06:31
is very good, and the layout is beautiful.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Le06

Author: gemini.oo.alh@163.com


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-04-04 16:08:43
24 days, receiving after minor repairs
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | gemini.oo.alh@163.com

Author: Spaceman


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 12.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-03-09 05:50:01
A good old-fashioned journal in the aerospace field, has been unable to find a suitable reviewer, acceptd after 10 months of minor repair in the first trial, the review speed is too slow
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | Spaceman

Author: aqiu


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-11-18 03:54:51
with editor more than 2 monthsAnd then sent to the review has been 5 months, I do not know how to say this journal review speed
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | aqiu

Author: DJKing


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-11-12 01:28:06
Reviewer invited for 130 days, I don't know how to describe the editing speed. Don't you push it?This is inefficient, no one really!The space science SCIE journal, very not recommended
Show Review in Original Language
(8) Thank | DJKing

Author: zhangyuenglish@163.com


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-08-23 08:26:20
has submited three articles in two years, two of them.Both of the two books were submitted for revision in less than one month, and they were directly acceptd after the repair.On the contrary, the article that refused to accept the manuscript was rejected directly after three months.I feel that this journal editor will first evaluate the quality of the article, and he feels that he can be accepted for reviewers and will be processed quickly!The overall feeling is relatively good, and this year's impact factor has improved a lot, it is recommended!
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | zhangyuenglish@163.com

Author: ryan_devil7@163.com


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-03-09 10:11:43
2We gave the preliminary review comments after the minor repairs and more than one month before and after the recruitment.
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | ryan_devil7@163.com

Author: abc


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-12-06 18:11:41
Submitted in June this year, just sent for review in six months, I really don't know what to say.....
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | abc

Author: CT


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-07-14 14:36:28
I feel that the review period is normal.The difficulty is average.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | CT

Author: 111


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 9.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-04-25 14:48:03
Only sent for review in two months, rejected for six months, this speed is also very simple
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 111

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-05-18 18:35:00
Manuscript processing is quite slow, more than 1 month, and there is no reviewer, the efficiency is extremely low!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-04-30 16:38:00
Editor-in-Chief is a Taiwanese who is biased against mainland contributors..Rejection does not give any reason, irresponsible!It is recommended not to select for this journal. The following is the conclusion after this submission, it is not responsible......Ms. Ref. No.: AA-D-12-00370Title: **********************************************************Acta Astronautica
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-02-23 21:58:00
AA is a journal of the IAA International Astronautical Society and has now been promoted to the Q2 district..There are some special editions of the IAA conference, and the speed of review is ok.One of my submissions in November, received in March, four months before and after, the probability is greater.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-08-22 12:50:00
Journal Homepage URL: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find ... ription#description
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-04-06 09:06:00
Aerospace Journals, ReviewSpeed ​​has been faster, but recently due to the increase in the amount of submission, the processing speed is slightly slower; it is easier to
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: space
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-02-26 12:19:00
is better to select, 24 times a year, the publishing speed is faster
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: microgravity
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2010-09-17 15:42:00
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

First    Previous    1    Next    Last  (To Page
/1)

Start your review of [ACTA ASTRONAUTICA]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.


© 2010-2021  ACCDON LLC 400 5th Ave, Suite 530, Waltham, MA 02451, USA
PrivacyTerms of Service