My Account Submit My Manuscript
Letpub, Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service

JOURNAL OF MODERN OPTICS

   For Publishers  New

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:
Journal Cover Design
APA has partnered with LetPub to provide a full suite of author services

[JOURNAL OF MODERN OPTICS]Hello, you are Visitor Number 49636 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitleJOURNAL OF MODERN OPTICS
Journal Title AbbreviationsJ MOD OPTIC
ISSN0950-0340
E-ISSN1362-3044
h-index81
CiteScore
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
3.100.4910.726
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Physics and Astronomy
Subcategory: Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
Q275 / 183

Self-Citation Ratio (2019-2020)7.40%
Official Websitehttp://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/jmo
Online Manuscript Submissionhttp://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tmop
Open AccessNo
PublisherTAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD, 4 PARK SQUARE, MILTON PARK, ABINGDON, ENGLAND, OXON, OX14 4RN
Subject AreaPhysics
Country/Area of PublicationENGLAND
Publication FrequencySemimonthly
Year Publication Started1987
Annual Article Volume221
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index
Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0950-0340%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Authorized Data from Publisher:
Data from Authors: About 2.7 month(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: Easy
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【JOURNAL OF MODERN OPTICS】CiteScore Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • CiteScore Trend


First    Previous    1    Next    Last  (To Page
/1)
  Reviews on JOURNAL OF MODERN OPTICS: Write a review
Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: 光学
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2010-08-14 16:22:00
I submitted two articles they were both accepted. The journal is fine, but the editors are slow to process the articles. There are generally two reviewers who are professional. It is best to become familiar with the types of articles the journal publishes. There are two major shortcomings in the journal: 1) the copyright transfer agreement must be faxed or mailed (scanning is not possible), and 2) it is very slow to publish accepted articles. One of my articles accepted last year has not been published yet, but only e-first.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: lbx


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-02-01 20:08:21
Previously, one article later selectd OEPLASMONIC was rejected, and then simply selectd to optik. After waiting for three months, there was no movement, so the submission was submitted in 2015.11.20, and 12.1 received the reviewer's comments (not to be reviewed by the reviewer after the revision), 12.10Back, the next day showed under review, hit Christmas, until the 1.10 status is still under review, my heart, ask the tutor whether to remind, the instructor thinks that there is another reviewer, so there is no control, 1.28 nightReceived by mail.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | lbx

Author: ckghostwj@126.com


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2015-01-28 18:33:55
is submitted in September, and the results of the review are published in November.The first time I selectd for SCI, I feel very lucky. It's a good journal. I don't need a page fee. I only scan the copyright agreement. I don't know if I want to mail the copyright agreement.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | ckghostwj@126.com

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-11-28 09:12:00
First trial for nearly 2 months; revised draft for one month, the speed can also accept irrigation journal ~
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-07-11 22:24:00
13.6.5Submission 8.21 first-instance opinion overhaul on oneThe reviewer's comments raised two questions about the stability of the system and the scope of the measurement. The other reviewer did not comment on the editor and made the overhaul 9.25 to release the revised draft. 11.8 Directly received
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-07-19 20:27:00
I applied an image processing application, selectd directly rejected, reviewerFrom the four aspects of Significance:, Scientific Validity, Scientific Contribution, and Overall Presentation, the overall explanation was given, but no specific review comments were given.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-08-21 18:12:00
Journal Homepage URL: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/jmo
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-07-01 19:48:00
Manuscript is relatively easy, I am doing holographic storage materials, submitted in November last year, revised 3 times during the period, received around June this year.See the sample for half a month.The copyright agreement must be mailed back to the editorial department of the journal, airmail, and the fee is 14 yuan.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-05-13 19:11:00
is relatively easy, you can recommend reviewers, old British journals, and some highly quoted articles.The speed of review is uncertain, and if a reviewer is recommended, it may be faster.After receiving, the editing efficiency is OK. One of my articles asks for proof within one day.Then there will be a DOI number soon, iFirst will come out first (about one month from receiving iFirst), and the issue will be published in about two months.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-03-31 12:45:00
just acceptd an article.The manuscript was reviewed for 2 months, reviewed for 1 month, and then reviewed and repaired for half a month.Ifirst was released more than a month after the accept, but I don't know how long it will take to formally publish.I am eager to hear from the insiders.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2010-10-17 20:41:00
The review is quick, and the first-instance opinion is given within 1 month.However, after the minor repair, it will still be sent to the original reviewer for retrial, and the time will still be within one month.Online publishing is fast, about one month after receiving iFirst (iFirst is the last published version, but there is no issue number, page number).Official publication is slower.It feels easier to receive.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2010-08-21 14:16:00
The journal is OK, but since it is not published by card publishers such as Elsevier/Springer or IEEE/APS/IOP, it is difficult to buy some databases, and few universities generally buy them..
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Physics光学
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2010-07-17 22:09:00
08 selectd once, recommended 2 reviewers, and one gave review comments.Then I changed back to the past according to the review comments. The structure editor actually said that my paper is mainly in signal processing, not in the scope of the journal. I really don't know what they did early!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

First    Previous    1    Next    Last  (To Page
/1)

Start your review of [JOURNAL OF MODERN OPTICS]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.


© 2010-2020  ACCDON LLC 400 5th Ave, Suite 530, Waltham, MA 02451, USA
PrivacyTerms of Service